Brilliant Gameologists Forum

Playtime! => Retired PbP Games => Play by Post General => Eberron - Red Hand of Doom => : BowenSilverclaw February 01, 2010, 01:34:08 PM

: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 01, 2010, 01:34:08 PM
Any out-of-character, off-topic and/or metagame chatter goes here :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 01, 2010, 02:06:46 PM
Ok, so who knows who? Unless Bowen has plans for how we all met/meet, it will probably make his job a bit easier if at least some of us know each other. And... Flumph isn't exactly the kind of guy who travels around alone. Without someone to basically act like a parent towards him, he'd probably get into all kinds of trouble. He would definitely appreciate a canine companion, also. (Awww... good puppy! Let Flumph scratch behind your ears! :D )

I'm going to RP him a bit like Sloth from the Goonies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Goonies). He's actually average intelligence, but a bit... stunted... emotionally, and since I'm headed towards picking up Deformity: Madness soon... I figure I might as well get a head start on RPing it.   :p


And since I said he was previously a slave to Rakshasa in the demon wastes, is there anything I should actually know about Rakshasa in Eberron, or the Demon Wastes, that might be important? I haven't actually read up on either much, but I remember that Rakshasa are actually supposed to be some kind of ancient demonic faction that opposes the dragons of argonesse, right? I know Agita's loli character in the Death of an Artist thread was also from there. Any pointers?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 01, 2010, 02:10:52 PM
I'm fine with however we decide to do it.

I'm a bit behind on character creation due to life being a little bitch, but I'll be done within the next couple of days.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 01, 2010, 02:24:58 PM
It's cool, I've got plenty of stuff to do as well.

And yes, I forgot to mention it so far, sorry 'bout that, but I would prefer if you guys have been traveling together for a while, or are at least traveling together at the start of the campaign.

Any ideas for character hooks? I'm all ears.

Potential ones I have so far (of the top of my hat):
-Rumors of (an increase in) bandit raids in the area
-Rumors or old map of ruins possibly containing undiscovered treasure
-Hired as mercenaries to investigate rumors about goblinoid raids originating in Darguun and crossing the border (the adventure takes place in eastern Breland, close to the border)
-Vision by superior (if character is a member of a church) causes said superior to send the PC to investigate
-Message delivery to someone in the area


Got anything else?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 01, 2010, 02:31:14 PM
Got anything else?
A dark force is threatening all of the puppies/butterflies/fluffy bunnies in the area, and a hero is needed to defend them!  :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 01, 2010, 02:34:36 PM
Got anything else?
A dark force is threatening all of the puppies/butterflies/fluffy bunnies in the area, and a hero is needed to defend them!  :D
See 'rumors of increasing bandit/goblinoid raids', please :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 01, 2010, 02:55:00 PM
So I see that "example" map wasn't just a hypothetical one, eh?  :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 01, 2010, 02:59:14 PM
So I see that "example" map wasn't just a hypothetical one, eh?  :lol
Yeah, big surprise there :P


: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 01, 2010, 03:14:53 PM
Re: Rakshasas- Read up on the Lords of Dust.
Rakshasas are part of an evil organization called the Lords of Dust who scheme in Khorvaire to release their godlike masters from Khyber. These evil spirits are the undisputed masters of illusion, treachery, and subversion, and they have a hand in the politics of practically every nation of Khorvaire.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 01, 2010, 03:22:09 PM
Re: Rakshasas- Read up on the Lords of Dust.
Rakshasas are part of an evil organization called the Lords of Dust who scheme in Khorvaire to release their godlike masters from Khyber. These evil spirits are the undisputed masters of illusion, treachery, and subversion, and they have a hand in the politics of practically every nation of Khorvaire.
I'd heard of the Lords of Dust, and know they are a "faction" in Eberron, and that they are based out of the Demon Wastes. Come to think of it... that's probably enough for me to know, since I'm playing someone with the mentality of a 5 year old. :P It should be interesting RPing him having Collector of Stories, though. "Oooh! Oooh! I heard a story about that once!"  :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 01, 2010, 03:43:09 PM
Haha :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 01, 2010, 05:04:23 PM
Being a(n ex-)soldier, my character could've been commissioned by the Karrn military to do a short mission on behalf of Breland as a token proof of friendship or something?

As for the Rakshasas, the Rakshasa Rajahs were basically the big bads of Eberron prehistory (like, a million+ years ago). They were, IIRC, mostly based in modern Khorvaire and fought the dragons of Argonessen and the couatls of Sarlona. They're basically Eberron's version of the Demon Lords and Archdevils from other settings (for example, Demogorgon would be a powerful Rajah in Eberron). In the end, the couatls sacrificed themselves in order to seal the Rajahs in Khyber.

Other than that, what I did in preparation for coming up with a background for Lucy was read up on the Demon Wastes section of the Player's Guide to Eberron and that's about it.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 01, 2010, 05:32:54 PM
My backstory should be easy to connect in. I can be someone doggy companion and I could've come from just about any country.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 01, 2010, 07:01:51 PM
I fight evil with demons.  What more do you want from me?   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 01, 2010, 08:11:36 PM
I fight evil with demons.  What more do you want from me?   :P
Let's see, I'll make you a list. Would you like it ordered alphabetically? :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 03, 2010, 04:04:01 PM
hey! there are three dragonborns! cool!
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 03, 2010, 04:06:32 PM
hey! there are three dragonborns! cool!
Yeah... why don't we just all be dragonborns? Then we can say that's what we have in common.  :lol :lmao
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 03, 2010, 04:08:53 PM
Bahamut made us do it!
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 03, 2010, 04:14:25 PM
Sorry, I lose all the awesome things that make me Me if I do that. :P

Speaking of which, that makes 2 dragons, 2 dogs, and a human made of stone. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 03, 2010, 04:28:16 PM
well I've changed from Dog to Monkey/Bird.

whose the other dog!?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 03, 2010, 04:35:13 PM
well I've changed from Dog to Monkey/Bird.

whose the other dog!?
The greatest band in the world (http://www.myspace.com/holtzclaw) has a song named "Monkey-Dog". You should totally be one of those...
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 03, 2010, 04:37:48 PM
Bowen said I can't homebrew animals for Divine Minion. There are none with both Dog and a Flying form that aren't +2.  :(
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 03, 2010, 04:43:06 PM
Bowen said I can't homebrew animals for Divine Minion. There are none with both Dog and a Flying form that aren't +2.  :(
Eh, I was just joking. It was a good excuse to pimp one of my favorite bands. They're kind of like what you'd get if Ween and Frank Zappa had a lovechild, and that lovechild grew up in the hills of Tennessee.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 03, 2010, 04:48:48 PM
Sorry, my bad. Three dragons, a stony human, and one dog. :P

well I've changed from Dog to Monkey/Bird.

whose the other dog!?

Marruspawn look like jackal-human hybrids. Jackals are canines. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 10:12:26 AM
So, do you guys think you can be ready by friday next week? I should have a little bit more spare time by then, so I'd like to kick this campaign off that friday night after I get home (local time, GMT+1) if that's okay with the rest of you :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 04, 2010, 11:01:54 AM
So, do you guys think you can be ready by friday next week? I should have a little bit more spare time by then, so I'd like to kick this campaign off that friday night after I get home (local time, GMT+1) if that's okay with the rest of you :)
I'm ready now. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 11:45:45 AM
So, do you guys think you can be ready by friday next week? I should have a little bit more spare time by then, so I'd like to kick this campaign off that friday night after I get home (local time, GMT+1) if that's okay with the rest of you :)
I'm ready now. :P
Have a brewski :cheers

:lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 04, 2010, 01:25:27 PM
I've a couple hundred gold to spend and a backstory to flesh out. that's it.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 01:29:56 PM
Excellent.

As far as I'm concerned, you guys can already start with IC-chatter in the game thread, if you want to. As soon as everyone's done with their character, I'll kick off the game for real.

You are currently on a dusty old road, on your way to Drellin's Ferry and the time is just after 12 o'clock, so the afternoon sun is beating down on you.

So, as soon as you guys have your personalities ready and have decided why you are travelling together, knock yourself out :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 04, 2010, 01:39:07 PM
I need you to answer my question first.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 01:45:14 PM
Done :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 01:48:04 PM
@Phaedrus: You've got Extra Readied Maneuver listed as a feat for when you hit level 6. Don't you mean Extra Granted Maneuver? Seeing as you're mostly a Crusader...


EDIT: Chahar-Aina weighs 10 lb., Dastana weigh 5lb. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 04, 2010, 01:52:16 PM
@Phaedrus: You've got Extra Readied Maneuver listed as a feat for when you hit level 6. Don't you mean Extra Granted Maneuver? Seeing as you're mostly a Crusader...


EDIT: Chahar-Aina weighs 10 lb., Dastana weigh 5lb. :)
Thanks. And yeah. :D

Edit: I also had the price of the glaive listed incorrectly... So there goes either my cloak or holy symbol.  :mad So how does that item crafting thing work that Agita used? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 04, 2010, 01:52:20 PM
does anyone have extra dimensional space?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 02:25:45 PM
@Phaedrus: You've got Extra Readied Maneuver listed as a feat for when you hit level 6. Don't you mean Extra Granted Maneuver? Seeing as you're mostly a Crusader...


EDIT: Chahar-Aina weighs 10 lb., Dastana weigh 5lb. :)
Thanks. And yeah. :D

Edit: I also had the price of the glaive listed incorrectly... So there goes either my cloak or holy symbol.  :mad So how does that item crafting thing work that Agita used? :P
See this (http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7065.msg231747#msg231747) post.

Further details are in DMG2.


In other news, I'm loving this party already :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 04, 2010, 03:11:17 PM
Ok, so let's decide how we know each other, and all that jazz... My guy is a freakish escaped slave with the mental capacity (and enthusiasm) of a 5 year old. So he would pretty much take up with anyone that would tolerate him, as long as they weren't "mean". ;) So he'll just be tagging along with whomever... I guess everyone?
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 04, 2010, 04:48:48 PM
5 year old mentality? I've got a adolescent mentality too! But I'm like 11 or 12 so that's a little different.

Like Phaedrus, my backstory is broad enough to fit with just about everyone.

What do you all think of getting cheesy and us all being best friends?  :love
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 04, 2010, 05:13:20 PM
5 year old mentality? I've got a adolescent mentality too! But I'm like 11 or 12 so that's a little different.

Like Phaedrus, my backstory is broad enough to fit with just about everyone.

What do you all think of getting cheesy and us all being best friends?  :love
YAY! BFF! Monkeys are fuzzy... kind of like puppies... so yeah, Flumph and your character can get along just fine. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 05:25:13 PM
5 year old mentality? I've got a adolescent mentality too! But I'm like 11 or 12 so that's a little different.

Like Phaedrus, my backstory is broad enough to fit with just about everyone.

What do you all think of getting cheesy and us all being best friends?  :love
YAY! BFF! Monkeys are fuzzy... kind of like puppies... so yeah, Flumph and your character can get along just fine. :D
...and I'll call him George :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 04, 2010, 05:32:58 PM
I'm really big and really really really smart.   :P

Does that make me your babysitter?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 05:39:05 PM
Ow god, how are the gobbo's ever going to take you guys serious?


:P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 04, 2010, 05:46:44 PM
I'm really big and really really really smart.   :P

Does that make me your babysitter?
If you want the job, the position is still unfilled.  :D We can be like Pinky and the Brain... with a talking monkey that breathes fire as a pet. :D

You know... with a monkey and a jackal, we're going to look like we just escaped from the circus or something.

Edit: Here we go. A portrait of our party.

(http://i1014.photobucket.com/albums/af269/PhaedrusXY/RHoD/collage.jpg)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 04, 2010, 06:20:57 PM
Hahaha, awesNO WAY!!!

 :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 06:41:49 PM
:lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 04, 2010, 06:51:26 PM
Hey look, I made you some tokens! :P

[spoiler](http://www.majhost.com/gallery/Just-my-2-cents/xyz/dog.png) (http://www.majhost.com/gallery/Just-my-2-cents/xyz/flumph.png) (http://www.majhost.com/gallery/Just-my-2-cents/xyz/harika.png) (http://www.majhost.com/gallery/Just-my-2-cents/xyz/hgiant.png) (http://www.majhost.com/gallery/Just-my-2-cents/xyz/monkey.png)[/spoiler]

Also, added image source to the character sheet. The artist is awesome, so I'd feel bad not linking to his page.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 06:55:40 PM
Nice :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 04, 2010, 06:59:21 PM
I need a new character portrait!
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 07:05:39 PM
No you don't :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 04, 2010, 07:10:09 PM
I'm going to find one today, just you see.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 04, 2010, 07:13:09 PM
Here, a bit better one:

(http://i1014.photobucket.com/albums/af269/PhaedrusXY/RHoD/collage4.jpg)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 07:15:02 PM
At least in that one he's not wearing a speedo :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 04, 2010, 07:17:28 PM
Well, you're a half-giant wizard, right?

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_GstvG_siaoQ/SOeiJaiIVBI/AAAAAAAAATM/3lOJIOrbvaQ/s400/Hagrid3.jpg)

:P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 04, 2010, 07:33:34 PM
That's what kept popping up when I google image searched for half-giant.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 07:35:25 PM
So, is your character named Fezzik or Hagrid? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 04, 2010, 07:39:09 PM
I am Sunharrower!
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 04, 2010, 07:48:08 PM
How about the Primordial Sun Giant pic in SoX?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 04, 2010, 07:48:58 PM
How about the Primordial Sun Giant pic in SoX?
EDIT: Apparently I remembered a different one...

TBH, I don't think it's that great of a pic...
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 04, 2010, 08:01:57 PM
Well, I don't like the pic you chose for my character, considering it's a Jackal Lord and not a Marruspawn, but it's hard to find pics of any kind of half-animal without wading into questionable territory. I'll probably just use the Marrulurk pic in the book.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 04, 2010, 08:10:19 PM
Well, I don't like the pic you chose for my character, considering it's a Jackal Lord and not a Marruspawn, but it's hard to find pics of any kind of half-animal without wading into questionable territory. I'll probably just use the Marrulurk pic in the book.
I couldn't find a marruspawn pic, and I figured that was pretty close. It was just a joke, anyway. Pick your own picture. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 04, 2010, 08:12:23 PM
By the way, your character frightens me. I can't discern any reason your character should be so child-like in personality, and yet also a highly trained combatant. :o

 :lmao
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 04, 2010, 08:15:36 PM
By the way, your character frightens me. I can't discern any reason your character should be so child-like in personality, and yet also a highly trained combatant. :o

 :lmao
Yes, exactly. And after the first couple of encounters, he will be picking up Deformity: Madness as a bonus feat. Then it will all make more sense. :D

His backstory is that he was the offspring of slaves that had been bred and magically experimented on for the amusement of rakshasa in the demon wastes for multiple generations. He fought as a gladiator for their amusement, likely against his own relatives sometimes. Does it make more sense now?  :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 04, 2010, 08:26:21 PM
It's doesn't matter how much sense it makes. It's still frightening. :P
A certifiably insane Caster? Even we better watch out. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 04, 2010, 10:38:35 PM
It's doesn't matter how much sense it makes. It's still frightening. :P
A certifiably insane Caster? Even we better watch out. :D
He's a wisdom based caster who has a wisdom of 6 (soon to be 2). So I wouldn't worry too much about his casting. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 04, 2010, 11:04:54 PM
Heh, well-played sir. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 04, 2010, 11:27:34 PM
Woo, almost done!  Just need to find spells and equipment (and apparently find a good portrait).
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 05, 2010, 12:15:28 AM
Look, I'm a woman now!  And my portrait won't resize, I've shrunk it small on photobucket but the picture in my post never changes.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 05, 2010, 11:35:54 AM
It's pretty small right now...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 05, 2010, 12:33:11 PM
Huh, apparently the resizing has a delay of over five minutes.  Odd.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 05, 2010, 02:39:56 PM
I'm really big and really really really smart.   :P

Does that make me your babysitter?
If you want the job, the position is still unfilled.  :D We can be like Pinky and the Brain... with a talking monkey that breathes fire as a pet. :D

You know... with a monkey and a jackal, we're going to look like we just escaped from the circus or something.

Now that I'm a woman does that make you guys my adopted children?   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 05, 2010, 02:45:52 PM
I'm really big and really really really smart.   :P

Does that make me your babysitter?
If you want the job, the position is still unfilled.  :D We can be like Pinky and the Brain... with a talking monkey that breathes fire as a pet. :D

You know... with a monkey and a jackal, we're going to look like we just escaped from the circus or something.

Now that I'm a woman does that make you guys my adopted children?   :P
That could be fun to RP. Hell... it will be two women with three weird things.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 05, 2010, 02:47:36 PM
I'm really big and really really really smart.   :P

Does that make me your babysitter?
If you want the job, the position is still unfilled.  :D We can be like Pinky and the Brain... with a talking monkey that breathes fire as a pet. :D

You know... with a monkey and a jackal, we're going to look like we just escaped from the circus or something.

Now that I'm a woman does that make you guys my adopted children?   :P
That could be fun to RP. Hell... it will be two women with three weird things.

See, now I want to make a crazy old lady who calls all of you, and all of the demons she's going to summon, her children.   :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 05, 2010, 02:47:54 PM
I'm really big and really really really smart.   :P

Does that make me your babysitter?
If you want the job, the position is still unfilled.  :D We can be like Pinky and the Brain... with a talking monkey that breathes fire as a pet. :D

You know... with a monkey and a jackal, we're going to look like we just escaped from the circus or something.

Now that I'm a woman does that make you guys my adopted children?   :P
That could be fun to RP. Hell... it will be two women with three weird things.

See, now I want to make a crazy old lady who calls all of you, and all of the demons she's going to summon, her children.   :lol
Like a monstrous version of the crazy old cat lady :lol

Somehow I doubt a Karrnathi soldier will have a very nurturing nature though :P


Also, does this mean Nanshork's character is responsible for your actions? :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 05, 2010, 02:50:11 PM
By the way, Nanshork, have you ever thought about being a follower of the Silver Flame?
Methinks the Malconvoker could fit quite well with a more excentric and/or zealous member...

EDIT: Would also work quite well in this particular campaign, I think.

Just a thought :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 05, 2010, 02:52:17 PM
Sounds awesome. Do it. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 05, 2010, 02:55:28 PM
I'm really big and really really really smart.   :P

Does that make me your babysitter?
If you want the job, the position is still unfilled.  :D We can be like Pinky and the Brain... with a talking monkey that breathes fire as a pet. :D

You know... with a monkey and a jackal, we're going to look like we just escaped from the circus or something.

Now that I'm a woman does that make you guys my adopted children?   :P
That could be fun to RP. Hell... it will be two women with three weird things.
My character calls dibs on being the butch. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 05, 2010, 03:23:08 PM
My character can be the teenager who fights with you constantly and makes fun of you for being old.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 05, 2010, 03:35:06 PM
Ow god, I think you guys just gave me the first aneurysm of the campaign :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 05, 2010, 03:41:42 PM
Cross-posted from Character Creation:

By the way, while going over your sheets, I got an idea from bears' and Phaedrus' sheets.

Please include a wishlist in your sheet, about what treasure/items you'd like to get your hands on over the course of the campaign. I'm changing at least some of the treasure to better suit your characters anyway, so that would really help me and ensure happy players :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 05, 2010, 03:48:27 PM
One thing that's definitely going on my sheet is an Intercepting weapon (Forge of War). It's like another Steadfast Boots. :D
It also has to be the most crappily worded enhancement ever. It begins with "This weapon grants you an extra attack per round". *sigh* The intent is clear, but the text...
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 05, 2010, 03:49:15 PM
One thing that's definitely going on my sheet is an Intercepting weapon (Forge of War). It's like another Steadfast Boots. :D
It also has to be the most crappily worded enhancement ever. It begins with "This weapon grants you an extra attack per round". *sigh* The intent is clear, but the text...
Ooooh, make that two of those. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 05, 2010, 03:50:19 PM
*heads of to /rs/*
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 05, 2010, 03:59:08 PM
Okay, as you may have already guessed, I'm obviously only allowing that weapon with the intended effect (so an 'interrupting' attack once per round against any of the listed actions) ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 05, 2010, 04:23:32 PM
Another cross-post:

And before I forget, remember this is Eberron, so you guys get Action Points (see ECS) :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 05, 2010, 05:31:15 PM
And another one :P:

Also, since this campaign is supposed to be somewhat of a testing ground for my RL-group, and since they aren't as experienced as you guys, I've decided to somewhat increase your power level (and theirs once I run this IRL).

LA-buyback is no longer in effect, instead you get (that is, if you want) a +1 LA template for free.

For example, Agita could play Harika as a Stony Human level 5 Warblade.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 05, 2010, 09:25:43 PM
So that means I can't buy off my one LA, but I get a free LA 1 template? I think I can live with that. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 05, 2010, 10:21:11 PM
So that means I can't buy off my one LA, but I get a free LA 1 template? I think I can live with that. ;)
He said either racial or template LA +1 is free.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 05, 2010, 10:51:09 PM
Hey Bowen, for ease of use are my summons going to act on my initiative?

Edit: For that matter, since they're going to get buffs from feats and class abilities do you want me to keep track of that information or are you going to do it?
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 05, 2010, 11:57:41 PM
So that means I can't buy off my one LA, but I get a free LA 1 template? I think I can live with that. ;)
He said either racial or template LA +1 is free.

Well, I'll have to weigh my options then. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 06, 2010, 07:35:01 AM
So that means I can't buy off my one LA, but I get a free LA 1 template? I think I can live with that. ;)
He said either racial or template LA +1 is free.

Well, I'll have to weigh my options then. :P
No...
You get your +1 for free and that's it (sorry if that wasn't clear)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 06, 2010, 07:35:50 AM
Hey Bowen, for ease of use are my summons going to act on my initiative?

Edit: For that matter, since they're going to get buffs from feats and class abilities do you want me to keep track of that information or are you going to do it?
Your initiative, yes.

And yes,  please keep track of all the buffs/effects, I've got enought stuff going on with the NPCs ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 06, 2010, 02:27:24 PM
So that means I can't buy off my one LA, but I get a free LA 1 template? I think I can live with that. ;)
He said either racial or template LA +1 is free.

Well, I'll have to weigh my options then. :P
No...
You get your +1 for free and that's it (sorry if that wasn't clear)

That's fine. It's pretty much the best option anyway. Most of the templates are centered around melee combatants anyway.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 06, 2010, 03:56:47 PM
By the way, have you thought about this, Nanshork?
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7066.msg232724#msg232724 (http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7066.msg232724#msg232724)

Just a thought, but I didn't see a reply yet so I figured I'd post again just as a reminder :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 06, 2010, 08:38:07 PM
By the way, have you thought about this, Nanshork?
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7066.msg232724#msg232724 (http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7066.msg232724#msg232724)

Just a thought, but I didn't see a reply yet so I figured I'd post again just as a reminder :)

Do you think that the Silver Flame would be alright with me summoning exclusively very evil things?   :P

And if I worship the Silver Flame I lose out on a +1 for my affiliation!   :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 06, 2010, 08:42:48 PM
I think the Silver Flame would be fine since you're using evil creatures to fight evil creatures. Either way, at least one of them gets killed, so that's a win-win for the Church. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 07, 2010, 07:56:54 AM
By the way, have you thought about this, Nanshork?
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7066.msg232724#msg232724 (http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7066.msg232724#msg232724)

Just a thought, but I didn't see a reply yet so I figured I'd post again just as a reminder :)

Do you think that the Silver Flame would be alright with me summoning exclusively very evil things?   :P

And if I worship the Silver Flame I lose out on a +1 for my affiliation!   :lol
Why would you lose out on a +1?

I think the Silver Flame would be fine since you're using evil creatures to fight evil creatures. Either way, at least one of them gets killed, so that's a win-win for the Church. :D
What he said :)

That's the Malconvoker's schtick, and there is plenty of mention of Malconvokers who are a member of a good church in the book :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 07, 2010, 08:39:27 AM
By the way, have you thought about this, Nanshork?
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7066.msg232724#msg232724 (http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7066.msg232724#msg232724)

Just a thought, but I didn't see a reply yet so I figured I'd post again just as a reminder :)

Do you think that the Silver Flame would be alright with me summoning exclusively very evil things?   :P

And if I worship the Silver Flame I lose out on a +1 for my affiliation!   :lol
Why would you lose out on a +1?

I think the Silver Flame would be fine since you're using evil creatures to fight evil creatures. Either way, at least one of them gets killed, so that's a win-win for the Church. :D
What he said :)

That's the Malconvoker's schtick, and there is plenty of mention of Malconvokers who are a member of a good church in the book :)

Paragnostic Assembly members get a +1 for worshipping Boccob or Wee-Jas (neither of whom exist in Eberron) or Knowledge as a principle. He's referring to the fact that, RAW, his only option for getting that +1 is to worship knowledge as a principle rather than worshiping a deity.

However, since the Silver Flame is not a deity in itself but rather a set of principles and ideals, it is entirely appropriate for the Adaptation listed under the Paragnostic Assembly's entry.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 07, 2010, 09:20:20 AM
By the way, have you thought about this, Nanshork?
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7066.msg232724#msg232724 (http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7066.msg232724#msg232724)

Just a thought, but I didn't see a reply yet so I figured I'd post again just as a reminder :)

Do you think that the Silver Flame would be alright with me summoning exclusively very evil things?   :P

And if I worship the Silver Flame I lose out on a +1 for my affiliation!   :lol
Why would you lose out on a +1?

I think the Silver Flame would be fine since you're using evil creatures to fight evil creatures. Either way, at least one of them gets killed, so that's a win-win for the Church. :D
What he said :)

That's the Malconvoker's schtick, and there is plenty of mention of Malconvokers who are a member of a good church in the book :)

Paragnostic Assembly members get a +1 for worshipping Boccob or Wee-Jas (neither of whom exist in Eberron) or Knowledge as a principle. He's referring to the fact that, RAW, his only option for getting that +1 is to worship knowledge as a principle rather than worshiping a deity.

However, since the Silver Flame is not a deity in itself but rather a set of principles and ideals, it is entirely appropriate for the Adaptation listed under the Paragnostic Assembly's entry.
That sounds fair enough to me :)

Make it so :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 07, 2010, 02:56:22 PM
Just to let you guys know, I'm pretty much done :)

I'll be pretty busy this next week, but I should be able to kick of with the first encounter either friday night or saturday morning (local time, GMT +1).


Does that work for you guys as well?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 07, 2010, 03:03:14 PM
I guess, though I'm becoming progressively more busy as the final final exams loom nearer.

Also, what kind of 12th grade teacher gives her students a 5-page glorified "What I want to be when I grow up" essay? :banghead
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 07, 2010, 03:06:05 PM
Also, what kind of 12th grade teacher gives her students a 5-page glorified "What I want to be when I grow up" essay? :banghead
My High School had all students do that. And it was like 10% of your final grade and you had to shadow somebody and all that shit. Lucky for me, AP English exempted you from it.  :D

@Bowen, awesome! I won't be able to post much next weekend, I'm taking the trip to see girlfriend.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 07, 2010, 03:06:45 PM
@Agita: Yeah, that does suck...
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 07, 2010, 04:12:09 PM
I'll be around as much as usual.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 09, 2010, 03:24:21 PM
And a happy B-Day to Phaedrus :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 09, 2010, 03:25:10 PM
And a happy B-Day to Phaedrus :)
Thanks. :D


And.... AWWWW FUCK! I just noticed that I accidentally deleted like half my character sheet last night while fiddling with my equipment...  :banghead I have a backup saved, but I'm sure it isn't up to date...

Edit: Whew... False alarm. I just messed up the spoilers, so it was hidden inside one...  :facepalm
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 09, 2010, 03:31:38 PM
*resists making a joke about age*
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 09, 2010, 03:34:30 PM
*resists making a joke about age*
:lmao I've always been like that. I don't think it's actually gotten any worse with age. If anything, I don't forget as many things now as I used to, because I've disciplined myself to develop rituals like compulsively checking my pants pockets for my keys before I close the door to my house/car/etc, putting my wallet and cell phone in exactly the same place every time I take them out of my pockets, etc.  :D I'm probably a bit OCD as a result of my own forgetfulness. :P

Hmm... I realised that I no longer need the magic-blooded template, and that I might actually be able to get my wisdom up enough to cast 1st level spells, if I dump the Madness feat. :D I can take Insane Defiance instead, and still be mostly protected from the same things, but also be able to benefit from "good" mind affecting stuff when needed.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 09, 2010, 03:36:00 PM
Hehe, same here :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 09, 2010, 03:40:38 PM
Isn't there a minimum of 1 for a stat, regardless of racial penalties? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 09, 2010, 03:43:03 PM
Don't worry, I'm like twenty (more like 19, I guess) years younger than you and have the same problem. :D

I'm not sure there's a universal minimum. In most cases where there's a cap on how low the stat is allowed to go, it's stated as part of the ability mods section.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 09, 2010, 03:44:14 PM
Isn't there a minimum of 1 for a stat, regardless of racial penalties? :P
Yes, and a minimum of 3 for Int :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 09, 2010, 03:46:25 PM
Isn't there a minimum of 1 for a stat, regardless of racial penalties? :P
Yes, and a minimum of 3 for Int :P

That mean someone with a base 8 wisdom who has a -10 racial penalty still have a wisdom of 1. What if someone casted Owl's Wisdom on him? Does he have a 2 or a 5?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 09, 2010, 03:51:08 PM
Isn't there a minimum of 1 for a stat, regardless of racial penalties? :P
Yes, and a minimum of 3 for Int :P
Awesome! Charisma 1 here I come!  :lol :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 09, 2010, 03:51:21 PM
Isn't there a minimum of 1 for a stat, regardless of racial penalties? :P
Yes, and a minimum of 3 for Int :P

That mean someone with a base 8 wisdom who has a -10 racial penalty still have a wisdom of 1. What if someone casted Owl's Wisdom on him? Does he have a 2 or a 5?
5
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 09, 2010, 03:51:42 PM
Isn't there a minimum of 1 for a stat, regardless of racial penalties? :P
Yes, and a minimum of 3 for Int :P
Awesome! Charisma 1 here I come!  :lol :P
A fishstick will have more personality :lol :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 09, 2010, 04:11:07 PM
I have to put my highest stat into Int (16, which drops to 10...) just to meet the skill prereqs for Master of Nine... and it STILL eats every single one of my skill points.  :banghead This is one of the craziest characters I've ever made I think, literally and figuratively. Not the most powerful, but likely the most absurd.

So... what 1st level scrolls/spells should I load up on? Omen of Peril? Protection from Evil? I'm a real cleric now!  :bounce :birthday
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 09, 2010, 04:13:09 PM
I you can actually cast now, why not go RKV instead?

Just a thought...
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 09, 2010, 04:22:40 PM
I you can actually cast now, why not go RKV instead?

Just a thought...
Yeah... it occurred to me too. I don't know if I want to bother, though. I'm still going to basically suck at it, and I think Mo9 sounds like a lot of fun. Every level adds a maneuver readied, which is also a maneuver granted for a Crusader, and either 1 or 2 maneuvers known from any discipline. It really does sound incredible, and I want to try it out.

I'm also kind of sick of playing casters, and clerics in particular. I wanted to try a non-caster, but having just 1st level spells is easy enough to deal with...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 09, 2010, 04:30:07 PM
I you can actually cast now, why not go RKV instead?

Just a thought...
Yeah... it occurred to me too. I don't know if I want to bother, though. I'm still going to basically suck at it, and I think Mo9 sounds like a lot of fun. Every level adds a maneuver readied, which is also a maneuver granted for a Crusader, and either 1 or 2 maneuvers known from any discipline. It really does sound incredible, and I want to try it out.

I'm also kind of sick of playing casters, and clerics in particular. I wanted to try a non-caster, but having just 1st level spells is easy enough to deal with...
Yeah, true, it adds a lot of versatility in terms of maneuvers :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 11, 2010, 12:09:21 PM
So, seeing as there's been a change of schedule (read: I've got an infection that prevents me from taking an exam), I'll probably be able to kick this off either today or tomorrow.

Pretty much as soon as you guys finish your characters really.


So, how far are you guys? :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 11, 2010, 12:10:30 PM
All I need left is gear and fluff, and it isn't as if we have a lot of money to work with.   :P

I should be done soon.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 11, 2010, 12:13:08 PM
All I need left is gear and fluff, and it isn't as if we have a lot of money to work with.   :P

I should be done soon.
Same here.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 11, 2010, 12:32:48 PM
I'll finish updating my sheet later today, but I don't think I need to change my equipment at all (unless anyone can see any issues with that). There's always a bunch of gear I'd love to have, but hopefully I'll pick some of it up sooner or later. :)

Beyond that, I didn't have to change much. I'll make the necessary alterations to my change once I get home from classes.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 11, 2010, 12:54:23 PM
The game is afoot :D

So whenever you're ready, guys :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 11, 2010, 01:03:36 PM
I delivered my paper yesterday. I felt like being a smartass and titled it "What I want to be when I grow up". :P
Now I need to do a book review for German class, after that I can get to work on finalizing my sheet. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 11, 2010, 01:07:46 PM
I just need a name.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 11, 2010, 01:49:35 PM
So I take it you're going with the Dwarf, Phaedrus? :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 11, 2010, 02:23:04 PM
So I take it you're going with the Dwarf, Phaedrus? :)
Yeah. Alas poor Flumph, we barely knew him. :D

Also, I'll have Shield Other on Goldflower all the time except when we're sleeping. So that's a +1 deflection bonus to AC and a +1 resistance bonus on saves for her, but I have to stay within 35 feet of her or the spell ends.

He'll also be in the Iron Guard's Glare stance at all times, since that's the only one he knows and there is no reason for him not to be. So enemies that I threaten (10 ft reach) have a -4 to hit any of my team mates, but no penalty to attack Kalal. Attackers instinctively know this (for some reason...). He'll try to stay adjacent to Goldflower unless/until combat breaks out.


Also, I realize that we're assuming that we all at least know each other, and are traveling together, but should we say that Yamanu and Kalal have known each other longer? Maybe Yamanu helped Kalal make his way out of the desert (Burning Wastes) after he escaped his Rakshasa overlord(s)? Want to come up with stories of how all of us met?

And... I ran short of money and had to get rid of the Wand of No Light. I can prep one or two per day, though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 11, 2010, 03:02:00 PM
I'm still coming up with my backstory myself, I just love how Kalal is so protective of me.  Is the Dwarf in love with the Half-Giantess?   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 11, 2010, 03:04:10 PM
I'm still coming up with my backstory myself, I just love how Kalal is so protective of me.  Is the Dwarf in love with the Half-Giantess?   :P
Very funny. He's just that kind of guy. He thinks of it as his job to protect those that are more "frail" than himself. I just hope we don't both get hit with a Fireball... that will hurt with that Shield Other up...

If you can cover the MM Rod... I might buy a camel, and I'll also get a Healing Belt. I thought a camel would make a "cool" mount for a desert dwarf, and he could use one due to his crappy speed. I don't know what they'd cost, though. What about the same as a mule, Bowen? Or are they priced in Sandstorm?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 11, 2010, 03:14:29 PM
I'm still coming up with my backstory myself, I just love how Kalal is so protective of me.  Is the Dwarf in love with the Half-Giantess?   :P
Very funny. He's just that kind of guy. He thinks of it as his job to protect those that are more "frail" than himself. I just hope we don't both get hit with a Fireball... that will hurt with that Shield Other up...

If you can cover the MM Rod... I might buy a camel, and I'll also get a Healing Belt. I thought a camel would make a "cool" mount for a desert dwarf, and he could use one due to his crappy speed. I don't know what they'd cost, though. What about the same as a mule, Bowen? Or are they priced in Sandstorm?
According to Sandstorm a Two-humped Camel costs 100 gp, while a Dromedary Camel costs 75 gp.
A War Camel costs 450 gp.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 11, 2010, 03:20:01 PM
According to Sandstorm a Two-humped Camel costs 100 gp, while a Dromedary Camel costs 75 gp.
A War Camel costs 450 gp.
Ah screw it. I don't have Sandstorm handy, and so can't look up the stats. I'll just start without a mount and maybe buy one later if I think I need it. I think I'm ready to go.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 11, 2010, 03:27:56 PM
For what it counts, camel. (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/monsters/camel.htm) Sandstorm only prices them.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 11, 2010, 03:28:19 PM
According to Sandstorm a Two-humped Camel costs 100 gp, while a Dromedary Camel costs 75 gp.
A War Camel costs 450 gp.
Ah screw it. I don't have Sandstorm handy, and so can't look up the stats. I'll just start without a mount and maybe buy one later if I think I need it. I think I'm ready to go.
Basic info:

Dromedary Camel: 3d8+6 (19 hp), AC 13, Speed 50, light/medium/heavy load 300/600/900
Two-humped Camel: 3d8+9 (22 hp), AC 14, Speed 40, light/medium/heavy load 300/600/900
War Camel: 4d8+16 (34 hp), AC 16, Speed 50, light/medium/heavy load 300/600/900
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 11, 2010, 03:48:38 PM
I can cover the MM rod, go get your camel.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 11, 2010, 04:11:17 PM
I can cover the MM rod, go get your camel.   :P
K. I think I'll just get the cheap one, and a Healing Belt. The damned thing will probably die immediately, anyway. :P

Ah screw it. I just went with a mule. More hit points for less money. I'll just call it Camel. (WOOOAAAH CAMEL! :D ) I did get a Healing Belt and put a few more charges on my Wand of Lesser Vigor, though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 11, 2010, 07:07:48 PM
Isn't there a khopesh that's a 1d8/18-20 weapon that works like the bastard sword/dwarven waraxe? Would it be ok if I substitute that for the dwarven waraxe racial affinity for Kalal, since he's a desert dwarf?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 11, 2010, 07:11:45 PM
Isn't there a khopesh that's a 1d8/18-20 weapon that works like the bastard sword/dwarven waraxe? Would it be ok if I substitute that for the dwarven waraxe racial affinity for Kalal, since he's a desert dwarf?
Only one I know of is the Khopesh in Sandstorm.
1d6, 18-20/2, One-handed, can be used to make Trip attacks.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 11, 2010, 07:17:41 PM
Isn't there a khopesh that's a 1d8/18-20 weapon that works like the bastard sword/dwarven waraxe? Would it be ok if I substitute that for the dwarven waraxe racial affinity for Kalal, since he's a desert dwarf?
Only one I know of is the Khopesh in Sandstorm.
1d6, 18-20/2, One-handed, can be used to make Trip attacks.
Yeah... just found the stats to it in crystalkeep from the Arms and Equipment Guide. It was the same, but did 1d8 damage and is an exotic weapon. Why did they nerf the damage for Christ's sake? Is it a martial weapon in Sandstorm? Ah well, looks like I'll be sticking with the waraxe for now...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 12:56:45 PM
Okay boys, head on over to the Marauder Attack thread and roll for Initiative :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 12, 2010, 12:58:44 PM
Except I can't because I don't have equipment.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 12:59:35 PM
Same. I also haven't statted out my free horsey yet. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 12, 2010, 01:00:31 PM
Oy, can we assume I used my invocation to make people immune to my Breath Weapon on everyone?

