Author Topic: Erudite is a shitty class  (Read 48692 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The Lurker

  • That monkey with the orange ass cheeks
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
Re: I think we're reading the Erudite wrong...
« Reply #120 on: July 26, 2009, 10:59:24 PM »
Discuss.
Nobody cares.  This is the exact same thinking that tells us that Vigilantes have 33 third level spells per day.

We.  Don't.  Fucking.  Care.  About.  Obvious.  Lack.  Of.  Proofreading.

Sinfire Titan

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5697
  • You've got one round to give a rat's ass.
    • Email
Re: I think we're reading the Erudite wrong...
« Reply #121 on: July 26, 2009, 11:05:23 PM »
Discuss.
Nobody cares.  This is the exact same thinking that tells us that Vigilantes have 33 third level spells per day.

We.  Don't.  Fucking.  Care.  About.  Obvious.  Lack.  Of.  Proofreading.

No it isn't. One is clearly a typo, while the other is a direct reprint of the Dragon Magazine version of the class. One has also been errata'ed to be proper, while the other is completely untouched (then again, most of CP needs Errata).

I admit, the class is actually somewhat balanced by the previous interpretation, but the RAW here is very clear.


You just don't want to lose a war you started.


[spoiler][/spoiler]

dark_samuari

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1024
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #122 on: July 26, 2009, 11:40:07 PM »
Erudites do not have easier access to infinite PP, because Erudites need SRD + at least one more book (and they need to find a Wu Jen, which is actually impossible because who would be stupid enough to be a Wu Jen willingly but smart enough to cast Wu Jen spells and survive to level 15?)

Anyone playing in these campaign settings?
[spoiler]

[/spoiler]

I mean really Kaelik, really?

So, best case, the Erudite is surpassing the psion and not equalling the wizard.  We don't fucking care.

"Cookies aren't tasty because they aren't as tasty as cake." That's your argument, while simplified, it's what you've been re-stating over & over.

How about this, you do the good old test of setting an Erudite up against appropriate CR challenges?

Basically, you need to having a plausible & comparable power scale that doesn't begin at Wizard and end at Wizard. 

Samb

  • Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #123 on: July 27, 2009, 12:07:36 AM »
If your whole argument is "wizard is better and anything erudite can do that is better is cheese" Then you fucking lose.  You can't make a good fucking argument, no one was brought over by your motherfucking cluster fuck bombs, and your "time of the fucking month" attitude certainly didn't help.

Most sane people: erudite deserves to be tier 1 for this that and the other.
Your fucking response: MOTHERFUCKING CHEESE!!!!!!!!

You. Lose.


You just don't want to lose a war you started.


Sinfire Titan wins thread.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2009, 12:09:31 AM by Samb »

Sinfire Titan

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5697
  • You've got one round to give a rat's ass.
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #124 on: July 27, 2009, 12:09:19 AM »
If your whole argument is "wizard is better and anything erudite can do that is better is cheese" Then you fucking lose.  You can't make a good fucking argument, no one was brought over by your motherfucking cluster fuck bombs, and your "time of the fucking month" attitude certainly didn't help.

Most sane people: erudite deserves to be tier 1 for this that and the other.
Your fucking response: MOTHERFUCKING CHEESE!!!!!!!!

You lose, Sinfire Titan wins thread.


You working on a world record or something?


[spoiler][/spoiler]

Samb

  • Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #125 on: July 27, 2009, 12:12:46 AM »
Some people think they sound more intimidating when they swear more.  I think Lurker feels that way so the only way to really get through to him is to cluster F-bomb him back.  The stress relief is a nice bonus.

[spoiler]
Swearing is cool as fuck! Right? Are we fucking right? Fuck yes, we are!

Fuck, people fucking swear. It's a fucking fact of fucking life. As a result, fucking authors who try to avoid the fuck out of having their fucking characters use harsh fucking language end up sounding pretty fucking silly.

Some of those fuckers, however, go to the fucking opposite extreme. (Or is it the opposite fucking extreme? That's probably a fucking distinction without a fucking difference.) They fucking try to make their fucking dialogue sound fucking "fresh" and fucking "real" by dropping fucking swear words into every other fucking sentence, or more fucking often, until they use fucking foul fucking language every fucking phrase, whether or not they have the slightest fucking worth of use. This is the fucking Cluster F Bomb: fucking swearing for fucking swearing's sake, where fucking realism and fucking self-restraint can go fuck themselves. Extreme fucking forms of this type of fucking dialogue can become blatantly fucking unrealistic and quickly de-fucking-sensitize motherfucking audiences, thereby fucking up the entire fucking purpose of fucking swearing.

