Bottom line. Beguilers aren't Tier 3 and any objective assessment can determine that. The only reason JaronK doesn't is because he values high levels too much, and potential to break the game in stupid ways that won't be allowed more than in cool ways that will be allowed
.
That's your bottom line? Really? You're bottom line is indistinguishable from whining. Yes:
he values high levels too much, and potential to break the game in stupid ways that won't be allowed more than in cool ways that will be allowed
Is a whine, and not even a very good complaint.
The whole "cool ways" vs "stupid ways" is completely subjective.
What you think is "cool" the next man ("I" in this case) says "stupid" and it doesn't really say anything at all.
The whole "he values high levels too much" is an actually grossly empty statement because you don't define what "you" mean by high level. 16-20 I'd think but... you could mean something else.
This is relavant because the fact of the matter is "THOSE LEVELS EXIST" and they're where the most powerful shit is going on. so to have a tier'd system in terms of power and versatility would be ridiculous without examining the high levels.
So what are we to do?
I would actually be willing to listen about the beguiler maybe it is tier 2 however....
You are
JaronK this is a joke.
actively being too obnoxious
You have some sort of obsession with maximum bullshit potential.
If your Tier system measures nothing more than game breaking potential or ease, please admit that so that we can all ignore you.
to bother debate with.
So much so that
I TOO wish Jaronk would say what you suggest so we can all ignore YOU!
Don't like it?
Make a tier system of your own?
Whining about how its better or worse while berating the dude as an idiot is just going to increase his resitance, hell MOST thinking peoples resistance to listening to you.
In anycase, here's something I thought about reading these last 3-5 pages. One of the things that I see as being (perhaps not key, but relavant) is the amount of support classes have being pretty key to what level they have.
I would think that the beguiler having a limited spell list well... LIMITS it somewhat for certain things.
also THIS
Only about half of those are Mind-Affecting. My biggest concern with the begiler when I read it was that so much of the spell list was useless against a lot of monsters, but there are still some really good spells on that list that aren't.
This is true however. . . I think the whole idea of 1/2 thier spells being immune to mind affecting sucks.
I believe the sorceror still has more options spell wise and well the "Wings Spells" is seriously impassable on thier arsenal and the fact that there are spells that say sorceror "only" at all give the sorc the edge. In my book.
Moreoever in terms of support. . . There are Sublevels, and Racial Sub levels, and feats and all of them say "sorceror" thats kind of a big deal for optimization. The Minimum and The MAXIMIUM that can be tacked on
So being more about having a more accurate tier system that simple "peen bruising" I propose the most relavant question I could think of.
Is the factotum with its class features and limited spells more or less limited than the Sorceror with its "less limited spells" and all of the "sorceror directed" content.
See without bitching about it. We can probabbly do an analysis of what the totality of all both classes bring to the table.
Clearly being a shadow craft mage is irrelavant as both of them do it and I... I'd imagine there would not be many of those flying around in non optimized play "I don't KNOW" this but... unless someones been online googling builds they'd have to discover it themselve so. Meh.
So barring that, the factotum came out with good class ablilities and spells.
So How tricked out can the sorceror be?
But also we should look at it from the otherside too.
How badass is a bard or Dreadnecro comparatively?