Shifting is a free action, can I do it during the initiative phase?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 01:07:43 PM
Then get that done ASAP :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 01:10:11 PM
Oy, can we assume I used my invocation to make people immune to my Breath Weapon on everyone?

Shifting is a free action, can I do it during the initiative phase?
Yeah, I was already assuming that :)

And you can only take free actions during your turn, so as soon as your turn comes up, you can shift.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 12, 2010, 02:45:12 PM
Ahem, I call purple!   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 02:47:01 PM
In case it wasn't obvious from the uniform, dibs on red (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BringMyRedJacket). :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 12, 2010, 02:53:10 PM
How does brown look? Yeah, that'll do.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 12, 2010, 02:56:04 PM
I guess that means I'm in the Navy now, then. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 12, 2010, 03:06:26 PM
pink because it's the best

omg that's unreadable

how about purple

yeah that works
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 12, 2010, 03:10:42 PM
pink because it's the best

omg that's unreadable

how about purple

yeah that works

Ahem, I call purple!   :P
:D
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 12, 2010, 03:11:48 PM
I can switch to Maroon if you want Navy.  :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 03:40:22 PM
Venn, you're up :)

Also, bears, you've got a PM :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 12, 2010, 03:47:08 PM
@Bowen
thank you!

@Phaedrus && Nanshork
...sorry! Scanned for the colored text, not the words.

I guess I'm teal.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 03:48:40 PM
Venn, you're up :)

Also, bears, you've got a PM :)

By the way, feel free to take your turn as well, Agita. I don't the two of you will interfere with eachothers actions much, seeing as you don't have any real battlefield-altering options (read: spells :P).

Might as well keep up the pace :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 03:55:17 PM
Okay, I think the Colonel is ready to rock now. Feel free to see if her equipment checks out.

Also, I'm probably the only one who always thinks "Yamainu" when he reads Yamanu's name.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 03:57:24 PM
Okay, I think the Colonel is ready to rock now. Feel free to see if her equipment checks out.

Also, I'm probably the only one who always thinks "Yamainu" when he reads Yamanu's name.
I wouldn't even know what Yamainu is/means :P


EDIT: Equipment is fine :)

Hunter's Sense requires one (other) Tiger Claw maneuver though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 04:05:52 PM
Hunter's Sense requires one (other) Tiger Claw maneuver though.
The maneuver progression looks like this, IIRC:

Level 1: Steel Wind, Douse the Flames, Moment of Perfect Mind
Level 2: Wolf Fang Strike
Level 3: Mountain Hammer
Level 4: Hunter's Sense, swap out Wolf Fang Strike for Wall of Blades

WFS provides the prereq and is swapped out when you get HS because it qualifies for itself. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 04:11:21 PM
WFS provides the prereq and is swapped out when you get HS because it qualifies for itself. :D
It does?

Rules/FAQ/whatever citation plox?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 04:14:07 PM
WFS provides the prereq and is swapped out when you get HS because it qualifies for itself. :D
It does?

Rules/FAQ/whatever citation plox?
It's pretty much the same as taking Martial Study for a prereq maneuver, then taking it again for a maneuver with a 1 maneuver prereq and retraining the first out. Hold on, I'll see if I can find a citation, but I'm pretty sure it works by RAW, and it's pretty much a widely accepted practice.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 04:19:36 PM
WFS provides the prereq and is swapped out when you get HS because it qualifies for itself. :D
It does?

Rules/FAQ/whatever citation plox?
It's pretty much the same as taking Martial Study for a prereq maneuver, then taking it again for a maneuver with a 1 maneuver prereq and retraining the first out. Hold on, I'll see if I can find a citation, but I'm pretty sure it works by RAW, and it's pretty much a widely accepted practice.
Now that you mention it, I have seen it on the CO boards before...

Assuming noone objects, I'll allow it :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 12, 2010, 04:20:44 PM
I don't object.  Anybody got any suggestions for feats for Monstrous Centipede? 
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 04:25:41 PM
I don't object.  Anybody got any suggestions for feats for Monstrous Centipede? 
Ability Focus (Poison)?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 04:27:35 PM
I don't object.  Anybody got any suggestions for feats for Monstrous Centipede? 
Assuming you don't want Martial Study... Look around for tactical feats, I guess.
Shape Soulmeld (Kraken Mantle or Girallon Arms), maybe? But then, I think that might fall into the same category as Martial Study. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 12, 2010, 04:28:55 PM
I don't object.  Anybody got any suggestions for feats for Monstrous Centipede? 
Assuming you don't want Martial Study... Look around for tactical feats, I guess.
Shape Soulmeld (Kraken Mantle or Girallon Arms), maybe? But then, I think that might fall into the same category as Martial Study. :P

I'm trying to avoid things that will make Bowen hurt me.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 04:29:24 PM
I don't object.  Anybody got any suggestions for feats for Monstrous Centipede? 
Assuming you don't want Martial Study... Look around for tactical feats, I guess.
Shape Soulmeld (Kraken Mantle or Girallon Arms), maybe? But then, I think that might fall into the same category as Martial Study. :P

I'm trying to avoid things that will make Bowen hurt me.   :P
Then why are you playing a spellcaster? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 04:32:34 PM
I don't object.  Anybody got any suggestions for feats for Monstrous Centipede? 
Assuming you don't want Martial Study... Look around for tactical feats, I guess.
Shape Soulmeld (Kraken Mantle or Girallon Arms), maybe? But then, I think that might fall into the same category as Martial Study. :P

I'm trying to avoid things that will make Bowen hurt me.   :P

Yeah, as a general rule, no Spellcasting/alternate magic systems/maneuvers feats, or seriously powerful stuff like Entangling Exhalation etc., and you should be fine :)

Just ask yourself this: 'Would I allow this if I were DM-ing?' :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 12, 2010, 04:53:18 PM
Would Ability Focus: Poison and Virulent Poison (Savage Species) stack?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 04:55:57 PM
Would Ability Focus: Poison and Virulent Poison (Savage Species) stack?
I don't have SS at hand ATM, but assuming they don't provide the same kind of bonus/both provide an unnamed bonus, then yes, they would stack.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 04:56:10 PM
Why would your target be flat-footed?
Because he won Initiative?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 04:57:09 PM
Why would your target be flat-footed?
Because he won Initiative?
I need to read up on the surprise round/initiative rules...

But assuming the enemy was already aware of him, would he still catch them flat-footed?

EDIT: Yes he would, sorry about that, guys  :embarrassed

Gimme a minute to edit my post please :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 05:00:00 PM
Since Harika figured out where the two scents come from, is it assumed that she already took the move action to sense the direction of the smell?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 05:01:15 PM
Since Harika figured out where the two scents come from, is it assumed that she already took the move action to sense the direction of the smell?
That costs a move action? Wow...that sucks...

Yeah, since I already mentioned that info to you, it is assumed for this round. No need to screw players over for a mistake made by the DM. For future encounters, please remind me of that rule ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 05:03:31 PM
Yes... remind you of a rule disadvantageous to me. Thy wish is my command. :smirk

EDIT: Is the movement penalty for moving up the slope all because it's a slope, or is some of it due to difficult terrain? I'm asking because Up the Hill skill trick lets me move up a slope or stair at normal speed for a round per encounter. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 05:11:04 PM
Yes... remind you of a rule disadvantageous to me. Thy wish is my command. :smirk

EDIT: Is the movement penalty for moving up the slope all because it's a slope, or is some of it due to difficult terrain? I'm asking because Up the Hill skill trick lets me move up a slope or stair at normal speed for a round per encounter. :D
Seeing as RHoD was written before CS, I'm going to rule slope, so go ahead ;)
Just take into account the undergrowth in J5 ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 05:56:50 PM
Agita, I see you ;)

(in other words, waiting for your In Character response :P)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 12, 2010, 06:00:35 PM
If I use the Animal Devotion feat to gain flight, which acts like Overland Flight, am I slowed by my medium encumbrance? The spell says you move slower if encumbered or wearing medium or heavy armor, but dwarves explicitly aren't slowed by those things...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 06:10:08 PM
Unfortunately a 13 misses, as does a 20.
How about a 25? The second attack was a 25, not a 20. It's also against flat-footed AC.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 06:13:07 PM
If I use the Animal Devotion feat to gain flight, which acts like Overland Flight, am I slowed by my medium encumbrance? The spell says you move slower if encumbered or wearing medium or heavy armor, but dwarves explicitly aren't slowed by those things...
I'll cut you some slack here. Dwarven bonuses etc. also apply to fly speeds :)

Unfortunately a 13 misses, as does a 20.
How about a 25? The second attack was a 25, not a 20. It's also against flat-footed AC.
I shouldn't drink while DM-ing...  :embarrassed

Gimme a minute to edit my post, please :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 07:21:45 PM
Yeah, that Mineral Warrior template was a good idea :)

bearsarebrown is next :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 07:35:23 PM
Contingency: If a hobbo hits her for more than 10 damage, Harika will use Wall of Blades to get another shot at making it miss (and look badass in the process).
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 07:39:23 PM
Contingency: If a hobbo hits her for more than 10 damage, Harika will use Wall of Blades to get another shot at making it miss (and look badass in the process).
If I happen to forget about that (pretty damn likely, knowing me :P), please remind me :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 12, 2010, 08:25:47 PM
If I use the Animal Devotion feat to gain flight, which acts like Overland Flight, am I slowed by my medium encumbrance? The spell says you move slower if encumbered or wearing medium or heavy armor, but dwarves explicitly aren't slowed by those things...
bump-a-lumpa
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 12, 2010, 08:31:28 PM
If I use the Animal Devotion feat to gain flight, which acts like Overland Flight, am I slowed by my medium encumbrance? The spell says you move slower if encumbered or wearing medium or heavy armor, but dwarves explicitly aren't slowed by those things...
bump-a-lumpa

Lookie-here:
If I use the Animal Devotion feat to gain flight, which acts like Overland Flight, am I slowed by my medium encumbrance? The spell says you move slower if encumbered or wearing medium or heavy armor, but dwarves explicitly aren't slowed by those things...
I'll cut you some slack here. Dwarven bonuses etc. also apply to fly speeds :)


Ahem. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 08:35:05 PM
Thanks, Venn :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 12, 2010, 08:39:30 PM
If I use the Animal Devotion feat to gain flight, which acts like Overland Flight, am I slowed by my medium encumbrance? The spell says you move slower if encumbered or wearing medium or heavy armor, but dwarves explicitly aren't slowed by those things...
bump-a-lumpa

Lookie-here:
If I use the Animal Devotion feat to gain flight, which acts like Overland Flight, am I slowed by my medium encumbrance? The spell says you move slower if encumbered or wearing medium or heavy armor, but dwarves explicitly aren't slowed by those things...
I'll cut you some slack here. Dwarven bonuses etc. also apply to fly speeds :)


Ahem. :)
Doh! Thread moves too fast! I can't keep up! :P Thanks. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 08:40:27 PM
If I use the Animal Devotion feat to gain flight, which acts like Overland Flight, am I slowed by my medium encumbrance? The spell says you move slower if encumbered or wearing medium or heavy armor, but dwarves explicitly aren't slowed by those things...
bump-a-lumpa

Lookie-here:
If I use the Animal Devotion feat to gain flight, which acts like Overland Flight, am I slowed by my medium encumbrance? The spell says you move slower if encumbered or wearing medium or heavy armor, but dwarves explicitly aren't slowed by those things...
I'll cut you some slack here. Dwarven bonuses etc. also apply to fly speeds :)


Ahem. :)
Doh! Thread moves too fast! I can't keep up! :P Thanks. :D
Don't worry about it, we'll just blame it on your age ;) :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 12, 2010, 08:50:10 PM
Doh! Thread moves too fast! I can't keep up! :P Thanks. :D
Don't worry about it, we'll just blame it on your age ;) :P
DOH!  :fu

So we're headed towards a town, right?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 08:51:43 PM
Doh! Thread moves too fast! I can't keep up! :P Thanks. :D
Don't worry about it, we'll just blame it on your age ;) :P
DOH!  :fu

So we're headed towards a town, right?
Yup, Drellin's Ferry to be precise. It's the closest town from wherever you departed from ;)

How so?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 12, 2010, 09:08:35 PM
And Saru/bearsarebrown is next :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 12, 2010, 09:28:15 PM
And Saru/bearsarebrown is next :)

Fixed. :)

(By the way, very apt naming on your part, bears. :D)

Speaking of which, I found 'Yamanu' when looking through Egyptian names.
YAMANU: Egyptian myth name of a god of wind and air, meaning "the hidden one."
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 12, 2010, 09:31:24 PM
Yamanu just keeps reminding me of Yamainu due to the similarity. The Yamainu (literally, 'mountain dog') being a sort of paramilitary intelligence agency in one of the better anime I watched in '09.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 12, 2010, 10:05:14 PM
(By the way, very apt naming on your part, bears. :D)

There is a chance that I'm horrible at names and wiki'd starting at macaque until I found something that looked like a name...
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 13, 2010, 01:23:46 AM
Well, Saru is japanese for monkey, so it's fairly well picked. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 13, 2010, 09:45:42 AM
Another thing I just remembered: the Colonel also has +2 AC vs. ranged attacks due to her armor crystal. :P

I totally forgot to buy Blessed Bandages for the money I had left. Oh well, we're on our way to a town anyway, and they're cheap enough I should be able to find some even if there's no Magic Mart.

I keep feeling the urge to call her Ku:nel, but I'm not sure if anyone here would catch the reference. :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 13, 2010, 10:14:58 AM
You're still hit ;)
And please update your sheet with that info ;)

Okay guys, round 1, let's go :)
Venn & Agita, go ahead :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 13, 2010, 10:23:42 AM
What's the Str check to knock over a tree? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 13, 2010, 10:30:38 AM
What's the Str check to knock over a tree? :P
Don't waste your time trying :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 13, 2010, 02:02:22 PM
Does 1 round recharge time mean I can use it on my next turn or the turn after that?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 13, 2010, 02:07:37 PM
Turn after that, so you'll have to go 1 round without.


By the way, you really should get some armor and barding in the next town ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 13, 2010, 02:16:02 PM
Yeah that's definitely something I forgot to do. I even have the gold to do it... I just forgot. :lol

Are the trees providing any cover?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 13, 2010, 02:30:02 PM
Yes, cover and concealment.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 13, 2010, 02:44:17 PM
Yes, cover and concealment.

If they provide cover and concealment for the gobbos, shouldn't we also get one or both from them? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 13, 2010, 02:47:43 PM
Yes, cover and concealment.

If they provide cover and concealment for the gobbos, shouldn't we also get one or both from them? :P
You do ;)

EDIT: I just didn't want to clog the game thread with a bazillion dice rolls, so I just posted the noticeable results you experienced ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 13, 2010, 03:39:30 PM
By the way, not sure if I mentioned this before, but aside from Venn, I'm okay with Agita posting his turn as well, to keep things moving.

Figured the two of you won't really get in each others way, and the enemy won't act until after you guys.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 13, 2010, 04:05:42 PM
By the way, not sure if I mentioned this before, but aside from Venn, I'm okay with Agita posting his turn as well, to keep things moving.

Figured the two of you won't really get in each others way, and the enemy won't act until after you guys.
I'm aware, yes. It's just that I'm a lazy bastard and easily distracted, so I get distracted and take hours to post in the end (even though I spend like a few minutes doing the actual writing). :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 13, 2010, 04:17:05 PM
Do I need to dismount if I activate my flight and charge?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 13, 2010, 04:25:29 PM
Do I need to dismount if I activate my flight and charge?
Yes.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 13, 2010, 04:40:45 PM
Are the hashed squares the "escarpment" and thus 4 squares to enter, or is that the sides of the road? I'm not well-versed in such vocabulary. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 13, 2010, 04:48:19 PM
Yeah, sorry 'bout that, just copy-pasted the description from the adventure :P

The brown-striped squares aren't important right now, they denote the point at which the hobbo's would have sprung their trap.

The 4-squares to enter are indeed the sides of the road, the 'slopes' leading up to the green area.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 13, 2010, 04:56:27 PM
Do I need to dismount if I activate my flight and charge?
Yes.
Ok, on my action I'll dismount (move action), activate Animal Devotion (swift action), and fly to D10 (move action, speed is 45'),and draw my weapon (free action while moving). I'm now threatening RA1 (due to my reach), which means he takes a -4 to attack Saru due to my stance. I'm still (barely) within range of Shield Other, also.

That works, right?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 13, 2010, 04:57:02 PM
Do I need to dismount if I activate my flight and charge?
Yes.
Ok, on my action I'll dismount (move action), activate Animal Devotion (swift action), and fly to D10 (move action, speed is 45'),and draw my weapon (free action while moving). I'm now threatening RA1 (due to my reach), which means he takes a -4 to attack Saru due to my stance. I'm still (barely) within range of Shield Other, also.

That works, right?
Sounds good to me :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 13, 2010, 06:49:04 PM
Next up, bearsarebrown :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 14, 2010, 12:43:41 AM
I might go help "the colonel" instead. We'll see.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 14, 2010, 03:54:57 AM
How high is the rubble in the southwest?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 14, 2010, 08:31:40 AM
See in-game post :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 14, 2010, 08:43:14 AM
And Phaedrus and Nanshork are up next :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 14, 2010, 12:08:30 PM
Just a head's up that I'm working fairly late today so I won't get around to my next turn until later, if everyone else manages to act today. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 14, 2010, 12:25:09 PM
Thanks for the head's up :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 14, 2010, 01:24:17 PM
Could I not shift 5ft and be able to hit both?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 14, 2010, 01:39:35 PM
Lemme go check :)

EDIT:
You can move 5 feet in any round when you don’t perform any other kind of movement.

So that's a no, sorry.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 14, 2010, 07:26:41 PM
I cast Summon Monster as a standard action.  That mean the monster gets to go on the turn that I cast it.  How much of a turn does it get?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 14, 2010, 07:35:12 PM
IIRC a standard action, allthough I'm not sure...

EDIT:
Rapid Summoning (Ex)
Any time a conjurer using this variant casts a summon monster spell, its casting time is 1 standard action rather than 1 full round. (Creatures so summoned can only take a standard action in the round they are summoned.)

You've got Rapid Summoning, right?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 14, 2010, 09:11:35 PM
Ahh, I forgot that the book told me.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 14, 2010, 09:25:07 PM
I'm going to summon something.  Surprise.   :P

What information about the creature do you want available in the combat thread in a spoiler block?
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 14, 2010, 10:39:30 PM
Guess we didn't get to me anyway, so no worries. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 14, 2010, 11:49:31 PM
@Bowen

I've got Flyby Attack. It's all a part of the movement.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 15, 2010, 12:41:04 AM
Next round you'll need to make a DC20 Ride check to control your mount though (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/skills/ride.htm (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/skills/ride.htm), see Control Mount in Battle).
So what gets around that? Does it need the Combat Riding set of tricks specifically? Does it have to be specifically a warhorse (or other mount with "war" in the name)? Since I assumed my mount is trained somehow, I put down that it has the attack trick twice, which means it will attack undead, aberrations, etc. I don't think I've ever actually used a non-warhorse mount in combat before, except for ones that weren't trained to fight at all (which I just dismounted from).
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 05:53:35 AM
@Bowen

I've got Flyby Attack. It's all a part of the movement.
Ah, right, completely forgot about that.

Okay, I'll edit it in :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 05:56:07 AM
Next round you'll need to make a DC20 Ride check to control your mount though (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/skills/ride.htm (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/skills/ride.htm), see Control Mount in Battle).
So what gets around that? Does it need the Combat Riding set of tricks specifically? Does it have to be specifically a warhorse (or other mount with "war" in the name)? Since I assumed my mount is trained somehow, I put down that it has the attack trick twice, which means it will attack undead, aberrations, etc. I don't think I've ever actually used a non-warhorse mount in combat before, except for ones that weren't trained to fight at all (which I just dismounted from).
Yeah, I had to look it up as well. I think the Combat Riding set should do the trick, yes.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 06:01:06 AM
I'm going to summon something.  Surprise.   :P

What information about the creature do you want available in the combat thread in a spoiler block?
HP, AC (touch, flat-footed), Fort/Ref/Will, space/reach, attack(s), grapple, special attacks/attack options and feats, please :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 15, 2010, 06:30:13 AM
Alright.  Let me summon something and get a post up before I pass out so that the game can carry on.

Also, a link has been posted to my summons list in my character sheet for reference for everyone.

And Yay, Google Docs lets you upload files from your computer now!

Edit: I'll just copy and paste statblocks from my file, it'll make things easier.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 07:58:59 AM
I'll kick of round 2 once I get back from the gym, see you in a couple of hours :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 15, 2010, 12:51:10 PM
Okay, I'll edit it in :)

Thanks!

@Nanshork, why didn't the summon make a full round attack?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 12:54:35 PM
Okay, I'll edit it in :)

Thanks!

@Nanshork, why didn't the summon make a full round attack?
It only had a standard action, due to Rapid Summoning.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 15, 2010, 12:56:27 PM
Next round you'll need to make a DC20 Ride check to control your mount though (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/skills/ride.htm (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/skills/ride.htm), see Control Mount in Battle).
So what gets around that? Does it need the Combat Riding set of tricks specifically? Does it have to be specifically a warhorse (or other mount with "war" in the name)? Since I assumed my mount is trained somehow, I put down that it has the attack trick twice, which means it will attack undead, aberrations, etc. I don't think I've ever actually used a non-warhorse mount in combat before, except for ones that weren't trained to fight at all (which I just dismounted from).
Yeah, I had to look it up as well. I think the Combat Riding set should do the trick, yes.
Ok. Mind if I change the mule's tricks to "Combat Riding" package, then? I just thought some of the tricks in that set looked utterly worthless and/or redundant, and wanted to replace them with more useful ones like tracking, working, etc. I figured that giving it attack twice, so it will fight things like aberrations and undead, should be enough to make it not "frightened" in combat... I mean... if it will attack a Spawn of Kyuss when told to, it obviously isn't that frightened... or can overcome it, at any rate...

But... mules are cheap. I can just buy one to carry my shit around, track, etc, and another one as a "war mount". :D

Either way is fine. I can just dismount, also.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 01:01:12 PM
Next round you'll need to make a DC20 Ride check to control your mount though (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/skills/ride.htm (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/skills/ride.htm), see Control Mount in Battle).
So what gets around that? Does it need the Combat Riding set of tricks specifically? Does it have to be specifically a warhorse (or other mount with "war" in the name)? Since I assumed my mount is trained somehow, I put down that it has the attack trick twice, which means it will attack undead, aberrations, etc. I don't think I've ever actually used a non-warhorse mount in combat before, except for ones that weren't trained to fight at all (which I just dismounted from).
Yeah, I had to look it up as well. I think the Combat Riding set should do the trick, yes.
Ok. Mind if I change the mule's tricks to "Combat Riding" package, then? I just thought some of the tricks in that set looked utterly worthless and/or redundant, and wanted to replace them with more useful ones like tracking, working, etc. I figured that giving it attack twice, so it will fight things like aberrations and undead, should be enough to make it not "frightened" in combat... I mean... if it will attack a Spawn of Kyuss when told to, it obviously isn't that frightened... or can overcome it, at any rate...

But... mules are cheap. I can just buy one to carry my shit around, track, etc, and another one as a "war mount". :D
Yeah, no problem :)

And just treat it as if it has the Attack trick twice, so it can attack all those scary monsters ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 15, 2010, 01:18:45 PM
Thanks.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 01:21:06 PM
No prob :)

New round is up, Venn & Agita, go ahead :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 01:27:44 PM
By the way, if anyone wants to identify anything with a Knowledge check, be my guest. I'm not going to call for those with every encounter, it's up to you to tell me you want to do that ;)
Figured I'd mention it just in case.

Ofcourse, with this encounter it's pretty obvious :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 15, 2010, 02:27:19 PM
Could we say that the mist is centered on Kalal, and so covers Goldflower and the road entirely? It is supposed to be centered on the caster, and I'd prefer that. Hopefully the BB dude won't know exactly where she is at to attack her then, and neither will the archers.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 02:33:50 PM
I'll update the map, you're right that currently they can guess her general area because of her mount being partially visible.

Gimme a couple of minutes :)


EDIT: Venn, PM regarding your Listen check.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 15, 2010, 02:35:47 PM
Thanks. Sorry for the bother, but that could be a big deal. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 02:44:20 PM
I understand. I did take the center of your mount as the center of the spell though (seeing as the center needs to be at an intersection that seemed the most logical choice), which means part of the road isn't obscured.

Sunflower and her mount should be fine though (unless someone moves up next to the cloud and they don't make a 5ft step back before that time).


I hope that's okay :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 15, 2010, 02:48:42 PM
Perfect. Thanks.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 02:59:11 PM
No problem :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 15, 2010, 03:36:12 PM
Venn, you might want to take a 5' step before launching all those attacks, unless you like drawing attacks of opportunity.  :D (Although I guess if he has a bow equipped he probably doesn't threaten, though... Is that the idea?)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 04:11:22 PM
I think it is.

That, and Venn has (as far as he knows :P) succesfully hidden himself :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 04:50:39 PM
bears/Saru is up next. Don't forget that Listen check ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 15, 2010, 05:14:31 PM
Well, I'm hidden from that first guy, RA2. You can't take an AoO against a foe you can't see. I could have sworn I'd seen an official rule about that. There's no way you could react to an attack you can't see, especially if it's coming from behind you and you're unaware of the creature, but I guess since I can't find an official rule it doesn't matter.

He was armed with a ranged weapon anyway, so as you said, it doesn't matter in this case.

Unfortunately you can’t hide after this full attack.
: Hide
Action:
Usually none. Normally, you make a Hide check as part of movement, so it doesn’t take a separate action. However, hiding immediately after a ranged attack (see Sniping, above) is a move action.

Well, damn. At least I'm still in the trees. That's got to count for something. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 05:18:49 PM
Hey, +4 AC and concealment ain't half bad :)

It's partially what helped keep these Hobgoblins alive :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 15, 2010, 05:28:35 PM
Well, I'm hidden from that first guy, RA2. You can't take an AoO against a foe you can't see. I could have sworn I'd seen an official rule about that. There's no way you could react to an attack you can't see, especially if it's coming from behind you and you're unaware of the creature, but I guess since I can't find an official rule it doesn't matter.

Can't make AoO if flatfooted is the rule. Unless you have Combat Reflexes.

I half wish Bowen gave those archers Elven bows + Combat Reflexes just to screw with us now...

Oh! and don't worry about the hiding. I hit 'em with Grease.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 05:32:23 PM
Well, I'm hidden from that first guy, RA2. You can't take an AoO against a foe you can't see. I could have sworn I'd seen an official rule about that. There's no way you could react to an attack you can't see, especially if it's coming from behind you and you're unaware of the creature, but I guess since I can't find an official rule it doesn't matter.

Can't make AoO if flatfooted is the rule. Unless you have Combat Reflexes.

I half wish Bowen gave those archers Elven bows + Combat Reflexes just to screw with us now...

Oh! and don't worry about the hiding. I hit 'em with Grease.
Yeah, how?

(see ingame post)
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 15, 2010, 05:34:54 PM
Oh, sorry. I shifted, casted, then shifting back. The wand is in a wand chamber in my staff.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 05:37:15 PM
Okidoki :)

EDIT: And Phaedrus and Nanshork are up next :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 15, 2010, 05:55:56 PM
Let's hope that sometime during the campaign we find a wand of grease at a higher CL, so it lasts longer than a round. :D

Are the creatures in the area automatically flat-footed/balancing, or do they have to fail a save? I think failing means they fall prone rather than are balancing, so I guess the former?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 15, 2010, 05:59:10 PM
Speaking of CL (and range), you'll need to be in L15 (or some L16 or something) to get the area you want covered with grease, bears.

@Venn: They don't need to make a Balance check until they want to move, so only those that moved/tried to move are considered Balancing (and thus Flat-Footed if they have less than 5 ranks in Balance).
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 15, 2010, 06:06:03 PM
Oh damn I must've counted wrong. Ehhhh I'll just be in L15.

@Venn
Which means you'll kill at least that dog.

And yeah, getting a new Wand would cost 750g * CL to buy. We'll get one soon I think.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 15, 2010, 06:07:16 PM
Why not get a staff? They can arguably be used at higher CL with a high UMD result. :D
Hell, they're even cheaper than wands if you put only one spell in them.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 15, 2010, 06:09:47 PM
In that case, Grease actually works against me more than it works for me. If a creature doesn't move, I get no benefit. If they do and they fall, it's harder for me to hit them. There's only a tiny space for benefit, which is if I'm engaged in melee with the creature in question, and that's somewhere I don't want to be unless I know I can either get good damage off on them or I have little other choice.

@bears: Again, prone is terrible for me. Being prone doesn't deny a foe their dex bonus, so no sneak attack, plus they get a +4 to ac vs. ranged attacks. I'd be wasting an action if I attacked the prone dog.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 15, 2010, 06:16:08 PM
Why not get a staff?
That could work.

@Venn
...oh  :embarrassed
I won't use it next time
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 15, 2010, 06:31:38 PM
In that case, Grease actually works against me more than it works for me. If a creature doesn't move, I get no benefit. If they do and they fall, it's harder for me to hit them. There's only a tiny space for benefit, which is if I'm engaged in melee with the creature in question, and that's somewhere I don't want to be unless I know I can either get good damage off on them or I have little other choice.

@bears: Again, prone is terrible for me. Being prone doesn't deny a foe their dex bonus, so no sneak attack, plus they get a +4 to ac vs. ranged attacks. I'd be wasting an action if I attacked the prone dog.
If they try to walk and succeed, they're balancing. If they don't have at least 5 ranks in balance, that makes them flat-footed. So it could work out to benefit you. It just didn't this time. :P And prone is still good for everyone, since they're less of a threat and/or draw an AoO for standing up. So unless they both make the save and then don't move afterwards, it is overall likely to benefit us, I think.

And... is there a decent way to handle my granted maneuvers online? Its really easy in real life, because you can just use cards. But we can't do that here...

I guess I'll assign them numbers, roll 1d5, and then reassign and roll 1d4. Those will be the first two granted. Then I'll roll 1d3 next round... Kind of clunky, though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 15, 2010, 06:33:59 PM
I think it's kinda dumb that falling prone doesn't mean flatfooted.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 15, 2010, 06:40:28 PM
PXY: That's what I usually do. I list them alphabetically by level, then roll 1dX, where X is the number of maneuvers readied, and count down from the top.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 15, 2010, 07:00:45 PM
Oh yeah, I think if my strike hits Colonel Sanders gets to take a 5' step if she wants. I forget who it is that has to be adjacent to whom, though... and I doubt she wants to, anyway. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 15, 2010, 07:05:12 PM
Yeah. The +4 to hit probably would've been more useful, but eh. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 15, 2010, 07:10:37 PM
Yeah. The +4 to hit probably would've been more useful, but eh. :P
For you!  :smirk I'd rather kill him outright and get it over with, and move on to the next one (if possible). :D Hmm... the +4 would also apply to the mule's attacks though.  :lol

Also I forgot the +1 morale bonus to my attacks (and the mule's) from the Colonel's aura.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 07:26:48 AM
Did I mention yet that I love cover :P

It's what keeping RW2 and 3 alive right now :lol


I'll be back with the next round in a couple of hours, of to the gym now.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 16, 2010, 10:41:23 AM
A 26 misses?!  :bigeye I forgot to add in the +1 morale bonus.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 16, 2010, 10:43:12 AM
Here's an idea: How about we lure them out of the goddamn forest thing?

Alternatively, set the whole thing on fire. Bears? :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 16, 2010, 10:48:41 AM
Here's an idea: How about we lure them out of the goddamn forest thing?

Alternatively, set the whole thing on fire. Bears? :D
lol

Have these guys even hit you? I say we ignore them. They must be fighting defensively or something, and probably can't hit crap themselves, either. It was the archers that were chewing you up, right?

We could probably hit them if we use our Earth Strike ability + maneuvers that add to hit bonuses, but this is ridiculous.

Yeah... let's just ignore them and go after the big dude + dogs, and bears can breathe these guys. And then we loot their freakin' armor... because it must be magical.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 16, 2010, 11:01:03 AM
Actually, they've been hitting me every time. They just never got through my DR. :P
Yeah, ignoring the wimps sounds good.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 16, 2010, 11:41:16 AM
Alternatively, we could try tripping and/or grappling, since those don't rely on hitting full AC. I don't see that getting hit on the AoO even causes a trip to fail like it does for a grapple or disarm attempt (I've never actually tried it when it would provoke an AoO before. :P ).
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 16, 2010, 11:45:08 AM
I suppose I could do a Bull Rush since I've got Imp BR anyway... Might as well act like I actually care. :P
Also, BR doesn't require an attack, just a Str check, which I'm confident the Colonel will win.

If I ever play RHoD again, I'm going to be a Dungeoncrasher, just for this encounter. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 16, 2010, 11:47:34 AM
What good does a bull rush do, besides provoking an AoO from me (which I'll probably miss :P)? Tripping would at least make them easier to hit.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 16, 2010, 11:50:17 AM
I could shove them out of a tree square so they don't get the cover anymore, for one. (And then I'd be in that square and get the cover myself.)
EDIT: Unless every square counts as containing a tree...
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 16, 2010, 12:07:12 PM
I could shove them out of a tree square so they don't get the cover anymore, for one. (And then I'd be in that square and get the cover myself.)
EDIT: Unless every square counts as containing a tree...
Yeah... I wasn't sure how they were getting cover in the first place. They've already moved around and are still getting it... and yet they are still hitting you (and probably me now...).
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 12:13:07 PM
I could shove them out of a tree square so they don't get the cover anymore, for one. (And then I'd be in that square and get the cover myself.)
EDIT: Unless every square counts as containing a tree...
Yeah... I wasn't sure how they were getting cover in the first place. They've already moved around and are still getting it...
Everyone in the 'trees' area gets cover, including you guys. Sorry guys, but that's what the adventure book says.

@Phaedrus: I thought you had a 25, my bad. A 26 hits, I'll edit my post :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 16, 2010, 12:14:15 PM
I could shove them out of a tree square so they don't get the cover anymore, for one. (And then I'd be in that square and get the cover myself.)
EDIT: Unless every square counts as containing a tree...
Yeah... I wasn't sure how they were getting cover in the first place. They've already moved around and are still getting it...
Everyone in the 'trees' area gets cover, including you guys. Sorry guys, but that's what the adventure book says.

@Phaedrus: I thought you had a 25, my bad. A 26 hits, I'll edit my post :)
Yeah sorry. I forgot the +1 morale from Ms. Thang's aura. I mentioned it in the OOC thread here, but I guess you missed it.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 16, 2010, 12:14:37 PM
True Strike ignores cover and concealment, right? Now I wish I still had the APs for an extra action... :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 12:17:35 PM
I could shove them out of a tree square so they don't get the cover anymore, for one. (And then I'd be in that square and get the cover myself.)
EDIT: Unless every square counts as containing a tree...
Yeah... I wasn't sure how they were getting cover in the first place. They've already moved around and are still getting it...
Everyone in the 'trees' area gets cover, including you guys. Sorry guys, but that's what the adventure book says.

@Phaedrus: I thought you had a 25, my bad. A 26 hits, I'll edit my post :)
Yeah sorry. I forgot the +1 morale from Ms. Thang's aura. I mentioned it in the OOC thread here, but I guess you missed it.
Yeah, I missed that, sorry.

: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 16, 2010, 12:18:50 PM
Updated the demon's stats with the damage from the hellhounds.  I can summon them, I know what they are.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 12:25:03 PM
Okay, just found out I made a boo-boo.

Apparently there are 2 sections in the book talking about the terrain in this encounter. While one says that simply being in the forested terrain grants both cover and concealment, the other says you only get cover if you're in the same square as a tree (as in, the treetrunks depicted on the map).

I'm going to go with the second ruling because frankly I felt the first one was a tad retarded anyway.


The good news though, is that I don't have to make any further edits, since all your previous attacks wouldn't have hit their normal AC anyway, or were negated by concealment the one time it did hit :)



Sorry about any confusion, guys :embarrassed:
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 12:25:33 PM
Updated the demon's stats with the damage from the hellhounds.  I can summon them, I know what they are.   :P
Yeah, I agree :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 12:28:09 PM
And Kalal killed the Hobgob, congrats :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 16, 2010, 12:30:45 PM
Thanks. And sorry for the trouble. It's hard to keep up with bonuses from other people's stuff. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 16, 2010, 12:35:11 PM
Thanks. And sorry for the trouble. It's hard to keep up with bonuses from other people's stuff. :P

Agreed.  I'm just assuming that my demon is too far away until told otherwise.   :p
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 12:55:20 PM
Got a question for you guys. How is communication handled between a Summoned Monster and the caster that Summoned it?

As in, if the critter were to detect something that the caster doesn't know about, would it tell the caster automatically, or only if explicitely told to tell caster about that kind of thing?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 16, 2010, 12:56:43 PM
Got a question for you guys. How is communication handled between a Summoned Monster and the caster that Summoned it?

As in, if the critter were to detect something that the caster doesn't know about, would it tell the caster automatically, or only if explicitely told to tell caster about that kind of thing?

I think that's more up to you honestly, there aren't really any rules about it.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 16, 2010, 12:59:49 PM
Got a question for you guys. How is communication handled between a Summoned Monster and the caster that Summoned it?

As in, if the critter were to detect something that the caster doesn't know about, would it tell the caster automatically, or only if explicitely told to tell caster about that kind of thing?
It would probably depend on the summoned creature, and the caster. I don't think anything says that they are required to always act in their summoner's best interest. They just obey orders.

But yeah, I don't remember seeing this actually covered by the rules anywhere. There might be something in one of the "Fiend" books.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 16, 2010, 01:07:10 PM
Got a question for you guys. How is communication handled between a Summoned Monster and the caster that Summoned it?

As in, if the critter were to detect something that the caster doesn't know about, would it tell the caster automatically, or only if explicitely told to tell caster about that kind of thing?
It would probably depend on the summoned creature, and the caster. I don't think anything says that they are required to always act in their summoner's best interest. They just obey orders.

But yeah, I don't remember seeing this actually covered by the rules anywhere. There might be something in one of the "Fiend" books.