This is a fucking subjective fuckstick of a trope. The "realism" factor is very fucking context-dependent: fucking obscenities that sound fucking natural coming from a fucking drunken frat boy or a violent-as-fuck Glaswegian would fucking sound completely fucked up coming from a fucking Indiana housewife (although sometimes that's the fucking point). And every fucking fucker will have their own fucking standards for how much cussing is too fucking much.

If these fucking shows or movies get fucking rebroadcast on network TV or even basic fucking cable, expect the offending fucking scenes to be fucking fucked up and fucking edited to within an inch of their fucking lives, mrifking ludicrously redubbed, or ***ing hilariously deafiningly bleeped the f*** out.

Some fucking writers will give a character fucking Tourettes Shitcock Syndrome to fucking justify this. Compare fucking Refuge In Vulgarity, and con-fucking-trast Foreign Cuss Word, fucking Pardon My Klingon, and especially Gosh fucking Dang It To Heck. Just for the fuck of it, see also that other fuckin' wiki.

Notice that if you take a fucking look at most fucking kinds of fucking pornographic fucking literature, you'll find that they also fuck the living fuck out of some of the same words as the Cluster F Bomb. The two phenomena may seem pretty fucking similar, but there's a big fucking difference. Because if you're writing a pornographic fucking text, or in some kind of similar fucking circumstances, you're using "fuck" when you mean actual fucking. (Lady Chatterley's Fucking Lover is a fucking example of this, and not of the Cluster F Bomb version.) On the other fucking hand, some of even the most fucking excessive users of the Cluster F Bomb will tend to use other, milder choices of fucking words for when the fucking characters have actually begun to fucking talk about literal fucking. Some fuckers don't fucking see the fucking distinction, but there is a motherfucking one. The word "fuck" has been a fucking integral part of fucking dirty talk for many fucking centuries before the first fucker dropped a fucking Cluster F Bomb.

Fucking compare with Precision Fucking F Strike, motherfuckers. Fucking see also Obligatory Fucking Swearing, which sometimes fucking well takes the form of fucking Cluster F Bombs all over the fucking place. [/spoiler]

Not to sound insensative but Tourette's syndrome IS a very real and serious condition, we should try to refrain from giving poor Lurker a fucking seizure.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2009, 12:18:02 AM by Samb »

Sinfire Titan

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5697
  • You've got one round to give a rat's ass.
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #126 on: July 27, 2009, 12:15:41 AM »
You could have just linked your text instead of quoting the entire article...


[spoiler][/spoiler]

Samb

  • Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #127 on: July 27, 2009, 12:19:25 AM »
Hey I put it in a spoiler so all may read it here.  Get off my motherfucking back, you motherfuckin motherfucker cocksucker.  Shit I don't say anything about your loudass siggy do I?

See? I'm tough.

Sinfire Titan

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5697
  • You've got one round to give a rat's ass.
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #128 on: July 27, 2009, 12:29:06 AM »
Hey I put it in a spoiler so all may read it here.  Get off my motherfucking back, you motherfuckin motherfucker cocksucker.  Shit I don't say anything about your loudass siggy do I?

See? I'm tough.

You're talking shit to a guy who has Nine Ball for a sigtar? Your balls must be made of diamond.
 :p
And I actually turned off the option to view sigs because that image slows my loading time. It now only shows on my screen when I look at my account.


[spoiler][/spoiler]

Kaelik

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #129 on: July 27, 2009, 12:35:50 AM »
Anyone playing in these campaign settings?
[spoiler]

[/spoiler]

I mean really Kaelik, really?

You really didn't get the joke, did you?

Quote
"Cookies aren't tasty because they aren't as tasty as cake." That's your argument, while simplified, it's what you've been re-stating over & over.

How about this, you do the good old test of setting an Erudite up against appropriate CR challenges?

Basically, you need to having a plausible & comparable power scale that doesn't begin at Wizard and end at Wizard. 

Dude, his argument is that they are Tier 2 good, not Tier 1 good. He does this by showing they are about as good as a Sorcerer. A Little better than a Psion and a lot worse than Wizards. And as good as Sorcerers! WTF. It's right there in his earlier posts. good as a Sorcerer=in Tier of Sorcerer.

At least Sinfires arguments might be relevant, you are just burning strawmen as fast as you can make them, and you've literally done nothing but burn Strawmen and complain about cussing in this thread.

