the order of books

[dougch]

so for knowing what was the order upon which all 3.0 and 3.5 books happened to have been released? does anybody know? can we get a list?

[j0lt]

Check the WotC product catalogue.

[dougch]

yuck it works but it doesn't say the the edition on the page gpotta do a ahrd search

[Nanshork]

yuck it works but it doesn't say the the edition on the page gpotta do a ahrd search

Anything printed after 3.5 core rules is 3.5

[awaken DM golem]

Yep.
iirc - Book of Vile Darkness and Book of Eternal Daisy's , both had a disclaimer that they worked for 3e and 3.5e.
Some 3e books had updates available on wizards.com, and some more 3e material also got updates.
Plenty of the 3e books had no update at all for 3.5e, but can be considered directly port-able into 3.5e
Alas, that is not truly true; there are minor interaction problems between 3e and 3.5e.
As long as the DM can wield rule zero with reasoned authority (not like Cartman), both editions get along quite well.
CO-board types cringe at the idea 3e + 3.5e , or also bringing in Dragon magazine. The interactions get worse.
But it is fun  .

[Sinfire Titan]

Yep.
iirc - Book of Vile Darkness and Book of Eternal Daisy's , both had a disclaimer that they worked for 3e and 3.5e.
Some 3e books had updates available on wizards.com, and some more 3e material also got updates.
Plenty of the 3e books had no update at all for 3.5e, but can be considered directly port-able into 3.5e
Alas, that is not truly true; there are minor interaction problems between 3e and 3.5e.
As long as the DM can wield rule zero with reasoned authority (not like Cartman), both editions get along quite well.
CO-board types cringe at the idea 3e + 3.5e , or also bringing in Dragon magazine. The interactions get worse.
But it is fun  .

BoED did, but the BoVD was 3.0 material, plain and simple.