I didn't think abut that.  I'll check when I get home from work in half an hour.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 01:20:00 PM
Got a question for you guys. How is communication handled between a Summoned Monster and the caster that Summoned it?

As in, if the critter were to detect something that the caster doesn't know about, would it tell the caster automatically, or only if explicitely told to tell caster about that kind of thing?
It would probably depend on the summoned creature, and the caster. I don't think anything says that they are required to always act in their summoner's best interest. They just obey orders.

But yeah, I don't remember seeing this actually covered by the rules anywhere. There might be something in one of the "Fiend" books.

I didn't think abut that.  I'll check when I get home from work in half an hour.
Okay, let me know :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 01:30:59 PM
So, how's that Will save, Venn? :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 16, 2010, 01:32:55 PM
So, how's that Will save, Venn? :smirk
Oh great...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 01:38:37 PM
So, how's that Will save, Venn? :smirk
Oh great...
:D
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 16, 2010, 01:42:19 PM
Uh oh  :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 16, 2010, 01:55:55 PM
Got a question for you guys. How is communication handled between a Summoned Monster and the caster that Summoned it?

As in, if the critter were to detect something that the caster doesn't know about, would it tell the caster automatically, or only if explicitely told to tell caster about that kind of thing?
It would probably depend on the summoned creature, and the caster. I don't think anything says that they are required to always act in their summoner's best interest. They just obey orders.

But yeah, I don't remember seeing this actually covered by the rules anywhere. There might be something in one of the "Fiend" books.

I didn't think abut that.  I'll check when I get home from work in half an hour.
Okay, let me know :)

I didn't find anything.  It seems to be up to you.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 01:57:11 PM
Got a question for you guys. How is communication handled between a Summoned Monster and the caster that Summoned it?

As in, if the critter were to detect something that the caster doesn't know about, would it tell the caster automatically, or only if explicitely told to tell caster about that kind of thing?
It would probably depend on the summoned creature, and the caster. I don't think anything says that they are required to always act in their summoner's best interest. They just obey orders.

But yeah, I don't remember seeing this actually covered by the rules anywhere. There might be something in one of the "Fiend" books.

I didn't think abut that.  I'll check when I get home from work in half an hour.
Okay, let me know :)

I didn't find anything.  It seems to be up to you.
In that case I'm going with the 'strictly following orders' option, thanks for looking it up :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 16, 2010, 01:58:36 PM
Got a question for you guys. How is communication handled between a Summoned Monster and the caster that Summoned it?

As in, if the critter were to detect something that the caster doesn't know about, would it tell the caster automatically, or only if explicitely told to tell caster about that kind of thing?
It would probably depend on the summoned creature, and the caster. I don't think anything says that they are required to always act in their summoner's best interest. They just obey orders.

But yeah, I don't remember seeing this actually covered by the rules anywhere. There might be something in one of the "Fiend" books.

I didn't think abut that.  I'll check when I get home from work in half an hour.
Okay, let me know :)

I didn't find anything.  It seems to be up to you.
In that case I'm going with the 'strictly following orders' option, thanks for looking it up :)

That's what I figured. No problem.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 16, 2010, 02:33:40 PM
And Venn passed his Will save.

EDIT: And round 3 is up. Have fun slaughtering ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 16, 2010, 08:29:33 PM
Hey Bowen, did you forget my name and label me as Sunflower?

And a random question for everybody.  Is it worth a feat and a class level to dip into Mindbender for telepathy?
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 16, 2010, 09:25:25 PM
Hey Bowen, did you forget my name and label me as Sunflower?

And a random question for everybody.  Is it worth a feat and a class level to dip into Mindbender for telepathy?

Giving Telepathic commands to your summons could be mighty handy, but with such a limited number of levels, I'm not sure what you might be missing out on.

Updated my turn.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 16, 2010, 10:11:07 PM
Hey Bowen, did you forget my name and label me as Sunflower?

And a random question for everybody.  Is it worth a feat and a class level to dip into Mindbender for telepathy?
If you follow it up with Mindsight, yeah. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 07:30:22 AM
Hey Bowen, did you forget my name and label me as Sunflower?

And a random question for everybody.  Is it worth a feat and a class level to dip into Mindbender for telepathy?
Fixed :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 07:37:28 AM
Damnit, failed the Spot check by 1 :P
Stupid distance penalties :banghead :lol


Agita is up next :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 17, 2010, 01:39:04 PM
A thought: The warblade recharge mechanic says it must be followed with a melee attack or a standard action to do nothing. It doesn't say that it has to be a regular standard-action attack, so could I use a swift action and charge someone to recharge?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 01:54:10 PM
A thought: The warblade recharge mechanic says it must be followed with a melee attack or a standard action to do nothing. It doesn't say that it has to be a regular standard-action attack, so could I use a swift action and charge someone to recharge?
Sure.

Only problem with that is you can't see the guy you're charging, so I'm not sure you can do that right now. Scent only let's you pinpoint the square when you're within 5ft., right?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 17, 2010, 01:59:08 PM
A thought: The warblade recharge mechanic says it must be followed with a melee attack or a standard action to do nothing. It doesn't say that it has to be a regular standard-action attack, so could I use a swift action and charge someone to recharge?
Sure.

Only problem with that is you can't see the guy you're charging, so I'm not sure you can do that right now. Scent only let's you pinpoint the square when you're within 5ft., right?
Oh, I'm most certainly not going to charge right now - in part because I can't charge through difficult terrain. Just some reference for the future.

I*'ll post in two hours or so, because I have to go now. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 02:00:50 PM
All good :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 17, 2010, 04:30:46 PM
Should I make a spot check vs. the mysterious caster in K18 to see if I can see them as well? :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 04:31:53 PM
Sure, go ahead :P

EDIT:
A Spot check result higher than 20 generally lets you become aware of an invisible creature near you, though you can’t actually see it.

It’s practically impossible (+20 DC) to pinpoint an invisible creature’s location with a Spot check, and even if a character succeeds on such a check, the invisible creature still benefits from total concealment (50% miss chance).


So it won't do you any more good than your keen hearing ability thingy...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 17, 2010, 04:40:55 PM
Come to think of it... I was going to do a Jump check so I wouldn't have to go through that pesky 4-squares-per-space slope, but a) is that both ways, or only up? b) couldn't I just burrow a 'cube' down and come out onto the road, since it's lower? :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 04:48:37 PM
Come to think of it... I was going to do a Jump check so I wouldn't have to go through that pesky 4-squares-per-space slope, but a) is that both ways, or only up? b) couldn't I just burrow a 'cube' down and come out onto the road, since it's lower? :D
Works both ways, not just 'up'. Also remember that the forested terrain is light undergrowth, so costs 2 squares.

And yes, burrowing that way would work, but the first square of movement (vertically) would still cost you 2 squares.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 17, 2010, 04:51:57 PM
Would it? Aren't movement penalties for moving into, rather than out of squares?
Technically, it would be diagonally down. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 04:55:51 PM
Eh, I think you're actually correct.

Damnit :P


Sure, go ahead :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 05:35:03 PM
bearsarebrown is next :)


@Agita: I have no idea either...
What's the default for burrowing?

I don't think it really matters though...

EDIT:
Burrow
A creature with a burrow speed can tunnel through dirt, but not through rock unless the descriptive text says otherwise. Creatures cannot charge or run while burrowing. Most burrowing creatures do not leave behind tunnels other creatures can use (either because the material they tunnel through fills in behind them or because they do not actually dislocate any material when burrowing); see the individual creature descriptions for details.

Unless Mineral Warrior specifically mentions leaving a tunnel, you don't leave one.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 17, 2010, 05:53:07 PM
Sure, go ahead :P

EDIT:
A Spot check result higher than 20 generally lets you become aware of an invisible creature near you, though you can’t actually see it.

It’s practically impossible (+20 DC) to pinpoint an invisible creature’s location with a Spot check, and even if a character succeeds on such a check, the invisible creature still benefits from total concealment (50% miss chance).


So it won't do you any more good than your keen hearing ability thingy...

Oh, so it's invisible? I didn't know. :D
Are you basically saying that I don't need to look because I can already tell it's invisible? :)

Also, damn, I forgot to take the 5-ft step I was going to take.  :banghead
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 17, 2010, 06:07:44 PM
So, having Scent at the moment, can the colonel tell what the eff you're talking about? :P Like, one more smelly guy or whatever?
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 17, 2010, 06:14:03 PM
Are you within scent range of square K18? Then probably. Otherwise, not likely. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 06:15:43 PM
Sure, go ahead :P

EDIT:
A Spot check result higher than 20 generally lets you become aware of an invisible creature near you, though you can’t actually see it.

It’s practically impossible (+20 DC) to pinpoint an invisible creature’s location with a Spot check, and even if a character succeeds on such a check, the invisible creature still benefits from total concealment (50% miss chance).


So it won't do you any more good than your keen hearing ability thingy...

Oh, so it's invisible? I didn't know. :D
Are you basically saying that I don't need to look because I can already tell it's invisible? :)
Well, you've pinpointed it last round, and you don't see anything in that square (no need for a Spot check to notice a square is empty :P), so yeah, that's a pretty logical conclusion :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 17, 2010, 06:16:54 PM
Nope, I'm not. So I'll just have to ignore you two. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 06:17:48 PM
Nope, I'm not. So I'll just have to ignore you two. ;)
Eh, you still have 4 other guys to focus on ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 06:35:08 PM
bears: Since your BW doesn't actually deal damage, Entangling Exhalation doesn't apply, sorry.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 06:40:56 PM
Also, Phaedrus and Nanshork are up next :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 17, 2010, 06:41:23 PM
If your breath weapon doesn’t deal energy damage, creatures damaged by the initial breath are still entangled but don’t take additional damage on later rounds.

Is that only referencing ability damage then?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 06:49:33 PM
If your breath weapon doesn’t deal energy damage, creatures damaged by the initial breath are still entangled but don’t take additional damage on later rounds.

Is that only referencing ability damage then?
Or hp damage that isn't energy damage. There are BW's that deal slashing or piercing damage or dessication damage and the like IIRC.

Slow definitely isn't damage of any kind though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 17, 2010, 06:52:03 PM
If your breath weapon doesn’t deal energy damage, creatures damaged by the initial breath are still entangled but don’t take additional damage on later rounds.

Is that only referencing ability damage then?
Or hp damage that isn't energy damage. There are BW's that deal slashing or piercing damage or dessication damage and the like IIRC.

Slow definitely isn't damage of any kind though.
So self-esteem damage doesn't count? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 06:53:32 PM
If your breath weapon doesn’t deal energy damage, creatures damaged by the initial breath are still entangled but don’t take additional damage on later rounds.

Is that only referencing ability damage then?
Or hp damage that isn't energy damage. There are BW's that deal slashing or piercing damage or dessication damage and the like IIRC.

Slow definitely isn't damage of any kind though.
So self-esteem damage doesn't count? :P
Is the Colonel feeling insecure because she can't take out a simple Hobgoblin? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 17, 2010, 06:57:23 PM
gotcha @ breath weapon damage.

and don't make fun of him that he can't kill someone  :(
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 17, 2010, 06:58:10 PM
If your breath weapon doesn’t deal energy damage, creatures damaged by the initial breath are still entangled but don’t take additional damage on later rounds.

Is that only referencing ability damage then?
Or hp damage that isn't energy damage. There are BW's that deal slashing or piercing damage or dessication damage and the like IIRC.

Slow definitely isn't damage of any kind though.
So self-esteem damage doesn't count? :P
Is the Colonel feeling insecure because she can't take out a simple Hobgoblin? :P
Not if it has goddamn cover and concealment all the goddamn time. :P But as a(n allegedly) badass dual-wielding hobbo I'd feel pretty hit in my self-esteem if I suddenly got hit by a slow effect.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 06:58:24 PM
and don't make fun of him that he can't kill someone  :(
Are you saying Agita is playing a trap? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 17, 2010, 06:58:59 PM
Does constrict damage get applied on the initial successful grapple?  It says on any grapple check.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 06:59:33 PM
If your breath weapon doesn’t deal energy damage, creatures damaged by the initial breath are still entangled but don’t take additional damage on later rounds.

Is that only referencing ability damage then?
Or hp damage that isn't energy damage. There are BW's that deal slashing or piercing damage or dessication damage and the like IIRC.

Slow definitely isn't damage of any kind though.
So self-esteem damage doesn't count? :P
Is the Colonel feeling insecure because she can't take out a simple Hobgoblin? :P
Not if it has goddamn cover and concealment all the goddamn time. :P But as a(n allegedly) badass dual-wielding hobbo I'd feel pretty hit in my self-esteem if I suddenly got hit by a slow effect.
True, true, and angry at that...

If only he were high enough level to pick up IHS :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 07:00:00 PM
Does constrict damage get applied on the initial successful grapple?  It says on any grapple check.

I've always played it as such, so yeah.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 17, 2010, 07:02:49 PM
Does constrict damage get applied on the initial successful grapple?  It says on any grapple check.

I've always played it as such, so yeah.

 :banghead  Why did I try to attack with the low attack bonus?  I'm just grappling next time!
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 17, 2010, 07:04:08 PM
Does constrict damage get applied on the initial successful grapple?  It says on any grapple check.

I've always played it as such, so yeah.

 :banghead  Why did I try to attack with the low attack bonus?  I'm just grappling next time!
Thanks for giving me one more round :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 18, 2010, 07:12:45 AM
And it looks like that might not matter after all...

Nice shot Phaedrus :)


Working on Round 4 right now, should be up in about 15-20 minutes.


EDIT: I don't see how you thought that L/M-13/14 would get you next to the BB though ???
Anywho, I figured I'd put Kalal next to him anyway, and even without the flanking bonus you still hit.

Map should be up in a bit.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 18, 2010, 07:44:10 AM
Round 4 is up.

Hope you guys like it so far...
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 18, 2010, 12:13:16 PM
And it looks like that might not matter after all...

Nice shot Phaedrus :)


Working on Round 4 right now, should be up in about 15-20 minutes.


EDIT: I don't see how you thought that L/M-13/14 would get you next to the BB though ???
Anywho, I figured I'd put Kalal next to him anyway, and even without the flanking bonus you still hit.

Map should be up in a bit.
Kalal has reach, and you can hit across diagonals with it.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 18, 2010, 12:19:18 PM
And it looks like that might not matter after all...

Nice shot Phaedrus :)


Working on Round 4 right now, should be up in about 15-20 minutes.


EDIT: I don't see how you thought that L/M-13/14 would get you next to the BB though ???
Anywho, I figured I'd put Kalal next to him anyway, and even without the flanking bonus you still hit.

Map should be up in a bit.
Kalal has reach, and you can hit across diagonals with it.
Still leaves you 1 square short...

Want me to reposition Kalal so there's an empty square between him and the hobbo?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 18, 2010, 12:33:58 PM
Still leaves you 1 square short...

Want me to reposition Kalal so there's an empty square between him and the hobbo?
Yeah... sorry I must have looked at it wrong, unless you moved him and I missed it. I wanted to be 1 square away diagonally so that if the Hell Hound moved to attack me it would draw an AoO.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 18, 2010, 01:02:25 PM
Yay, I might actually be able to hit it with the crab now!
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 18, 2010, 01:12:22 PM
Yay, I might actually be able to hit it with the crab now!
That was what I was hoping for. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 18, 2010, 01:13:03 PM
Will edit the map then in a couple of minutes :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 18, 2010, 01:17:35 PM
Yay, I might actually be able to hit it with the crab now!
That was what I was hoping for. ;)

My summons will stop sucking when we go up a level, I promise!   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 18, 2010, 01:17:46 PM
Yeah, so you did move BB. In his position on the previous map (P16) I would have been able to reach him from L/M-13/14, and since the crab was placed at P17, I would have been flanking with it.

So I'm not sure I would have gotten the +2 to hit from flanking or not. It depends on whether he 5' stepped before or after I attacked.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 18, 2010, 01:34:01 PM
Yeah, so you did move BB. In his position on the previous map (P16) I would have been able to reach him from L/M-13/14, and since the crab was placed at P17, I would have been flanking with it.

So I'm not sure I would have gotten the +2 to hit from flanking or not. It depends on whether he 5' stepped before or after I attacked.
Yes, he moved during his turn, I posted that (just didn't update the map, I figured you guys would read the opponents' actions before posting yours ;))

And don't worry, even without the flanking benefit your attack still managed to hit.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 18, 2010, 01:38:30 PM
And don't worry, even without the flanking benefit your attack still managed to hit.
The crab might not, though. :P

And I still forgot a +1 to hit (from being on higher ground/mounted...). So many little bonuses... :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 18, 2010, 01:51:31 PM
And don't worry, even without the flanking benefit your attack still managed to hit.
The crab might not, though. :P

And I still forgot a +1 to hit (from being on higher ground/mounted...). So many little bonuses... :P
:lol

New map is up :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 19, 2010, 03:03:22 PM
No idea what I should do, really. :P I want to go after the caster, but he's invisible and I can't reach him in one turn. I could try to double move-burrow in his direction (fuck movement penalty for slopes). Or I could ignore him, go after the puppy that's next to Saru and probably get dominated or something after expending Moment of Perfect Mind. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 03:09:10 PM
You could go stab RW3 or the HH next to Saru and recover your maneuvers. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 03:12:14 PM
No idea what I should do, really. :P I want to go after the caster, but he's invisible and I can't reach him in one turn. I could try to double move-burrow in his direction (fuck movement penalty for slopes). Or I could ignore him, go after the puppy that's next to Saru and probably get dominated or something after expending Moment of Perfect Mind. :P
You didn't expend it, remember ;)

You made a normal Will save because you were flat-footed.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 19, 2010, 03:16:07 PM
No idea what I should do, really. :P I want to go after the caster, but he's invisible and I can't reach him in one turn. I could try to double move-burrow in his direction (fuck movement penalty for slopes). Or I could ignore him, go after the puppy that's next to Saru and probably get dominated or something after expending Moment of Perfect Mind. :P
You didn't expend it, remember ;)

You made a normal Will save because you were flat-footed.
Yeah. But the next time he targets my Will I'll expend it, and then I'm defenseless for a round. [/paranoia] :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 03:18:50 PM
No idea what I should do, really. :P I want to go after the caster, but he's invisible and I can't reach him in one turn. I could try to double move-burrow in his direction (fuck movement penalty for slopes). Or I could ignore him, go after the puppy that's next to Saru and probably get dominated or something after expending Moment of Perfect Mind. :P
You didn't expend it, remember ;)

You made a normal Will save because you were flat-footed.
Yeah. But the next time he targets my Will I'll expend it, and then I'm defenseless for a round. [/paranoia] :P
Unless he can cast multiple spells in a round, you can just recover it every round. And at this level... I'd be really surprised if he can cast multiple spells in a round...
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 19, 2010, 03:25:43 PM
You can come stand next to me. Plus if you've got scent you'll know where he is once you're next to him. And I've got Island of Blades up so you'll be flanking him with me. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 19, 2010, 03:31:12 PM
No idea what I should do, really. :P I want to go after the caster, but he's invisible and I can't reach him in one turn. I could try to double move-burrow in his direction (fuck movement penalty for slopes). Or I could ignore him, go after the puppy that's next to Saru and probably get dominated or something after expending Moment of Perfect Mind. :P
You didn't expend it, remember ;)

You made a normal Will save because you were flat-footed.
Yeah. But the next time he targets my Will I'll expend it, and then I'm defenseless for a round. [/paranoia] :P
Unless he can cast multiple spells in a round, you can just recover it every round. And at this level... I'd be really surprised if he can cast multiple spells in a round...
Actually, since Immediate actions use up your swift action for the next round, I can't, as recovering also takes a swift action.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 03:32:31 PM
No idea what I should do, really. :P I want to go after the caster, but he's invisible and I can't reach him in one turn. I could try to double move-burrow in his direction (fuck movement penalty for slopes). Or I could ignore him, go after the puppy that's next to Saru and probably get dominated or something after expending Moment of Perfect Mind. :P
You didn't expend it, remember ;)

You made a normal Will save because you were flat-footed.
Yeah. But the next time he targets my Will I'll expend it, and then I'm defenseless for a round. [/paranoia] :P
Unless he can cast multiple spells in a round, you can just recover it every round. And at this level... I'd be really surprised if he can cast multiple spells in a round...
Actually, since Immediate actions use up your swift action for the next round, I can't, as recovering also takes a swift action.
Yes, fear the invisible caster, fear him! MWUHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!


:lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 03:33:03 PM
You know... the sheer awesomeness of burrowing through the ground to pop up next to the invisible (mage?) and scare the shit out of them makes me favor that tactic, even if it might not be the most effective. :D

One problem might be that I don't think anyone else currently knows exactly which square Mr. Sneaky-(mage?) is in in-character, except Venn/Yamamoto.

Actually, since Immediate actions use up your swift action for the next round, I can't, as recovering also takes a swift action.
Ah, that's right. Action economics in action, eh? :P


Also... the Colonel and Kalal should definitely get some of those Horizon Walker Chronocharms (and Belts of Battle later) so they can play "Whack-a-mole" with the enemies (and they'll be the moles  :lol ).
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 19, 2010, 03:37:22 PM
Come to think of it, shouldn't the caster have become visible if he targeted Harika with a spell, or is he 7th+ level and under Greater Invis? :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 03:38:14 PM
Come to think of it, shouldn't the caster have become visible if he targeted Harika with a spell, or is he 7th+ level and under Greater Invis? :D
I figured it was the latter. In which case, we should be happy we're not struggling inside an Evard's Black Tentacles or Solid Fog right now. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 03:42:01 PM
Come to think of it, shouldn't the caster have become visible if he targeted Harika with a spell, or is he 7th+ level and under Greater Invis? :D
I figured it was the latter. In which case, we should be happy we're not struggling inside an Evard's Black Tentacles or Solid Fog right now. :P
Depends on the spell, no ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 03:49:52 PM
Come to think of it, shouldn't the caster have become visible if he targeted Harika with a spell, or is he 7th+ level and under Greater Invis? :D
I figured it was the latter. In which case, we should be happy we're not struggling inside an Evard's Black Tentacles or Solid Fog right now. :P
Depends on the spell, no ;)
While we're on the topic... do you think damage reduction would be effective vs. Evard's? It specifically says it does bludgeoning damage, and it isn't a force effect.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 03:54:39 PM
Come to think of it, shouldn't the caster have become visible if he targeted Harika with a spell, or is he 7th+ level and under Greater Invis? :D
I figured it was the latter. In which case, we should be happy we're not struggling inside an Evard's Black Tentacles or Solid Fog right now. :P
Depends on the spell, no ;)
While we're on the topic... do you think damage reduction would be effective vs. Evard's? It specifically says it does bludgeoning damage, and it isn't a force effect.
Yes, it's regular damage, not energy or ability damage or something.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 19, 2010, 04:28:53 PM
Isn't Yamanu in L18? I don't mind them being close, but I don't envision the Colonel as a furry. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 04:36:21 PM
Isn't Yamanu in L18? I don't mind them being close, but I don't envision the Colonel as a furry. :P
Fixed, thanks for the reminder :)

bears, you're up next :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 04:47:02 PM
BTW, Nanshork, did you go with the old 'cat'lady thing?
I couldn't find an age on your sheet, so are you just a regular half-giant, or an old lady?

I addressed you as 'old' in the game-thread, not sure if that's correct...
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 19, 2010, 04:51:32 PM
Does concealment block AoOs?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 04:53:54 PM
Does concealment block AoOs?
Nope. Total concealment and (regular) cover do. Concealment does prevent sneak attacks, though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 19, 2010, 05:09:54 PM
And because leaving the square provokes, if I move into total concealment, I still get attacked?

I'm trying to avoid having to take the 5ft step...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 19, 2010, 05:11:41 PM
And because leaving the square provokes, if I move into total concealment, I still get attacked?

I'm trying to avoid having to take the 5ft step...
Untrained Tumble check?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 05:13:27 PM
And because leaving the square provokes, if I move into total concealment, I still get attacked?

I'm trying to avoid having to take the 5ft step...
Untrained Tumble check?
I thought Tumble was trained only? *heads of to SRD*

EDIT: Yup, trained only.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 19, 2010, 05:17:34 PM
Just did the 5ft step instead. Next round I'll be able to come up and help with the group of dudes.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 05:18:00 PM
And because leaving the square provokes, if I move into total concealment, I still get attacked?

I'm trying to avoid having to take the 5ft step...
You could take a 5' step and hide, I think. Are any of your forms good at hiding? Or you could just eat the AoO and get the hell out of dodge. Are you low on hit points?

You could also use the Withdraw action, but that's all you'd get to do for the round, basically.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 05:20:00 PM
And because leaving the square provokes, if I move into total concealment, I still get attacked?

I'm trying to avoid having to take the 5ft step...
You could take a 5' step and hide, I think. Are any of your forms good at hiding? Or you could just eat the AoO and get the hell out of dodge. Are you low on hit points?

You could also use the Withdraw action, but that's all you'd get to do for the round, basically.
Yeah, Hide being a move action but not using actual movement that would work.

And (even though I'm the DM), +1 at taking the AoO, you've got the most HP of the party IIRC.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 19, 2010, 05:35:45 PM
I also got hit pretty hard and I'm sitting at 12hp right now.

I think hiding is a great idea. I don't have any ranks but I'm Tiny so...

EDIT: Turn updated.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 05:39:23 PM
Yeah, I forgot about that, sorry :embarrassed


So, are you going to do anything with your leftover move-action (aside from moving, since you already took a 5ft.-step)?

If not, I'll post the next round of NPC actions :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 19, 2010, 05:43:58 PM
BTW, Nanshork, did you go with the old 'cat'lady thing?
I couldn't find an age on your sheet, so are you just a regular half-giant, or an old lady?

I addressed you as 'old' in the game-thread, not sure if that's correct...

I'm in my mid-fifties, it's in my description.  At the cusp of middle age for half-giants, but old compared to all you young un's. 

So in short, yes.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 05:45:46 PM
So due to Shield Other, half the damage that Goldfinger took goes to Kalal. So how are we doing the remainder? Who gets 3 and who gets 4? Also, does Kalal's damage reduction apply?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 19, 2010, 05:47:17 PM
Do I even have a general idea of where invisi-mage is?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 19, 2010, 05:49:11 PM
Do I even have a general idea of where invisi-mage is?
Since talking is a free action and both Harika and Yamanu have got it pinpointed, they could just say "cast here kthx".
Noone answered the question I had about Glitterdust, though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 05:54:52 PM
Do I even have a general idea of where invisi-mage is?
Since talking is a free actions and both Harika and Yamanu have got it pinpointed, they could just say "cast here kthx".
Indeed :)

Do I even have a general idea of where invisi-mage is?
Like Agita said, the PCs that have a general idea can give you a general area to cast in.

So due to Shield Other, half the damage that Goldfinger took goes to Kalal. So how are we doing the remainder? Who gets 3 and who gets 4? Also, does Kalal's damage reduction app
I'm going to say 3 to Kalal and 4 to Goldflower.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 19, 2010, 05:57:39 PM
Do I even have a general idea of where invisi-mage is?
Since talking is a free action and both Harika and Yamanu have got it pinpointed, they could just say "cast here kthx".
Noone answered the question I had about Glitterdust, though.

Look at my sheet under casting.  I have it specifically in case we went up against invisibles.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 05:59:02 PM
Do I even have a general idea of where invisi-mage is?
Since talking is a free action and both Harika and Yamanu have got it pinpointed, they could just say "cast here kthx".
Noone answered the question I had about Glitterdust, though.

Look at my sheet under casting.  I have it specifically in case we went up against invisibles.   :P
Good boy *pats head*

No bear-butts for you today :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 19, 2010, 05:59:29 PM
Do I even have a general idea of where invisi-mage is?
Since talking is a free action and both Harika and Yamanu have got it pinpointed, they could just say "cast here kthx".
Noone answered the question I had about Glitterdust, though.

Look at my sheet under casting.  I have it specifically in case we went up against invisibles.   :P
Naw, I meant the question about whether it actually negates concealment or only helps to pinpoint.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 06:01:42 PM
Does Kalal's damage reduction apply on the damage from Shield Other? I think probably not, but I could see it going either way, depending on how you view the spell working.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 19, 2010, 06:02:03 PM
Do I even have a general idea of where invisi-mage is?
Since talking is a free action and both Harika and Yamanu have got it pinpointed, they could just say "cast here kthx".
Noone answered the question I had about Glitterdust, though.

Look at my sheet under casting.  I have it specifically in case we went up against invisibles.   :P
Naw, I meant the question about whether it actually negates concealment or only helps to pinpoint.

Spell doesn't mention concealment at all.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 19, 2010, 06:02:47 PM
Be careful where you aim that stuff, though. Half of my schtick is hiding. :D

The dust blinds affected creatures and outlines them, so I imagine the concealment is negated since you know exactly where they are.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 19, 2010, 06:05:39 PM
@Bowen, I hid with the move action.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 19, 2010, 06:07:17 PM
The dust blinds affected creatures and outlines them, so I imagine the concealment is negated since you know exactly where they are.
I feel like I should wait until the encounter is over before continuing this argument, just in case. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 06:13:09 PM
@Bowen, I hid with the move action.
Cool :)

I'll post the NPC actions in a couple of minutes.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 19, 2010, 06:36:53 PM
Is Mr. Crabs flanking with anybody?  I know he still gets that +4 at least.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 06:41:06 PM
Is Mr. Crabs flanking with anybody?  I know he still gets that +4 at least.
No, I don't believe he is.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 06:47:45 PM
Is Mr. Crabs flanking with anybody?  I know he still gets that +4 at least.
No, I don't believe he is.
The guy he gets the +4 on ran away and hid.  :(
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 06:50:45 PM
Is Mr. Crabs flanking with anybody?  I know he still gets that +4 at least.
No, I don't believe he is.
The guy he gets the +4 on ran away and hid.  :(
And there's that...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 19, 2010, 06:52:22 PM
Bah, all those spoilers and talking about different guys I didn't know what was going on anymore.   :P

Edit: Wait, shouldn't crab have gotten an AOO?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 19, 2010, 07:01:04 PM
Bah, all those spoilers and talking about different guys I didn't know what was going on anymore.   :P

Edit: Wait, shouldn't crab have gotten an AOO?
He used tumble. So no...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 07:05:36 PM
Bah, all those spoilers and talking about different guys I didn't know what was going on anymore.   :P

Edit: Wait, shouldn't crab have gotten an AOO?
He used tumble. So no...
What Phaedrus said :)

And I've got the same problem, Nanshork, I tend to miss a couple of things every now and then as well.


I'll update tomorrow, I'm just too tired right now to be a decent DM, sorry guys.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 19, 2010, 07:06:44 PM
Bah, all those spoilers and talking about different guys I didn't know what was going on anymore.   :P

Edit: Wait, shouldn't crab have gotten an AOO?
He used tumble. So no...

You think I read through the two pages that appeared since I last check the combat thread that thoroughly?   :p
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 07:08:54 PM
Bah, all those spoilers and talking about different guys I didn't know what was going on anymore.   :P

Edit: Wait, shouldn't crab have gotten an AOO?
He used tumble. So no...

You think I read through the two pages that appeared since I last check the combat thread that thoroughly?   :p
If I can do it, so can you :P *holds up pictures of a bear's hairy ass*
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 19, 2010, 07:10:42 PM
Bah, all those spoilers and talking about different guys I didn't know what was going on anymore.   :P

Edit: Wait, shouldn't crab have gotten an AOO?
He used tumble. So no...

You think I read through the two pages that appeared since I last check the combat thread that thoroughly?   :p
If I can do it, so can you :P *holds up pictures of a bear's hairy ass*

AHH!!  I'M BLIND!!! :bigeye
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 07:17:43 PM
Bah, all those spoilers and talking about different guys I didn't know what was going on anymore.   :P

Edit: Wait, shouldn't crab have gotten an AOO?
He used tumble. So no...

You think I read through the two pages that appeared since I last check the combat thread that thoroughly?   :p
If I can do it, so can you :P *holds up pictures of a bear's hairy ass*

AHH!!  I'M BLIND!!! :bigeye

Long live nostalgia :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 19, 2010, 07:18:09 PM
Bah, all those spoilers and talking about different guys I didn't know what was going on anymore.   :P

Edit: Wait, shouldn't crab have gotten an AOO?
He used tumble. So no...

You think I read through the two pages that appeared since I last check the combat thread that thoroughly?   :p
If I can do it, so can you :P *holds up pictures of a bear's hairy ass*

AHH!!  I'M BLIND!!! :bigeye

Long live nostalgia :P

Got to love in jokes.   :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 19, 2010, 07:38:42 PM
Bah, all those spoilers and talking about different guys I didn't know what was going on anymore.   :P

Edit: Wait, shouldn't crab have gotten an AOO?
He used tumble. So no...

You think I read through the two pages that appeared since I last check the combat thread that thoroughly?   :p
If I can do it, so can you :P *holds up pictures of a bear's hairy ass*

AHH!!  I'M BLIND!!! :bigeye

Long live nostalgia :P

Got to love in jokes.   :D

Indeed :D [/Teal'c]
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 20, 2010, 11:52:21 AM
Directed by her friends, Goldflower moves backward a little and casts a spell to help them find the enemy mage.

[spoiler]
Horse five foot steps back.  I wish I wasn't on this thing anymore.

Glitterdust cast wherever I can hit the square it is in while hitting the least amount of hiding friends. 

Will save DC: 21 to avoid being blinded for 6 rounds.
[/spoiler]
As Goldflower conjurer forth a glittering dust she hears the enemy mage mocking her in goblin about the ineffectiveness of her spells.
[spoiler]The fucker actually made his safe, lucky bastard that he is: http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2413356/ (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2413356/)[/spoiler]
Whatever. The becoming visible bit doesn't offer a save, so we can see it now, which is the main perk. Him being blind is just a bonus. :P
Unless the guy has Superior Invisibility up, in which case I call bullshit on the module. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 12:07:33 PM
Directed by her friends, Goldflower moves backward a little and casts a spell to help them find the enemy mage.

[spoiler]
Horse five foot steps back.  I wish I wasn't on this thing anymore.

Glitterdust cast wherever I can hit the square it is in while hitting the least amount of hiding friends. 

Will save DC: 21 to avoid being blinded for 6 rounds.
[/spoiler]
As Goldflower conjurer forth a glittering dust she hears the enemy mage mocking her in goblin about the ineffectiveness of her spells.
[spoiler]The fucker actually made his safe, lucky bastard that he is: http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2413356/ (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2413356/)[/spoiler]
Whatever. The becoming visible bit doesn't offer a save, so we can see it now, which is the main perk. Him being blind is just a bonus. :P
Unless the guy has Superior Invisibility up, in which case I call bullshit on the module. :P
I knew I forgot something :P

Yeah, I really shouldn't stay up till 4 am :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 20, 2010, 12:22:21 PM
Meanwhile, her crab goes after the hellhound that was attacking her.
[spoiler]
Attack: 7  Damage: 5
Attack: 25  Damage: 7 (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2412781/)

Hah, that looks like a hit!  Free grapple!

Grapple: 19 Constrict damage: 14 (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2412783/)
[/spoiler]
[spoiler]It needs to spend 2 move actions to get to the enemy, so it can't make attacks.[/spoiler]

Crap, forgot about that damn 2o' move speed!  Can I change targets?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 12:29:00 PM
Meanwhile, her crab goes after the hellhound that was attacking her.
[spoiler]
Attack: 7  Damage: 5
Attack: 25  Damage: 7 (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2412781/)

Hah, that looks like a hit!  Free grapple!

Grapple: 19 Constrict damage: 14 (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2412783/)
[/spoiler]
[spoiler]It needs to spend 2 move actions to get to the enemy, so it can't make attacks.[/spoiler]

Crap, forgot about that damn 2o' move speed!  Can I change targets?
Yeah, ofcourse.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 20, 2010, 01:59:35 PM
Sorry Bowen... I had another +1 to hit from Furious Counterstrike that I forgot... Would I have hit the dog with that?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 02:07:31 PM
Would you have hit an AC 20 with that?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 20, 2010, 02:08:36 PM
Would you have hit an AC 20 with that?
No...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 20, 2010, 02:16:32 PM
Venn, if you want to tag-team the caster, you could have Yamanu delay until after the colonel so he can get his sneak attack damage from flanking. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 20, 2010, 02:53:17 PM
Well, as long as someone's adjacent to it at some point we'll get flanking bonuses. I also have my boosts to help with that so I don't need to throw away my position in initiative order. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 20, 2010, 02:58:22 PM
I'd still want to have one of us on either side of him, so he can't 5-ft. step out of both our threatened ranges, though we don't have to be flanking him directly.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 20, 2010, 03:11:48 PM
True. Still, I hate to think of giving up that delicious Initiative place. :D
Though, if I ready to attack "when Harika moves in to flank" don't I take an immediate action that still puts me before your turn? Wouldn't my initiative technically stay the same?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 20, 2010, 03:14:24 PM
True. Still, I hate to think of giving up that delicious Initiative place. :D
Though, if I ready to attack "when Harika moves in to flank" don't I take an immediate action that still puts me before your turn? Wouldn't my initiative technically stay the same?
Yeah, I guess. Technically, your initiative would go to one above Harika, so 28.

Also, is every goddamn hobbo in this module carrying a goddamn shield? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 03:17:35 PM
True. Still, I hate to think of giving up that delicious Initiative place. :D
Though, if I ready to attack "when Harika moves in to flank" don't I take an immediate action that still puts me before your turn? Wouldn't my initiative technically stay the same?
Yeah, I guess. Technically, your initiative would go to one above Harika, so 28.

Also, is every goddamn hobbo in this module carrying a goddamn shield? :P
What's wrong with shields ???
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 20, 2010, 03:32:40 PM
True. Still, I hate to think of giving up that delicious Initiative place. :D
Though, if I ready to attack "when Harika moves in to flank" don't I take an immediate action that still puts me before your turn? Wouldn't my initiative technically stay the same?
Yeah, I guess. Technically, your initiative would go to one above Harika, so 28.

Also, is every goddamn hobbo in this module carrying a goddamn shield? :P
What's wrong with shields ???
Nothing at all, just an observation.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 04:00:42 PM
True. Still, I hate to think of giving up that delicious Initiative place. :D
Though, if I ready to attack "when Harika moves in to flank" don't I take an immediate action that still puts me before your turn? Wouldn't my initiative technically stay the same?
Yeah, I guess. Technically, your initiative would go to one above Harika, so 28.

Also, is every goddamn hobbo in this module carrying a goddamn shield? :P
What's wrong with shields ???
Nothing at all, just an observation.
Hehe, yeah, most of the rank and file guys are sword and board.

