These boards are now READ ONLY. We've started over! So don't try posting here. Go here: www.minmaxforum.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
just say "you muse believe in the unicorn for it to heal you. if you hesitate, or doubt in it's power, the unicorn can tell. so make sure t- HARMONY HARMONY OH LOVE"
Quote from: Saxony on October 08, 2010, 01:16:05 AMBy yes, she means no.That explains so much about my life.
By yes, she means no.
Quote from: BeholderSlayer on February 08, 2011, 09:32:20 PMhiicantcomeupwithacharacterthatisntaghostwhyisthatamijustretardedorsomethingWhy would you even do this? It hurts my eyes and looks like you ate your keyboard before suffering an attack of explosive diarrhea.
hiicantcomeupwithacharacterthatisntaghostwhyisthatamijustretardedorsomething
Quote from: Anklebite on March 10, 2010, 12:10:20 PMjust say "you muse believe in the unicorn for it to heal you. if you hesitate, or doubt in it's power, the unicorn can tell. so make sure t- HARMONY HARMONY OH LOVE"Or, you know, you just "summon" the unicorn. The others have no reason to believe you did something else so they'll be affected fully.
A gygaxian dungeon is like the world's most messed up game show. Behind door number one: INSTANT DEATH! Behind door number 2: A magic crown! Behind door number 3: 4d6 giant bees, and THREE HUNDRED POUNDS OF HONEY!
Quote from: McPoyo on March 30, 2010, 05:13:33 PMThey don't/haven't, was the point. 3.5 is as dead as people not liking nice tits.Sometimes, their tits (3.5) get enhancements (houserules), but that doesn't mean people don't like nice tits.Though sometimes, the surgeon (DM) botches them pretty bad...Best metaphor I have seen in a long time. I give you much fu.
They don't/haven't, was the point. 3.5 is as dead as people not liking nice tits.Sometimes, their tits (3.5) get enhancements (houserules), but that doesn't mean people don't like nice tits.Though sometimes, the surgeon (DM) botches them pretty bad...
Three Errata for the Mage-kings under the sky,Seven for the Barbarian-lords in their halls of stone,Nine for Mortal Monks doomed to die,One for the Wizard on his dark throneIn the Land of Charop where the Shadows lie.
Only if they interact with it...
Quote from: McPoyo on March 10, 2010, 12:28:17 PMOnly if they interact with it...I think having a SLA activated on you counts as 'interacting'.
Quote from: fuinjutsu on August 31, 2010, 04:30:15 PMIn other words, he thinks there's a "correct" way to play D&D. *sigh*There is: Kill shit and loot the corpse!
In other words, he thinks there's a "correct" way to play D&D. *sigh*
When you use a tool the way it was designed for -- its intended function -- then it will work very well for you.But it's not the tool's fault if you use it for something else and you fail utterly, such as trying to eat cereal with a butterknife, pounding nails with a screwdriver, blogging to voice your political opinions, and brushing your teeth with a hammer.
Quote from: Agita on March 10, 2010, 12:33:19 PMQuote from: McPoyo on March 10, 2010, 12:28:17 PMOnly if they interact with it...I think having a SLA activated on you counts as 'interacting'.Not if you never come into physical contact with it, imo, but that's something that the rules are quiet on: what counts as interaction.
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
Q 43:
Quote from: ksbsnowowl on March 10, 2010, 01:25:42 PMQ 43:by RAW, you can't do that, so that means we get to stretch interpretations anyhow.first, assume that the item was made by a druid with said feat. second, take the creature you wish to summon, and compare it's challenge rating to the summon nature's ally table.pick the higher level one.then, base cost off of a one-use item of that spell. add greenbound summoning to item pre-req.
If you stop ignoring 289 pages telling what the intent is to stretch "more power" in your own god complexion of your interpretation trumps all to cover ability adjustments from aging then I will ignore a quarter page of rules that exist within a sidebar.
I think in this case the grammar is less important than whether the Str and Dex bonus provided to your created undead scales.
alright, I think we got off track with the #'s (go ahead and check the last page or 2)I'm sure this has been covered before, but I can't find it:Q54Are there any feats for a non-dragon to increase the # of natural attacks per round?
or you could do what the creator of that feat intended and add +2 to the spell level (for the purpose of price simplification, of course)
Q 55: 5th level Wizard spell Sonic Rumble - what book is this from?
Quote from: wotmaniac on March 10, 2010, 01:35:48 PMor you could do what the creator of that feat intended and add +2 to the spell level (for the purpose of price simplification, of course)I'm away from my books. What is this referring to? Is there some mention in the feat that implies the above?
Quote from: ksbsnowowl on March 10, 2010, 01:51:40 PMQ 55: 5th level Wizard spell Sonic Rumble - what book is this from?A 55: Magic of Faerun.
Quote from: ksbsnowowl on March 10, 2010, 01:51:40 PMQuote from: wotmaniac on March 10, 2010, 01:35:48 PMor you could do what the creator of that feat intended and add +2 to the spell level (for the purpose of price simplification, of course)I'm away from my books. What is this referring to? Is there some mention in the feat that implies the above?there is nothing in the books that refer to this, implied or otherwise. I'm just taking it from the "horse's mouth" -- which is now linked at the bottom of my sig. It seems reasonable, to the point that my group has happily incorporated it in to all of our games.
Q42: Does an Ur priest lose anything by voluntarily converting to a god?