Kaelik

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #130 on: July 27, 2009, 12:41:02 AM »
If your whole argument is "wizard is better and anything erudite can do that is better is cheese" Then you fucking lose.  You can't make a good fucking argument, no one was brought over by your motherfucking cluster fuck bombs, and your "time of the fucking month" attitude certainly didn't help.

Most sane people: erudite deserves to be tier 1 for this that and the other.
Your fucking response: MOTHERFUCKING CHEESE!!!!!!!!

Yes, cheese is made of cheese. Infinite power points is something you can't expect to have in a game. Nor is having every discipline power of every discipline for free at no cost instantly despite the fact that Erudites clearly get discipline powers at the cost of XP a level behind.

If Cheese is always allowed, how can you claim my Sorcerer Incantatrix level 12 isn't Tier 1? He has Infinite spells per day of Infinite CL and Infinite DCs and he Persists every single buff in the game that he wants at the beginning of the day.

I only needed SRD+Players guide to FR for that. And the Infinite spells at infinite CL with infinite DCs is SRD only.

Technically it's all arbitrarily high, not infinite. But Infinite is more fun to type.

EDIT: By adding Dragon Cocks of Ebberon and Races of Dragon Cock + Web supplement I can do that at level 9. By using Phaerwhatever, I can do it at ECL 8.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2009, 12:43:22 AM by Kaelik »

Anklebite

  • Man in Gorilla Suit
  • *****
  • Posts: 2009
  • I shall play you the song of my people.
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #131 on: July 27, 2009, 12:50:22 AM »


Not to sound insensative but Tourette's syndrome IS a very real and serious condition, we should try to refrain from giving poor Lurker a fucking seizure.

I actually have mild tourettes, and it does not make me swear uncontrollably. I just emit odd noises under stress.  another common misconception is that dyslextics read everything backwards, while my dyslectic friend merely mixes up and jarbles words now and then.
I do not suffer from paranoia; I enjoy every second of it.
Pioneer of the Ultimate Magus + Sublime Chord + Ultimate Magus combo

Sinfire Titan

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5697
  • You've got one round to give a rat's ass.
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #132 on: July 27, 2009, 12:52:13 AM »
If Cheese is always allowed, how can you claim my Sorcerer Incantatrix level 12 isn't Tier 1? He has Infinite spells per day of Infinite CL and Infinite DCs and he Persists every single buff in the game that he wants at the beginning of the day.

But that's the thing: A Sor 6/Incanatrix 6 is Tier 1 (actually, Tier 0, but the Tiers don't go that far). Because the Incanatrix modifies it to be Tier 1 material.

JaronK's Tier thread isn't about the Incanatrix though. Nor the Shadowcraft Mage, or Soulbow, or even the Shining Blade. It's about the base powerline of the class itself. PrCs involve builds, feats, and skills. This is beyond the base powerline of the class itself, as the feats can affect a class' Tier.

The Tiers thread should not involve specific builds, because those are intentionally more powerful than the original class. However, some builds cannot be considered builds because they only require a single feat or variant class feature or substitution level to be made efficient.

An example is the Druid. If a Druid has Natural Spell, what Tier is it? High end of Tier 1, right? What about without Natural Spell?

Probably on the other side of that Tier. Likewise, a Dungeoncrasher Fighter is not a Tier 5 class (for the full 6 levels it exists, at least). That's a single option that vastly improves the playability of a class.

Without Spell-to-Power, an Erudite has only a few options due to lack of Discipline access. They are still capable of breaking the campaign, but not in the same way a Tier 1 is.

Spell-to-Power gives them access to dozens of different class-restricted options at a pitiful price tag. One of those options happens to bypass a major restriction on the class that prevented it from being effective. This isn't about a single build, because what are they giving up? A feat that can be replaced, and 20 XP/Erudite level upon trying to learn Arcane Fusion/Greater Arcane Fusion.


Have you ever seen a class that can bypass it's major restriction by taking a single feat at a certain level? Or a class that can break the game by paying XP? I have, and both of those are Tier 1.


[spoiler][/spoiler]

Samb

  • Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #133 on: July 27, 2009, 12:58:05 AM »

Yes, cheese is made of cheese. Infinite power points is something you can't expect to have in a game. Nor is having every discipline power of every discipline for free at no cost instantly despite the fact that Erudites clearly get discipline powers at the cost of XP a level behind.

If Cheese is always allowed, how can you claim my Sorcerer Incantatrix level 12 isn't Tier 1? He has Infinite spells per day of Infinite CL and Infinite DCs and he Persists every single buff in the game that he wants at the beginning of the day.

I only needed SRD+Players guide to FR for that. And the Infinite spells at infinite CL with infinite DCs is SRD only.