Oh, and the archers have bucklers ofcourse :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 20, 2010, 05:20:16 PM
Don't forget the guys flanking Goldflower have a -4 to hit her from Kalal's stance.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 05:36:12 PM
Thanks for the reminder :)

@Venn: You can't flank with ranged attacks, can you?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 20, 2010, 06:05:22 PM
Thanks for the reminder :)

@Venn: You can't flank with ranged attacks, can you?
Well... he threatening the mage with a dagger in each hand. If he throws one dagger, he's still flanking with the other one. However, I don't think he gets the bonus to attack with it if he throws it, since it specifies on a melee attack.
When making a melee attack, you get a +2 flanking bonus if your opponent is threatened by a character or creature friendly to you on the opponent’s opposite border or opposite corner.
He is still technically flanking, though (so the Colonel will get the +2 on her attacks).
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 20, 2010, 06:18:30 PM
Ah, sorry, I'll update that. The attack roll is still 27 though. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 06:40:37 PM
Okay...

So how are you getting sneak attack and hit-and-run damage? I'm probably missing something...
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 20, 2010, 06:52:09 PM
Sneak Attack from flanking? double dex from Targetteer and Dead Eye?

I provoke an AoO from him, but unless he's got a melee attack he wants to make, I figured I'd be safe.


I guess technically this doesn't work. I'll either get the ranged bonus damage or the sneak attack since he only counts as flanked vs. a melee attack. I'll change this now.

---edit---
Done. Kept ranged attack, removed sneak attack. Still threatening enemy due to weapons held.

You mainly questioned it because I would have killed him, wouldn't I have? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 07:09:04 PM
Hehe, no :lol

@Nanshork: got your PM, will edit in a minute :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 20, 2010, 07:17:17 PM
Hehe, no :lol

Drat.  :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 20, 2010, 07:26:58 PM
Drat, I should've readied an action to attack him if he moves or casts, but I didn't want to ruin my position in the Init order in case I could kill him since the fluff said he's severely wounded...
Oh well, no changing my plans after seeing how my roll turns out. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 07:31:19 PM
Almost there ;)

I'll have a post up in a couple of minutes.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 08:02:16 PM
Bend over guys ;)

Okay bears, you're up :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 20, 2010, 08:06:43 PM
No. :P

Any AoOs on the guys that moved around?
And noone charged? Aww. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 08:08:03 PM
No. :P

Any AoOs on the guys that moved around?
And noone charged? Aww. :P
The first guy charged, but missed :P

And no, no AoOs, they moved around your threatened area :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 20, 2010, 08:11:00 PM
No. :P

Any AoOs on the guys that moved around?
And noone charged? Aww. :P
The first guy charged, but missed :P
You need to tell me stuff like that. :P *points to Steadfast Boots*

(http://s3-llnw-screenshots.wegame.com/4-9411709197873304/9411709197873304_l.png)

:D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 08:14:57 PM
No. :P

Any AoOs on the guys that moved around?
And noone charged? Aww. :P
The first guy charged, but missed :P
You need to tell me stuff like that. :P *points to Steadfast Boots*

(http://s3-llnw-screenshots.wegame.com/4-9411709197873304/9411709197873304_l.png)

:D
It was in the OOC spoiler block :fu

:P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 20, 2010, 08:23:02 PM
It was in the OOC spoiler block :fu

:P
:embarrassed Drat, foiled by my awesome skimming skills! :P

One double-damage facerape for RW4, coming right up.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 20, 2010, 08:46:42 PM
It was in the OOC spoiler block :fu

:P
:embarrassed Drat, foiled by my awesome skimming skills! :P

One double-damage facerape for RW4, coming right up.
Nice :)

Gotta love them boots :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 20, 2010, 09:27:48 PM
So not a single one of those warriors provoked an AoO from me? The all popped in next to me from odd angles?
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 20, 2010, 11:55:02 PM
You said in the topic that the crab is grappling HH2. Did you mean HH1?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 21, 2010, 12:32:12 AM
Ok, so how about a hit point summary? Who is fucked up and how bad? I'm doing fine (51/59, 5 delayed).

Goldilocks might think of using this, also:

You can cast a spell normally if your mount moves up to a normal move (its speed) either before or after you cast. If you have your mount move both before and after you cast a spell, then you’re casting the spell while the mount is moving, and you have to make a Concentration check due to the vigorous motion (DC 10 + spell level) or lose the spell.

She could move in and out of the Obscuring Mist to avoid attacks.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 21, 2010, 02:18:00 AM
I'm at 42 out of 54, but I'm also surrounded by hobgoblins. I could use some darkness or something over here. :O
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 21, 2010, 08:24:57 AM
I'm at like 20.

Saru has decent Charisma, right? I wonder if he (or someone else) could handle my horsie to go chomp on something. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 08:26:10 AM
So not a single one of those warriors provoked an AoO from me? The all popped in next to me from odd angles?
Correct, tactics and all that ;)
These aren't random (non-Eberron/traditional) Orc marauders or something :P


You said in the topic that the crab is grappling HH2. Did you mean HH1?
No, I meant HH2. Nanshork changed his actions because getting to HH1 would cost a double move and not allow the crab to attack anymore.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 21, 2010, 10:13:59 AM
I'm at 42 out of 54, but I'm also surrounded by hobgoblins. I could use some darkness or something over here. :O
I can do that. Trying to keep Goldilocks from being beaten to death over here too, though. She seems to like using her face as a shield. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 10:23:15 AM
I'm at 42 out of 54, but I'm also surrounded by hobgoblins. I could use some darkness or something over here. :O
I can do that. Trying to keep Goldilocks from being beaten to death over here too, though. She seems to like using her face as a shield. :P
:lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 21, 2010, 10:50:50 AM
So whose turn is it? Saru?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 10:51:48 AM
Yup, waiting for bears.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 21, 2010, 02:08:39 PM
Sorry. Had work to do last night and am very confused by the map.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 02:20:23 PM
Sorry. Had work to do last night and am very confused by the map.
What's confusing you?
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 21, 2010, 02:54:11 PM
I think I got it now. Mostly where the Hell Hound and the BB are.

Where is BB?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 21, 2010, 03:02:51 PM
Next to Yamanu, I think.
Speaking of which, we've got a good amount of bunched-up enemies around us. :D
Also, if you put an earea effect on us, the caster will very likely croak it, so that's a bonus. Do try not to entangle us, though. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 03:05:16 PM
Next to Yamanu, yes (in P18, to be precise).
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 21, 2010, 03:27:19 PM
Okay, I want to fly south and entangle that group of people.

Can you update the map so I can see where they are? I can't seem to figure it out from the posts.

sorry  :embarrassed
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 03:36:49 PM
No problem, I was thinking about doing that anyway.

But first, I'm of to have some diner, will have the map up later tonight.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 04:45:39 PM
Map is up :)

Enjoy the pileup.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 21, 2010, 04:52:01 PM
Note that RW4 is at negative hp.
And also that the colonel doesn't have Evasion. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 05:13:44 PM
Ah yes, I forgot to black out RW4.
Ow well, I'm sure you guys can remember that little detail :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 21, 2010, 05:35:15 PM
Next to Yamanu, I think.
Speaking of which, we've got a good amount of bunched-up enemies around us. :D
Also, if you put an earea effect on us, the caster will very likely croak it, so that's a bonus. Do try not to entangle us, though. :P
Well, we're immune to his breath weapon, so are we also immune to the entangling effect since it's based from the BW?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 21, 2010, 05:37:39 PM
Next to Yamanu, I think.
Speaking of which, we've got a good amount of bunched-up enemies around us. :D
Also, if you put an earea effect on us, the caster will very likely croak it, so that's a bonus. Do try not to entangle us, though. :P
Well, we're immune to his breath weapon, so are we also immune to the entangling effect since it's based from the BW?
:facepalm

Right. Basic DFA tactics. Silly me.
Nevermind, napalm away. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 05:38:54 PM
Next to Yamanu, I think.
Speaking of which, we've got a good amount of bunched-up enemies around us. :D
Also, if you put an earea effect on us, the caster will very likely croak it, so that's a bonus. Do try not to entangle us, though. :P
Well, we're immune to his breath weapon, so are we also immune to the entangling effect since it's based from the BW?
Yup, that's the idea :)
You don't take damage from it, so you're not affected by Entangling Exhalation either.

It's like party-friendly napalm-bombing :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 21, 2010, 06:07:05 PM
Kal and Gol, you two can take care of the two up there, right?

If RW4 is dead I think I can hit.. 5,6,7 and the caster in one breath. Nice.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 06:17:38 PM
DC on breath weapon plox :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 21, 2010, 06:29:17 PM
Phaedrus and Nanshork are up :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 21, 2010, 07:20:17 PM
whoopsies. I knew I forgot something. DC 23.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 21, 2010, 10:25:57 PM
Kal and Gol, you two can take care of the two up there, right?

If RW4 is dead I think I can hit.. 5,6,7 and the caster in one breath. Nice.
I can take care of these two, if Goldflower can manage not to be killed by them, yeah. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 21, 2010, 10:57:56 PM
Kal and Gol, you two can take care of the two up there, right?

If RW4 is dead I think I can hit.. 5,6,7 and the caster in one breath. Nice.
I can take care of these two, if Goldflower can manage not to be killed by them, yeah. :P

I'm trying!
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 21, 2010, 11:17:08 PM
Hooray, invisible! :D
---------
So, just waiting on Bowen to finish up the round, then?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 23, 2010, 01:30:52 PM
Jup, but I'm a wreck right now, so that'll probably have to wait 'till tomorrow morning (GMT+1), sorry guys, but otherwise I'd just end up making a lot of mistakes.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 23, 2010, 01:33:19 PM
Jup, but I'm a wreck right now, so that'll probably have to wait 'till tomorrow morning (GMT+1), sorry guys, but otherwise I'd just end up making a lot of mistakes.

No worries, it just gives me more excuses to bitch. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 23, 2010, 02:11:48 PM
It's fine, I just pulled an all-nighter myself, so I'm going to be on-and-off all day. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 11:44:16 AM
Working on an update, need a response from Phaedrus and Nanshork before I can finish it though (see ingame replies to your last posts) :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 11:52:34 AM
I think I'm going to die.  I blame the horse.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 12:06:30 PM
Why blame the horse? :P

Also, see ingame reply plox.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 12:12:25 PM
I think I'm going to die.  I blame the horse.
Don't forget that you can use your mount for cover with a DC 15 ride check. That will give you another +4 AC.

And... let me remind you that you have Invisibility at will as a SLA. So you could have the horse move 5' and then make yourself Invisible, and then dismount with your own move action. The hobgoblin won't know where you went. I'd probably do that.


No, I don't want to change my actions. I figure Venn can kill one guy per attack if he's invisible. Each of his attacks does like twice what one of mine does, and he can attack multiple times per round. So it is better to enable him than to attack myself.

I can hit Goldflower with an immediate action Close Wounds on top of what I posted, though. I thought I'd hold it to see who actually needs it, but if she goes into the mist I won't be able to use it on her. So I'll do that.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 12:14:18 PM
My ride check is one, it's not worth trying.

I'll become invisible when either I'm in the mist or my horse dies.  We'll see which one happens first.   :p
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 24, 2010, 12:15:51 PM
My ride check is one, it's not worth trying.
Why not? It doesn't take an action, and you can try it untrained.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 12:16:37 PM
My ride check is one, it's not worth trying.
Why not? It doesn't take an action, and you can try it untrained.

Because my horse is threatening AOOs and not me?   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 12:17:46 PM
My ride check is one, it's not worth trying.
Why not? It doesn't take an action, and you can try it untrained.

Because my horse is threatening AOOs and not me?   :P
If your mount moves, you move also. You both draw Attacks of Opportunity, actually.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 12:18:59 PM
My ride check is one, it's not worth trying.
Why not? It doesn't take an action, and you can try it untrained.

Because my horse is threatening AOOs and not me?   :P
If your mount moves, you move also. You both draw Attacks of Opportunity, actually.
You do? I didn't know about that...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 12:19:28 PM
My ride check is one, it's not worth trying.
Why not? It doesn't take an action, and you can try it untrained.

Because my horse is threatening AOOs and not me?   :P
If your mount moves, you move also. You both draw Attacks of Opportunity, actually.
You do? I didn't know about that...

I didn't either.  Stupid horse....
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 12:20:48 PM
My ride check is one, it's not worth trying.
Why not? It doesn't take an action, and you can try it untrained.

Because my horse is threatening AOOs and not me?   :P
If your mount moves, you move also. You both draw Attacks of Opportunity, actually.
You do? I didn't know about that...
Of course. Just like you draw an AoO if someone bull rushes you past an opponent. It doesn't matter how you move, just that you move.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 12:21:55 PM
Also, Phaedrus, your mule can't 5ft step to attack the hellhound, it's in K10 now, not in K11 anymore (as posted here: http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7070.msg237567#msg237567 (http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7070.msg237567#msg237567))
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 12:24:49 PM
Also, Phaedrus, your mule can't 5ft step to attack the hellhound, it's in K10 now, not in K11 anymore (as posted here: http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7070.msg237567#msg237567 (http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7070.msg237567#msg237567))
Gah... freakin' spoilers... Well, it hit with the first attack. Can I keep that one? I could have just directed the mount to move instead of 5' step.

That means the bastard is inside the mist, also... Crap.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 12:25:54 PM
Also, Phaedrus, your mule can't 5ft step to attack the hellhound, it's in K10 now, not in K11 anymore (as posted here: http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7070.msg237567#msg237567 (http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7070.msg237567#msg237567))
Gah... freakin' spoilers... Well, it hit with the first attack. Can I keep that one?
Yeah, ofcourse :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 12:27:24 PM
Miss chance for mule (low misses): 1d100=93 (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2417976/)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 12:33:05 PM
Getting too complicated, changing action!
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 12:35:14 PM
Getting too complicated, changing action!
As long as she doesn't end adjacent to the hell hound, I think she has a decent chance of avoiding her attackers by turning invisible and then dismounting towards the hobgoblin. He won't know she's actually right next to him (unless he has scent or something weird), and the hell hound would have to spend a move action to get her direction using its scent. To actually attack her immediately, they'd have to just guess which square she's in (or get a Listen check 20 points higher than her Move Silently check to pinpoint her, with a -5 penalty for being in combat).

Edit: Not there! M9 or N8. If you hop off right next to the hell hound, it can automatically pinpoint you and attack. If you don't, it has to either move around randomly to try and find you, or spend a move action to get your direction.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 12:37:44 PM
I wasn't paying attention to the hellhounds movement, sorry. 

Question: Why would the spellcaster want to be next to a hobgoblin?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 12:39:00 PM
I wasn't paying attention to the hellhounds movement, sorry.  

Question: Why would the spellcaster want to be next to a hobgoblin?
Because she understands the scent ability? And knows hobgoblins don't typically have it?

Anyway, that's my suggestion. Sorry for being pushy. It's your character. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 12:41:09 PM
I wasn't paying attention to the hellhounds movement, sorry.  

Question: Why would the spellcaster want to be next to a hobgoblin?
Because she understands the scent ability? And knows hobgoblins don't typically have it?

Anyway, that's my suggestion. Sorry for being pushy. It's your character. :P

I meant: Why would the spellcaster want to be next to ANY ENEMY?   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 12:48:48 PM
Hey, here's what I think is an even better idea. Have the horse 5' step backwards into the mist, turn invisible, and then dismount IN FRONT OF IT. They'll sure as hell never expect that.  :lol As long as you don't wind up right next to the hound, they should have a hell of a time finding you I think.

Square M or N 11 for that, I guess. That way, you won't be adjacent to either enemy, so even if the hobgoblin has Scent they still won't easily know where you went.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 01:25:47 PM
Yeah, screw you guys, I just finally finished the update after having to change the map 2 or 3 times already :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 24, 2010, 01:34:50 PM
Yeah, screw you guys, I just finally finished the update after having to change the map 2 or 3 times already :P
Changing the map is easier with maptool. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 01:38:12 PM
Edit: Ok... FINAL OFFER... have Goldflower move to L12 after becoming invisible. That way, anyone that wants to attack her will suffer the -4 penalty from Kalal's stance. YES I AM CRAZY! :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 01:55:42 PM
Yeah, screw you guys, I just finally finished the update after having to change the map 2 or 3 times already :P
Changing the map is easier with maptool. :P
:banghead

:lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 02:08:25 PM
Edit: Ok... FINAL OFFER... have Goldflower move to L12 after becoming invisible. That way, anyone that wants to attack her will suffer the -4 penalty from Kalal's stance. YES I AM CRAZY! :P

Map is up, too late now.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 02:22:32 PM
So, aside from the fact that Nanshork now hates horses with the fiery intensity of a thousand suns, any other thoughts about this first encounter so far? :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 02:26:10 PM
We need to level up soon, I'm not impressed with my summons.   :banghead
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 02:33:57 PM
Really? I think they did pretty well.

I mean, sure, that Demon didn't hit much (at least partially due to sucky rolls IIRC), but it did absorb 2 or 3 rounds worth of full attacks and prevent some tactical movement.


Will level 6 give your character a big boost?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 02:38:49 PM
Really? I think they did pretty well.

I mean, sure, that Demon didn't hit that much, but it did absorb 2 or 3 rounds worth of full attacks and prevent some tactical movement.


Will level 6 give your character a big boost?

Oh they didn't do horrible, I just had higher expectations (mainly for the demon).  My crab kicked your ass.   :P

I'm AFB so I know my summons will get a boost but I think it's just longer duration until later.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 03:02:13 PM
So, aside from the fact that Nanshork now hates horses with the fiery intensity of a thousand suns, any other thoughts about this first encounter so far? :)
So far, so good. I'm actually really liking the mobility that being mounted offers. I think I'll definitely get enough Prestige Paladin levels for the mount and take that Holy Mount feat, although it is kind of a tough choice as there are so many other feats that I want, and it will mean losing at least one more caster level and also spending resources on buffing the mount and keeping it alive...
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 24, 2010, 03:41:47 PM
I think I'm going to take Rapid Breath soon. Getting a free Power Surge on every breath will be huge.

And I didn't realize how small the range on the breath was. I can't wait till level 11 when it increases.  :P

(Is there an item that increases it? The feat for it has a pretty hefty cost)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 24, 2010, 03:50:26 PM
All I can think of would be the metabreath feat. Typically, breath weapons don't get much support from items. If there were, man my Dragon Shaman could have used something like that in one of the RL games I used to play. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 24, 2010, 04:02:22 PM
I'm mounting my horse starting next encounter. In this encounter I've mostly ignored it because I didn't have the actions to spare to handle it (and I also realized I haven't picked its tricks yet... :P), but an extra meatshield+big move speed+additional full attack sequence is too good to pass up on until the horse becomes cannon fodder (which I think it won't become for a few levels, beefed up as it is :D).

Also, next level means WRT. Merry Christmas, Mr. DPR and Ms. BFC.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 04:34:43 PM
Damnit, just enough damage to drop him :P

Nice job, Venn :)


Agita, you're up next.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 24, 2010, 04:39:49 PM
Alright, another in my list of things to be done. I'll try to fit you in between my solo game on MW and homework. :P

Venn, better search these guys thoroughly after we're done. I'm betting they have magic items. I want to AoO invisible creatures too. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 04:43:20 PM
Alright, another in my list of things to be done. I'll try to fit you in between my solo game on MW and homework. :P

Venn, better search these guys thoroughly after we're done. I'm betting they have magic items. I want to AoO invisible creatures too. ;)
Bitch, please, they're Hobgoblins (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/monsters/hobgoblin.htm) :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 24, 2010, 04:47:35 PM
Bowen, do they specifically see me? You've got to be careful throwing phrases like "flat-footed" around. If they're just not flat-footed, then they don't take hit-and-run damage, which I didn't include. They take the targetteer and dead eye damage as they're not precision damage, and if I'm still invisible to them from my ring of the darkhidden and the No Light spell, I'd get my sneak attack and have total concealment from them, meaning they can't make AoO's.

If they specifically have See Invisibility on them, though, then that caster of their's sure had some sneaky insight into what was coming at them and with what tactics. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 04:57:31 PM
Bowen, do they specifically see me? You've got to be careful throwing phrases like "flat-footed" around. If they're just not flat-footed, then they don't take hit-and-run damage, which I didn't include. They take the targetteer and dead eye damage as they're not precision damage, and if I'm still invisible to them from my ring of the darkhidden and the No Light spell, I'd get my sneak attack and have total concealment from them, meaning they can't make AoO's.

If they specifically have See Invisibility on them, though, then that caster of their's sure had some sneaky insight into what was coming at them and with what tactics. :P
Wait, you've got a Ring of the Darkhidden?

That makes you invisible to Darkvision, doesn't it? :banghead


EDIT: Edited ingame post.

A note to everyone, please note any important conditional things/effects/items when they might come up, such as a Ring of the Darkhidden in an area of darkness, so I can prevent miscommunications like this in the future :)

I don't go over your entire sheets each and every time to see if I missed anything, I just check stuff like AC, the basics ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 24, 2010, 05:02:50 PM
Bowen, do they specifically see me? You've got to be careful throwing phrases like "flat-footed" around. If they're just not flat-footed, then they don't take hit-and-run damage, which I didn't include. They take the targetteer and dead eye damage as they're not precision damage, and if I'm still invisible to them from my ring of the darkhidden and the No Light spell, I'd get my sneak attack and have total concealment from them, meaning they can't make AoO's.

If they specifically have See Invisibility on them, though, then that caster of their's sure had some sneaky insight into what was coming at them and with what tactics. :P
Wait, you've got a Ring of the Darkhidden?

That makes you invisible to Darkvision, doesn't it? :banghead
Aye, that's the entire point. Hence my comment. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 05:03:13 PM
Bowen, do they specifically see me? You've got to be careful throwing phrases like "flat-footed" around. If they're just not flat-footed, then they don't take hit-and-run damage, which I didn't include. They take the targetteer and dead eye damage as they're not precision damage, and if I'm still invisible to them from my ring of the darkhidden and the No Light spell, I'd get my sneak attack and have total concealment from them, meaning they can't make AoO's.

If they specifically have See Invisibility on them, though, then that caster of their's sure had some sneaky insight into what was coming at them and with what tactics. :P
Wait, you've got a Ring of the Darkhidden?

That makes you invisible to Darkvision, doesn't it? :banghead
Aye, that's the entire point. Hence my comment. :D
See edit :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 24, 2010, 05:08:47 PM
We actually had a whole discussion about ways to get No Light and/or Darkness so I could combine it with my ring of the darkhidden. Remember discouraging me from adding a level of warlock to my build for just that purpose? :D

Also may I point out:
Hooray, invisible! :D
---------
So, just waiting on Bowen to finish up the round, then?
----------

I'll take a page out of my peers' books though and add the combat stats block to my combat posts, though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 05:31:39 PM
Yeah, I thought you just forgot about Hobbos having Darkvision, and that that was why you thought you were effectively invisible.

Assuming is bad, m'kay :embarrassed
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 05:52:19 PM
I just realized something that makes me happy.  My crab has darkvision!
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 24, 2010, 06:00:28 PM
Tumble succesful, the Colonel is at K17 and benefits from concealment. (L17 doesn't have a portion of 'tree' in it, so doesn't grant concealment. I hope this change of position is okay, otherwise let me know ;))
Oh, I thought everything green counted as undergrowth. Yeah, change is fine with me. So the grass is not difficult terrain then?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 06:16:21 PM
Tumble succesful, the Colonel is at K17 and benefits from concealment. (L17 doesn't have a portion of 'tree' in it, so doesn't grant concealment. I hope this change of position is okay, otherwise let me know ;))
Oh, I thought everything green counted as undergrowth. Yeah, change is fine with me. So the grass is not difficult terrain then?
I made a booboo, ninja-edited ;)

You're good at L17.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 06:43:22 PM
And Kalal and Goldflower are up.
Good luck with that AoO, Phaedrus :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 24, 2010, 06:44:26 PM
What enemies are still alive in the area of no-light?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 24, 2010, 06:49:50 PM
RW6 is the only one left standing. He's currently at L18.

RW8 is dead and all of the others are dying.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 07:33:01 PM
I think I'm within 30' of the Colonel, so I'm including her +1 aura in Kalal's attacks.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 24, 2010, 07:45:52 PM
IIRC, Stand Still forces a Ref save, not Fort.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 24, 2010, 07:52:56 PM
IIRC, Stand Still forces a Ref save, not Fort.
Oops. You're right.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 25, 2010, 08:01:37 AM
Will have the next round up in a bit, should be the last one, guys :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 25, 2010, 11:23:01 AM
And it's up, enjoy sweeping up the last bits of the encounter :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 25, 2010, 11:24:50 AM
So, Venn. You want the kill on RW6 (and then I'd go after RW3) or should I take it? :D
Though I guess it's easier for you to kill whoever you want than for me.

We should also try to talk to one of them just before killing him to give Bowen an excuse for Ominous Foreshadowing.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 25, 2010, 11:34:25 AM
We should also try to talk to one of them just before killing him to give Bowen an excuse for Ominous Foreshadowing.
Yeah, I was thinking the one over near me is hardly hurt. He'll probably be the last to drop. So let's talk to him. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 25, 2010, 11:37:31 AM
We should also try to talk to one of them just before killing him to give Bowen an excuse for Ominous Foreshadowing.
Yeah, I was thinking the one over near me is hardly hurt. He'll probably be the last to drop. So let's talk to him. :D
Wasn't RW3 one of the two guys we were duking it out with at the very beginning of the combat? He's got to have taken a hit or two from you or me. (too lazy to look it up, though :P).
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 25, 2010, 11:38:03 AM
Don't forget that all of the dropped Hobgoblins except for one aren't actually dead yet, just dying ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 25, 2010, 11:38:52 AM
We should also try to talk to one of them just before killing him to give Bowen an excuse for Ominous Foreshadowing.
Yeah, I was thinking the one over near me is hardly hurt. He'll probably be the last to drop. So let's talk to him. :D
Wasn't RW3 one of the two guys we were duking it out with at the very beginning of the combat? He's got to have taken a hit or two from you or me. (too lazy to look it up, though :P).
I do believe he's actually still at full health. And yes, he's been around since the beginning.

He's a tough little bugger :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 25, 2010, 11:39:54 AM
Maybe we should let him go. Then perhaps Bowen would make him a recurring NPC and we'd eventually develop injokes about how badass the guy is. :P

Don't forget that all of the dropped Hobgoblins except for one aren't actually dead yet, just dying ;)
So we just sit there waiting until they bleed out onto the ground and kill any that stand up? :P
Alternatively, bears can just area-mercykill them with his breath.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 25, 2010, 11:43:08 AM
Maybe we should let him go. Then perhaps Bowen would make him a recurring NPC and we'd eventually develop injokes about how badass the guy is. :P

Don't forget that all of the dropped Hobgoblins except for one aren't actually dead yet, just dying ;)
So we just sit there waiting until they bleed out onto the ground and kill any that stand up? :P
Alternatively, bears can just area-mercykill them with his breath.
Hehe, awesome :P

What I meant with the dying guys was that it's not a disaster if you accidentally kill one of the two remaining hobbos since you can always stabilize one of the dying ones for later interrogation ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 25, 2010, 11:46:01 AM
We also have a hound to put down. ;)

Anyway, I guess it's easier for you to get to RW 3, so I'll take care of the bugger next to you. At class right now though, will get to it soon.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 25, 2010, 11:48:48 AM
Actually, since the green stuff is difficult terrain, I'd be hard-pressed to find a way to move+attack.
Well, I guess I could charge with my burrow speed. :plot
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 25, 2010, 11:51:46 AM
Actually, since the green stuff is difficult terrain, I'd be hard-pressed to find a way to move+attack.
Well, I guess I could charge with my burrow speed. :plot
You can't, unfortunately.

Creatures cannot charge or run while burrowing.

http://www.d20srd.org/srd/specialAbilities.htm#burrow

I think you can jump while charging, though...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 25, 2010, 11:54:54 AM
Aw.
Well, I can't charge through difficult terrain in the first place. I can probably jump down the slope to avoid spending 4 squares of movement on it, but that's about it.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 25, 2010, 12:30:40 PM
So wait, the grass next to the trees is difficult terrain as well? That's odd. :o

In that case I'll go after RW3 and you can take care of RW6.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 25, 2010, 12:32:30 PM
So wait, the grass next to the trees is difficult terrain as well? That's odd. :o
Bowen lettig me gain concealment in L17 indicates that, yes, that seems to be undergrowth too.
Which makes me doubt why anyone would build a house there - speaking of which, we need to search that.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 25, 2010, 12:34:53 PM
So wait, the grass next to the trees is difficult terrain as well? That's odd. :o
Bowen lettig me gain concealment in L17 indicates that, yes, that seems to be undergrowth too.
Which makes me doubt why anyone would build a house there - speaking of which, we need to search that.
Yeah, the description of the map definitely counts as funky, I know. The book could have made a bit more sense...
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 25, 2010, 06:44:39 PM
Ok... I know we already started, but... could I rework my character slightly? And are/can we using partial save and BAB progression? I didn't ask before because it wouldn't have mattered, but I'd like to swap out one of my existing cleric levels for Church Inquisitor.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 25, 2010, 06:53:46 PM
Retraining is fine (but after this combat ;)).

We're not using partial BAB/saves though.


EDIT: I don't want to completely ignore fluff though, although reflavoring is fine.
IIRC Church Inquisitors are members of an order/organisation, right?

Any ideas for that?

I just want to keep some level of fluff, I hope you understand :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 25, 2010, 07:32:22 PM
Well, I had in his fluff that he joined a cult that worships one of the progenitor dragons (other than Kyber, obviously). I kind of waffled back and forth about whether it was Syberis or Eberron, but said Eberron in the end because it fits better with the whole "earth" theme he has going, but I could go either way if you'd prefer Syberis. He lived with them for a bit as an escaped slave, and then was recaptured.

I could just add that he uncovered a traitor that was going to turn the rest of them over to their former masters (the whole cult/colony was escaped slaves), but he was too late to stop them. So he was re-enslaved, and that's when they added the mineral warrior template to him as a kind of joke (oh, you worship Eberron now, eh?), and to make him tougher in the arena. (Or maybe I could say it was a "gift" from Eberron?)

I'd also like to reflavor his Animal Devotion feat to be "Dragon Devotion". It would work exactly the same, but the fluff and physical manifestations would be dragon-themed instead of animal.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 25, 2010, 07:43:35 PM
Sounds good to me :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 25, 2010, 08:17:59 PM
Holy crap... the skills are killing me. I realize now that I couldn't even get into Ruby Knight Vindicator with my current setup until WAY late in the game. So screw it. I'm just going to take the 2nd level of Crusader instead to get Thicket of Blades at 8th level (or maybe just take it with the martial stance feat). I probably won't bother with Church Inquisitor, either, as I don't want to lose another point of BAB. I'll just stick with my current character, and retrain the ranks I'd dumped into Hide to try and get into RKV into something else. I'll take 3 levels of Prestige Paladin and then just more cleric with the Holy Mount feat.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 25, 2010, 08:31:59 PM
Yeah, RKV does have pretty steep entry requirements in terms of skills.

EDIT: Would the increase in skill points from Cloistered Cleric help? Sure, you lose one point of BAB and a few HP, but it might be worth it...

Just a thought.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 25, 2010, 11:00:49 PM
The thing is, that will delay entering prestige paladin by another level, which means I won't be able to pick up Battle Blessing at 6th. I honestly don't think it is worth it.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 09:22:52 AM
Ah, right, forgot about that BAB requirement.

Yeah, I think as long as you pick up Thicket of Blades, you should have melee battlefield control covered, not many maneuvers that help with that aside from Thicket.
And since you wouldn't get to RKV 7 anyway...


I think advancing as a Cleric (or Cleric PrC) instead of RKV should work fine :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 26, 2010, 09:54:20 AM
11 points of damage, so after DR that's 3 total.

Yay for crits :lol
Counter point: Yay for Damage Reduction. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 10:28:05 AM
11 points of damage, so after DR that's 3 total.

Yay for crits :lol
Counter point: Yay for Damage Reduction. :P
Yeah, I know, that's why I was happy with the crit, that way he did at least some damage :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 10:29:31 AM
Ow, and Phaedrus, regarding your question about casters earlier on:
Yes, there will be casters. Not in every encounter, but there will be at least some casters.

I don't want to spoil too much though...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 01:32:01 PM
bears, I see you :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown February 26, 2010, 01:41:12 PM
bears, I see you :P

Oh! it's my turn! Sorry, posting it now.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 02:27:28 PM
Okay, Phaedrus and Nanshork, finish the job :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 26, 2010, 02:54:37 PM
Ow, and Phaedrus, regarding your question about casters earlier on:
Yes, there will be casters. Not in every encounter, but there will be at least some casters.

I don't want to spoil too much though...
Competent casters, or what WotC and too many players think are casters? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 03:13:14 PM
Ow, and Phaedrus, regarding your question about casters earlier on:
Yes, there will be casters. Not in every encounter, but there will be at least some casters.

I don't want to spoil too much though...
Competent casters, or what WotC and too many players think are casters? :P
Competent.

Like I said, all NPCs are at least somewhat tweaked in terms of feats, skills and spell selection by yours truly :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 03:16:47 PM
Congrats guys, you've succesfully murderized your first group of enemies :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 26, 2010, 03:17:34 PM
Yay!

First things first: We drink the tasty, tasty XP from their bleeding bodies!
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 03:35:11 PM
Yay!

First things first: We drink the tasty, tasty XP from their bleeding bodies!
Yes, speaking of XP, I'm thinking about changing that a bit (don't worry, it won't have any negative effect on your characters).

Due to the generally slow pace of PbPs I'm thinking about just dropping random encounters alltogether and only run scripted encounters. At least that way we'll make some actual progress :)

If I do this, I'll ofcourse increase the XP you guys get from the scripted encounters (without actually upping their EL ofcourse).


Any thoughts?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 26, 2010, 03:40:04 PM
Sounds good to me.

Now, about that level I need to go up... :flutter
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 03:42:09 PM
Yeah, yeah :P

Colonel Harika leveled up to level 5.
Everyone else is still level 5.

I'll get an exact number of XP either later on tonight or tomorrow.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 26, 2010, 03:48:15 PM
Yay.

I believe you said to PXY somewhere that the maneuver retraining mechanic for swapping lower-level maneuvers for higher-level ones applies to Stances too?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 04:03:12 PM
Jup.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 26, 2010, 04:07:11 PM
In that case, maybe I'll train out either Hunter's Sense or Punishing Stance for one of Pearl of Black Doubt or Tactics of the Wolf. Opinions? PoBD fits very well thematically, but may become obsolete when AC stops mattering. TotW is a small bonus now, but may or may not become significant.

And, naturally, I'm picking up WRT now.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 26, 2010, 04:58:28 PM
In that case, maybe I'll train out either Hunter's Sense or Punishing Stance for one of Pearl of Black Doubt or Tactics of the Wolf. Opinions? PoBD fits very well thematically, but may become obsolete when AC stops mattering. TotW is a small bonus now, but may or may not become significant.

And, naturally, I'm picking up WRT now.
:D

Mind if I swap out my skill points in Hide to Concentration and Ride instead? Or want me to wait till I level up?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 05:01:51 PM
In that case, maybe I'll train out either Hunter's Sense or Punishing Stance for one of Pearl of Black Doubt or Tactics of the Wolf. Opinions? PoBD fits very well thematically, but may become obsolete when AC stops mattering. TotW is a small bonus now, but may or may not become significant.

And, naturally, I'm picking up WRT now.
:D

Mind if I swap out my skill points in Hide to Concentration and Ride instead? Or want me to wait till I level up?

Go ahead :)

EDIT: Also, posted loot :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 26, 2010, 05:28:32 PM
Wasn't I given a free Artificer's Monocle that I never wrote down?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 26, 2010, 05:29:49 PM
Potions and Scrolls are really easy to identify even without one, though. You just need a Spellcraft check, and you're a caster, so...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 26, 2010, 05:38:21 PM
Potions and Scrolls are really easy to identify even without one, though. You just need a Spellcraft check, and you're a caster, so...

It's still important.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 05:43:30 PM
Wasn't I given a free Artificer's Monocle that I never wrote down?
IIRC you were, yes :)

Now write that damn thing down already :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 26, 2010, 07:54:49 PM
Off the top of my head, the Identify effect is activated by simply staring at whatever you're identifying for one minute under a Detect Magic spell, with no limit on uses/day.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 26, 2010, 08:01:54 PM
So... I read Goldflower's spoiler. :P

Is the Light of Syberis a cult opposed to the Cult of the Dragon Below? Is there also a cult devoted to Eberon? Or should I say that Kalal is part of the Light of Syberis?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 08:08:00 PM
Bad Phaedrus, bad! *hits PXY with rolled-up newspaper* :lol


Yeah, the Light of Syberis is the most directly opposed to those trying to release Tiamat.
Seeing as she corrupts those spawned from Eberron as well, you could also stick with that though.

