Author Topic: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...  (Read 127176 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Maat_Mons

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
  • What is a smile but a grimace of happiness?
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #800 on: September 09, 2010, 06:19:57 PM »
Q232: Are there stats for a cage of any kind (like the barred version of Forcecage, but made of something other than force)?

A 232: Arms and Equipment guide, page 21. 

PhaedrusXY

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8022
  • Advanced Spambot
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #801 on: September 09, 2010, 06:22:11 PM »
Q233
does having a spelllike ability spell X 1/day qualify as requirement beeing able to cast spell X?
(does this make sense the way i wrote it?)
Yes. This is spelled out in Complete Arcane.
Q232: Are there stats for a cage of any kind (like the barred version of Forcecage, but made of something other than force)?

A 232: Arms and Equipment guide, page 21. 
Thanks.
[spoiler]
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?

Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
[/spoiler]

Sobolev

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 742
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #802 on: September 09, 2010, 06:56:58 PM »
Q234: If a Sorcerer can know 7 first level spells, what should they be?
Sha'ir Handbook
Binder Handbook


Quote from: Negative Zero on November 04, 2009, 02:16:14 AM
In my humble opinion, CO is haberdashery. Some say we're mad, but we can all agree we're hatters. Yes, we have potential to make very sophisticated hats, very fancy hats, be they dark or light. But the truth is that the color of the hat does not come from the group of us - our community doesn't directly produce hats. We simply give average head circumferences, list current fashion trends, and point out some shiny, obscure baubles to add to the latest hat line.

carnivore

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1671
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #803 on: September 09, 2010, 07:08:53 PM »
A234

Sohala

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1268
  • Hammer Smash Good
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #804 on: September 09, 2010, 08:43:34 PM »
Q235
Do Steadfast Boots allow for attacks while flat-footed? If so, would that make you unflat-footed?
"You think I'm talking about breaking the rules?"
"No I'm just trying to figure out how far you want them bent."
[spoiler]
Characters
Ixen-Elemental Mage Test Game
Torgthen-The Darkening
Eldak-The Neverending Dungeon
Games
Dungeon Delver's Delight
Adventures in Eberron
Town of Terror
Working Progress
[3.5] Mana Mage

sir_argenon

  • Bi-Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 367
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #805 on: September 09, 2010, 09:05:54 PM »
Q240: is there any item that grants combat reflexes for free?

Ithamar

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 959
  • PM me if you're interested in some Arena action!
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #806 on: September 09, 2010, 09:13:00 PM »
A240:  Serpent Armor from MIC does just that.
Are you worthy of Ascension?
Always accepting gladiators!  Now with a new and improved rule set!

weenog

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1706
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #807 on: September 09, 2010, 10:13:32 PM »
Q 241:  Did WotC ever print any more information on dolgrims than what's in ECS?  I'm particularly interested in what their favored class is, and how their Dual Consciousness interacts with Two-Weapon Fighting or Multiweapon Fighting.
"We managed to make an NPC puke an undead monster."
"That sounds like a victory to me."

weenog

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1706
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #808 on: September 09, 2010, 11:34:12 PM »
Q 242: Multiweapon Fighting, Improved Multiweapon Fighting, and Greater Multiweapon Fighting say they replace Two-Weapon Fighting, Improved Two-Weapon Fighting, and Greater Two-Weapon Fighting for creatures with more than two arms.

When a ranger gets Two-Weapon Fighting, Improved Two-Weapon Fighting, and Greater Two-Weapon Fighting through his Combat Style, he doesn't have to meet the prerequisites for the feats.

Am I correct in assuming that a four-armed ranger picks up the Multiweapon Fighting feat chain and ignores their requirements, if he selects the two-weapon combat fighting style?
"We managed to make an NPC puke an undead monster."
"That sounds like a victory to me."

Generic_PC

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #809 on: September 09, 2010, 11:51:35 PM »
Q243: Are there any feats that off-set or grant bonuses for being small for the purposes of trip attacks, disarm, sunder, bull rush...?

Q244: Are there any ways for a Swordsage to get +Wis to Trip, Sunder, Bull Rush, etc.

I figure that since I screwed up my thread by asking about a small sized grappler in the title, I'll just figure it out. I'll probably learn more this way too.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2010, 12:07:30 AM by Generic_PC »
Witty sayings? Nah, not right now. Currently playing Dwarf Fortress and League of Legends. I really recommend League of Legends.

Zebu

  • Barbary Macaque at the Rock of Gibraltar
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #810 on: September 10, 2010, 12:35:02 AM »
Q244:  Go here: http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=215.0 for all your stat questions.  It's incredible!

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #811 on: September 10, 2010, 02:01:55 AM »
Q 242: Multiweapon Fighting, Improved Multiweapon Fighting, and Greater Multiweapon Fighting say they replace Two-Weapon Fighting, Improved Two-Weapon Fighting, and Greater Two-Weapon Fighting for creatures with more than two arms.

When a ranger gets Two-Weapon Fighting, Improved Two-Weapon Fighting, and Greater Two-Weapon Fighting through his Combat Style, he doesn't have to meet the prerequisites for the feats.

Am I correct in assuming that a four-armed ranger picks up the Multiweapon Fighting feat chain and ignores their requirements, if he selects the two-weapon combat fighting style?
That would be a good assumption, yes.
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.

ksbsnowowl

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1645
  • Wishing I was a raging Norseman
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #812 on: September 10, 2010, 03:41:52 AM »
Quote
From the DMG

Incorporealityextra damage from being favored enemies, and from sneak attacks. They move in any direction (including up or down) at will. They do not need to walk on the ground. They can pass through solid objects at will, although they cannot see when their eyes are within solid matter.

