Author Topic: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition  (Read 140243 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rebel7284

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1585
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #460 on: September 22, 2010, 04:18:51 PM »
A220: In core it's certainly white.  Out of core.. well I really don't feel like going through all the dragons in draconomicon and later sources.  Is there a particular reason you must know?  Or is it just curiosity about statistics?

edit: this should be Questions 221...
Negative level on a chicken would make it a wight the next day.  Chicken the other wight meat. -borg286

betrayor

  • Bi-Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 522
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #461 on: September 22, 2010, 04:37:46 PM »
A220: In core it's certainly white.  Out of core.. well I really don't feel like going through all the dragons in draconomicon and later sources.  Is there a particular reason you must know?  Or is it just curiosity about statistics?

edit: this should be Questions 221...

Well the bigger part is cyriosity,I have my own opinions of course( I think that Ethereal is the weakest of all) but it may be a nice idea to throw the weakest great wyrm ay my party so I don't want to tpk them,what I really am asking is opinions....

dna1

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1131
  • Im not albino Im just from Alaska
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #462 on: September 22, 2010, 04:49:09 PM »
white dragons < any other dragon
Slappin ho's like E-Honda

betrayor

  • Bi-Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 522
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #463 on: September 22, 2010, 05:00:52 PM »
I was just reading the various dragons and when I read the Incarnum dragon.....
Isn't the Incarnum dragon really weak if the party does not have anyone using Incarnum?
Or I am missing something?

BeholderSlayer

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #464 on: September 22, 2010, 05:12:31 PM »
Q221: What issues of dragon magazine are pertinent to 3.5e?
Hi Welcome
[spoiler]
Allow me to welcome you both with my literal words and with an active display of how much you fit in by being tone deaf, dumb, and uncritical of your babbling myself.[/spoiler]

bearsarebrown

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #465 on: September 22, 2010, 05:17:29 PM »
3.5 only? There isn't a hard transition but about 310-358. 295-309 is all 3.0 but a lot of it is still usable.

Nunkuruji

  • Bi-Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 416
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #466 on: September 22, 2010, 05:25:59 PM »
Q222: I'm looking for the post/thread/handbook that details the dozen or so party roles and the associated feats, features & skills: face/social, search/trap, bsf, etc. I can't recall if it is here or at 339, and google is failing me.

X-Codes

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 3941
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #467 on: September 22, 2010, 05:28:08 PM »
Q219: What was the name of that relatively lame Dwarf Bard PrC that's buried somewhere on the WotC website?
is this the one you're looking for?
Yes, exactly!  It looks like it has potential as a nanobots abuser.

The_Mad_Linguist

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8780
  • Simulated Thing
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #468 on: September 22, 2010, 05:28:32 PM »
Q223: Since devotion feats are all spell-like, does that mean you can use mortalbane on strength/animal devotion to add damage to the natural attack?  Or fire devotion to set people on extra hot fire with your extra hot melee attacks?
« Last Edit: September 22, 2010, 05:41:38 PM by The_Mad_Linguist »
Linguist, Mad, Unique, none of these things am I
My custom class: The Priest of the Unseen Host
Planetouched Handbook
Want to improve your character?  Then die.

Nunkuruji

  • Bi-Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 416
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #469 on: September 22, 2010, 05:29:48 PM »
3.5 only? There isn't a hard transition but about 310-358. 295-309 is all 3.0 but a lot of it is still usable.

Just avoid 3.0 psionics stuff, it's not particularly compatible.

X-Codes

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 3941
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #470 on: September 22, 2010, 05:53:14 PM »
Q222: I'm looking for the post/thread/handbook that details the dozen or so party roles and the associated feats, features & skills: face/social, search/trap, bsf, etc. I can't recall if it is here or at 339, and google is failing me.
A222: I wrote that mini-Handbook.  It's on 339, but I don't have a link.  If memory serves, it was called something like Covering the Bases.

PhaedrusXY

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8022
  • Advanced Spambot
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #471 on: September 22, 2010, 05:55:10 PM »
3.5 only? There isn't a hard transition but about 310-358. 295-309 is all 3.0 but a lot of it is still usable.

Just avoid 3.0 psionics stuff, it's not particularly compatible.
Yeah. Pretty much everything else either works as-is, or with minor tweaking, though.
[spoiler]
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?

Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
[/spoiler]

betrayor

  • Bi-Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 522
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #472 on: September 22, 2010, 05:57:33 PM »
3.5 only? There isn't a hard transition but about 310-358. 295-309 is all 3.0 but a lot of it is still usable.