Maybe see if you can find something interesting in Dragons of Eberron if you have it/can get your hands on it? It has some pretty cool fluff :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 26, 2010, 08:09:24 PM
Okay, it's official.  Whenever we run into the BBEG everybody is going to burst into laughter because Goldflower's personality is getting out of control.   :p
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 08:11:05 PM
Okay, it's official.  Whenever we run into the BBEG everybody is going to burst into laughter because Goldflower's personality is getting out of control.   :p
:lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 26, 2010, 08:29:06 PM
Okay, it's official.  Whenever we run into the BBEG everybody is going to burst into laughter because Goldflower's personality is getting out of control.   :p
:lol

I called Tiamat a "naughty naughty dragon".  I don't even know where that came from.   :p
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 26, 2010, 08:32:13 PM
Maybe you're just digging a little too deep to pull in that "Mama Hippie" personality for her? :D

It's entertaining, though. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 08:34:58 PM
It's entertaining, though. :P
Just like the 'banter' between the Colonel and Yamanu :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 26, 2010, 08:36:07 PM
Well, having two characters with militaristic backgrounds, but two entirely different militaristic backgrounds, will typically result in minor conflict. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 26, 2010, 08:37:43 PM
Makes for a fun read, though :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork February 27, 2010, 05:12:29 PM
So how much do I get healed for from the wand?   :p
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 27, 2010, 05:15:23 PM
Assuming CL 1, you'd heal 11 HP IIRC.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 27, 2010, 05:21:57 PM
I'd also like a shot from the wand. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 27, 2010, 05:28:59 PM
I'd also like a shot from the wand. :D
You sound like a drug addict :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 27, 2010, 05:35:33 PM
That's why I said shot instead of "hit" ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 27, 2010, 05:54:16 PM
So just three wand charges? I also have that healing belt that I gave to Bears in-game, which can heal a total of 6d8 per day.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 27, 2010, 05:55:11 PM
I'd like to note that I'm at 19/60.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 27, 2010, 05:56:34 PM
Wow, that DR really saved your ass, huh? :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 27, 2010, 06:02:48 PM
Wow, that DR really saved your ass, huh? :)
Well, the 60 is already counting the +11 hp from levelling up (7 average on a d12+4 Con), but yes it did.
I prefer to think of it as the hobbos being too wimpy to hurt Colonel Badass (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ColonelBadass), though. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 27, 2010, 08:05:45 PM
Something I just noticed:
: SRD, Handle Animal skill, Train animal for purpose: Combat Riding
Warhorses and riding dogs are already trained to bear riders into combat, and they don’t require any additional training for this purpose.
So does that mean they get those six tricks for free, and are free to learn other tricks with their remaining slots? :D That would mean a magebred warhorse (or any warhorse, for that matter) could learn all tricks mentioned under Handle Animal. Or does it simply mean that they've got those tricks hardwired into them in their regular trick 'slots'?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw February 27, 2010, 08:15:10 PM
Something I just noticed:
: SRD, Handle Animal skill, Train animal for purpose: Combat Riding
Warhorses and riding dogs are already trained to bear riders into combat, and they don’t require any additional training for this purpose.
So does that mean they get those six tricks for free, and are free to learn other tricks with their remaining slots? :D That would mean a magebred warhorse (or any warhorse, for that matter) could learn all tricks mentioned under Handle Animal. Or does it simply mean that they've got those tricks hardwired into them in their regular trick 'slots'?
I'm gonna go with the first, I don't see it explicitely mentioned that the combat riding replaces the regular set of tricks they can learn.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 27, 2010, 08:20:01 PM
Something I just noticed:
: SRD, Handle Animal skill, Train animal for purpose: Combat Riding
Warhorses and riding dogs are already trained to bear riders into combat, and they don’t require any additional training for this purpose.
So does that mean they get those six tricks for free, and are free to learn other tricks with their remaining slots? :D That would mean a magebred warhorse (or any warhorse, for that matter) could learn all tricks mentioned under Handle Animal. Or does it simply mean that they've got those tricks hardwired into them in their regular trick 'slots'?
I'm gonna go with the first, I don't see it explicitely mentioned that the combat riding replaces the regular set of tricks they can learn.
Cool. In that case I'll just not bother with tricks and write down "all of them, because he's fucking Champion the Wonder Horse (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Adventures_of_Champion_(TV_series))".

And Yamanu can be Rebel the dog. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 27, 2010, 08:49:38 PM
Something I just noticed:
: SRD, Handle Animal skill, Train animal for purpose: Combat Riding
Warhorses and riding dogs are already trained to bear riders into combat, and they don’t require any additional training for this purpose.
So does that mean they get those six tricks for free, and are free to learn other tricks with their remaining slots? :D That would mean a magebred warhorse (or any warhorse, for that matter) could learn all tricks mentioned under Handle Animal. Or does it simply mean that they've got those tricks hardwired into them in their regular trick 'slots'?
I'm gonna go with the first, I don't see it explicitely mentioned that the combat riding replaces the regular set of tricks they can learn.
Cool. In that case I'll just not bother with tricks and write down "all of them, because he's fucking Champion the Wonder Horse (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Adventures_of_Champion_(TV_series))".

And Yamanu can be Rebel the dog. :P

I don't get the reference.

Even with the Wiki link. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 27, 2010, 08:50:30 PM
Something I just noticed:
: SRD, Handle Animal skill, Train animal for purpose: Combat Riding
Warhorses and riding dogs are already trained to bear riders into combat, and they don’t require any additional training for this purpose.
So does that mean they get those six tricks for free, and are free to learn other tricks with their remaining slots? :D That would mean a magebred warhorse (or any warhorse, for that matter) could learn all tricks mentioned under Handle Animal. Or does it simply mean that they've got those tricks hardwired into them in their regular trick 'slots'?
I'm gonna go with the first, I don't see it explicitely mentioned that the combat riding replaces the regular set of tricks they can learn.
Cool. In that case I'll just not bother with tricks and write down "all of them, because he's fucking Champion the Wonder Horse (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Adventures_of_Champion_(TV_series))".

And Yamanu can be Rebel the dog. :P

I don't get the reference.

Even with the Wiki link. :P
Rebel is, according to the link, a dog in the series.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem February 27, 2010, 08:51:37 PM
I get that. I was just mentioning that the show is so old that it's not something I'm familiar with. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita February 27, 2010, 08:54:03 PM
I get that. I was just mentioning that the show is so old that it's not something I'm familiar with. :)
Neither am I. I just googled for 'wonder horse', and that was one of the first links I got. :P
Phaedrus might know it, though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY February 28, 2010, 11:19:41 AM
I get that. I was just mentioning that the show is so old that it's not something I'm familiar with. :)
Neither am I. I just googled for 'wonder horse', and that was one of the first links I got. :P
Phaedrus might know it, though.
Very funny.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 02, 2010, 11:31:30 AM
Let's just say whomever uses exactly what healing charges out of character and be done with it, ok?

I said in character that I was giving Saru a healing belt, so can he actually use that please? And I'll spend charges from my wand of lesser vigor on myself (1), the colonel (I'm guessing more than 1... lol ), Venn (1?) and Nanshork (1?).

So Saru/BearsAreBrown needs to roll 2d8 per charge that he uses on that belt, and he has three charges per day. If you don't want the belt, and want me to "loan" it to someone else and use wand charges on you, that's fine too. I wish someone would use it though, since I can't (without losing the function of my own belt) but I put it down on my sheet.

And Yamanu, Goldflower, and Kalal are all healed for 11 points each.

Those new hit points for leveling up shouldn't start out as damage, so I'm not expending charges for them. The Colonel should then be at 22/60. I'll spend 3 charges from the wand to heal her up to 55/60. Ok?

So that's a total of 6 wand charges used. If any of you need/want more healing, let me know OOC and I'll just mark the charges off my sheet. I can't be bothered to go dig through the game thread to figure out how many hit points you're down and how much healing you need, though.



Also, anyone mind if I take the MW full plate and a set of barding for my mule from the loot? I don't really care how we do loot distribution, or even care much if I get those items. I just want to update my character sheet. :P I might take a blunt weapon of some kind as a backup and for DR, also. I think there was a morning star, right?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 02, 2010, 11:35:02 AM
Those new hit points for leveling up shouldn't start out as damage, so I'm not expending charges for them. The Colonel should then be at 22/60. I'll spend 3 charges from the wand to heal her up to 55/60. Ok?
Sounds good.

I just remembered something: I will, of course, be taking IHS when we next level up. We need to talk about what conditions are endable with it and what conditions aren't. I'm guessing "the damage I'm suffering from' and 'the existence of the BBEG' are right out. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 02, 2010, 11:39:08 AM
That all sounds fine to me.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 02, 2010, 11:48:13 AM
Ok, this is what I'd like to take from the loot. If anyone wants one of these items, or thinks I'm taking more than I should, let me know. Otherwise I'm putting them down on my sheet.

Heavy spiked shield
MW full plate
Chain shirt barding
-1x Scroll of Spiritual Weapon (Divine, CL 3rd)
-1x Scroll of Summon Monster III (Divine, CL 3rd)
MW morning star

Should we post this stuff in the loot thread, or do you just want to keep that for your posts only, Bowen?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 02, 2010, 11:59:10 AM
I am green with envy in the face of your mighty copypasta skills, Nanshork. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork March 02, 2010, 12:02:45 PM
I am green with envy in the face of your mighty copypasta skills, Nanshork. ;)

I did some minor editing.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown March 02, 2010, 12:13:09 PM
If no ones against, I'll be taking the

Mithral Chain Shirt, Masterwork Chahar-Aina, Masterwork Dastana x1

I need some more AC  :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 02, 2010, 06:49:07 PM
Should we post this stuff in the loot thread, or do you just want to keep that for your posts only, Bowen?
That might come in handy for future reference (I don't think that'll be necessary, but you never know).

Also, that way it's easier for the whole group to see what part of the loot is unclaimed and can be sold :P


I'll open up the thread :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 02, 2010, 07:08:39 PM
Damn, they didn't happen to just carry daggers in case they needed to, say, cut some meat or cloth? :P
I'm sure I'll run into someone with free daggers. :D

So, we splitting the gold evenly I presume?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 02, 2010, 07:09:56 PM
Personally, I support the idea of party funds. But then again, I'm just a dirty communist. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 02, 2010, 07:18:56 PM
Personally, I support the idea of party funds. But then again, I'm just a dirty communist. :P
Me too. "To each according to his needs. From each according to his abilities." is the way I'd prefer to split the loot. And put the rest into a party   fund. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 02, 2010, 07:22:19 PM
Personally, I support the idea of party funds. But then again, I'm just a dirty communist. :P
Me too. "To each according to his needs. From each according to his abilities." is the way I'd prefer to split the loot. And put the rest into a party fund. :D
We should join up with Tshern and call ourselves the Brilliant Commieologists.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 03, 2010, 07:42:47 AM
Damn, they didn't happen to just carry daggers in case they needed to, say, cut some meat or cloth? :P
I'm sure I'll run into someone with free daggers. :D

So, we splitting the gold evenly I presume?
12 daggers ;)

They're medium though :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 03, 2010, 11:23:07 AM
Damn, they didn't happen to just carry daggers in case they needed to, say, cut some meat or cloth? :P
I'm sure I'll run into someone with free daggers. :D

So, we splitting the gold evenly I presume?
12 daggers ;)

They're medium though :P
I'll take one. I found out the hard way once in a game that you should always carry a freakin' dagger. (A dwarf I was playing was eaten by a giant catfish... I had no way to attack it while grappling, nor after I was swallowed...)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 03, 2010, 11:44:55 AM
Yeah, most of my characters have at least 4 daggers on their person at all times :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 03, 2010, 11:46:35 AM
There's some things that it's silly to use Iron Heart Surge on. On stuff like that, I'm tempted to say it's awesome instead. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 03, 2010, 11:53:45 AM
Yeah, most of my characters have at least 4 daggers on their person at all times :P
The funny thing about the catfish story is the ending... The guy I was traveling with actually had a rope tied around me at the time, and was standing on the shore, so he could pull me out of the water in case anything "bad" happened (I was searching for something on the bottom of a lake). Of course, me being eaten by a giant catfish wasn't on the expected venue of "bad things" for the evening. He was unable to pull me out before I was swallowed, but he did manage to eventually pull the catfish out and kill it. Then he paid for having my character Raised from the dead, and had the catfish stuffed and hung on the wall at the local tavern. Now almost every game we play with that DM involves us stopping at that Inn where the innkeeper tells us this awesome story about the crazy warrior that went fishing with a dwarf for bait, and caught that catfish. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 03, 2010, 02:59:16 PM
Yeah, most of my characters have at least 4 daggers on their person at all times :P
The funny thing about the catfish story is the ending... The guy I was traveling with actually had a rope tied around me at the time, and was standing on the shore, so he could pull me out of the water in case anything "bad" happened (I was searching for something on the bottom of a lake). Of course, me being eaten by a giant catfish wasn't on the expected venue of "bad things" for the evening. He was unable to pull me out before I was swallowed, but he did manage to eventually pull the catfish out and kill it. Then he paid for having my character Raised from the dead, and had the catfish stuffed and hung on the wall at the local tavern. Now almost every game we play with that DM involves us stopping at that Inn where the innkeeper tells us this awesome story about the crazy warrior that went fishing with a dwarf for bait, and caught that catfish. :D
That's awesome and I'm totally putting that in my own campaign. :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 04, 2010, 09:50:10 AM
So....

What's your next move going to be, guys? :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 04, 2010, 10:09:00 AM
I tried agreeing about going to check out the building, but wanted to let everyone finish healing up. I'm in class now so I can try to stir things along once I can make a full post.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 04, 2010, 11:15:55 AM
Cool, just want to keep things moving :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 04, 2010, 11:21:59 AM
Yeah, I think the plan is to gather our loot, heal up, and then check out the house.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 04, 2010, 11:25:23 AM
We've already done two of those three things though, I think is the point. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 04, 2010, 11:42:45 AM
We've already done two of those three things though, I think is the point. :)
I was waiting for Bowen to say "Ok, here's what you see in the house". :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 04, 2010, 11:59:00 AM
We've already done two of those three things though, I think is the point. :)
I was waiting for Bowen to say "Ok, here's what you see in the house". :P
And I was waiting for you guys to actually go over to the house and/or roll Spot/Search/whatever :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 04, 2010, 12:33:04 PM
Description for Yamanu is up :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 04, 2010, 03:07:08 PM
Fear my copypasta skills :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 04, 2010, 03:08:51 PM
Fear my copypasta skills :P
lol, I didn't cheat this time. So we all got the same spoiler, eh?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 04, 2010, 03:10:11 PM
Fear my copypasta skills :P
lol, I didn't cheat this time. So we all got the same spoiler, eh?
Jup.

Just nothing to hear, or see (throught the windows and hole that is) at the moment.


That might change if you guys decide to enter, ofcourse :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork March 06, 2010, 10:42:13 PM
An FYI, I'm going to be out of the country from the 9th until the 16th.  My dad is getting married in South African and I'm his best man.  I probably won't have internet access.  What do you want to do with my character Bowen?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 07, 2010, 01:17:39 AM
Going out of town myself from the 8th to the 14th and probably won't be able to post very much during that time.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 07, 2010, 07:38:58 AM
Well then, looks like we've got a slow period coming up :)

Aside from some RP between Agita, Venn and Bears as they finish traveling to town, I think I won't start any important stuff (either combat or NPC roleplay) until you guys return, assuming that's okay with everyone.

Have fun, guys :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 09, 2010, 06:16:03 PM
Well... I'm here and have internet access, and parts of this thing I'm at are quite boring. So... I'll be around. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 17, 2010, 08:06:28 AM
So, seeing as it's the 17th over here...

Everybody ready to continue? :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 17, 2010, 12:32:09 PM
Yeah, definitely ready here. I just wanted to bury them before we moved on. I guess we should have stated we were moving on, though...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 17, 2010, 12:35:16 PM
Yeah, definitely ready here. I just wanted to bury them before we moved on. I guess we should have stated we were moving on, though...
Yeah, I was kinda waiting for that, making sure you guys had done anything you wanted to do at the farmhouse :)

I'll get some more stuff up later today.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 17, 2010, 02:11:46 PM
What are we out here for, again? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 17, 2010, 02:14:06 PM
I don't think you guys ever decided on that :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 17, 2010, 02:19:03 PM
What are we out here for, again? :P
Yeah... I was wondering about that, too... I guess we're aimless wanderers. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 17, 2010, 02:24:13 PM
To kick ass and take names, obviously. We're adventurers, guys.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 17, 2010, 02:40:46 PM
Yeah, but there's gotta be a reason you're not with the army still, and so on for everyone else. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 17, 2010, 02:47:49 PM
Yeah, but there's gotta be a reason you're not with the army still, and so on for everyone else. :)
The war ended and I don't really have anything to do. I'm basically on extended leave, with continuous availability in case I'm needed.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 17, 2010, 03:07:52 PM
But why are you guys traveling together? :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 17, 2010, 03:56:00 PM
My character is an escaped slave, and if it is ok with Venn I was going to say that his character helped Kalal escape the waste. Since Yamanu is a "native" desert dwelling creature, and very sneaky, I figured he could be good at that. I don't know if that jives with his military background, though. 

bears' character's draconic nature could be a good reason for Kalal to have taken up with him, since Kalal worships Syberis. Given that his character is young and a bit naive, Kalal would probably think he should try to protect him.

He would also want to protect the old giantess, because he thinks she's a bit daft but good-natured. He also worries that her dabblings with dark forces will one day come back to bite her, and he wants to be there when it does.

So I could certainly see why Saru, Kalal, and Goldflower would be traveling together. The other two seem like they're misplaced soldiers with nothing better to do, so maybe they just took up with us to have traveling companions, or out of a sense of survival (it's easier to get by in the wilds when you have allies to cover your own shortcomings).
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 17, 2010, 04:24:58 PM
Yamanu could have helped you like that, though it would have been a while ago. He's more part of a mercenary company than a military, though they are almost an official military in Xen'drik.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 17, 2010, 04:35:49 PM
Yamanu could have helped you like that, though it would have been a while ago. He's more part of a mercenary company than a military, though they are almost an official military in Xen'drik.
How would they have met up again, then? After Yamanu returned from Xendrik, he looked up his "old buddy", who happened to be traveling around with a shapeshifting dragon and an old woman?  :lol I guess that could work, though I'd imagined Kalal's escape hadn't been so far in the past.

And how is the Colonel fitting into this "motley crew"? :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown March 17, 2010, 04:52:05 PM
That type of backstory works for Saru. I think we should stick we that.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 17, 2010, 05:02:05 PM
Yamanu could have helped you like that, though it would have been a while ago. He's more part of a mercenary company than a military, though they are almost an official military in Xen'drik.
How would they have met up again, then? After Yamanu returned from Xendrik, he looked up his "old buddy", who happened to be traveling around with a shapeshifting dragon and an old woman?  :lol I guess that could work, though I'd imagined Kalal's escape hadn't been so far in the past.

And how is the Colonel fitting into this "motley crew"? :D
She had nothing better to do and joined because talking to rocks, corpses, and your sword gets boring eventually? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 18, 2010, 01:12:09 AM
Yamanu was looking for a group of adventurers to blend into in hopes of seeking information on the Caldyn Fragments.

During the process of one of my exploits, I could have freed you, possibly recently. Then we joined up with the others. Simple enough.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 18, 2010, 01:19:38 AM
During the process of one of my exploits, I could have freed you, possibly recently. Then we joined up with the others. Simple enough.
Eh, the idea of you having freed me some years ago, and then us meeting up again to adventure together recently had kind of grown on me. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 18, 2010, 03:01:50 AM
Ok, we'll say I freed you while I was escaping my fellow Marruspawn, and in recent weeks I contacted you as I was aware that you would know this area better than I would, or would at least know someone who does.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 18, 2010, 03:36:59 PM
So... is there any way that Saru and/or Yamanu could scout for us from now on, so that we don't get ambushed again? Having to stand there and get pounded during the surprise round... sucks.

I'm assuming that if one of them scouted ahead and came back and told us that there are enemies ahead, that they wouldn't get surprise round when we move up, even if we can't actually see them, right? (I think the fact that Saru can turn into a bird and has a massive spot check makes him perfect for this job... but I also know it is kind of dangerous... :P )

We can keep communications open via the Message  (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/spells/message.htm)spell, if we have at least some idea that we might be walking into trouble. It only lasts 10 min/lvl, though. So if we're just traveling, we won't be able to use it all the time. We'd have to come up with a different method of communication if the "scout" is far enough ahead of the rest of us to need it. I think the range on Message is about right for this purpose, though. 150 feet means a -15 penalty to Spot, so the enemy's aren't likely to see the rest of us before the scout can get word back to us that they are there.

I'm really missing Malphus' bird that I summon on my binder character right about now... Anyone planning on dipping into that? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 18, 2010, 04:06:49 PM
I was, until I was discouraged from it. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 18, 2010, 04:07:30 PM
I was, until I was discouraged from it. :P
:lmao I forgot that. Your first character concept for this game was some kind of binder gish, wasn't it?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 18, 2010, 04:10:29 PM
I was, until I was discouraged from it. :P
:lmao I forgot that. Your first character concept for this game was some kind of binder gish, wasn't it?
:lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 18, 2010, 04:13:49 PM
The first concept was an anima mage.
Then I decided on the Marrulurk, but I was still going to go with a level in Binder for Malphas's invisibility and sudden strike damage. Someone figured that wasn't worth it, however.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 18, 2010, 04:15:42 PM
The first concept was an anima mage.
Then I decided on the Marrulurk, but I was still going to go with a level in Binder for Malphus's invisibility and sudden strike damage. Someone figured that wasn't worth it, however.
I don't think it is worth it just for those things. It is for the bird, though. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 18, 2010, 04:17:24 PM
Yeah, the bird is really the best thing about Malphas (not -us :P).
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 18, 2010, 04:27:52 PM
Well, of course the bird too. :D

Also, fixed.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 01:52:14 PM
Wow, Harika and Kalal are starting to sound like a bickering couple :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 19, 2010, 01:53:46 PM
Except she's the miserly old man and he's the wife who goes spending money on "frivolities"? :P

: BowenSilverclaw
(http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv39/JoopKoenraads/Red%20Hand%20of%20Doom%20PbP/o37.jpg)
Oh hey I know that chick!

No, not really. Would've been hilarious, though. :P For reference, yes, Austrian barmaids really look like that. But only in places where ski tourists go. Because that's kind of the point, you see.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 19, 2010, 01:57:41 PM
Wow, Harika and Kalal are starting to sound like a bickering couple :lol
Yeah, it's kind of fun, too. :P Kalal spent most of his life living in a pit with a bunch of other stinking slaves complete no doubt with lice and the occasional corpse. So yeah, sue him for wanting to enjoy a luxury every now and then. :D He's also hoping he can get laid.  :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 01:58:08 PM
Except she's the miserly old man and he's the wife who goes spending money on "frivolities"? :P
:lol

: BowenSilverclaw
(http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv39/JoopKoenraads/Red%20Hand%20of%20Doom%20PbP/o37.jpg)
Oh hey I know that chick!

No, not really. Would've been hilarious, though. :P For reference, yes, Austrian barmaids really look like that. But only in places where ski tourists go. Because that's kind of the point, you see.
Yeah, I know. I just googled 'Oktoberfest girl', seemed somewhat fitting for a place like this. And I went with one of the more modest pics :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 19, 2010, 02:01:03 PM
: BowenSilverclaw
(http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv39/JoopKoenraads/Red%20Hand%20of%20Doom%20PbP/o37.jpg)
Oh hey I know that chick!

No, not really. Would've been hilarious, though. :P For reference, yes, Austrian barmaids really look like that. But only in places where ski tourists go. Because that's kind of the point, you see.
Yeah, I know. I just googled 'Oktoberfest girl', seemed somewhat fitting for a place like this. And I went with one of the more modest pics :P
Well, the Oktoberfest is technically Bavarian, not Austrian. So that explains why I didn't recognize the brand on the glasses (it looks a bit similar to Puntigamer off-hand, but not quite). The traditional garb (and pretty much everything else) is very similar, though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 02:02:05 PM
: BowenSilverclaw
(http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv39/JoopKoenraads/Red%20Hand%20of%20Doom%20PbP/o37.jpg)
Oh hey I know that chick!

No, not really. Would've been hilarious, though. :P For reference, yes, Austrian barmaids really look like that. But only in places where ski tourists go. Because that's kind of the point, you see.
Yeah, I know. I just googled 'Oktoberfest girl', seemed somewhat fitting for a place like this. And I went with one of the more modest pics :P
Well, the Oktoberfest is technically Bavarian, not Austrian. So that explains why I didn't recognize the brand on the glasses (it looks a bit similar to Puntigamer off-hand, but not quite). The traditional garb (and pretty much everything else) is very similar, though.
Yeah, I really should try to get a group of friends together to hit Oktoberfest either this or next year :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 04:26:01 PM
Wow, Harika and Kalal are starting to sound like a bickering couple :lol
Yeah, it's kind of fun, too. :P Kalal spent most of his life living in a pit with a bunch of other stinking slaves complete no doubt with lice and the occasional corpse. So yeah, sue him for wanting to enjoy a luxury every now and then. :D He's also hoping he can get laid.  :smirk
After all those years without women :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 19, 2010, 04:31:08 PM
Wow, Harika and Kalal are starting to sound like a bickering couple :lol
Yeah, it's kind of fun, too. :P Kalal spent most of his life living in a pit with a bunch of other stinking slaves complete no doubt with lice and the occasional corpse. So yeah, sue him for wanting to enjoy a luxury every now and then. :D He's also hoping he can get laid.  :smirk
After all those years without women :lol
Poor wenches... Kalal is literally made of stone, after all. :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 04:32:35 PM
Wow, Harika and Kalal are starting to sound like a bickering couple :lol
Yeah, it's kind of fun, too. :P Kalal spent most of his life living in a pit with a bunch of other stinking slaves complete no doubt with lice and the occasional corpse. So yeah, sue him for wanting to enjoy a luxury every now and then. :D He's also hoping he can get laid.  :smirk
After all those years without women :lol
Poor wenches... Kalal is literally made of stone, after all. :lol
This (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y72hJ2xSc4) comes to mind :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 05:47:13 PM
By the way, will continue with the plot once I get a reaction from Goldflower on the whole room issue (seriously, the things players can get worked up over :P)

Speaking of Nanshork, how was South-Africa? :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork March 19, 2010, 05:53:35 PM
Goldflower doesn't care.  I'll put that in for you.   :P

South Africa was cool, I enjoyed it.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 19, 2010, 06:10:40 PM
Wow, Harika and Kalal are starting to sound like a bickering couple :lol
Yeah, it's kind of fun, too. :P Kalal spent most of his life living in a pit with a bunch of other stinking slaves complete no doubt with lice and the occasional corpse. So yeah, sue him for wanting to enjoy a luxury every now and then. :D He's also hoping he can get laid.  :smirk
After all those years without women :lol
Poor wenches... Kalal is literally made of stone, after all. :lol
They do say "a hard man is good to find", right?  :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 06:11:52 PM
Wow, Harika and Kalal are starting to sound like a bickering couple :lol
Yeah, it's kind of fun, too. :P Kalal spent most of his life living in a pit with a bunch of other stinking slaves complete no doubt with lice and the occasional corpse. So yeah, sue him for wanting to enjoy a luxury every now and then. :D He's also hoping he can get laid.  :smirk
After all those years without women :lol
Poor wenches... Kalal is literally made of stone, after all. :lol
They do say "a hard man is good to find", right?  :D
Hard as a rock ;) (shameless AC/DC plug (see reply on previous page ;)))
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 06:18:12 PM
South Africa was cool, I enjoyed it.
Good to hear that :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 19, 2010, 06:23:37 PM
Wow, Harika and Kalal are starting to sound like a bickering couple :lol
Yeah, it's kind of fun, too. :P Kalal spent most of his life living in a pit with a bunch of other stinking slaves complete no doubt with lice and the occasional corpse. So yeah, sue him for wanting to enjoy a luxury every now and then. :D He's also hoping he can get laid.  :smirk
After all those years without women :lol
Poor wenches... Kalal is literally made of stone, after all. :lol
They do say "a hard man is good to find", right?  :D
Hard as a rock ;) (shameless AC/DC plug (see reply on previous page ;)))
In any case, I don't think the Colonel will be getting any. You might as well drill a hole in a wall. Literally. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 06:26:05 PM
Wow, Harika and Kalal are starting to sound like a bickering couple :lol
Yeah, it's kind of fun, too. :P Kalal spent most of his life living in a pit with a bunch of other stinking slaves complete no doubt with lice and the occasional corpse. So yeah, sue him for wanting to enjoy a luxury every now and then. :D He's also hoping he can get laid.  :smirk
After all those years without women :lol
Poor wenches... Kalal is literally made of stone, after all. :lol
They do say "a hard man is good to find", right?  :D
Hard as a rock ;) (shameless AC/DC plug (see reply on previous page ;)))
In any case, I don't think the Colonel will be getting any. You might as well drill a hole in a wall. Literally. :P
Ouch...Just, ouch...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 06:33:23 PM
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?action=post;quote=247748;topic=7067.80;num_replies=89;sesc=745663975390a86c712ead84836a0f05

Another man?
You mean like the Colonel? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 19, 2010, 06:35:54 PM
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?action=post;quote=247748;topic=7067.80;num_replies=89;sesc=745663975390a86c712ead84836a0f05

Another man?
You mean like the Colonel? :P
The colonel is probably manlier than many actual men. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 06:39:37 PM
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?action=post;quote=247748;topic=7067.80;num_replies=89;sesc=745663975390a86c712ead84836a0f05

Another man?
You mean like the Colonel? :P
The colonel is probably manlier than many actual men. :P
No wonder she doesn't get hit on :P

I guess the portrait doesn't fit with her actual behaviour/demeanor :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 19, 2010, 06:45:23 PM
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?action=post;quote=247748;topic=7067.80;num_replies=89;sesc=745663975390a86c712ead84836a0f05

Another man?
You mean like the Colonel? :P
The colonel is probably manlier than many actual men. :P
No wonder she doesn't get hit on :P

I guess the portrait doesn't fit with her actual behaviour/demeanor :P
It's an anime portrait. In anime, you don't have to look manly to be manly. :P
And I dunno, the portrait always suggested to me a warrior chick. Mostly, it's the fact that she has an eyepatch, a big sword (that's chained to her arm), and a relatively large bust (which is usually a cue for physical power).
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 06:47:54 PM
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?action=post;quote=247748;topic=7067.80;num_replies=89;sesc=745663975390a86c712ead84836a0f05

Another man?
You mean like the Colonel? :P
The colonel is probably manlier than many actual men. :P
No wonder she doesn't get hit on :P

I guess the portrait doesn't fit with her actual behaviour/demeanor :P
It's an anime portrait. In anime, you don't have to look manly to be manly. :P
And I dunno, the portrait always suggested to me a warrior chick. Mostly, it's the fact that she has an eyepatch, a big sword (that's chained to her arm), and a relatively large bust (which is usually a cue for physical power).
I know. My point was that as soon as any possible admirers see how she acts they'll be thoroughly discouraged from hitting on her :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 19, 2010, 07:54:57 PM
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?action=post;quote=247748;topic=7067.80;num_replies=89;sesc=745663975390a86c712ead84836a0f05

Another man?
You mean like the Colonel? :P
The colonel is probably manlier than many actual men. :P
No wonder she doesn't get hit on :P

I guess the portrait doesn't fit with her actual behaviour/demeanor :P
It's an anime portrait. In anime, you don't have to look manly to be manly. :P
And I dunno, the portrait always suggested to me a warrior chick. Mostly, it's the fact that she has an eyepatch, a big sword (that's chained to her arm), and a relatively large bust (which is usually a cue for physical power).
I know. My point was that as soon as any possible admirers see how she acts they'll be thoroughly discouraged from hitting on her :P
Eh, there's a market for everything. ;) And it's not like she's the kind that farts, burps, and spills beer on her clothes.

Come to think of it, maybe Yamanu is right... the seemingly unimportant bar wench is a named NPC. :plot
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 19, 2010, 08:04:43 PM
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?action=post;quote=247748;topic=7067.80;num_replies=89;sesc=745663975390a86c712ead84836a0f05

Another man?
You mean like the Colonel? :P
The colonel is probably manlier than many actual men. :P
No wonder she doesn't get hit on :P

I guess the portrait doesn't fit with her actual behaviour/demeanor :P
It's an anime portrait. In anime, you don't have to look manly to be manly. :P
And I dunno, the portrait always suggested to me a warrior chick. Mostly, it's the fact that she has an eyepatch, a big sword (that's chained to her arm), and a relatively large bust (which is usually a cue for physical power).
I know. My point was that as soon as any possible admirers see how she acts they'll be thoroughly discouraged from hitting on her :P
Eh, there's a market for everything. ;) And it's not like she's the kind that farts, burps, and spills beer on her clothes.

Come to think of it, maybe Yamanu is right... the seemingly unimportant bar wench is a named NPC. :plot
NPC speculation aside, I think it's mostly a matter of Harika's behavior intimidating/scaring the men :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 22, 2010, 05:14:22 PM
As for your question regarding the British military, after this report we decided to sent a messenger to the nearest base with Brelish soldiers. That was some two weeks ago though, and we haven't heard anything since. For some reason our Messages aren't getting through either..."[/color] Town Speaker Wiston looks more and more worried as he continues his story.
Freudian slip? :P

: BowenSilverclaw
Captain Soranna Anitah, Captain of the town guard:
Anyone have any good (read: non-stripperific) female warrior pics?
Hold on, I'll look up some female warriors out of my pic folders for Soranna. Any specifications on hair/eye color, armor, or weapon?

EDIT: Two ideas for now.
[spoiler](http://www.majhost.com/gallery/Just-my-2-cents/xyz/sword_003.jpg)
Has an eyepatch for bonus points. On the opposite side of the colonel's, even.

(http://www.geocities.jp/yoshidameme/illust/pic8449845ioji/hp29.jpg)
The outfit is a bit modern, but it does kinda fit Eberron. And damn, this artist is awesome (the same that drew the portrait for Harika).[/spoiler]

: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 22, 2010, 06:06:57 PM
Yeah, that should be Brelish. I'll edit it, thanks :)

As for Soranna, not too heavy armor, longsword or longsword and shield.
Thanks for helping out.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 22, 2010, 06:16:33 PM
Yeah, that should be Brelish. I'll edit it, thanks :)

As for Soranna, not too heavy armor, longsword or longsword and shield.
Thanks for helping out.
First one should work out fine, then.

For even less armor, there's also this.:P

[spoiler](http://yotsuba.imouto.org/sample/2027399de5814bbf5297b5148702b00a/moe%2054986%20sample.jpg)[/spoiler]
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 22, 2010, 06:35:07 PM
Looks a little too happy, to me. These people have been undergoing hobgoblin assaults! :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 22, 2010, 06:47:08 PM
I kinda like the one I just uploaded, kinda battlehardened and no-nonsense.
Any thoughts? :)

Also, I hope you guys are liking this game so far, it's my first ever PbP-game and I don't really know you guys so it's hard to include stuff that I know you'll like :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 22, 2010, 06:49:27 PM
Yeah, I'm enjoying it. I'd enjoy it more if we could avoid being ambushed in the future (at least sometimes). :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 22, 2010, 06:53:43 PM
Yeah, I'm enjoying it. I'd enjoy it more if we could avoid being ambushed in the future (at least sometimes). :P
Someone should get Telepathy and Mindsight somehow. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 22, 2010, 07:18:29 PM
See, those are the kind of things my real-life group probably wouldn't think about :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 22, 2010, 07:34:14 PM
I kinda like the one I just uploaded, kinda battlehardened and no-nonsense.
Any thoughts? :)

Also, I hope you guys are liking this game so far, it's my first ever PbP-game and I don't really know you guys so it's hard to include stuff that I know you'll like :)

It's good. I just wish I could boost the amount of my bonus damage I can apply to my attacks. As-is half of it is rather situational, but welcome nonetheless. :P

Yeah, I'm enjoying it. I'd enjoy it more if we could avoid being ambushed in the future (at least sometimes). :P
Someone should get Telepathy and Mindsight somehow. :P

I wish I could extend the range of my super-hearing and take a feat to allow me to pinpoint enemies as a free action. It seems almost appropriate, but I doubt there's anything like that. Improved scent extends the range of scent out to 60 feet, and I can see that being reflavored for my ability, but 1) I'm tight enough on feats as-is, and 2) that doesn't also allow me to pinpoint as a free action, so I'm still wasting actions.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 22, 2010, 07:37:21 PM
Do we have some way to find and enslave a Psurlon with Mindsight? Those have Telepathy out to 250', IIRC. That's what we use for intelligence in The Fall of Pun-Pun, and I think int may be even more valuable in a game about armies. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 22, 2010, 07:39:45 PM
Do we have some way to find and enslave a Psurlon with Mindsight? Those have Telepathy out to 250', IIRC. That's what we use for intelligence in The Fall of Pun-Pun, and I think int may be even more valuable in a game about armies. :D
Oh god... don't even talk about it...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 22, 2010, 07:41:17 PM
Do we have some way to find and enslave a Psurlon with Mindsight? Those have Telepathy out to 250', IIRC. That's what we use for intelligence in The Fall of Pun-Pun, and I think int may be even more valuable in a game about armies. :D
Oh god... don't even talk about it...
That bad?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 22, 2010, 07:44:26 PM
Do we have some way to find and enslave a Psurlon with Mindsight? Those have Telepathy out to 250', IIRC. That's what we use for intelligence in The Fall of Pun-Pun, and I think int may be even more valuable in a game about armies. :D
Oh god... don't even talk about it...
That bad?
Well... it is quite annoying as a DM. I can deal with it, but it certainly gets rid of certain kinds of encounters, or shoehorns you into using specific kinds of things that are immune to it for them. I think the blanket of area effect crowd control that his other minions throw down is probably more annoying, though. :P Those freakin' Tome undead feats are ridiculous. They're like leadership on crack. My real mistake was letting him cherry-pick his starting minions, though. If I hadn't done that, and had instead limited it to things they actually killed in the game, it wouldn't be nearly as bad. That was a big mistake on my part...
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 22, 2010, 07:45:18 PM
Kinda removes the mystery when nothing can move within 250 feet of your group without being detected. I'm not sure anything has a move speed equal to that (without specifically trying to get that fast), naturally, so you can pretty much pick up anything before it gets to you, with the exception of teleporting-opponents.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 22, 2010, 07:48:05 PM
Kinda removes the mystery when nothing can move within 250 feet of your group without being detected. I'm not sure anything has a move speed equal to that (without specifically trying to get that fast), naturally, so you can pretty much pick up anything before it gets to you, with the exception of teleporting-opponents.
There are a few things that can move more than that and still do something without spells/SLAs/etc, but not many... The house rules we agreed on do help somewhat also (Mindblank and other immunities to [Mind-Affecting] blocking it, and allowing Slippery Mind to let you make a hide check against it). So it's tolerable. I can certainly understand the appeal as a PC, but it is still a headache as a DM. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 22, 2010, 07:52:58 PM
Kinda removes the mystery when nothing can move within 250 feet of your group without being detected. I'm not sure anything has a move speed equal to that (without specifically trying to get that fast), naturally, so you can pretty much pick up anything before it gets to you, with the exception of teleporting-opponents.
There are a few things that can move more than that and still do something without spells/SLAs/etc, but not many... The house rules we agreed on do help somewhat also (Mindblank and other immunities to [Mind-Affecting] blocking it, and allowing Slippery Mind to let you make a hide check against it). So it's tolerable. I can certainly understand the appeal as a PC, but it is still a headache as a DM. :P
Yeah, it would be something to keep in mind. Then again, if you guys pick it up, it'll be with a PC, so I can always swap in some Archers to stay out of the initial 100ft AWACS radius :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 22, 2010, 07:56:08 PM
Yeah, it would be something to keep in mind. Then again, if you guys pick it up, it'll be with a PC, so I can always swap in some Archers to stay out of the initial 100ft AWACS radius :P
Yeah, but they have it at a 250' radius in my Pun-Pun game. Most encounters don't start further apart than that, due to the insane distance penalties on Spot checks.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 22, 2010, 07:57:14 PM
Yeah, it would be something to keep in mind. Then again, if you guys pick it up, it'll be with a PC, so I can always swap in some Archers to stay out of the initial 100ft AWACS radius :P
Yeah, but they have it at a 250' radius in my Pun-Pun game. Most encounters don't start further apart than that, due to the insane distance penalties on Spot checks.
True, but no way in hell you'll get an AWACS-minion in this game ;) :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 24, 2010, 11:16:07 AM
Hmm, seems much of our group has been quiet the past couple days. A lot of the dialogue is just between Bowen and Phaedrus. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 24, 2010, 11:39:13 AM
Jup, I figured I'd keep the ball rolling so to speak.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 24, 2010, 12:02:17 PM
Hmm, seems much of our group has been quiet the past couple days. A lot of the dialogue is just between Bowen and Phaedrus. :P
Yeah... I have a hard time just sitting there if no one else is saying anything... Sorry if I'm hogging the spotlight.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 24, 2010, 12:03:30 PM
No, just commenting that other people need to get involved too. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown March 24, 2010, 01:08:08 PM
I should get more involved, sorry guys. :( I'll try to be more active. Just assume I've been in Hawk form up until now.  ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 29, 2010, 08:30:22 AM
So...
Do you guys want to take the conversation into any general direction, are there other things you want to say and/or ask?
If not, I'll just continue with the default route I had planned (all aboard the DM-train, *choo-choo*) ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 29, 2010, 12:05:28 PM
Well... we should at least decide how we're going to approach this. If we're going to set out and night and be sneaky, try to bait them into an ambush, try scouting, etc.