Technically it's all arbitrarily high, not infinite. But Infinite is more fun to type.

EDIT: By adding Dragon Cocks of Ebberon and Races of Dragon Cock + Web supplement I can do that at level 9. By using Phaerwhatever, I can do it at ECL 8.
You are the only one that feels the need to stick to SRD as a standard of non-cheese.  Erudite doesn't even exist in SRD so your all your points in "I can do it SRD onry" are moot.  Many have already pointed out that erudite has more powers per day, better selection of spells and powers, and fit the definition of a tier 1.  You are the only one using a different standard to judge erudite.

In your little world Erudite is a shitty class because it needs a bunch of books and the web enhancements.  If you like the strict and arbitrary standards of your own microcosms then so be it, but you should realize that the rest of the community see your standards for what they are: shallow and arbitrary.

dark_samuari

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1024
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #134 on: July 27, 2009, 01:16:43 AM »
Dude, his argument is that they are Tier 2 good, not Tier 1 good. He does this by showing they are about as good as a Sorcerer. A Little better than a Psion and a lot worse than Wizards. And as good as Sorcerers! WTF. It's right there in his earlier posts. good as a Sorcerer=in Tier of Sorcerer.

No, his argument is not that. The thread is titled Erudite is a shitty class.

An opening claim in the initial post is
It's a shitty class, and you're a stupid person for believing it's a good class.

Maybe you could start a thread titled Erudite should be Tier 2? Maybe that would let you argue something relevant to the actual proposed argument we are involved in with this thread, Kailik. But here, in this thread, we'd like to debate the issue at hand if that would be okay with you?

Kaelik

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #135 on: July 27, 2009, 02:16:32 AM »
No, his argument is not that. The thread is titled Erudite is a shitty class.

An opening claim in the initial post is

Maybe you could start a thread titled Erudite should be Tier 2? Maybe that would let you argue something relevant to the actual proposed argument we are involved in with this thread, Kailik. But here, in this thread, we'd like to debate the issue at hand if that would be okay with you?

1) Learn to spell. No. Learn to copy paste someone's name if you are so incompetent you can't glance up to see it previously written in your post. But still learn to spell samurai.

2) You need to learn how to read an argument. While I appreciate that the literary tradition of writing a title and not having your argument be expressed in the title, but rather in the body of the text may seem annoying and trite to you. Some people like to use titles to attract attention to the subject without fully elucidating their argument until after you read the text. Which by the way, explains that the Erudite is not Tier 1, and is not as good as people claim.

But you know what. Levels 1-10 the Erudite is a shitty class. It's a craptastic terrible class of terrible. Despite the fact that 90% of D&D games go on in that range, and that many games don't allow web sites, people seem to think the Erudite is worth playing. It is not. In 93% of games you will be better as a Psion. So yes, the Erudite is a shitty class, but even if it D&D was a game that only existed (or was even played with any regularity) at level 11 through 20, Erudite would still be a class about on par with a Sorcerer, and therefore the argument that Erudite is not as good as this board thinks it is would remain true.

You are the only one that feels the need to stick to SRD as a standard of non-cheese.  Erudite doesn't even exist in SRD so your all your points in "I can do it SRD onry" are moot.  Many have already pointed out that erudite has more powers per day, better selection of spells and powers, and fit the definition of a tier 1.  You are the only one using a different standard to judge erudite.

In your little world Erudite is a shitty class because it needs a bunch of books and the web enhancements.  If you like the strict and arbitrary standards of your own microcosms then so be it, but you should realize that the rest of the community see your standards for what they are: shallow and arbitrary.

It has nothing to do with Core only. It has to do with the obvious fact that if cheese is allowed, Tier comparisons are meaningless.

If you want to keep being an arrogant shit head about cheese you have to do one of the following things:

1) Explain to me how a DC 2000 finger of death at CL 2000 50 times a day is appropriate for a Tier 2 level 14 character. (And obviously other DC 1999 spells from level 6 slots)

2) Explain to me how Infinite Power points is less cheesy than Infinite spells or using retraining to get all disciplines is not cheese, but using retraining to get 30+ spells known per level is cheese.

3) Explain to me how an Erudite without infinite power points or retraining is better than a Sorcerer without infinite spells per day or known.

You have done nothing close to any of those.

All you have done is whine about how I'm a meany for saying no cheese without addressing the fact that with cheese the Sorcerer is superior.

If Cheese is always allowed, how can you claim my Sorcerer Incantatrix level 12 isn't Tier 1? He has Infinite spells per day of Infinite CL and Infinite DCs and he Persists every single buff in the game that he wants at the beginning of the day.