Why exclude 359 and 360?
They do have some 3.5 material.....

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #473 on: September 22, 2010, 06:01:52 PM »
Q222: I'm looking for the post/thread/handbook that details the dozen or so party roles and the associated feats, features & skills: face/social, search/trap, bsf, etc. I can't recall if it is here or at 339, and google is failing me.
A222: I wrote that mini-Handbook.  It's on 339, but I don't have a link.  If memory serves, it was called something like Covering the Bases.
Did a search, and the only thing with "Covering the Bases" is the quoted sentence.
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.

PhaedrusXY

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8022
  • Advanced Spambot
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #474 on: September 22, 2010, 06:06:46 PM »
Q222: I'm looking for the post/thread/handbook that details the dozen or so party roles and the associated feats, features & skills: face/social, search/trap, bsf, etc. I can't recall if it is here or at 339, and google is failing me.
A222: I wrote that mini-Handbook.  It's on 339, but I don't have a link.  If memory serves, it was called something like Covering the Bases.
Did a search, and the only thing with "Covering the Bases" is the quoted sentence.
Is this it?
The Iconic Roles, Defining just what they're supposed to do. - (by X-Codes)

The link in the 339 Handy Links thread is dead... You might be able to find it in the Internet Archive, if you're lucky...

Here is the original URL: http://community.wizards.com/forumhandler?t=703828
[spoiler]
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?

Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
[/spoiler]

Nunkuruji

  • Bi-Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 416
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #475 on: September 22, 2010, 06:16:21 PM »
Q222: I'm looking for the post/thread/handbook that details the dozen or so party roles and the associated feats, features & skills: face/social, search/trap, bsf, etc. I can't recall if it is here or at 339, and google is failing me.
A222: I wrote that mini-Handbook.  It's on 339, but I don't have a link.  If memory serves, it was called something like Covering the Bases.
Did a search, and the only thing with "Covering the Bases" is the quoted sentence.
Is this it?
The Iconic Roles, Defining just what they're supposed to do. - (by X-Codes)

The link in the 339 Handy Links thread is dead... You might be able to find it in the Internet Archive, if you're lucky...

Here is the original URL: http://community.wizards.com/forumhandler?t=703828

Damn you wizards....

Would have been a helpful read for a few newer players at the table

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #476 on: September 22, 2010, 06:27:10 PM »
Q222: I'm looking for the post/thread/handbook that details the dozen or so party roles and the associated feats, features & skills: face/social, search/trap, bsf, etc. I can't recall if it is here or at 339, and google is failing me.
A222: I wrote that mini-Handbook.  It's on 339, but I don't have a link.  If memory serves, it was called something like Covering the Bases.
Did a search, and the only thing with "Covering the Bases" is the quoted sentence.
Is this it?
The Iconic Roles, Defining just what they're supposed to do. - (by X-Codes)

The link in the 339 Handy Links thread is dead... You might be able to find it in the Internet Archive, if you're lucky...

Here is the original URL: http://community.wizards.com/forumhandler?t=703828

Damn you wizards....

Would have been a helpful read for a few newer players at the table
Yeah, but that's how they work though. Taking out all the useful stuff while "advancing" or "making it better".
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.

Hallack

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1344
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #477 on: September 22, 2010, 07:46:08 PM »
Q223: Any good spells or techniques for Vampire killing?  Particularly locking the gaseous bastards down?  I suppose a Disintegrate on the Gaseous form should work too?
Placeholder - T'tosc

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #478 on: September 22, 2010, 08:09:54 PM »
Q 224 What's the average AC (standard, flat-footed, and touch) the average 20th level character should be able to hit? What should be the highest? What should a gish character be able to hit?
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.

bearsarebrown

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
Re: Simple Q&A #17 -- the "your mama's so ___ ... " edition
« Reply #479 on: September 22, 2010, 08:35:50 PM »
Q225 Migrated question from another topic: Does there exist any RAW way to destroy a plane? Open ended Epic Spells and SDAs don't count.

[spoiler]
That destroys everything on the plane. But can you actually destroy the plane?

All those Metabreath feats do is make the plane uncomfortable to Plane Shift to. I want to remove the ability to even Shift there.

3000 mile radius x 150 blasts of this size x 2 twinned, think that covers every geometrically possible part of a planet?  Going off even something Earth-sized, that's doable with merely 4 of those spheres.

Yes, but the space it occupied still exists. The plane may be empty, but it is still a plane. This is a question of making Hell not be there anymore.
[/spoiler]