I like the ambush idea, personally. My character can't be sneaky while moving around very well, unless he's tunneling under the party, but he could probably stay hidden fairly well if he was buried up to his neck under a bush (total concealment) and not moving.

I guess he could just tunnel along while we're scouting, though. And Goldflower does have that at-will invisibility... I guess Kalal could wear light armor and try to move silently while under the effects of that...

Also, we don't have to RP it out, but I'd like to see if that guy that escaped remembers anything else, and at least have Goldflower tell us WTF a manticore is, because in-character the rest of us probably don't know. ;)

But anyway, I want to have a plan, not just go blundering into the next ambush.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 30, 2010, 12:08:33 PM
So, how do the rest of you guys wanna finish this up?
In character RP or OOC summary?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork March 30, 2010, 12:10:38 PM
Whichever, Goldflower isn't much of a strategist with the planning and whatnot.   :p
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem March 30, 2010, 02:09:47 PM
Doesn't matter that much, but it seems we ought to hurry up and move on. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw March 30, 2010, 02:47:09 PM
I'm currently sick as a dog and have a lot of personal stuff to sort out, but I'll try to get some stuff up before the weekend.

Do you guys want the relevant stuff in an easy OOC manner as well, possibly in addition to RP?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY March 30, 2010, 02:54:49 PM
Doesn't matter that much, but it seems we ought to hurry up and move on. :)
Ok, let's go scouting at night then, and try being sneaky. I'll either have Kalal tunnel underneath you guys, or travel in light armor with Invisibility from Goldmoon. I guess we can assume that a good starting place would be where ever the "survivor" saw all those hobgoblins at.

I'm currently sick as a dog and have a lot of personal stuff to sort out, but I'll try to get some stuff up before the weekend.

Do you guys want the relevant stuff in an easy OOC manner as well, possibly in addition to RP?
Hope you get to feeling better. OOC is fine with me. I just want to try and not walk right into another ambush, especially one that might be near their home base. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita March 30, 2010, 02:59:19 PM
Doesn't matter that much, but it seems we ought to hurry up and move on. :)
Ok, let's go scouting at night then, and try being sneaky. I'll either have Kalal tunnel underneath you guys, or travel in light armor with Invisibility from Goldmoon.
Why not both? :D
The colonel is already in light armor and can burrow as well, so she might as well come too.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown March 30, 2010, 11:23:03 PM
I can fly and scout great.  :D And I'm totally inconspicuous! I'll be flying over you guys.

And I'm fine with an OOC summary.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw April 03, 2010, 12:16:15 PM
OOC summary:

You've made a positive impression on the townsfolk you've met so far, so here's what they (including the surviving guardsman) can tell you:
-There have been at least 3 different warbands around the townsfolks' lands at the same time, each about 15 to 20 strong, so you're dealing with a minimum of 50 Hobgoblins.
-The enemy appears to have allied himself with several types of monstrous creatures, including Hellhounds and Manticores.
-A dozen town guardsmen weren't strong enough to take care of the Hobgoblins.
-In addition to monsters, the goblinoids appear to have at least some spellcasters on their side.
-The townsfolk suspect that the enemy's lair is situated somewhere in the Witchwood and have given you directions. If you head into the Witchwood, you're adviced to seek out a man named Jorr, even though his cabin is somewhat out of the way. He's a hunter who knows his way around the local wilderness and might be of some assistance if you can convince him to join you.
-Located in the Witchwood is an old ruined castle named Vraath Keep, it could be possible that the goblinoids seized that for their stronghold. It's supposed to be haunted, but the goblinoids might not care.

With a succesful Diplomacy check (DC 15), you'll be able to get some minor magical assistance (up to 600 gp worth of potions and/or scrolls provided by the towns' spellcasters).


Any questions? :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita April 03, 2010, 12:41:40 PM
Aye.
-There have been at least 3 different warbands around the townsfolks' lands at the same time, each about 15 to 20 strong, so you're dealing with a minimum of 50 Hobgoblins.
Does this include the group we killed?

With a succesful Diplomacy check (DC 15), you'll be able to get some minor magical assistance (up to 600 gp worth of potions and/or scrolls provided by the towns' spellcasters).
Max spell level/caster level on these? :P
In any case, the Colonel will take 10 for a Diplo result of 16.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw April 06, 2010, 10:23:49 AM
I'm sorry guys, but my personal issues have taken a turn for the worse during the last couple of days, so I'm afraid I'm going to have to put this game on hold for the time being. I'll be back eventually though, hopefully within 2 weeks time.

Sorry for the inconvenience,
Bowen
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem April 06, 2010, 01:47:55 PM
Sorry to hear that. I hope things improve for you soon; good luck.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 09, 2010, 06:31:24 PM
Sorry for taking so long, guys. Let's just say the excrement hit the ceiling-mounted rotating cooling device.

Anywho, things are going a lot better now, so I should be back to full DM-ing and gaming capacity starting today.


So now for the big question: are you guys still interested in continuing this campaign?
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem May 10, 2010, 12:24:21 AM
No problem. I'm still around, and despite being in several games, I'm still up for continuing if everyone else is.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork May 10, 2010, 02:05:56 AM
I'm still around.
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown May 10, 2010, 02:32:55 AM
I'm still around. But not for long.

May 18th I leave for Boot Camp.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 10, 2010, 10:25:05 AM
I'm still around. But not for long.

May 18th I leave for Boot Camp.
Any preference on what happens with Saru when you leave?


Agita, Phaedrus, you still game?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 10, 2010, 10:38:23 AM
Aye. But tonight, I'm thinking of pulling an all-nighter to finish that last damn assignment I have, so don't count on me today or tomorrow before like 8 pm. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 10, 2010, 11:13:33 AM
No problem :)

: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 10, 2010, 11:18:15 AM
And an answer to these questions:

Aye.
-There have been at least 3 different warbands around the townsfolks' lands at the same time, each about 15 to 20 strong, so you're dealing with a minimum of 50 Hobgoblins.
Does this include the group we killed?
Yes, it does.

With a succesful Diplomacy check (DC 15), you'll be able to get some minor magical assistance (up to 600 gp worth of potions and/or scrolls provided by the towns' spellcasters).
Max spell level/caster level on these? :P
In any case, the Colonel will take 10 for a Diplo result of 16.
Minimum required CL. Higher CL might be possible (Diplomacy check with a DC of 20), up to the level of the NPC who created it (I'll get back to you on that once I find my RHoD book), but it'll cost extra.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 11, 2010, 12:27:28 PM
I'm still around. But not for long.

May 18th I leave for Boot Camp.
Good luck. What flavor of boot camp? A couple of my close friends were jarheads. They spoke quite highly of Camp LeJune. ;)

And yeah, I"m still around. Just got back from a short vacation.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 11, 2010, 01:12:42 PM
Cool :)

So, what info do you guys need before you can walk into my next ambush go on your way and what are your plans so far?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 11, 2010, 01:27:26 PM
I think we were going to try and stealthily find their camp/hideout/lair/whatever. The two stony people were going to tunnel along underneath while the others sneak around (invisibly?) above ground. And I guess Saru would be giving us an aerial view.

I guess we should seek out this Jorr dude first, and then maybe Vraath Keep, since those are the leads we've gotten.

I don't think I need much else.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem May 11, 2010, 03:33:51 PM
That seems to be about the right of it. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 11, 2010, 03:34:47 PM
If everyone's ready to start moving again, I'll start typing up some new IC stuff tomorrow morning :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem May 11, 2010, 03:37:08 PM
Whoo! :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: bearsarebrown May 11, 2010, 06:02:30 PM
What flavor of boot camp? A couple of my close friends were jarheads. They spoke quite highly of Camp LeJune. ;)
Indirect Infantry at Fort Benning in Georgia. It's a part of a greater plan involving Army ROTC at Uni of Central Florida.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 12, 2010, 03:59:05 PM
So, you guys have an idea yet about the magic items (up to 600 gp for free, the rest you gotta buy with your own money if you have any left) you want?

I figured it'd be a lot faster to do this OOC, so we can get on with the actual adventure instead of spending a week or more haggling about items and prices :)


The NPCs at your disposal for magic items are:
-Avarthel, neutral good male Half-Orc Druid 6 of the Gatekeeper sect (Brew Potion and Scribe Scroll feats)
-Brother Derny, neutral good male Human Cleric 5 of the Sovereign Host and the town's priest (Brew Potion and Scribe Scroll feats)
-Sertieren the Wise, neutral male Halfling Abjurer 5 (prohibited: Enchantment & Evocation)(Scribe Scroll and Craft Wondrous Item feats)
-Morlin Coalhewer, lawful good male Dwarf Cleric 5 of Dol Dorn (Craft Magic Arms and Armor feat)
 

A Diplomacy check against DC20 can get you a 10% discount if you want to buy anything.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 12, 2010, 04:12:29 PM
If noone else has anything in mind, Harika will take a Chronocharm of the Horizon Walker from the halfling. From the remaining 100, we could buy some Blessed Bandages from the priest guy and other stuff.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 12, 2010, 04:19:28 PM
Just a minor note: please check the minimum CL required for items. I don't have my MIC handy, so I can't check. Looks like I'll have to trust you guys :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 12, 2010, 04:23:21 PM
Chronocharm of the Horizon Walker is CL 3, as are Blessed Bandages (why? It's not even a Cure Minor, it just stabilizes) so no problem there. But yeah, I did forget to check, sorry. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 12, 2010, 04:55:30 PM
No prob, I forgot to mention it in the first place :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 12, 2010, 05:09:05 PM
No prob, I forgot to mention it in the first place :lol
Actually, I'm pretty sure you did mention max CL 6 sometime in the past, and it can easily be inferred from the fact that all the NPCs we can get stuff from are 5th level (with the exception of the Druid, who's 6th).
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 12, 2010, 05:53:49 PM
So... are we selling off all the extra loot then? I have a laundry list of cheap items I'd like to buy, but I'm not sure if I have the cash to buy any of them. At the least, I plan to get one of those Chronocharms of the Horizon Walker myself.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 12, 2010, 06:03:38 PM
Selling off loot is fine, but as usual you'll only be able to sell it for half of the price (so you could sell a fullplate for 750gp) ;)

: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 12, 2010, 06:05:57 PM
Selling off loot is fine, but as usual you'll only be able to sell it for half of the price (so you could sell a fullplate for 750gp) ;)
Hands off the full plate.  :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 12, 2010, 06:07:59 PM
Selling off loot is fine, but as usual you'll only be able to sell it for half of the price (so you could sell a fullplate for 750gp) ;)
Hands off the full plate.  :smirk
:lol

: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 12, 2010, 07:13:41 PM
Ok, I figured out how much the loot is worth, how much that gives each of us as a split if we sell it all, and then subtracted out the salable value of the items I took from that to figure out how much cash I get. I posted all of that in the loot thread, for everyone's convenience.

I'll get a chronocharm of the horizon walker for my "free" item from the townsfolk, and keep the cash from my share of the loot, I think. There are a couple of items I'd like that I can't quite afford.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 12, 2010, 07:25:27 PM
Here's a crazy idea: How about we each put together some of our share of the loot and we use that to buy an Orb of Mental Renewal and/or a Rod of Bodily Restoration? We don't know how common ability damage will be, but it would suck to come unprepared if we do encounter it. One of those costs 3.1k, split five ways that would make 620 each.

Oh, is the 600 gp of free items for each party member of for the party as a whole?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 12, 2010, 07:27:39 PM
Here's a crazy idea: How about we each put together some of our share of the loot and we use that to buy an Orb of Mental Renewal and/or a Rod of Bodily Restoration? We don't know how common ability damage will be, but it would suck to come unprepared if we do encounter it. One of those costs 3.1k, split five ways that would make 620 each.

Oh, is the 600 gp of free items for each party member of for the party as a whole?
I was thinking of getting the Caduceus Bracers in a couple of levels. They'd let me use my Lay on Hands to heal ability damage and/or remove fatigue, and they only cost 2000 gp. That won't be available for two levels, though. So if we're worried about it before then, we might consider the orbs. I'd say we can just wait personally, though... I can always prep Lesser Restoration (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/spells/restorationLesser.htm) to cure those things if we run into it before then.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 12, 2010, 07:31:20 PM
Sounds good. Alternatively, a Wand of Lesser Restoration is 1.5k.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 12, 2010, 07:36:15 PM
Sounds good. Alternatively, a Wand of Lesser Restoration is 1.5k.
Fuck... that's really cheap. If we're worried about it at all, we should just buy one of those... 50 charges of that should be enough for the whole campaign, unless we have to destroy a Yuan-Ti temple or something crazy...

Hell... if we could find an archivist to buy it from, it would be 750 gp, wouldn't it? And I could actually craft one for half that next level, since I'm picking up a prestige paladin level... if I could spare a day to work with someone with the feat...

Yeah... let's not bother with the orbs or the gloves.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem May 12, 2010, 07:49:29 PM
Guh... I've never been good with equipment. I think I'll let you guys figure that out. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 12, 2010, 08:03:59 PM
Guh... I've never been good with equipment. I think I'll let you guys figure that out. :P
Here is a suggestion for your free item (which I have on my Yamanu clone in Hijax's game :P ):

BOOTS OF AGILE LEAPING (MiC, 600 gp, 2 lbs)
These crocodile-skin boots feel slightly elastic. While wearing boots of agile leaping, you can add your Dexterity modifier (instead of your Strength modifier) on Jump checks.
If you have at least 5 ranks in Balance, you can stand from prone as a swift action. When standing from prone, you do not provoke attacks of opportunity.

After thinking about it, I think we should just pitch in and buy a Wand of Lesser Restoration, if we can get it at 1500 gp or less. Then we can just not worry about ability damage for the rest of the game... It's only 300 gp each...
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem May 12, 2010, 08:16:07 PM
Ok, those might be pretty decent. Might even be worth sinking in just 4 more ranks into balance.

Also, looking at the loot thread, it should be fairly easy to manage pitching in for that stuff.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork May 12, 2010, 10:22:06 PM
I'm good for buying whatever.   :p
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 13, 2010, 04:32:52 AM
Oh, is the 600 gp of free items for each party member of for the party as a whole?
Party wide. I think the module intended it mostly for Scrolls and Potions...

: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 13, 2010, 08:22:39 AM
Oh, is the 600 gp of free items for each party member of for the party as a whole?
Party wide. I think the module intended it mostly for Scrolls and Potions...


Probably, but scrolls and potions mostly suck, so who cares what WotC intended? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 13, 2010, 06:36:17 PM
Oh, is the 600 gp of free items for each party member of for the party as a whole?
Party wide. I think the module intended it mostly for Scrolls and Potions...


Probably, but scrolls and potions mostly suck, so who cares what WotC intended? :P
Agreed :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 14, 2010, 07:00:01 AM
By the way, just let me know when you guys are finished sorting out gear and I'll send you on you way :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 14, 2010, 12:10:37 PM
Ok, those might be pretty decent. Might even be worth sinking in just 4 more ranks into balance.
The "stand from prone as a swift action without provoking an AoO" ability is amazing. I can't believe they give it away that cheaply...


If we're buying a wand of Lesser Restoration, then I'm ready. I'll just jot that and the chronocharm down on my sheet and I'm done. Unless someone else doesn't trust the paladin-to-be, and wants to hold the wand...  :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 14, 2010, 12:58:14 PM
I'm still around. But not for long.

May 18th I leave for Boot Camp.
Any preference on what happens with Saru when you leave?
Bumpy since it's only 4 days away...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 17, 2010, 06:06:46 AM
So...???
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem May 17, 2010, 09:30:14 AM
Sorry, busy time for me with finals approaching. :(
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 17, 2010, 09:37:02 AM
I just finished my first five-hour written exam half an hour ago. One more on wednesday, then a four-hour one on friday.

So yeah, I'm pretty much free. :P Gonna see what I can do to get a post up.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 17, 2010, 09:38:02 AM
Don't worry about it, guys, just checking to see everyone's still on board, even with breaks for real life and what not :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 17, 2010, 09:48:39 AM
Naw, I'm serious. Wednesday's exam is German, so I don't need to learn for that, and school's already out.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 17, 2010, 11:27:48 AM
I just finished my first five-hour written exam half an hour ago. One more on wednesday, then a four-hour one on friday.
Jesus Christ. You're in High School, right? That sounds insane... College exams don't even last that long here. The only ones I've taken that long were standardized tests to get into college/graduate school/etc.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 17, 2010, 11:35:53 AM
I just finished my first five-hour written exam half an hour ago. One more on wednesday, then a four-hour one on friday.
Jesus Christ. You're in High School, right? That sounds insane... College exams don't even last that long here. The only ones I've taken that long were standardized tests to get into college/graduate school/etc.
Well, that's pretty much what they are. You need to have taken these (a Matura, or Abitur in Germany) to go to a university. Theretically it's also a good thing to have when you apply for a job, but in practice I'm pretty sure it's mostly worthless since almost anyone who didn't quit school to do an apprenticeship or something is pretty much assumed to have it. Technically it's not even part of High School, since we already graduated last Wednesday, and anyone can take it if they think they can do it.
After the written exams are done, we have one month of preparation time, and then I'll have four oral exams, all in one half-day. But hey, no pressure.:D
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 17, 2010, 11:40:38 AM
Well don't screw those up for sure, then! Especially not for an online DnD game! :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita May 17, 2010, 11:43:18 AM
Well don't screw those up for sure, then! Especially not for an online DnD game! :P
Bah, always you old people with your superior experience and whatnot telling me not to screw up my grades! :P
I wonder if there's a smiley for shaking a cellphone or a DS or something to counter the cane-shaking.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 17, 2010, 11:46:17 AM
Well don't screw those up for sure, then! Especially not for an online DnD game! :P
Bah, always you old people with your superior experience and whatnot telling me not to screw up my grades! :P
Yeah, I know... To be honest, I was so drunk the night before I took mine that I was still drunk when I went to take them. I still got the highest score anyone had ever gotten in my county, though. ;) About a year later, I quit drinking for good, as it had gotten completely out of hand.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 27, 2010, 09:08:24 AM
Bump?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork May 27, 2010, 12:10:23 PM
Hiya.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY May 27, 2010, 01:22:55 PM
Hi!  :blah :whistle
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem May 27, 2010, 03:34:38 PM
Well, so... yeah. Finals are over for me. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw May 29, 2010, 01:45:51 PM
Cool, I still got finals, but I can manage some posts.

But like I said before, I was kinda waiting on a signal from you guys that you've got your item list done and are ready to move on :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork May 31, 2010, 06:44:46 PM
Just an FYI, I'm going to be out of town from the 3rd to the 15th, but I'll have internet during most of that.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem May 31, 2010, 06:57:47 PM
I'll also be limited from the 2nd through the 6th, but mostly the 5th and 6th.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 01, 2010, 10:24:22 AM
No prob, it's not like the game can get any slower :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 01, 2010, 10:32:19 AM
No prob, it's not like the game can get any slower :P
Is that supposed to be a challenge? :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 03, 2010, 04:15:52 PM
I'm going out of town from Friday till Monday (4th-7th), and probably won't be posting at all during that time. I hope the rest of you guys have your shopping lists figured out by then. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 03, 2010, 04:20:00 PM
You had yours done already? :P

Anywho, have fun :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 03, 2010, 04:20:36 PM
You had yours done already? :P
Mine's been done for weeks...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 03, 2010, 04:37:43 PM
I'll... try to get mine done soon. I just need to review the last few OOC pages to remember what the frick we were even talking about getting. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 03, 2010, 04:43:17 PM
I'll... try to get mine done soon. I just need to review the last few OOC pages to remember what the frick we were even talking about getting. :P
Here you go:
After thinking about it, I think we should just pitch in and buy a Wand of Lesser Restoration, if we can get it at 1500 gp or less. Then we can just not worry about ability damage for the rest of the game... It's only 300 gp each...
;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 03, 2010, 04:45:57 PM
I'll... try to get mine done soon. I just need to review the last few OOC pages to remember what the frick we were even talking about getting. :P
Here you go:
After thinking about it, I think we should just pitch in and buy a Wand of Lesser Restoration, if we can get it at 1500 gp or less. Then we can just not worry about ability damage for the rest of the game... It's only 300 gp each...
;)
I'm pretty sure there was also talk about other things though, no?
At least, I know I wanted to get some items I forgot to buy at character creation.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 03, 2010, 09:04:37 PM
Okay, so we've got a budget of 11,655 gp from selling the loot, right? Actually, make that 11,654. I want a dagger too. To that we add 600 gp of free magic items. If we subtract the Wand of Lesser Restoration from that (can we even get it for cheap with the casters that are in town?), we've got 10,155 gp to split five ways, plus 600 gp of free magic items, assuming we can't use the 600 toward paying off a more expensive item. If we can, instead everyone simply gets 2,151 gp to spend as they see fit. I think Phaedrus and I are the only ones who took some of the loot for ourselves. Do we want to bother figuring out how much less stuff each of us gets?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 04, 2010, 06:05:30 AM
You can use the 600 gp to pay for part of the wand or some other expensive magic item :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 04, 2010, 11:30:19 AM
Man, I wish returning weapons weren't so damn expensive. Anyway, I'm on my laptop right now, and my shopping list is on my desktop which I don't have immediate access to at the moment. Perhaps later today.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 04, 2010, 03:16:53 PM
How expensive is that gaunlet of infinite blades thingy? Would that be affordable? Don't think it gives you magic daggers, but it's a start...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 04, 2010, 03:41:04 PM
How expensive is that gaunlet of infinite blades thingy? Would that be affordable? Don't think it gives you magic daggers, but it's a start...
It's 6.5 k and CL 12, so I don't think we can get it just now.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 04, 2010, 04:33:15 PM
How expensive is that gaunlet of infinite blades thingy? Would that be affordable? Don't think it gives you magic daggers, but it's a start...
It's 6.5 k and CL 12, so I don't think we can get it just now.
Might be something to put in some loot eventually...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 04, 2010, 04:42:18 PM
I'm not sure whether I should get a Chronocharm plus other stuff or an Amulet of Teamwork for my share. It might help me if I can get a ruling on whether multiple such amulets distributed over party members would stack. ;) The most important part of the amulet is the +2 untyped damage bonus that all flankers get when the wearer flanks an enemy. On one hand, it could be argued that multiple amulets are the same type of item so they don't stack under the same source clause, on the other hand they might be different sources witht he same name.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 04, 2010, 05:59:38 PM
How expensive is that gaunlet of infinite blades thingy? Would that be affordable? Don't think it gives you magic daggers, but it's a start...
It's 6.5 k and CL 12, so I don't think we can get it just now.
Might be something to put in some loot eventually...

It's actually already on my wishlist, which I just now remembered is already on my character sheet in that thread...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 04, 2010, 06:42:26 PM
How expensive is that gaunlet of infinite blades thingy? Would that be affordable? Don't think it gives you magic daggers, but it's a start...
It's 6.5 k and CL 12, so I don't think we can get it just now.
Might be something to put in some loot eventually...

It's actually already on my wishlist, which I just now remembered is already on my character sheet in that thread...
Noted :)

I'm not sure whether I should get a Chronocharm plus other stuff or an Amulet of Teamwork for my share. It might help me if I can get a ruling on whether multiple such amulets distributed over party members would stack. ;) The most important part of the amulet is the +2 untyped damage bonus that all flankers get when the wearer flanks an enemy. On one hand, it could be argued that multiple amulets are the same type of item so they don't stack under the same source clause, on the other hand they might be different sources witht he same name.
I'm gonna go with same source on this one, so no stacking. Sorry bub ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 04, 2010, 06:45:05 PM
I'm not sure whether I should get a Chronocharm plus other stuff or an Amulet of Teamwork for my share. It might help me if I can get a ruling on whether multiple such amulets distributed over party members would stack. ;) The most important part of the amulet is the +2 untyped damage bonus that all flankers get when the wearer flanks an enemy. On one hand, it could be argued that multiple amulets are the same type of item so they don't stack under the same source clause, on the other hand they might be different sources witht he same name.
I'm gonna go with same source on this one, so no stacking. Sorry bub ;)
Aww. :P
Then I think I'll just get a Chronocharm and some Blessed Bandages and save the rest. The bonus is nice, but if we're going to be fighting dozens of hobbos at once, it's not as effective as they'll be ganging up on us, not vice versa.
...Is there a credit institute in the town where I could deposit my money and get interest on it? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 05, 2010, 05:33:44 AM
I'm not sure whether I should get a Chronocharm plus other stuff or an Amulet of Teamwork for my share. It might help me if I can get a ruling on whether multiple such amulets distributed over party members would stack. ;) The most important part of the amulet is the +2 untyped damage bonus that all flankers get when the wearer flanks an enemy. On one hand, it could be argued that multiple amulets are the same type of item so they don't stack under the same source clause, on the other hand they might be different sources witht he same name.
I'm gonna go with same source on this one, so no stacking. Sorry bub ;)
Aww. :P
Then I think I'll just get a Chronocharm and some Blessed Bandages and save the rest. The bonus is nice, but if we're going to be fighting dozens of hobbos at once, it's not as effective as they'll be ganging up on us, not vice versa.
...Is there a credit institute in the town where I could deposit my money and get interest on it? :P
You can deposit it for safe keeping (although I think it's just as safe, if not safer, on an adventurer's body :P), but you won't be getting any interest :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 10, 2010, 01:05:16 PM
There, done. Unless there's other cheap utility items we should get that I haven't thought of. I'll probably buy some Tree tokens when we need to stop a big army or so. :D

For now, I guess we'll talk to the guard guy and hash out a plan.

Also, sorry for the delay. I was picking spells for a level 12 Wizard and feeling like a kid in a toy store. ...is 14.9k too much to spend on spells for the spellbook? >_>
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 10, 2010, 06:15:07 PM
There, done. Unless there's other cheap utility items we should get that I haven't thought of. I'll probably buy some Tree tokens when we need to stop a big army or so. :D
Gee, I wonder what the odds of that happening are :P

Also, sorry for the delay. I was picking spells for a level 12 Wizard and feeling like a kid in a toy store. ...is 14.9k too much to spend on spells for the spellbook? >_>
Hahaha, I know exactly how you feel. And no, that's not too much at all :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 03:34:55 PM
Okay, new IC post is up, time to get this show on the road again.
Let me know if you have any questions :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 14, 2010, 03:44:15 PM
minus Saru, who has decided to stay behind to aid the city guard as a scout alerting them to possible raiders
Smooth.

I think I heard something about bridges and RHoD once... Let's go with the Dawn Way. :D Also, more ambushes=more XP.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 04:08:23 PM
minus Saru, who has decided to stay behind to aid the city guard as a scout alerting them to possible raiders
Smooth.

I think I heard something about bridges and RHoD once... Let's go with the Dawn Way. :D Also, more ambushes=more XP.
Yay metagaming :P

I'll see if I can get a map up tonight or tomorrow, the townsfolk would probably have a (spare) basic map to show to/give you/that you can copy. Ideally without letters marking certain spots, but if I can't find one like that the regular one will have to do.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 14, 2010, 04:25:47 PM
Urg, sorry about taking so long with the shopping list. Can someone remind me of how much we each had to spend?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 14, 2010, 04:27:09 PM
Hmm... mounts. So handy, and yet damned near impossible to sneak around with. Should we leave them in town, and take the footpath? Or maybe we just head like bats out of hell back down the road, and rely on being badassed enough to take care of whatever ambushes we might run into. :D Then, once we've talked to Jorr, we can try our hand at being stealthy.

How much time are we talking about in absolute terms, anyway? Is it 2 days if we ride at full speed, and 8 if we sneak, or what? What's the difference in time on horseback vs. the footpath?



@Venn: I tallied it up in the Loot thread, and Agita did the math just a bit back in this one. Here  (http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=7300.0)is the number I came up with, after halving everything due to the 50% loss in selling stuff:
Halving that due to the 50% loss from selling stuff, and dividing by 5, leaves us with shares of 2331 gp each.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 14, 2010, 04:27:24 PM
Okay, so we've got a budget of 11,655 gp from selling the loot, right? Actually, make that 11,654. I want a dagger too. To that we add 600 gp of free magic items. If we subtract the Wand of Lesser Restoration from that (can we even get it for cheap with the casters that are in town?), we've got 10,155 gp to split five ways, plus 600 gp of free magic items, assuming we can't use the 600 toward paying off a more expensive item. If we can, instead everyone simply gets 2,151 gp to spend as they see fit. I think Phaedrus and I are the only ones who took some of the loot for ourselves. Do we want to bother figuring out how much less stuff each of us gets?
That's what I got.

I say we take our additional tanks with us. I'm pretty sure my horsey can kill some hobbos on its own.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 14, 2010, 04:29:04 PM
I think Phaedrus and I are the only ones who took some of the loot for ourselves. Do we want to bother figuring out how much less stuff each of us gets?
I calculated that. I listed prices for most of the stuff, so you can use those to estimate it. Don't forget to halve them, though, as the total loot amount (and our shares) is halved assuming we're going to sell them.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 14, 2010, 04:31:14 PM
Ok, thanks guys.  Got some errands to run but I'll figure this out later today.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 04:47:05 PM
I'll try to get travelling time posted in a bit.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 05:23:01 PM
Distance per route:
-Dawn Way: 8,5 miles Dawn Way + 3 miles Witch Trail
-Witch Trail: 1 mile Plains + 7 miles Witch Trail

Routes:
-Dawn Way: x1
-Witch Trail: x1 (unmounted only due to low overgrowth)

Speed:
On Foot:
-Speed 20: 16 miles/day
-Speed 30: 24 miles/day

Mule:
-24 miles/day
-231-690 lb.: 16 miles/day
Heavy (War)horse:
-40 miles/day
-201-600 lb. (Heavy Horse): 28 miles/day
-301-900 lb. (Heavy Warhorse): 28 miles/day

Speed modifiers:
-Travelling normally: x1
-Travelling cautiously (lower chance of being noticed, higher chance of getting the drop on any ambushers): x½
-Hiding at any opportunity (lowest chance of being noticed, highest chance of getting the drop on any ambushers): x¼

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Going with the slowest speeds here (20ft./16 miles per day on foot due to Yamanu as well as 20ft./16 miles per day mounted due to Phaedrus' Mule (that's currently on a medium load, right?).
  
Given these factors, the Dawn Way route should take close to 6 hours both mounted and on foot.
The Witch Way route should take roughly 4 hours.

(not counting slower speed due to cautious travel).


EDIT: Noticed I made a mistake concerning mounts on the Witch Trail, edited ingame post.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 14, 2010, 05:35:28 PM
Wait, didn't you say the Dawn way is the quicker road to take? If it isn't, what's the point of taking it if not metagaming considerations and desire for more XP?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 14, 2010, 05:35:55 PM
Well let's just go the Witch's Way, then, and hide. Hmm... the best way to go at a decent movement rate and still be sneaky might be to have Goldflower (and Yamanu?) travel invisibly above ground while the Colonel and Kalal tunnel under them. That way Goldflower would need to refresh the invis like once every 3 rounds on average. They could otherwise just walk normally and keep their eyes and ears open. Us burrowers could go at full speed (which is half normal speed), only surfacing every now and then to make sure we're still going the right way, etc.

Is there some way for us to communicate while half of us are underground?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 06:07:14 PM
Wait, didn't you say the Dawn way is the quicker road to take? If it isn't, what's the point of taking it if not metagaming considerations and desire for more XP?
Yeah, that's what I initially thought, but apparently that isn't the case. Kinda weird really *shrug*

The biggest advantage it offers is that you can bring your mount along I guess. It would be different if you were to cut straight through the forest instead of using the Witch Trail, in that case the Dawn Way would definitely be faster.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 06:10:15 PM
Well let's just go the Witch's Way, then, and hide. Hmm... the best way to go at a decent movement rate and still be sneaky might be to have Goldflower (and Yamanu?) travel invisibly above ground while the Colonel and Kalal tunnel under them. That way Goldflower would need to refresh the invis like once every 3 rounds on average. They could otherwise just walk normally and keep their eyes and ears open. Us burrowers could go at full speed (which is half normal speed), only surfacing every now and then to make sure we're still going the right way, etc.

Is there some way for us to communicate while half of us are underground?
That's a burrow speed of 15, right? So that way it would cost you what, 5 and a half hours or so?

As for communication, maybe some kind of Telepathy (not that any of you guys have that IIRC), otherwise I wouldn't know.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 14, 2010, 06:12:20 PM
How much time would it take if we cut straight through the forest and just mowed down the undergrowth in front of us to speed it up? :D

I do kind of want to use my mount in battle before it stops being awesome for the level and becomes cannon fodder, though...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 06:26:56 PM
How much time would it take if we cut straight through the forest and just mowed down the undergrowth in front of us to speed it up? :D

I do kind of want to use my mount in battle before it stops being awesome for the level and becomes cannon fodder, though...
*breaks out RHoD booklet*

Cutting straight through the forest means travelling at half speed. I'd say it would take about 5 and a half hours. And ofcourse there's the risk of getting lost (Survival DC15 to avoid getting lost).
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 14, 2010, 06:29:22 PM
How much time would it take if we cut straight through the forest and just mowed down the undergrowth in front of us to speed it up? :D

I do kind of want to use my mount in battle before it stops being awesome for the level and becomes cannon fodder, though...
*breaks out RHoD booklet*

Cutting straight through the forest means travelling at half speed. I'd say it would take about 5 and a half hours. And ofcourse there's the risk of getting lost (Survival DC15 to avoid getting lost).
Which is why I said we'd mow down the stuff that makes us move slower (undergrowth and stuff). Brute force approach, in other words. Would that be faster? :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 14, 2010, 06:37:32 PM
How much time would it take if we cut straight through the forest and just mowed down the undergrowth in front of us to speed it up? :D

I do kind of want to use my mount in battle before it stops being awesome for the level and becomes cannon fodder, though...
*breaks out RHoD booklet*

Cutting straight through the forest means travelling at half speed. I'd say it would take about 5 and a half hours. And ofcourse there's the risk of getting lost (Survival DC15 to avoid getting lost).
Which is why I said we'd mow down the stuff that makes us move slower (undergrowth and stuff). Brute force approach, in other words. Would that be faster? :D

It still takes time to mow that stuff down, as it were. You've got to stop in front of an obstacle and then remove it. Otherwise it's like trying to walk through a wall. You could plausibly do it, but the impact is gonna serious cramp your style. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 14, 2010, 06:39:48 PM
How much time would it take if we cut straight through the forest and just mowed down the undergrowth in front of us to speed it up? :D

I do kind of want to use my mount in battle before it stops being awesome for the level and becomes cannon fodder, though...
*breaks out RHoD booklet*

Cutting straight through the forest means travelling at half speed. I'd say it would take about 5 and a half hours. And ofcourse there's the risk of getting lost (Survival DC15 to avoid getting lost).
Which is why I said we'd mow down the stuff that makes us move slower (undergrowth and stuff). Brute force approach, in other words. Would that be faster? :D

It still takes time to mow that stuff down, as it were. You've got to stop in front of an obstacle and then remove it. Otherwise it's like trying to walk through a wall. You could plausibly do it, but the impact is gonna serious cramp your style. :P
Nah, I've got DR, walking through walls is no prob. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 06:49:20 PM
How much time would it take if we cut straight through the forest and just mowed down the undergrowth in front of us to speed it up? :D

I do kind of want to use my mount in battle before it stops being awesome for the level and becomes cannon fodder, though...
*breaks out RHoD booklet*

Cutting straight through the forest means travelling at half speed. I'd say it would take about 5 and a half hours. And ofcourse there's the risk of getting lost (Survival DC15 to avoid getting lost).
Which is why I said we'd mow down the stuff that makes us move slower (undergrowth and stuff). Brute force approach, in other words. Would that be faster? :D

It still takes time to mow that stuff down, as it were. You've got to stop in front of an obstacle and then remove it. Otherwise it's like trying to walk through a wall. You could plausibly do it, but the impact is gonna serious cramp your style. :P
Nah, I've got DR, walking through walls is no prob. :P
Machete-killing of plant-life is included in those 5.5 hours :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 14, 2010, 06:51:36 PM
How much time would it take if we cut straight through the forest and just mowed down the undergrowth in front of us to speed it up? :D

I do kind of want to use my mount in battle before it stops being awesome for the level and becomes cannon fodder, though...
*breaks out RHoD booklet*

Cutting straight through the forest means travelling at half speed. I'd say it would take about 5 and a half hours. And ofcourse there's the risk of getting lost (Survival DC15 to avoid getting lost).
Which is why I said we'd mow down the stuff that makes us move slower (undergrowth and stuff). Brute force approach, in other words. Would that be faster? :D

It still takes time to mow that stuff down, as it were. You've got to stop in front of an obstacle and then remove it. Otherwise it's like trying to walk through a wall. You could plausibly do it, but the impact is gonna serious cramp your style. :P
Nah, I've got DR, walking through walls is no prob. :P
Machete-killing of plant-life is included in those 5.5 hours :P
But a greatsword is longer and can therefore kill more plant life in one swing, right? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 14, 2010, 06:55:43 PM
But a greatsword is longer and can therefore kill more plant life in one swing, right? :P

Ok, so maybe instead of 5.5 hours it becomes 5.4 hours? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 14, 2010, 06:59:38 PM
Since you can make a single melee attack even after your mount moves full speed, doesn't that mean we could have our mounts move, then make an attack to destroy anything in front of us, and then have the mount move again? Yay for D&D physics and turn-based actions! :P

I like using my mount in combat, also. The extra actions are handy, even ignoring attacks. So are we leaning towards just running down the road and/or plowing through the woods?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 14, 2010, 07:10:17 PM
What if I take some of Kalal's mule's load onto my warhorse so it doesn't carry a medium load anymore and we then have our mounts hustle? Would that draw extra ambushes (aka extra XP)? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 07:24:52 PM
http://www.d20srd.org/srd/movement.htm

Hustle is only possible for one hour, and not listed for distance covered/day (8 hours).