...
I'd never noticed the red part before.

Wow, I really want to be a Telthor Saint now...

Q 245: Even though an incorporeal creature would normally be immune to favored enemy damage and skirmish damage, does the Swift Hunter feat still grant you the ability to apply skirmish damage to such creatures?  Assuming you have its type as a favored enemy, of course.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

KSB Snow Owl's Archer Build thread

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #813 on: September 10, 2010, 04:57:26 AM »
Q 246This marvelous creature appears as a small housecat with sleek golden fur and glowing emerald eyes.Combat
Like all cats, a golden cat enjoys catching mice, rabbits and small birds. They tend to avoid attacking things larger than themselves unless cornered and defending themselves. Even then, they seek escape as soon as possible.
Luck/Unluck (Su):Telepathy (Su): A golden cat can communicate telepathically with its owner to a range of 100 feet.
Skills: Golden cats have a +4 racial bonus on Hide and Move Silently checks and a +8 racial bonus on Balance, Jump and Climb checks. It
can always choose to take 10 on a Climb check, even if rushed or threatened. They use their Dexterity modifier instead of their Strength modifier on Climb and Jump checks.[/spoiler]
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.

cru

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 613
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #814 on: September 10, 2010, 05:43:29 AM »
Quote
From the DMG
Incorporealityextra damage from being favored enemies, and from sneak attacks. They move in any direction (including up or down) at will. They do not need to walk on the ground. They can pass through solid objects at will, although they cannot see when their eyes are within solid matter....
I'd never noticed the red part before.
Wow, I really want to be a Telthor Saint now...
Q 245: Even though an incorporeal creature would normally be immune to favored enemy damage and skirmish damage, does the Swift Hunter feat still grant you the ability to apply skirmish damage to such creatures?  Assuming you have its type as a favored enemy, of course.
Let me answer differently. The information in DMG is invalid, because MM is the primary source of information about monsters, and MM does not mention any such bullshit. Could this be some kind of 3.0 relict in DMG?

Edit: Rules Compendium does not mention this either.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2010, 05:49:28 AM by cru »

The_Mad_Linguist

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8780
  • Simulated Thing
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #815 on: September 10, 2010, 05:45:25 AM »
But it's a status ailment, not a monster.
Linguist, Mad, Unique, none of these things am I
My custom class: The Priest of the Unseen Host
Planetouched Handbook
Want to improve your character?  Then die.

Nanshork

  • Man in Gorilla Suit
  • *****
  • Posts: 2146
  • BOO!
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #816 on: September 10, 2010, 05:57:38 AM »
Q 246This marvelous creature appears as a small housecat with sleek golden fur and glowing emerald eyes.Combat
Like all cats, a golden cat enjoys catching mice, rabbits and small birds. They tend to avoid attacking things larger than themselves unless cornered and defending themselves. Even then, they seek escape as soon as possible.
Luck/Unluck (Su):Telepathy (Su): A golden cat can communicate telepathically with its owner to a range of 100 feet.
Skills: Golden cats have a +4 racial bonus on Hide and Move Silently checks and a +8 racial bonus on Balance, Jump and Climb checks. It
can always choose to take 10 on a Climb check, even if rushed or threatened. They use their Dexterity modifier instead of their Strength modifier on Climb and Jump checks.[/spoiler]

RAW the familiar rules say Cat so you can only get a Cat, not anything cat-like.  You might be able to gain it with the Improved Familiar feat if your DM lets you. 
My babies - A thread of random builds I've come up with over the years.
Notes to self

The_Mad_Linguist

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8780
  • Simulated Thing
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #817 on: September 10, 2010, 06:05:00 AM »
Seems about pseudodragon level as a familiar.
Linguist, Mad, Unique, none of these things am I
My custom class: The Priest of the Unseen Host
Planetouched Handbook
Want to improve your character?  Then die.

Agita

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5465
  • SFT is mai waifu.
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #818 on: September 10, 2010, 06:38:02 AM »
Q 242: Multiweapon Fighting, Improved Multiweapon Fighting, and Greater Multiweapon Fighting say they replace Two-Weapon Fighting, Improved Two-Weapon Fighting, and Greater Two-Weapon Fighting for creatures with more than two arms.

When a ranger gets Two-Weapon Fighting, Improved Two-Weapon Fighting, and Greater Two-Weapon Fighting through his Combat Style, he doesn't have to meet the prerequisites for the feats.

Am I correct in assuming that a four-armed ranger picks up the Multiweapon Fighting feat chain and ignores their requirements, if he selects the two-weapon combat fighting style?
That would be a good assumption, yes.
Technically, no, because the entry says TWF, not MWF. Of course, that was because the writers were stupid and didn't think anyone would play a nonhumanoid monster. So a reasonable DM should allow it.
It's all about vision and making reality conform to your vision. By dropping a fucking house on it.

Agita's Awesome Poster Compilation
Lycanthromancer's Awesome Poster Compilation

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Simple Q&A 16: Has Anyone Really Been Far Even As ...
« Reply #819 on: September 10, 2010, 06:52:13 AM »
Q 247 I'm confused on how the Druid spell Miasma works, even after reading the errata. It says "To avoid suffocating, it must hold its breath by making a Constitution check vs. DC 10 + 1 per previous success." What previous success?
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.