These boards are now READ ONLY. We've started over! So don't try posting here. Go here: www.minmaxforum.com
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Littha on October 06, 2011, 04:30:04 PMQuote from: Byrandom on October 06, 2011, 04:19:06 PMQuote from: InnaBinder on October 06, 2011, 11:44:21 AMDo you see the issue with this? You're getting hung up on "absolutely" and then finding a situation where it doesn't work, in order to go "a-ha! Gotcha!" There are going to be corner-case situations that Wizards, Druids, Clerics, and all the other Tier 1s can't handle, or can't handle well. Do you think they should all be downgraded because it's possible to name those situations?Wizards, clerics, archivists and artificers can really do everything. They can have the right spell for any situation. If they can't do something, it means that nobody can.(Clearly, with everything I'm saying that they can solve any problem. I'm not looking for strange situations that will never happen in game here.)While the druid simply can't. He's strong in combat and has many options out of combat, but that's it. I fail to see how Pun-Pun addresses this assertion.The difference between the druid and the Tier 1 classes is huger than the difference between the druid and the Tier 2 classes.If you don't agree, please do tell me what problems a druid playing in a group composed of a binder, a wu jen and a sorcerer brings. They all seem more or less on the same level to me.While the difference is huge if you bring a druid in a group composed of a wizard, an archivist and an artificer. The other characters can literaly do anything. The druid simply can't: he can do his job well, but he is the only one who is depedent on the others.Wizards have no resurrection or healing magic. Thus they cannot solve every problem and your argument falls apart.Clerics have a lack of decent blasting spells.On a more serious note, the druid fits in fine with a tier 2 party because tier 2 is as strong as tier 1 but lacks the versatility not because of a lack of power. Said druid can completely repick his spells every day and can go from being a bear to a mouse several times a day too. One day he could decide he wanted to be a blaster and with a decent choice of spells do about as well as a sorcerer, next day he could decide he wants to melee and prepares buff spells for himself and uses wildshape for some damage. Day after that he plays party support and heals and buffs everyone else. Sorcerer is still stuck blasting. Wizards have Wish. Your argument is invalid.Blasting is subpar so the point is moot.
Quote from: Byrandom on October 06, 2011, 04:19:06 PMQuote from: InnaBinder on October 06, 2011, 11:44:21 AMDo you see the issue with this? You're getting hung up on "absolutely" and then finding a situation where it doesn't work, in order to go "a-ha! Gotcha!" There are going to be corner-case situations that Wizards, Druids, Clerics, and all the other Tier 1s can't handle, or can't handle well. Do you think they should all be downgraded because it's possible to name those situations?Wizards, clerics, archivists and artificers can really do everything. They can have the right spell for any situation. If they can't do something, it means that nobody can.(Clearly, with everything I'm saying that they can solve any problem. I'm not looking for strange situations that will never happen in game here.)While the druid simply can't. He's strong in combat and has many options out of combat, but that's it. I fail to see how Pun-Pun addresses this assertion.The difference between the druid and the Tier 1 classes is huger than the difference between the druid and the Tier 2 classes.If you don't agree, please do tell me what problems a druid playing in a group composed of a binder, a wu jen and a sorcerer brings. They all seem more or less on the same level to me.While the difference is huge if you bring a druid in a group composed of a wizard, an archivist and an artificer. The other characters can literaly do anything. The druid simply can't: he can do his job well, but he is the only one who is depedent on the others.Wizards have no resurrection or healing magic. Thus they cannot solve every problem and your argument falls apart.Clerics have a lack of decent blasting spells.On a more serious note, the druid fits in fine with a tier 2 party because tier 2 is as strong as tier 1 but lacks the versatility not because of a lack of power. Said druid can completely repick his spells every day and can go from being a bear to a mouse several times a day too. One day he could decide he wanted to be a blaster and with a decent choice of spells do about as well as a sorcerer, next day he could decide he wants to melee and prepares buff spells for himself and uses wildshape for some damage. Day after that he plays party support and heals and buffs everyone else. Sorcerer is still stuck blasting.
Quote from: InnaBinder on October 06, 2011, 11:44:21 AMDo you see the issue with this? You're getting hung up on "absolutely" and then finding a situation where it doesn't work, in order to go "a-ha! Gotcha!" There are going to be corner-case situations that Wizards, Druids, Clerics, and all the other Tier 1s can't handle, or can't handle well. Do you think they should all be downgraded because it's possible to name those situations?Wizards, clerics, archivists and artificers can really do everything. They can have the right spell for any situation. If they can't do something, it means that nobody can.(Clearly, with everything I'm saying that they can solve any problem. I'm not looking for strange situations that will never happen in game here.)While the druid simply can't. He's strong in combat and has many options out of combat, but that's it. I fail to see how Pun-Pun addresses this assertion.The difference between the druid and the Tier 1 classes is huger than the difference between the druid and the Tier 2 classes.If you don't agree, please do tell me what problems a druid playing in a group composed of a binder, a wu jen and a sorcerer brings. They all seem more or less on the same level to me.While the difference is huge if you bring a druid in a group composed of a wizard, an archivist and an artificer. The other characters can literaly do anything. The druid simply can't: he can do his job well, but he is the only one who is depedent on the others.
Do you see the issue with this? You're getting hung up on "absolutely" and then finding a situation where it doesn't work, in order to go "a-ha! Gotcha!" There are going to be corner-case situations that Wizards, Druids, Clerics, and all the other Tier 1s can't handle, or can't handle well. Do you think they should all be downgraded because it's possible to name those situations?
The basic point is: druids can't do anything. That's huge for a Tier 1 class. All the other Tier 1 classes have the option to do anything they want.
You know what's more powerful than Pun-pun ?[spoiler]The OfficialThreadLocker. "we" had to do this super complicated Ritual to Summon said Thread Locker. [/spoiler]Like Tier (-1) ...