At best it'll net you one hour...and that's because I'm too tired to object right now :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 14, 2010, 07:30:36 PM
What if I take some of Kalal's mule's load onto my warhorse so it doesn't carry a medium load anymore and we then have our mounts hustle? Would that draw extra ambushes (aka extra XP)? :P
Just Kalal and his armor, shield, and weapons would put the mule well into medium encumbrance. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 07:38:48 PM
What if I take some of Kalal's mule's load onto my warhorse so it doesn't carry a medium load anymore and we then have our mounts hustle? Would that draw extra ambushes (aka extra XP)? :P
Just Kalal and his armor, shield, and weapons would put the mule well into medium encumbrance. :P
By the way, I noticed on your sheet you wanted to buy another mule. Did you want to do that before you guys left town?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 14, 2010, 07:40:17 PM
What if I take some of Kalal's mule's load onto my warhorse so it doesn't carry a medium load anymore and we then have our mounts hustle? Would that draw extra ambushes (aka extra XP)? :P
Just Kalal and his armor, shield, and weapons would put the mule well into medium encumbrance. :P
How much does he weigh, exactly? Maybe my pimped ride can handle him. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 14, 2010, 07:43:50 PM
What if I take some of Kalal's mule's load onto my warhorse so it doesn't carry a medium load anymore and we then have our mounts hustle? Would that draw extra ambushes (aka extra XP)? :P
Just Kalal and his armor, shield, and weapons would put the mule well into medium encumbrance. :P
How much does he weigh, exactly? Maybe my pimped ride can handle him. :P
Should get a Belt of Wide Earth for that mule :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 15, 2010, 12:42:02 AM
What if I take some of Kalal's mule's load onto my warhorse so it doesn't carry a medium load anymore and we then have our mounts hustle? Would that draw extra ambushes (aka extra XP)? :P
Just Kalal and his armor, shield, and weapons would put the mule well into medium encumbrance. :P
How much does he weigh, exactly? Maybe my pimped ride can handle him. :P
Should get a Belt of Wide Earth for that mule :P
Or get a dwarven mule.  :smirk

If we decide to take our mounts, I might buy another one. If not, definitely not now.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 15, 2010, 01:30:29 AM
You know, I honestly can't think of anything I want with this gold. I think I may just save it. Though, a Healing Belt might be nice for those inevitable emergencies.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 15, 2010, 11:21:01 AM
You know, I honestly can't think of anything I want with this gold. I think I may just save it. Though, a Healing Belt might be nice for those inevitable emergencies.
You can borrow mine. I can't wear two belts. :P Of course, if you want a second one, it won't be unused I'm sure.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 15, 2010, 12:43:00 PM
So let me know when you guys have decided on a route :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 15, 2010, 01:09:01 PM
So let me know when you guys have decided on a route :)
I have an idea.


(http://ginavivinetto.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/fred11.gif)

Let's split up, gang!

What could possibly go wrong? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 15, 2010, 01:14:25 PM
(http://www.amcgltd.com/archives/bear-how-about-no-wj9.jpg)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 18, 2010, 08:22:44 AM
For some reason that picture isn't showing for me...
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 18, 2010, 11:22:19 AM
For some reason that picture isn't showing for me...
I'm not sure which pic you couldn't see, but I posted the "How about No" bear.



So... which way are we going, gang? Let's just pick one and get on with it. Since it is actually a fairly short trip, I'm thinking we go the sneaky route and leave our mounts in town. (I mean the foot path, with two above ground invisible and two tunneling below). I don't care much either way, though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 18, 2010, 12:56:21 PM
Couldn't see yours.
I'm familiar with it though :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 18, 2010, 12:59:09 PM
I'm fine with taking the forest trail.

We should probably get something that gives us blindsense or something as soon as we can afford it if we want to use out burrow speed a lot.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 18, 2010, 01:38:31 PM
I'm fine with taking the forest trail.

We should probably get something that gives us blindsense or something as soon as we can afford it if we want to use out burrow speed a lot.
It would have to not need LoE. Maybe Tremorsense? There is a graft for that, but I'm not sure how much it costs.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 18, 2010, 02:07:42 PM
I'm fine with taking the forest trail.

We should probably get something that gives us blindsense or something as soon as we can afford it if we want to use out burrow speed a lot.
It would have to not need LoE. Maybe Tremorsense? There is a graft for that, but I'm not sure how much it costs.
There's the Tremor Graft from MoE, but that sucks. You need to take a move action to pinpoint creatures, and you only get info that is accurate as of the moment you take the action.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 18, 2010, 02:12:15 PM
I'm fine with taking the forest trail.

We should probably get something that gives us blindsense or something as soon as we can afford it if we want to use out burrow speed a lot.
It would have to not need LoE. Maybe Tremorsense? There is a graft for that, but I'm not sure how much it costs.
There's the Tremor Graft from MoE, but that sucks. You need to take a move action to pinpoint creatures, and you only get info that is accurate as of the moment you take the action.
Better than nothing. We don't need to pinpoint, if we're mostly using it for navigating underground, do we? Even a general idea of what's around us should be enough... How much is that thing? Is it insanely overpriced, like most grafts?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 18, 2010, 02:15:51 PM
I'm fine with taking the forest trail.

We should probably get something that gives us blindsense or something as soon as we can afford it if we want to use out burrow speed a lot.
It would have to not need LoE. Maybe Tremorsense? There is a graft for that, but I'm not sure how much it costs.
There's the Tremor Graft from MoE, but that sucks. You need to take a move action to pinpoint creatures, and you only get info that is accurate as of the moment you take the action.
Better than nothing. We don't need to pinpoint, if we're mostly using it for navigating underground, do we? Even a general idea of what's around us should be enough... How much is that thing? Is it insanely overpriced, like most grafts?
No, I mean that's the only thing it can do. It doesn't actually give tremorsense, just the shitty pinpointing ability. It's just something similar, but worse.

EDIT: Here's what it does.
: MoE, page 133
Effect: As long as you are touching the ground, you can take a move action to activate your graft, sensing the number and location of all creatures within 20 feet. You know the exact location of creatures within range when you activate this ability, but unless you can also see them, this knowledge can quickly become moot as those creatures move.
 Your bulky legs make your movement slower and more ponderous. As a result, your land speed decreases by 5 feet.
It's comparatively cheap for grafts at 6k.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 18, 2010, 04:15:14 PM
Not worth it, IMO.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 18, 2010, 04:19:56 PM
Not worth it, IMO.
Agreed.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 18, 2010, 04:21:46 PM
Not worth it, IMO.
Agreed.
Yeah.
I get the feeling there may have been another one that gave real Tremorsense, but that's the only one that comes to mind.

EDIT: Glaring Eye gives Blindsense out to 30 ft. for 10k, but Blindsense requires LoE, doesn't it?
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 18, 2010, 04:33:01 PM
Well, Blindsight is a level 3 cleric spell and isn't self-only. :D
Unfortunately it's only minute/level.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 18, 2010, 04:42:53 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 18, 2010, 04:50:00 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".

Mindsight would only work if someone stayed above ground. You know, with the fact that it only detects minds and all. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 18, 2010, 05:00:51 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".

Mindsight would only work if someone stayed above ground. You know, with the fact that it only detects minds and all. :)
Not sure I get your meaning. Telepathy and, by extension, Mindsight don't need LoE to work. The bigger question is how to get Mindsight. I can think of two ways, but both require a two-feat investment, assuming Goldflower has traded her familiar for some ACF.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork June 18, 2010, 05:07:33 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".

Mindsight would only work if someone stayed above ground. You know, with the fact that it only detects minds and all. :)
Not sure I get your meaning. Telepathy and, by extension, Mindsight don't need LoE to work. The bigger question is how to get Mindsight. I can think of two ways, but both require a two-feat investment, assuming Goldflower has traded her familiar for some ACF.

Yep, traded it for Rapid Summoning.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 18, 2010, 05:24:52 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".

Mindsight would only work if someone stayed above ground. You know, with the fact that it only detects minds and all. :)
Not sure I get your meaning. Telepathy and, by extension, Mindsight don't need LoE to work. The bigger question is how to get Mindsight. I can think of two ways, but both require a two-feat investment, assuming Goldflower has traded her familiar for some ACF.
What about the typical Mindbender dip?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 18, 2010, 05:27:34 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".

Mindsight would only work if someone stayed above ground. You know, with the fact that it only detects minds and all. :)
Not sure I get your meaning. Telepathy and, by extension, Mindsight don't need LoE to work. The bigger question is how to get Mindsight. I can think of two ways, but both require a two-feat investment, assuming Goldflower has traded her familiar for some ACF.
What about the typical Mindbender dip?
Well, the only one in the group wo could even take it is Goldflower, and she's banned Enchantment, didn't she?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 18, 2010, 05:38:58 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".

Mindsight would only work if someone stayed above ground. You know, with the fact that it only detects minds and all. :)
Not sure I get your meaning. Telepathy and, by extension, Mindsight don't need LoE to work. The bigger question is how to get Mindsight. I can think of two ways, but both require a two-feat investment, assuming Goldflower has traded her familiar for some ACF.
What about the typical Mindbender dip?
Well, the only one in the group wo could even take it is Goldflower, and she's banned Enchantment, didn't she?
Bringing us back to the 2 feats (Touch of Captivation and Mindsight)

EDIT: Maybe a Wand of Blindsight for Kalal?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork June 18, 2010, 05:43:31 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".

Mindsight would only work if someone stayed above ground. You know, with the fact that it only detects minds and all. :)
Not sure I get your meaning. Telepathy and, by extension, Mindsight don't need LoE to work. The bigger question is how to get Mindsight. I can think of two ways, but both require a two-feat investment, assuming Goldflower has traded her familiar for some ACF.
What about the typical Mindbender dip?
Well, the only one in the group wo could even take it is Goldflower, and she's banned Enchantment, didn't she?

Yep, banned enchantment.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 18, 2010, 05:45:13 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".

Mindsight would only work if someone stayed above ground. You know, with the fact that it only detects minds and all. :)
Not sure I get your meaning. Telepathy and, by extension, Mindsight don't need LoE to work. The bigger question is how to get Mindsight. I can think of two ways, but both require a two-feat investment, assuming Goldflower has traded her familiar for some ACF.
What about the typical Mindbender dip?
Well, the only one in the group wo could even take it is Goldflower, and she's banned Enchantment, didn't she?
Bringing us back to the 2 feats (Touch of Captivation and Mindsight)
That would be two feats and a level. The two feats I'm thinking of are either Obtain Familiar+Improved Familiar for a Pseudodragon or Shape Soulmeld (Shedu Crown)+Mindsight. Actually, the latter would require three feats, as it also needs Open Least Chakra.

EDIT: Come to think of it, there's a way to do it with a single feat. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 18, 2010, 05:48:08 PM
Hrmmm... this is trickier than I thought...

The easiest answer is Leadership, it seems. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 18, 2010, 05:48:32 PM
Hrmmm... this is trickier than I thought...

The easiest answer is Leadership, it seems. :P
Damn you, don't explain the joke! :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 18, 2010, 05:51:02 PM
Hrmmm... this is trickier than I thought...

The easiest answer is Leadership, it seems. :P
Damn you, don't explain the joke! :P
Hey, my post was before your edit! Great minds think alike, that's all. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 18, 2010, 05:52:45 PM
Hrmmm... this is trickier than I thought...

The easiest answer is Leadership, it seems. :P
Damn you, don't explain the joke! :P
Hey, my post was before your edit! Great minds think alike, that's all. :D
Actually, my edit was a few seconds before your post. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 18, 2010, 05:53:04 PM
Sorry guys, no Leadership ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 18, 2010, 05:55:33 PM
Sorry guys, no Leadership ;)
Oh, right, that whole 'no cohorts' stuff. Bummer. The advantage of Shedu Crown is that anyone can do it, but it's also the biggest investment of the three methods. The other two are only doable by Goldflower and would probably derail her build a bit.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 18, 2010, 06:26:13 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".

Mindsight would only work if someone stayed above ground. You know, with the fact that it only detects minds and all. :)
Not sure I get your meaning. Telepathy and, by extension, Mindsight don't need LoE to work. The bigger question is how to get Mindsight. I can think of two ways, but both require a two-feat investment, assuming Goldflower has traded her familiar for some ACF.

My meaning is the point is for everyone to be below ground following in a tunnel or something, right? So that the party can travel without being detected by enemies? Well, mindsight doesn't let you tell what the geography is, it only lets you detect the presence of creatures' minds. It couldn't let you navigate unless someone was walking above ground and you were following them by tracking the movement of their mind. Without someone or something to track, you're still navigating blindly, until you happen upon a mind.

If the point isn't for everyone to travel below ground, then what is the point? The only one who could get mindsight, it seems, doesn't have a burrow speed.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 18, 2010, 06:52:46 PM
I think Tremorsense and Mindsight are basically the only constant detection methods that don't require LoE. We could make do with only one party member with Mindsight, though. Using the telepathy that goes with it, they could act as the party "navigator".

Mindsight would only work if someone stayed above ground. You know, with the fact that it only detects minds and all. :)
Not sure I get your meaning. Telepathy and, by extension, Mindsight don't need LoE to work. The bigger question is how to get Mindsight. I can think of two ways, but both require a two-feat investment, assuming Goldflower has traded her familiar for some ACF.

My meaning is the point is for everyone to be below ground following in a tunnel or something, right? So that the party can travel without being detected by enemies? Well, mindsight doesn't let you tell what the geography is, it only lets you detect the presence of creatures' minds. It couldn't let you navigate unless someone was walking above ground and you were following them by tracking the movement of their mind. Without someone or something to track, you're still navigating blindly, until you happen upon a mind.

If the point isn't for everyone to travel below ground, then what is the point? The only one who could get mindsight, it seems, doesn't have a burrow speed.
Yeah, but she can turn invisible for a minute at a time. Even if she turned both herself and Yamanu invisible once every minute, you guys could easily keep up with our slow asses tunneling under you. So no, everyone doesn't have to be underground for this to work. Two above invisibly and two below would work just as well for stealth purposes.

I think the point is a bit moot as it doesn't seem likely anyone is getting Mindsight any time soon, anyway.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 19, 2010, 04:32:07 AM
So glad we don't have someone with Mindsight and possibly Malphas' bird thingy. Gives the enemies at least some chance of succesfully getting the drop on you guys :P

So, what will it be, Witch Trail or Dawn Way? :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 19, 2010, 05:01:12 AM
I think we were going the Witch Trail to avoid drawing as much attention, even if it does take longer. Wasn't that it?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 19, 2010, 07:57:49 AM
I think we were going the Witch Trail to avoid drawing as much attention, even if it does take longer. Wasn't that it?
Actually, we were going the Witch Trail because for some reason the Dawn Way actually takes longer. It probably has to do with the fact that our slowest mount is as fast as our slowest character on foot.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 19, 2010, 09:14:22 AM
I think we were going the Witch Trail to avoid drawing as much attention, even if it does take longer. Wasn't that it?
Actually, we were going the Witch Trail because for some reason the Dawn Way actually takes longer. It probably has to do with the fact that our slowest mount is as fast as our slowest character on foot.
Yeah, that's pretty much it :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 21, 2010, 07:51:55 AM
Just an FYI, I'll be gone 'til tomorrow afternoon.
Hope you guys can get your gear done and have decided on a route/travelling method by then ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 21, 2010, 02:18:34 PM
We already decided on a trail. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 23, 2010, 04:05:40 PM
We all set to head out, guys?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 23, 2010, 04:16:09 PM
So we're doing the Witch (foot) trail, sans mounts, right? With Kalal and the Colonel tunneling underneath Yamanu and Goldflower, who will be invisible and/or hiding?

Christ... Kalal has so much crap, he's actually over his maximum load without the mule... I guess I'm going to have to leave some junk in town. :D

Edit: Done rearranging his equipment. I'm just going to have him wear his new full plate, since he's going to be burrowing and presumably won't have to worry about move silently checks, either.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 24, 2010, 04:56:17 AM
No move silently checks underground, indeed :P

I'll get something up later today :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 24, 2010, 10:46:06 AM
Can you hear the banjos yet, boys? :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 24, 2010, 12:28:23 PM
Did we rest for a day, and hence get to refresh spells and top off our hit points, or is this still the same day?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 24, 2010, 01:06:10 PM
This is day two, so unless you've spent spells on shopping and whatnot you have been able to refresh spell slots and heal.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 25, 2010, 04:03:56 AM
Phaedrus, Agita, your rolls por favor?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 25, 2010, 01:26:23 PM
I say we drop our invisibility and approach like normal visitors. No point in causing a fuss.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 25, 2010, 01:32:10 PM
I say we drop our invisibility and approach like normal visitors. No point in causing a fuss.
Sounds good to me.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 25, 2010, 01:33:38 PM
Should the little jackal-man with daggers strapped all over his body drop invisibility, too? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 25, 2010, 02:00:48 PM
Should the little jackal-man with daggers strapped all over his body drop invisibility, too? :P
Yeah. Maybe one of them is female and you'll pick up a date. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 25, 2010, 02:02:54 PM
Should the little jackal-man with daggers strapped all over his body drop invisibility, too? :P
Yeah. Maybe one of them is female and you'll pick up a date. :P
:grave



 :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 25, 2010, 03:01:17 PM
Should the little jackal-man with daggers strapped all over his body drop invisibility, too? :P
Yeah. Maybe one of them is female and you'll pick up a date. :P
:grave



 :P
:lol


Damnit Agita, I almost sprayed beer through my nose :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita June 25, 2010, 03:04:39 PM
Should the little jackal-man with daggers strapped all over his body drop invisibility, too? :P
Yeah. Maybe one of them is female and you'll pick up a date. :P
:grave



 :P
:lol


Damnit Agita, I almost sprayed beer through my nose :P
Don't drink while posting. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 25, 2010, 03:38:57 PM
Should the little jackal-man with daggers strapped all over his body drop invisibility, too? :P
Yeah. Maybe one of them is female and you'll pick up a date. :P
:grave



 :P
:lol


Damnit Agita, I almost sprayed beer through my nose :P
Don't drink while posting. :P
I was reading, not posting :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 25, 2010, 07:10:01 PM
BTW, I knew there was something I wanted to acquire once I got more money. I wanted to get my hands on some poisons, to take advantage of Marrulurks' poison use.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 25, 2010, 07:11:09 PM
Don't tell the paladin-to-be. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 26, 2010, 06:23:53 AM
BTW, I knew there was something I wanted to acquire once I got more money. I wanted to get my hands on some poisons, to take advantage of Marrulurks' poison use.
Depending on the poison type, the town Druid can probably help you with that (retroactively).

Consider him to be able to reliably get a Craft result of 23, or 25 if one of you guys has ranks in Craft (Poisonmaking) and wants to aid him (DC10; Craft (Alchemy) against DC10 can also be used to aid, assuming you have ranks in it, but at a -4 penalty on the roll; no more than 1 person can attempt to aid on this task).
Use the Craft DCs that are (IIRC) either in Complete Adventurer or Complete Scoundrel to determine what he can craft and try not to go for Black Lotus Extract or anything more exotic (stuff with names containing the names of critters like Purple Worms, Liches etc. :P) right away :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 28, 2010, 07:02:05 AM
*nudge*
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 28, 2010, 01:56:34 PM
Well, the idea was to have some oil of taggit and smear it on some jerky or other rations, sneak over near the dogs, and have them hopefully eat it. But they'd only need to roll an 11 to make the fort save. :/
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 28, 2010, 02:01:34 PM
Okay...
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY June 28, 2010, 02:02:24 PM
Uhh... how about we just announce ourselves? We're here to talk to this guy, not poison him and his dogs. ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 28, 2010, 02:07:55 PM
The oil only knocks them unconscious. :P

Still, it's fine. We'll drop invis and approach cautiously.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 28, 2010, 02:10:41 PM
Damnit Phaedrus, why did you have to talk some sense into him :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 28, 2010, 02:12:36 PM
We came to that plan before. I had almost forgotten that we came here, apparently, to just talk to a guy (why he lives 5 hours out of town is beyond me, though).
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 28, 2010, 02:20:51 PM
Huh, guess I missed that, or forgot about it. Sorry.

He's a hunter/trapper, and a loner, according to the adventure book.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 28, 2010, 02:33:00 PM
The whole knock-out jerky plan was so I could make use of my racial Poison Use and my Darkstalker feat. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw June 28, 2010, 02:56:54 PM
You'll get plenty of opportunities for that ;)

By the way, where you planning on buying some poison or not? Like I mentioned before, you can still do that (retroactively).
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem June 28, 2010, 04:11:32 PM
I'll still buy some oil of taggit. Never know when it might still come in handy. The druid's check allows me to get 3 doses of it. Almost 4, but I don't have craft (poisonmaking) right now, so I can't help. 3 Should be fine for now.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 04, 2010, 02:12:11 PM
Let's see if I've got this right. According to Jorr, the hobbos are in Vrath Keep, and they come into Alsir Vale to plunder and pillage using either the Skull Gorge or this Old Forest Road. Where's the forest road? I see only an Old North Road on the map.

Also, somehow the Snake Chili reminds me of this (http://fsn.seorinwastaken.com/index.php?v=120) and this (http://fsn.seorinwastaken.com/index.php?v=121). :D
Sounds good, though. I kind of want to try it. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 04, 2010, 05:50:00 PM
Poison sure would come in handy when trying to screw up an army... but there's no way Kalal would suggest that... being an aspiring paladin and all that. :P You know... poison the food/water supply, etc. They say an army walks on its stomach, or something like that. Right? Although D&D isn't usually the greatest when it comes to logistics. Hell... they could probably just have clerics create enough food and water for them every day...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 04, 2010, 05:54:30 PM
Poison sure would come in handy when trying to screw up an army... but there's no way Kalal would suggest that... being an aspiring paladin and all that. :P You know... poison the food/water supply, etc. They say an army walks on its stomach, or something like that. Right? Although D&D isn't usually the greatest when it comes to logistics. Hell... they could probably just have clerics create enough food and water for them every day...
And then there's the issue of Purify Food and Drink. It might be good for a one-shot surprise to mop up a camp, though. Heck, if we play our cards right and they don't eat cleric-created foot, we might be able to eliminate their presence in the valley camp by camp with this tactic. Still, I wouldn't count on it. All it takes is one cleric to stay conscious through the poison.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 04, 2010, 06:15:49 PM
Yeah, those damned clerics, ruining all our fun. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 05, 2010, 04:53:17 AM
Let's see if I've got this right. According to Jorr, the hobbos are in Vrath Keep, and they come into Alsir Vale to plunder and pillage using either the Skull Gorge or this Old Forest Road. Where's the forest road? I see only an Old North Road on the map.

Also, somehow the Snake Chili reminds me of this (http://fsn.seorinwastaken.com/index.php?v=120) and this (http://fsn.seorinwastaken.com/index.php?v=121). :D
Sounds good, though. I kind of want to try it. :P
Correct.

As for the Old Forest Road, unfortunately I haven't been able to find a map that doesn't betray the location of several important events/sites to you guys, and editing it would still make it blatantly obvious, so I'm going with a (crummy) description for now:

Old Forest Road is a road that, as the name implies, cuts right through the Witchwood (which, as you can see on the map, is pretty big) from (north)east to west, pretty much leading from  the Giantshield mountains in the east to the Wyrmsmoke mountains in the west. It basically follows the Witchstream river.
On the east side it leads to the town of Witchcross on the map, from where there's a major trade route heading north.
On the west side Vraath Keep is almost directly next to the road after which it heads into the Wyrmsmoke mountains. It has a reputation as a somewhat rough trail, and it's probably a lot worse in the mountains, seeing as the goblins probably didn't maintain the road all that well.

I hope that gives you a basic idea.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 05, 2010, 05:12:04 AM
Okay, got a crappy chopped up map of the Witchwood up for you guys :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 05, 2010, 09:35:23 AM
Okay. Now I'd like to know what all the letters represent, or at least those that wouldn't spoil anything. :P Most importantly, where is Jorr's house on the map?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 05, 2010, 10:00:09 AM
Ah right, sorry, forgot about that.

Edited map post.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 06, 2010, 01:42:14 AM
So we're hypothesizing (in character) that an army is going to come from somewhere off the map, and try to get to Vraath Keep, and that they'll likely come from SKull Gorge or the Old Forest Road? So the goblins in Vraath Keep are just a first wave?

Do we have any reason in character to actually think this is true? (OOC... yeah... but... I'm trying not to metagame here).

I guess we could try and take out the Skull Gorge bridge (The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly style... I like it :D ), but that's also going to screw up trade along the Dawn Way, isn't it?

Then we could just try sabotaging the Old Forest road, maybe even trying to destroy it somewhere in a place where it is already bad.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 06, 2010, 03:47:36 AM
Well, you've been told some stuff by the townsfolk already, and now by Jorr as well.

In character you know that gobbo activity has increased a lot lately, so who's to say it won't get even worse. You also know that if the ones already present in the area have some sort of base of operations, it's most likely located in the Witchwood, and Vraath Keep seems the most suitable location. According to Jorr the Skull Gorge Bridge is probably the best bet for what route the gobbos will be taking, seeing as it's in a lot better quality than the part of the Old Forest Road heading into the mountains, and heading out of the mountains and going over a bridge is easier than keeping going through the mountains over a trail that is likely quite small and crappy at certain locations when moving large amounts of troops (this is assuming more gobbos are on the way ofcourse).


As for screwing up trade, due to the gobbo menace it's already pretty much come to a stand still, so as far as the townsfolk are concerned they'd rather have you put a stop to the menace and worry about rebuilding/resuming trade after that ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 06, 2010, 09:11:27 AM
Free reign to destroy stuff? Sweet. Alright, let's tear that bridge a new one. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 06, 2010, 09:44:49 AM
Yo dawg, I herd you're gonna blow up a bridge... mind if I join?  :P

Seriously.... if you guys don't mind.... could I join up the fray?  :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 06, 2010, 09:49:38 AM
Personally, I don't see how it could hurt, being that we lost bearsarebrown. But that's just me.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 06, 2010, 12:28:00 PM
Well, you already know my answer, so assuming Phaedrus, Agita and Nanshork don't mind start making a character :)
Just need a reason for you to be in this neck o' the woods (quite literally :P) all alone at a time like this and for wanting to take down some gobbos :)


You could always play the redneck woodsman Jorr ofcourse :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 06, 2010, 12:30:15 PM
Well, you already know my answer, so assuming Phaedrus, Agita and Nanshork don't mind start making a character :)
Just need a reason for you to be in this neck o' the woods (quite literally :P) all alone at a time like this and for wanting to take down some gobbos :)


You could always play the redneck woodsman Jorr ofcourse :lol
Or he could be one of Jorr's buddies/relatives, who just happened to come by for a drink/some chili/etc. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 06, 2010, 12:38:14 PM
Well, you already know my answer, so assuming Phaedrus, Agita and Nanshork don't mind start making a character :)

*makes cute puppy eyes*

You guys don't mind, do you?  :flutter

If you do, there might be.... PROBLEMS  :smirk  :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 06, 2010, 12:40:53 PM
I certainly don't mind.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 06, 2010, 12:49:17 PM
Neither do I. With that, Nanshork is outvoted no matter what he wants. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 06, 2010, 12:58:41 PM
Neither do I. With that, Nanshork is outvoted no matter what he wants. :P
:lmao
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 06, 2010, 01:03:40 PM
It's a two-thirds majority, even, which would be enough to change the constitution in some places (three-fourths if you count Bowen, but he has veto power too).
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 06, 2010, 01:47:53 PM
As for the Diplomacy/party face question in the character creation thread, it'll come in handy in 1 or 2 situations later on in the adventure, but that's about it. So while it might be worthwile to put some points into it, a focused diplomancer is by no means necessary, especially when considering stuff like aid another and those single use skill-boosting spells and whatnot.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 06, 2010, 01:56:17 PM
Thanks guys, I feel special.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 06, 2010, 02:00:19 PM
As for the Diplomacy/party face question in the character creation thread, it'll come in handy in 1 or 2 situations later on in the adventure, but that's about it. So while it might be worthwile to put some points into it, a focused diplomancer is by no means necessary, especially when considering stuff like aid another and those single use skill-boosting spells and whatnot.
I have some points in it for flavor, so I can make small checks (DC 15) by taking ten. With a few Aid Anothers, I can easily make DC 20. Would that be enough?

Thanks guys, I feel special.   :P
You're welcome. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 06, 2010, 02:03:14 PM
As for the Diplomacy/party face question in the character creation thread, it'll come in handy in 1 or 2 situations later on in the adventure, but that's about it. So while it might be worthwile to put some points into it, a focused diplomancer is by no means necessary, especially when considering stuff like aid another and those single use skill-boosting spells and whatnot.
I have some points in it for flavor, so I can make small checks (DC 15) by taking ten. With a few Aid Anothers, I can easily make DC 20. Would that be enough?
Venn and I also have a few points in it, as seen recently in the thread. I guess we could all start talking at the same time, and roll our checks independently. As long as someone hits the DC, it should work, right? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 06, 2010, 02:04:34 PM
As for the Diplomacy/party face question in the character creation thread, it'll come in handy in 1 or 2 situations later on in the adventure, but that's about it. So while it might be worthwile to put some points into it, a focused diplomancer is by no means necessary, especially when considering stuff like aid another and those single use skill-boosting spells and whatnot.
I have some points in it for flavor, so I can make small checks (DC 15) by taking ten. With a few Aid Anothers, I can easily make DC 20. Would that be enough?
Venn and I also have a few points in it, as seen recently in the thread. I guess we could all start talking at the same time, and roll our checks independently. As long as someone hits the DC, it should work, right? :P
So we'd basically play politics? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 09, 2010, 05:18:35 PM
Yay for coordinated backgrounds :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 09, 2010, 05:23:53 PM
Yay for coordinated backgrounds :lol
Yeah! Too bad his name isn't Maynard, or I could ask him to bring out the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch!
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 12, 2010, 03:07:40 PM
Just a quick FYI, I'll be without a PC for a couple of days starting tomorrow (hopefully I'll have it back before the weekend, but I can't promise anything).
I hope you guys have decided on your next move by then ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 14, 2010, 12:30:21 PM
Ok... I am super fucking excited about this, even though it is fairly minor, and I didn't come up with it myself. I'd like to trade in Kalal's full plate for a bunch of Shapesand, which he will then shape into fullplate. This will have the advantage of being cheap, and allowing him to don/remove his armor as a standard action. :D (Or change his armor type, like turn his full plate into a chain shirt, if he wants to try being sneaky.)

Would you mind if I did this retroactively? So I can start using it immediately, instead of waiting till I could actually find and buy some of this stuff?  :bigeye I think it certainly fits him thematically, also. He is a desert dwarf, who escaped imprisonment from monsters in the desert. :D

The description is also a bit vague. How many "jugs" would I need to shape a set of fullplate out of this stuff? It says 1 jug is 100 gp, and that it weighs 12 lbs. But how much of that is the shapesand, and how much is the jug?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 14, 2010, 12:42:25 PM
The description is also a bit vague. How many "jugs" would I need to shape a set of fullplate out of this stuff? It says 1 jug is 100 gp, and that it weighs 12 lbs. But how much of that is the shapesand, and how much is the jug?
The PHB lists an empty one-gallon clay jug at 9 pounds.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 14, 2010, 12:48:39 PM
The description is also a bit vague. How many "jugs" would I need to shape a set of fullplate out of this stuff? It says 1 jug is 100 gp, and that it weighs 12 lbs. But how much of that is the shapesand, and how much is the jug?
The PHB lists an empty one-gallon clay jug at 9 pounds.
Yeah, I know. And the volume of 1 gallon is ridiculously small (0.134 cubic feet). Going by the jug listing, and just using weight, it would take 17 "jugs" of shapesand to make one set of full plate (50 lbs divided by 3). But how do we know the jug used for shapesand is clay? Maybe it's glass? Or maybe the "jug" is just the shaped shapesand?

The amount of stuff you can control is also listed in "X foot cubes", which going by the example means exactly what it says (not cubic feet). That means someone with a 16 Wis could control a block of this stuff that's 7 and a half feet on one side, which is massive. This item is somewhat vaguely written, but I'd really like to use it, as it is cool as hell. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 14, 2010, 03:38:53 PM
I also wanted to get my hands on some shapesand, since it's flavorful for yamanu's race and because he's got a great Wis score. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 14, 2010, 11:38:51 PM
Well.... shapesand is all nice and good, but what about our next move? What will we do? We have until Bowen gets back to decide how we die what we will do....

Personally, I don't think any kind of ambush will work...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 14, 2010, 11:44:49 PM
Goldflower refuses to talk logistics.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 15, 2010, 11:48:50 AM
I think we should try to sneak in (or kick in the door) of Vraath keep, and try to find out what they're plotting (IC).
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 15, 2010, 12:06:07 PM
Goldflower with her 22 or so Int should invent explosives. They'd never antcipate it! :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 15, 2010, 02:29:01 PM
Sorry, no points in craft: Alchemy.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 15, 2010, 02:45:30 PM
Sorry, no points in craft: Alchemy.   :P
So? You can use it untrained. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 16, 2010, 04:35:02 AM
Due to its ridiculous versatility, I'm going to say no to getting shapesand retroactively, but you might find some soon enough ;)

Also, while I do have internet again, I don't have Office yet, so I can't access any maps I saved on my flashdrive just yet. In other words, don't get into actual combat until saturday, if I'm lucky, or otherwise tuesday. Just traveling and planning and stuff is all good though :)

Sorry for the delay, guys.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 16, 2010, 08:24:10 AM
Also, while I do have internet again, I don't have Office yet, so I can't access any maps I saved on my flashdrive just yet. In other words, don't get into actual combat until saturday, if I'm lucky, or otherwise tuesday. Just traveling and planning and stuff is all good though :)
Use Maptool. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 16, 2010, 10:49:35 AM
Yeah...
no :P

I'll try and get GIMP set up today, should be good enough :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 16, 2010, 10:53:55 AM
I think we should try to sneak in (or kick in the door) of Vraath keep, and try to find out what they're plotting (IC).
Well, that probably is the closest place where you might find some gobbos, aside from the occasional wandering patrol.

If everyone agrees, I'll get to work :)

In the meantime, what do you guys want to do with Jorr? You can try to convince him to come along, or he can stay in his cabin (no, he won't steal any XP or treasure :P)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 16, 2010, 11:53:02 AM
Yeah...
no :P

I'll try and get GIMP set up today, should be good enough :)
Whatever, it's not my problem if you're doing more work than you have to. :P

If Jorr won't leech XP or gold, I'm all for having an additional wall of meat.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 16, 2010, 12:11:30 PM
Due to its ridiculous versatility, I'm going to say no to getting shapesand retroactively, but you might find some soon enough ;)
Bah. It's not like I'm going to try using it to make poison, or expensive spell components. I just want some cool armor.  :P I mean seriously, how cool is a desert dweller whose body is covered in stony plates, and who wears magically shifting armor made of sand?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 16, 2010, 12:22:52 PM
You should replicate alchemical items with it.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 16, 2010, 12:26:08 PM
You should replicate alchemical items with it.
I don't want to abuse it. I just want to do cool stuff with it, not make the DM ban it. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 16, 2010, 12:48:29 PM
You should replicate alchemical items with it.
I don't want to abuse it. I just want to do cool stuff with it, not make the DM ban it. :P
Ow, I wouldn't ban it with, say, alchemical items. That would just use up the sand :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 16, 2010, 12:54:36 PM
You should replicate alchemical items with it.
I don't want to abuse it. I just want to do cool stuff with it, not make the DM ban it. :P
Ow, I wouldn't ban it with, say, alchemical items. That would just use up the sand :P
See... that opens the door for crap like Black Lotus Extract, though... Or 5000 gp diamonds for Raise Dead, etc.

I think it should be limited to things that could conceivably be made of stone/metal/etc, and that don't require some kind of dramatic transformation of the base properties of the sand (like turning into diamond... glass might be ok, though, since that's basically just melted sand).
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 16, 2010, 12:58:37 PM
You should replicate alchemical items with it.
I don't want to abuse it. I just want to do cool stuff with it, not make the DM ban it. :P
Ow, I wouldn't ban it with, say, alchemical items. That would just use up the sand :P
See... that opens the door for crap like Black Lotus Extract, though... Or 5000 gp diamonds for Raise Dead, etc.

I think it should be limited to things that could conceivably be made of stone/metal/etc, and that don't require some kind of dramatic transformation of the base properties of the sand (like turning into diamond... glass might be ok, though, since that's basically just melted sand).
Ofcourse there's always the gentlemen's agreement to make sure you guys don't go overboard...

Ow look, a bunch of Goblin Druids with Shapesand :smirk



:P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 19, 2010, 12:41:26 PM
Complete Mage has the Steadying Robe, which negates the unsteadying effect of vigorous, violent, or extremely violent motion on your spellcasting; you need not make a concentration check  to cast a spell under circumstances like riding a mount or even being on a boat for that matter. Have your mount move twice and cast at the same time, for the low cost of 1000 gp.
The party's casters should definitely get these... At least Goldilocks should. I think I'll get Kalal one, too. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 19, 2010, 01:07:38 PM
Complete Mage has the Steadying Robe, which negates the unsteadying effect of vigorous, violent, or extremely violent motion on your spellcasting; you need not make a concentration check  to cast a spell under circumstances like riding a mount or even being on a boat for that matter. Have your mount move twice and cast at the same time, for the low cost of 1000 gp.
The party's casters should definitely get these... At least Goldilocks should. I think I'll get Kalal one, too. :D

That'll be funny. "Hey guys! I swapped out my full plate for this robe! Look, it's got wee li'l anchors on it! What a fun day of adventuring I'm in for! Oh, look, what's that small arrow-shaped object flying through the air toward me?"
 :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 19, 2010, 01:16:39 PM
Complete Mage has the Steadying Robe, which negates the unsteadying effect of vigorous, violent, or extremely violent motion on your spellcasting; you need not make a concentration check  to cast a spell under circumstances like riding a mount or even being on a boat for that matter. Have your mount move twice and cast at the same time, for the low cost of 1000 gp.
The party's casters should definitely get these... At least Goldilocks should. I think I'll get Kalal one, too. :D

That'll be funny. "Hey guys! I swapped out my full plate for this robe! Look, it's got wee li'l anchors on it! What a fun day of adventuring I'm in for! Oh, look, what's that small arrow-shaped object flying through the air toward me?"
 :lol

Meh. My armor isn't even magical. So I can wear it over my armor and it will function just fine. It might be an issue later, though...