But that's the thing: A Sor 6/Incanatrix 6 is Tier 1 (actually, Tier 0, but the Tiers don't go that far). Because the Incanatrix modifies it to be Tier 1 material.

...

Have you ever seen a class that can bypass it's major restriction by taking a single feat at a certain level? Or a class that can break the game by paying XP? I have, and both of those are Tier 1.

And none of that addresses the fact that a regular Sorcerer is better than a Spell to Power Erudite at 3/4ths of levels, and with cheese is better at every level except 11.

I have seen a class that can bypass every single restriction in the game by casting a single spell. It's called a Sorcerer. You have an incredible penchant for arguing something totally unrelated to the point of the thread you quote.

Sinfire Titan. Does an Erudite get to use infinite power points or retraining?

If not, how do you deal with the fact that Sorcerers are always casting better spells?

If yes? Fine, remove Incantatrix and explain to me how a Sorcerer 12 casting infinite DC infinity spells at infinite CL is not Tier 1.

dark_samuari

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1024
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #136 on: July 27, 2009, 02:32:21 AM »
3) Explain to me how an Erudite without infinite power points or retraining is better than a Sorcerer without infinite spells per day or known.

In a specific domain & function the sorcerer will gain the advantage but the Erudite possesses greater versatility as they're better at adapting & prepping.

Samb

  • Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #137 on: July 27, 2009, 02:39:02 AM »
Kaelik, like I said: Your standards are arbitrary and shallow and I don't feel like adhering to them.  Tier 1 is by definition able to do everything well and do it in several ways.  Erudite does this with sheer volume and selection of powers and spells.  Period.  This is all based on JaronK's definition, NOT yours.  If you wish to propose a different system that will more accuratly portray your standards then by all means but don't get all hot and bothered when the vast majority of people disagree with you.

I do agree with you that the original tier system has several flaws, the key one being that it doesn't account for optimization skills (or what some consider cheese) or multiclassing.  That being said, you are arguing with JaronK's system in mind and hence you are wrong.  Erudite even without recharge has access to more spells and powers than a sorcerer and psion, and that is the only reason it is classed where it is.

I can see you trying to confound this arguement (sure signs of someone losing one) by bring up all this useless detail.  So sorceress hacks help your position how?  Useless.  If you are debating that tier ones are broken then I might say you had a point (they are by definition) but to say that erudites don't deserve to be tier one is silly.  In fact all your listed cheese on them proves that they belong here.

If it makes you feel any better I think psion and sorceresses belong in tier one since it takes very little to give them exactly what a mage has, but that is an issue with the tier system itself not erudite itself.  I mean excusing sorceress cheese while vilifying erudite cheese= epic fail in logic.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2009, 02:43:22 AM by Samb »

Samb

  • Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Re: I think we're reading the Erudite wrong...
« Reply #138 on: July 27, 2009, 02:40:18 AM »

You just don't want to lose a war you started.
Thread. Already. Won.

Game. Over.

Kaelik

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
    • Email
Re: Erudite is a shitty class
« Reply #139 on: July 27, 2009, 02:46:57 AM »
In a specific domain & function the sorcerer will gain the advantage but the Erudite possesses greater versatility as they're better at adapting & prepping.

Sort of.

Sorcerers are better at the specific Domain & Function of "Combat, Avoiding Combat, Getting to Combat, and Staying Alive in Combat" Erudites are more versatile in that even though they are worse at those four things, they are better at "Opening Doors, and Finding Shit out."

And if a Sorcerer really wants, he can take a dip in Divine Oracle.

Kaelik, like I said: Your standards are arbitrary and shallow and I don't feel like adhering to them.  Tier 1 is by definition able to do everything well and do it in several ways.  Erudite does this with sheer volume and selection of powers and spells.  Period.  This is all based on JaronK's definition, NOT yours.  If you wish to propose a different system that will more accuratly portray your standards then by all means but don't get all hot and bothered when the vast majority of people disagree with you.

So Rogue with UMD as a class skill is Tier 1? Because it has every spell in the game. When you get the spells, what you can do with them, and what you have to do to get those spells is all part of the Tier system.

Erudites have fewer spells for 10 levels. Then they have fewer spells of the higher level spells in return for infinite versatility of spells no one actually uses.

The cost for all this is sucking in combat compared to real classes (IE half of Tier 3 at least manages to cast level appropriate effects, all of Tier 2).

Being able to suck is an ability that all classes have. Being able to suck diversely is not a qualifier for Tier 1.