Hmm... if I wore armor with Magic Vestment on it, and this robe over it, would the robe still work?

I hate those "body slot" rules anyway... and tend to forget them... :P Is armor even a slot? I see robe and shirt listed separately (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/magicItems/creatingMagicItems.htm#bodySlotAffinities), but not armor... I mean... I know you can only wear 1 suit of armor, but does it take up any of these slots? Or have its own?
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 19, 2010, 01:37:15 PM
That's body slot affinities, but not the actual slots.

This section (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/magicItems/magicItemBasics.htm#magicItemsOnTheBody) lists "One robe or suit of armor on the body (over a vest, vestment, or shirt)"
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 19, 2010, 01:40:43 PM
That's body slot affinities, but not the actual slots.

This section (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/magicItems/magicItemBasics.htm#magicItemsOnTheBody) lists "One robe or suit of armor on the body (over a vest, vestment, or shirt)"
Thanks. Anyway, until he starts wearing armor that's actually magical, it isn't really a problem. It's not like I already have one of these robes, either. :P I just thought it was a decent low level item, since I like playing mounted spellcasters.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 19, 2010, 03:43:58 PM
My name is not Goldilocks.   :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 19, 2010, 04:42:53 PM
My name is not Goldilocks.   :P
Yes it is. You've been outvoted. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 19, 2010, 04:55:09 PM
My name is not Goldilocks.   :P
Yes it is. You've been outvoted. :P

I win because you can't edit my character sheet.   :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 19, 2010, 05:09:13 PM
My name is not Goldilocks.   :P
Yes it is. You've been outvoted. :P

I win because you can't edit my character sheet.   :D
:smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 20, 2010, 04:51:25 PM
Ok, my PC should be back in full working order again *crosses fingers*

Are you guys ready to head into the woods and ambush that patrol?
If so, feel free to RP your way out of that cabin and into the woods and to post your actions/preparations/hide, move silently, listen, spot and other appropriate checks etc. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 21, 2010, 06:58:11 AM
And I found a somewhat more Eberron-compatible map of the area :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 21, 2010, 10:38:15 AM
By the way (yay, spamposting :P), with Jorr joining for now, how do you guys want to handle that?

The options I see are:
1) I decide his tactics and make his rolls and whatnot.
2) (One of) you decide his tactics and choose(s) his targets in combat, while I retain control of the RP aspect and make his rolls.
3) I retain control of the RP aspect, but let (one of) you control Jorr in terms of mechanics and make his rolls and all that.


Any thoughts?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 21, 2010, 12:00:54 PM
I'm for number one for speed if nothing else.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 21, 2010, 12:05:09 PM
I'm for number one for speed if nothing else.

Plus one.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 05:40:15 AM
Fast forwarding a wee bit, feel free to finish any RP during the travel first if you want to.

Also, fear my l33t kindergarden level map editing skills :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 06:35:11 AM
Say Venn, I think you didn't count the armor bonus from your chahar-aina and dastana towards your AC total ???
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 22, 2010, 08:01:05 AM
We're bringing our mounts now? Then I want my horse. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 08:26:02 AM
These are medium sized  ;)

Quit complaining and just post your damn rolls :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 22, 2010, 08:27:07 AM
These are medium sized  ;)

Mules are Large. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 22, 2010, 10:17:43 AM
[spoiler]Hide, Move Silently, Listen, Spot, Initiative (1d20+2=4, 1d20+2=12, 1d20-1=12, 1d20-1=7, 1d20+8=10) (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2619174/)

Also note that Harika has scent, so she at least detects the presence of creatures.[/spoiler]
[SPOILER]
Hide, Move Silently, Spot and Init: 6, 11, 11, 3 (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2619227/)

Nat 1 on init. Nice :rollseyes
[/spoiler]
OOC:
[spoiler]Uh, guys? Your location on the map (see first post) please?[/spoiler]
Let's say... G7?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 10:35:05 AM
[spoiler]Hide, Move Silently, Listen, Spot, Initiative (1d20+2=4, 1d20+2=12, 1d20-1=12, 1d20-1=7, 1d20+8=10) (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2619174/)

Also note that Harika has scent, so she at least detects the presence of creatures.[/spoiler]
[SPOILER]
Hide, Move Silently, Spot and Init: 6, 11, 11, 3 (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/2619227/)

Nat 1 on init. Nice :rollseyes
[/spoiler]
OOC:
[spoiler]Uh, guys? Your location on the map (see first post) please?[/spoiler]
Let's say... G7?
: BowenSilverclaw
Everyone: You approached from the east, so please pick a location for yourself on the map below on the east side of the road and at row 12 or below (to make sure we can get the entire combat on the map ).

I was kinda assuming you guys were waiting in ambush, not standing in plain sight :P

But please, correct me if you have other plans :)
Your approach is still from the east though, and I'd like you to start at line 12 or below like I said before just to keep things on the map with some distance for the surprise round (whoever gets it :smirk)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 22, 2010, 10:36:13 AM
I was kinda assuming you guys want to ambush, not stand in plain sight :P
Bah, I was distracted. :P I'll post my location later when I've taken an actual look at the map.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 10:36:49 AM
I was kinda assuming you guys want to ambush, not stand in plain sight :P
Bah, I was distracted. :P I'll post my location later when I've taken an actual look at the map.
:lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 22, 2010, 10:39:34 AM
Okay, unless I fail at geography (wouldn't be the first time, honestly - only subject I never got anything better than a C-equivalent on), we need to be below the road, yes? In that case... I13 seems right. Easy to dash out of and rape face asap.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 10:44:35 AM
Okay, unless I fail at geography (wouldn't be the first time, honestly - only subject I never got anything better than a C-equivalent on), we need to be below the road, yes? In that case... I13 seems right. Easy to dash out of and rape face asap.
Works for me :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 22, 2010, 01:32:32 PM
: VennDygrem
@Phaedrus: Typically, if you're not visible, wouldn't you get the same bonus to hide as from being Invisible? Since that's technically what you are.
Well... I guess I could have started above ground and invisible, with Goldflower around. It just isn't as cool as bursting out of the ground when I attack, though. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 22, 2010, 01:40:02 PM
What I meant was, whenever you're not visible, such as being in the dark vs. someone without darkvision, or being underground vs. someone without tremorsense, I expect you'd be considered invisible (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/conditionSummary.htm#invisible).
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 22, 2010, 01:53:28 PM
What I meant was, whenever you're not visible, such as being in the dark vs. someone without darkvision, or being underground vs. someone without tremorsense, I expect you'd be considered invisible (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/conditionSummary.htm#invisible).
Yeah, I know. Since his face is not covered, then he isn't completely out of sight, though. In 3.0, they had that 9/10ths cover rule. I think that would be appropriate here... except it was "simplified" for 3.5. So I guess he'd have "improved cover". I wanted to keep at least his face out, otherwise he'd have no way of knowing that the fight had even started. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 02:08:35 PM
What I meant was, whenever you're not visible, such as being in the dark vs. someone without darkvision, or being underground vs. someone without tremorsense, I expect you'd be considered invisible (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/conditionSummary.htm#invisible).
Yeah, I know. Since his face is not covered, then he isn't completely out of sight, though. In 3.0, they had that 9/10ths cover rule. I think that would be appropriate here... except it was "simplified" for 3.5. So I guess he'd have "improved cover". I wanted to keep at least his face out, otherwise he'd have no way of knowing that the fight had even started. :P
Why do I have the feeling a game of whack-a-mole is about to start :P

And yes, you can start in a stance.

EDIT: Also, gonna give you a +10 on your Hide check, seems fair enough.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 02:25:45 PM
Say Venn, I think you didn't count the armor bonus from your chahar-aina and dastana towards your AC total ???
Bump because I'm a nice guy :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 22, 2010, 02:40:29 PM
My spot check was 0.   :banghead
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 22, 2010, 02:42:53 PM
What I meant was, whenever you're not visible, such as being in the dark vs. someone without darkvision, or being underground vs. someone without tremorsense, I expect you'd be considered invisible (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/conditionSummary.htm#invisible).
Yeah, I know. Since his face is not covered, then he isn't completely out of sight, though. In 3.0, they had that 9/10ths cover rule. I think that would be appropriate here... except it was "simplified" for 3.5. So I guess he'd have "improved cover". I wanted to keep at least his face out, otherwise he'd have no way of knowing that the fight had even started. :P
Why do I have the feeling a game of whack-a-mole is about to start :P
In Soviet Eberron, Mole whacks you!

And yes, you can start in a stance.

EDIT: Also, gonna give you a +10 on your Hide check, seems fair enough.
Thanks! :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 22, 2010, 02:45:14 PM
Say Venn, I think you didn't count the armor bonus from your chahar-aina and dastana towards your AC total ???

Oh, looks like you're right. I'm updating that now.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 02:45:26 PM
@Nanshork: You have all your spell slots available again, it's a new day (see little intro snippet), so yes, your Extended Mage Armor is active :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 22, 2010, 02:46:47 PM
@Nanshork: You have all your spell slots available again, it's a new day (see little intro snippet), so yes, your Extended Mage Armor is active :)

That's what I get for skimming.   :rollseyes  Thanks for the heads up!
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 02:49:35 PM
@Nanshork: You have all your spell slots available again, it's a new day (see little intro snippet), so yes, your Extended Mage Armor is active :)

That's what I get for skimming.   :rollseyes  Thanks for the heads up!

No prob :)

Just waiting for Risada to give me his position and then we can get started :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 22, 2010, 02:51:31 PM
Isn't it kind of pathetic that Kalal's new bright and shiny MW fullplate only actually increases his AC by 1 compared to his old chain shirt + chahar-aina + dastana combo? Ah well, at least it doesn't slow him down. :P

I should probably just sell the full plate... sadly.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 22, 2010, 02:54:34 PM
Yeah, the Chahar-Aina + Dastana add on really makes a difference compared to a basic chain shirt :)

: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 22, 2010, 07:05:38 PM
Edited my post with my position...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 23, 2010, 04:52:38 AM
Thanks you, everyone get ready for a surprise round :)

Should be up in 15 minutes or so :)


EDIT: Okay, so more like 30 minutes with the boards fucking up, but it's up now. Enjoy :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 23, 2010, 01:53:17 PM
Why do I have a feeling this encounter will be over really fast? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 23, 2010, 02:15:56 PM
Hey, that crit on the ambush round was a fluke! A lucky, deadly fluke! :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 23, 2010, 03:12:00 PM
Hmm... Bowen, if Goldilocks's summon is going to be Large, can I retcon to have ended in K9 instead, to give it a little more space of its own (and completely block their retreat for good)? ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 23, 2010, 03:18:45 PM
Meh, don't worry. They're not going anywhere. :P

We should probably come up with our exact plan about how we're going to "interrogate" them. We could have discussed it while we traveled here IC.

So the plan is to basically:

1) take them in a room, intimidate the crap out of them, then tell them we're going to torture/execute/whatever one.

2) Lead one outside, where we'll make a bunch of scary sounds while one person inside tells the guy what's happening to his friend and what we're going to do to him next. (the ginger beer trick, etc)

3) Then we come back in with a bucket of blood and guts or whatever, pour them on/in front of the guy and tell him that's what's left of his friend, and then whomever has the best Intimidate skill scares the holy bezeesus out of him with a big circumstance modifier.

4) Then maybe we let one (the really scared one) "escape", after we talk about a bunch of made up crap about how we have an army coming in here soon, and they're going to be doing X, where X is some bullcrap that will cause them to spend time and resources trying to counter.

Something like that, right? What else?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 23, 2010, 03:27:26 PM
Hmm... Bowen, if Goldilocks's summon is going to be Large, can I retcon to have ended in K9 instead, to give it a little more space of its own (and completely block their retreat for good)? ;)
I haven't made the map for the next round yet, so sure, edit your post :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 23, 2010, 03:28:43 PM
Where are you going to get the guys and blood if not from one of the goblins? :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 23, 2010, 03:30:06 PM
Actually, I think it works better when we let the sounds speak for themselves. No descriptions, a coward's imagination is much better at scaring him than you can ever hope to be. guts and stuff might actually not be necessary. In fact absence of gross remains might imply that not enough is left over.

For the record, the ginger beer trick merely consists of making some insinuations (preferably showing the prisoners a big supply of ginger bear), picking out the one that seems most scared, then taking all of the other ones, one by one, to a separate room. Then one makes a disturbing sizzling sound and another screams as if he was being burned alive. Repeat for every prisoner, the plan being that by the time the last one comes around, he'll spill it all the second you touch him.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 23, 2010, 03:41:03 PM
Where are you going to get the guys and blood if not from one of the goblins? :P
We're in a forest, with a ranger. I figured it wouldn't be that hard... We should have done this before we got here, though, technically... That's why I said "We could have planned this on the way to the fight." :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 23, 2010, 03:43:00 PM
Where are you going to get the guys and blood if not from one of the goblins? :P
We're in a forest, with a ranger. I figured it wouldn't be that hard... We should have done this before we got here, though, technically... That's why I said "We could have planned this on the way to the fight." :P
And drag along a backpack that's oozing intestines and blood for the goblins to see? :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 23, 2010, 03:45:26 PM
Where are you going to get the guys and blood if not from one of the goblins? :P
We're in a forest, with a ranger. I figured it wouldn't be that hard... We should have done this before we got here, though, technically... That's why I said "We could have planned this on the way to the fight." :P
And drag along a backpack that's oozing intestines and blood for the goblins to see? :lol
I'm sure someone has a haversack. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 23, 2010, 03:47:09 PM
Where are you going to get the guys and blood if not from one of the goblins? :P
We're in a forest, with a ranger. I figured it wouldn't be that hard... We should have done this before we got here, though, technically... That's why I said "We could have planned this on the way to the fight." :P
And drag along a backpack that's oozing intestines and blood for the goblins to see? :lol
Meh, Jorr could split off from the group on the way back to his cabin, go kill something, and bring it back in secret while we start the interrogations. And we probably don't even need it, like Agita said. I just thought it would be funny and dramatic. :D

Looking over character sheets, it looks like Sckhar should be the one doing the intimidating and bluffing. No surprise there, really.  ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 23, 2010, 04:25:28 PM
Looking over character sheets, it looks like Sckhar should be the one doing the intimidating and bluffing. No surprise there, really.  ;)

Well....I can do this, but I won't refuse some aid in this task, that's for sure  :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 23, 2010, 04:45:50 PM
Yay for size penalties :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 23, 2010, 04:51:25 PM
Out of curiosity, does Goldilocks have Enlarge Person? :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 23, 2010, 04:54:12 PM
Out of curiosity, does Goldilocks have Enlarge Person? :D

Yes she does.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 24, 2010, 12:07:27 AM
Man, I really hope the plan works now that we've gone through the trouble of working out all the details. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 24, 2010, 01:44:43 AM
Man, I really hope the plan works now that we've gone through the trouble of working out all the details. :P

It will, my friend, it will.  ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 24, 2010, 02:36:01 AM
Speaking of giant centipedes... there was one in my house tonight. Damned thing was 2 or 3 inches long, with long "feeler-like" legs... My wife saw it and was like "What the fuck is that!?!"  :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 24, 2010, 02:44:25 AM
Speaking of giant centipedes... there was one in my house tonight. Damned thing was 2 or 3 inches long, with long "feeler-like" legs... My wife saw it and was like "What the fuck is that!?!"  :lol

 :o

Nanshork, what did you do!?

Also, what do I do with my action? Start blowing my horn, and lure even more goblinoids to the party?  :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 24, 2010, 02:51:58 AM
Breathe on these fools?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 24, 2010, 03:08:20 AM
Breathe on these fools?

I don't thik I can get anyone within the Aoe from where I am...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 24, 2010, 05:06:36 AM
Breathe on these fools?

I don't thik I can get anyone within the Aoe from where I am...

I think you could just get BM (but not LR2), but not without hitting Kalal as well...


Seeing as you don't seem to have a ranged weapon, I'd say start blowing that horn for some Inspire Courage. The chance of more goblinoids hearing you is pretty slim, I mean, the Witchwood is pretty big and your miles away from Vraath Keep, so if there are any gobbos there they won't hear you.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 24, 2010, 05:20:24 AM
And Jorr's attack is up as well, almost forgot about him :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 24, 2010, 08:05:32 AM
Blow that horn like a champ, Sckhar.
And don't forget to swallow.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 24, 2010, 08:33:59 AM
Blow that horn like a champ, Sckhar.
And don't forget to swallow.
:lol

I wasn't gonna go there because it was too easy...


I wonder what makes it masterwork :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 24, 2010, 10:02:17 AM
Risada, activating a Badge of Valor is an immediate action, so it only takes your swift action for next turn. You can't use Inspirational Boost, but you can use that.
Also: Wait, you don't have enough Int for Words of Creation? For shame. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 24, 2010, 10:14:47 AM
Risada, activating a Badge of Valor is an immediate action, so it only takes your swift action for next turn. You can't use Inspirational Boost, but you can use that.
Also: Wait, you don't have enough Int for Words of Creation? For shame. :P

How much is it again? 13? I could grab it at 9th, no problem....
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 24, 2010, 10:20:48 AM
Risada, activating a Badge of Valor is an immediate action, so it only takes your swift action for next turn. You can't use Inspirational Boost, but you can use that.
Also: Wait, you don't have enough Int for Words of Creation? For shame. :P

How much is it again? 13? I could grab it at 9th, no problem....
15.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 24, 2010, 10:22:40 AM
Risada, activating a Badge of Valor is an immediate action, so it only takes your swift action for next turn. You can't use Inspirational Boost, but you can use that.
Also: Wait, you don't have enough Int for Words of Creation? For shame. :P

How much is it again? 13? I could grab it at 9th, no problem....
15.
Meh, I can always toss in a +2 Int item ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 24, 2010, 11:11:53 AM
Next round is up.

A request to the initiators though, could you guys list which stance you're in in your posts please? Makes things a little easier for me :)
(yes, I know Phaedrus did so this round, it's just a general request :))
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 24, 2010, 03:33:35 PM
: Judas Priest - The Sentinel
Across his chest, in scabbards rest
The rows of glowing knives
Whose razor points in challenged tests
Have finished many lives

Now facing one another
The stand-off eats at time
Then all at once a silence falls
As the bell ceases its chime
Upon this sign the challengers
With shrieks and cries rush forth
The knives fly out like bullets
Upon their deadly course
Screams of pain and agony
Racks the silent air
Amidst the dying bodies
Blood runs everywhere
The figure stands expressionless
Impassive and alone
Unmoved by this victory
And the seeds of death he's sown

Seems to fit Yamanu and his fighting style methinks :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 24, 2010, 03:57:33 PM
Hah, that's pretty perfect. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 25, 2010, 08:43:20 AM
Hah, that's pretty perfect. :D
And I just remembered there'll be an encounter with a bell tower :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 25, 2010, 09:48:23 AM
I'm going to hold off on my turn until I see the outcome of the AoOs on LR1. If the gobbos are dropped by the AoOs, they can't throw the Tanglefoot Bags. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 25, 2010, 09:49:50 AM
I'm going to hold off on my turn until I see the outcome of the AoOs on LR1. If the gobbos are dropped by the AoOs, they can't throw the Tanglefoot Bags. :P
Correct, but I wanted to post everything at once, just in case they get lucky :P
So let's see that AoO of yours :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 25, 2010, 09:55:37 AM
I'm going to hold off on my turn until I see the outcome of the AoOs on LR1. If the gobbos are dropped by the AoOs, they can't throw the Tanglefoot Bags. :P
Correct, but I wanted to post everything at once, just in case they get lucky :P
So let's see that AoO of yours :smirk
You already have it. :smirk Power attack is oh so fun when coupled with Inspire Courage. EDIT: Woo, onehit.

Okay, Kalal has an example to follow. Is he a bad enough dude to oneshot LR1?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 25, 2010, 09:57:48 AM
Well, there goes that master plan :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 25, 2010, 11:27:27 AM
Just to confirm: Is there any goblin still alive?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 25, 2010, 12:01:47 PM
Just to confirm: Is there any goblin still alive?
All gobbos are alive, they're just unconscious.
LR1 and LR3 are still standing, I believe.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 25, 2010, 12:10:40 PM
Just to confirm: Is there any goblin still alive?
All gobbos are alive, they're just unconscious.
LR1 and LR3 are still standing, I believe.
Correct, although Kalal's and the Centipede's AoO's might change that.

Also, normally I'd just count BM and LR2 as dead, but seeing as you guys want to interrogate some gobbos I'm tracking their negative HP, hence the unconscious part.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 25, 2010, 12:19:44 PM
Good thing you only die at -10. This way we don't have to worry about that stupid -4 to hit to deal nonlethal damage. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 25, 2010, 12:33:07 PM
@Risada: I'll resolve your attack once all the remaining AoO's for that Gobbos are in.
Should those kill him, you can edit your post to do something else if you want to.


By the way, if a bard stops singing, his IC lingers for 5 rounds. Is it the same when he stops singing because he's killed ???
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 25, 2010, 12:46:36 PM
@Risada: I'll resolve your attack once all the remaining AoO's for that Gobbos are in.
Should those kill him, you can edit your post to do something else if you want to.


By the way, if a bard stops singing, his IC lingers for 5 rounds. Is it the same when he stops singing because he's killed ???
I'd assume so.

Although I could be convinced that seeing your buffer die would be a pretty big hit to morale.
Then again, if you've ever watched a shounen anime, deaths give morale bonuses if anything (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neSZ8SoViAk&fmt=18). :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 25, 2010, 12:59:21 PM
It would've been ok for the goblin to get away on the leopard if we had already spread our false information. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 25, 2010, 01:01:31 PM
We should totally somehow get one of them to tell their generals that we are only two people - a smart halfling and a fat half-giant.
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 25, 2010, 01:04:31 PM
If only we had Suggestion or Modify Memory. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 25, 2010, 04:27:39 PM
I am not fat!
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 25, 2010, 04:43:45 PM
I am not fat!
:lol

EDIT: I don't see Combat Reflexes on your Centipede's feat list, so which AoO will it make?

EDIT2: Nevermind, they both miss anyway ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 25, 2010, 04:54:01 PM
I am not fat!
:lol

EDIT: I don't see Combat Reflexes on your Centipede's feat list, so which AoO will it make?

EDIT2: Nevermind, they both miss anyway ;)
Fell, fuck.
Phaedrus, it's up to you. Don't let the colonel get bukkake'd. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 25, 2010, 05:01:00 PM
I am not fat!
:lol

EDIT: I don't see Combat Reflexes on your Centipede's feat list, so which AoO will it make?

EDIT2: Nevermind, they both miss anyway ;)
Fell, fuck.
Phaedrus, it's up to you. Don't let the colonel get bukkake'd. :P
:twitch
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork July 25, 2010, 07:30:39 PM
I am not fat!
:lol

EDIT: I don't see Combat Reflexes on your Centipede's feat list, so which AoO will it make?

EDIT2: Nevermind, they both miss anyway ;)


Sorry, the second one was rolled as a pre-edit before I actually posted because I didn't see it the first time I scanned your post.   :p
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 03:26:03 AM
@Phaedrus:
What does LR3 have cover from? His mount?
Jup :)

Doesn't that preclude him from throwing a tanglefoot bag this round, then?

Only LR1 and LR2 are attempting to throw a tanglefoot bag, LR3 is just making a run for it :)

Have LR3 or his mount been injured?
LR3 has taken 9 damage and 1 point of Dex damage from Goldilock's Centipede.



EDIT: Also, fuck Stand Still :fu





:P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 26, 2010, 05:32:54 AM
[spoiler]Have you read the blurb about terrain and movement cost in the first post of the thread? You can't move there in one move action.

Feel free to edit your action after I get the results of Phaedrus' AoO up :)[/spoiler]

I thought it was only in the forest area.... not the whole terrain.... oh well.... edited already...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 06:11:34 AM
[spoiler]Have you read the blurb about terrain and movement cost in the first post of the thread? You can't move there in one move action.

Feel free to edit your action after I get the results of Phaedrus' AoO up :)[/spoiler]

I thought it was only in the forest area.... not the whole terrain.... oh well.... edited already...
The forest area cost 2 squares per square moved and the slopes on the side of the road cost 4 squares per square moved.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 06:28:42 AM
Ready to wrap up this round after Agita's regular turn :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 26, 2010, 10:42:25 AM
EDIT: Also, fuck Stand Still :fu





:P
lol, wait till I get Thicket of Blades with it. :D

This might be a good time to spread some disinformation, if we're going to let this guy escape. I don't think Kalal is the one to do it, with his +0 Bluff mod, though. :P

Edit: Or we could take him as a "prisoner", along with one or two of the others, if we can stabalize them, and then let one of the "prisoners" escape, after they see how terribly we tortured their allies.  :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 26, 2010, 12:05:18 PM
Ok, so if I've got this right, only LR3 and his mount are still standing, and both of them are still where the map has them at the start of the turn, yes?
Might as well say ready to wrap up the encounter, not the round. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 26, 2010, 12:29:11 PM
Ok, so if I've got this right, only LR3 and his mount are still standing, and both of them are still where the map has them at the start of the turn, yes?
Might as well say ready to wrap up the encounter, not the round. :P
That's right. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 12:36:36 PM
Ok, so if I've got this right, only LR3 and his mount are still standing, and both of them are still where the map has them at the start of the turn, yes?
Might as well say ready to wrap up the encounter, not the round. :P
Correct :)

EDIT: If you guys want we can end the encounter right now. I mean, it's the five of you plus a summon against a level 3 goblin and his kittycat.
Just let me know what you guys want to do.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 26, 2010, 01:18:11 PM
[spoiler]Don't forget the flanking bonus. I forgot it earlier on my attacks. :P[/spoiler]
Oh, right. I was looking at the map where Kalal was too far to flank. Yeah, that probably pretty much ends the encounter.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 01:19:14 PM
Nice shot, exactly to -10 :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 26, 2010, 01:22:36 PM
Fake edit: Actually, I forgot the Inspire Courage damage bonus on the damage rolls (but not the attack rolls). Both should be 3 higher.
Does this change anything for the mount?
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 01:37:10 PM
Still conscious. I'll edit the damage taken though, missed that bit the first time around.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 26, 2010, 01:38:08 PM
[spoiler]Don't forget the flanking bonus. I forgot it earlier on my attacks. :P[/spoiler]
Oh, right. I was looking at the map where Kalal was too far to flank. Yeah, that probably pretty much ends the encounter.
Kalal has 10 foot reach. So even if he'd been over there, he could still flank. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 01:45:05 PM
[spoiler]Don't forget the flanking bonus. I forgot it earlier on my attacks. :P[/spoiler]
Oh, right. I was looking at the map where Kalal was too far to flank. Yeah, that probably pretty much ends the encounter.
Kalal has 10 foot reach. So even if he'd been over there, he could still flank. :D
Yeah, I keep forgetting that as well. I remembered it just in time to add in Kalal on the AoO's before posting :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 02:10:00 PM
So, do you guys agree with wrapping up? There's no way that leopard is going to survive a full round of attacks from Yamanu, Kalal and Goldflower's centipede and it's completely trapped...
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 26, 2010, 02:15:48 PM
So, do you guys agree with wrapping up? There's no way that leopard is going to survive a full round of attacks from Yamanu, Kalal and Goldflower's centipede and it's completely trapped...
Aye. Heck, we could just start stabilizing the unconscious gobbos. Without a rider and heavily wounded, it'll probably just flee wherever, and it's not like it can compromise us since it can't talk. And if it does fight to the death, we don't even care because it can't charge and thus can't damage Harika or Kalal worth shit. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 26, 2010, 02:31:54 PM
And it probably can't even find Yamanu. :P

It feels good to play a stealthy bastard again. XD
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 02:36:30 PM
And it probably can't even find Yamanu. :P

It feels good to play a stealthy bastard again. XD

Maybe if it gets within 30 ft., but otherwise no way in hell it'll find you :)

And yes, it'll probably fight to the death if it can't flee.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 26, 2010, 02:41:02 PM
And it probably can't even find Yamanu. :P

It feels good to play a stealthy bastard again. XD

Maybe if it gets within 30 ft., but otherwise no way in hell it'll find you :)

And yes, it'll probably fight to the death if it can't flee.
In that case... well, it's trapped between the colonel, Kalal, and the centipede. The centipede doesn't matter, and assuming it's a fairly normal leopard, it can only hurt Harika or Kalal at all if it rolls max damage on its bite (and then it's 1 damage per attack). So honestly, Harika could just take out her Blessed Bandages and start stabilizing the unconscious gobbos. She doesn't even care about AoOs. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 02:44:44 PM
And it probably can't even find Yamanu. :P

It feels good to play a stealthy bastard again. XD

Maybe if it gets within 30 ft., but otherwise no way in hell it'll find you :)

And yes, it'll probably fight to the death if it can't flee.
In that case... well, it's trapped between the colonel, Kalal, and the centipede. The centipede doesn't matter, and assuming it's a fairly normal leopard, it can only hurt Harika or Kalal at all if it rolls max damage on its bite (and then it's 1 damage per attack). So honestly, Harika could just take out her Blessed Bandages and start stabilizing the unconscious gobbos. She doesn't even care about AoOs. :P
Warbeast, so a little boost in Strength etc., that's it. Let's just assume you guys cleaved it in half between the four of you, it only needs like 10 more damage or so.
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 04:25:14 PM
Aftter Kalal's spells have been cast, you have the goblin in chain armor and the two of the other goblins stabilized.

You can post your interrogations and whatnot in the regular IC thread :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 26, 2010, 04:54:46 PM
You know... now that I think about it, this being magical fairy land and all (i.e. D&D)... we should probably kill that damned cat. Otherwise, some bastard cleric or druid will cast Speak With Animals on it, and find out more info about us than we wanted to give up. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem July 26, 2010, 04:58:02 PM
Well, depending on which way it darted into the forest, perhaps Yamanu could simply have stuck it with a dagger to put it out of its misery. :)
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 05:11:36 PM
If you want to, we can just say you guys did that. I mean, it's not like it could've gotten away if you didn't want it to.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 26, 2010, 05:16:43 PM
So... who's up for some leopard chili?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 26, 2010, 05:18:20 PM
So... who's up for some leopard chili?
I bet Yamanu is!  :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 26, 2010, 05:19:37 PM
Speaking of chili... what if we offer them some chili (gotta be nice to POWs) and casually point out that one goblin is missing? :smirk
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 26, 2010, 05:26:46 PM
Speaking of chili... what if we offer them some chili (gotta be nice to POWs) and casually point out that one goblin is missing? :smirk
SOILENT GREEN IS MADE OF GOBLINOIDS!




:lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 26, 2010, 06:02:39 PM
Speaking of chili... what if we offer them some chili (gotta be nice to POWs) and casually point out that one goblin is missing? :smirk
That's a great idea. :D  :lol
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 29, 2010, 01:46:56 PM
@Phaedrus: about 3.5 to 4 miles if you cut straight through the woods.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 29, 2010, 03:50:59 PM
That's not too far... but it would still take several hours if you're plowing through heavy undergrowth... We should have brought our mules and horses. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada July 30, 2010, 02:10:29 AM
I say let's question them right here.... perhaps out of the road, but not too far... so we can keep going faster...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 30, 2010, 02:03:59 PM
So, who's going to go all Jack Bauer on this little fellow? :P

Also, had my first RL RHoD session two days ago. Except for the Druid (who ran) it was a TPK...
Ofcourse, those two Greatbow crits didn't really help the party's chance of survival, nor did the Crusader taking some 47 damage in round one and dying in the next, or the Sorcerer's short range on his spells...

All in all, terrain really is a bitch in that first encounter though.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 30, 2010, 02:31:53 PM
It sure is. Remember how I was literally doing nothing but repositioning for one or two rounds at one point? And that's with a burrow speed.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY July 30, 2010, 02:59:21 PM
It sure is. Remember how I was literally doing nothing but repositioning for one or two rounds at one point? And that's with a burrow speed.
Yeah, I am REALLY happy that I wound up going with Earth Devotion. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 30, 2010, 03:04:07 PM
Maybe I should retrain out Combat Expertise for that. Taking that feat as filler was a dumb idea anyway. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw July 30, 2010, 03:25:20 PM
Maybe dip Cleric to use it more than once a day?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita July 30, 2010, 03:27:18 PM
Maybe dip Cleric to use it more than once a day?
Nevar. :P I want to go straight Warblade on this one.
Heck, looking at the pace we've been going with encounters/day, 1/day is enough. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY August 01, 2010, 11:58:48 PM
I say let's question them right here.... perhaps out of the road, but not too far... so we can keep going faster...
Yeah, I guess that would work... as long as we get the one we're "torturing" out of sight of the others, but not out of "sound". We told Jorr about our plan, right? So he probably knows of somewhere nearby to facilitate that. Even just somewhere with a hill so we can take them around a corner would work.

Also... what the hell are we going to do with these guys when we're done questioning them? I don't think Kalal would be ok with just murderizing them... (I personally on the other hand, have nothing against the rest of you doing it without his knowledge :P ).

Risada/Sckhar definitely needs to be the one bluffing and intimidating them. Hell... he should probably be the one who fakes being tortured, too. It could go like this:

Sckhar intimidates the crap out of them, giving them a big scary talk about what we're going to do to them if they don't talk. Then he and another or two of us lead one away to "be tortured". Sckhar then makes a lot of scary sounds like he's being tortured (bluff check) within hearing range of the other prisoners, but out of sight.

Then we leave the goblin that was supposedly tortured somewhere, and Sckhar comes back and talks about what he just did to that one. Then more bluffing and intimidating, and he takes away another one, makes some more scary sounds, etc. Repeat till we get to the last one, who hopefully is so fucking scared that he spills everything.

Then the rest of you get rid of them while Kalal is taking a leak or something. :P Or maybe Goldflower could be like "Hey Kalal, I think I left my canteen back there in the road. Mind checking for me?"
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw August 02, 2010, 06:56:01 AM
Haha, yeah, Jorr could probably find a usable location withing a couple of minutes walking distance.
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita August 02, 2010, 08:06:49 AM
I still think we should do their imaginations let the intimidating work for us. Don't talk to them, just show them the supposed implements.
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY August 02, 2010, 03:00:13 PM
I still think we should do their imaginations let the intimidating work for us. Don't talk to them, just show them the supposed implements.
We're still going to have to make a check, dude. This is D&D. At best, it will get us a circumstance bonus. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita August 02, 2010, 03:08:41 PM
I still think we should do their imaginations let the intimidating work for us. Don't talk to them, just show them the supposed implements.
We're still going to have to make a check, dude. This is D&D. At best, it will get us a circumstance bonus. :P
Naturally. I wouldn't have it any other way. However, we might as well do it with style. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada August 02, 2010, 06:29:55 PM
Will start the "torture" later....  ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY August 02, 2010, 07:23:11 PM
Let's add a little "good cop/bad cop" to the routine, also. Kalal can act like the "good cop", using Diplomacy to win them over while the "bad cop" (Schar) is out "torturing". :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita August 05, 2010, 04:55:20 PM
Two thoughts:
Any lewt from the gobbo encounter?

Do we have info on how spacious the two choke points that the Red Hands use to enter the valley are? The bridge would obviously be relatively narrow compared to, say, a road on open terrain, how about the other one? I'm asking because I just remembered the existence of Feather Tokens. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY August 05, 2010, 05:01:11 PM
Two thoughts:
Any lewt from the gobbo encounter?

Do we have info on how spacious the two choke points that the Red Hands use to enter the valley are? The bridge would obviously be relatively narrow compared to, say, a road on open terrain, how about the other one? I'm asking because I just remembered the existence of Feather Tokens. :D
:lmao
: Re: OOC discussion
: Agita August 05, 2010, 05:03:26 PM
Two thoughts:
Any lewt from the gobbo encounter?

Do we have info on how spacious the two choke points that the Red Hands use to enter the valley are? The bridge would obviously be relatively narrow compared to, say, a road on open terrain, how about the other one? I'm asking because I just remembered the existence of Feather Tokens. :D
:lmao
It wouldn't stop them forever, but a small forest growing on that bridge would probably cramp their style for a good while. We could use that time to wipe out the hobbos in the vale and then take the new ones out as they come in. It's probably not what the designers intended for us to do, but fuck that. :P
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY August 05, 2010, 05:57:18 PM
How many trees does it take to make a bridge fall down?
And if no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY August 12, 2010, 01:28:33 PM
So... who or what are we waiting on?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada August 12, 2010, 11:04:20 PM
So... who or what are we waiting on?

I don't know.... I know I was waiting for Bowen to tell us we arrived at the place, at least, to start the torture...
: Re: OOC discussion
: BowenSilverclaw August 13, 2010, 03:01:44 AM
I thought I said you already arrived...
Ow well: you arrived
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada August 13, 2010, 07:34:53 AM
Just to confirm: now that there's one out, the initial talk is with the other two, right?
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork August 20, 2010, 12:43:41 PM
I'm not doing any intimidating unless someone makes me.   :P

I've also discovered that if I could go back, I'd have done my summoner/support character a whole different way.   
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada August 20, 2010, 01:41:34 PM
I'm not doing any intimidating unless someone makes me.   :P


Maybe you (or anybody willing) could try an aid another for me?  ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: Nanshork August 20, 2010, 07:04:21 PM
I'm not doing any intimidating unless someone makes me.   :P


Maybe you (or anybody willing) could try an aid another for me?  ;)

I tried just for you and got an 8.   :blush
: Re: OOC discussion
: VennDygrem August 20, 2010, 07:23:45 PM
Yamanu is hiding so our numbers are not completely apparent to our enemies. However, if you want to make reference to our hungry war wolves or something like that, I can try and make a convincing growl. :D
: Re: OOC discussion
: Risada August 20, 2010, 07:27:58 PM
Yamanu is hiding so our numbers are not completely apparent to our enemies. However, if you want to make reference to our hungry war wolves or something like that, I can try and make a convincing growl. :D

Please do. It will add some weight to my words  ;)
: Re: OOC discussion
: PhaedrusXY August 30, 2010, 11:12:23 AM
After we find the results of their checks, Kalal will try diplomacy on the goblins.