Author Topic: Expert vs Monk Challenge!  (Read 151710 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

X-Codes

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 3941
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #360 on: June 11, 2011, 12:54:28 AM »
If we are allowing Dragon, Monk is Tier 4 anyway, and that makes the whole discussion meaningless.
If you're talking about the Wild Monk, that's really a separate class.  Everything that defines the 3.5e monk is traded out for Wild Shape AFAIK.

veekie

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 9034
  • WARNING: Homing Miko
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #361 on: June 11, 2011, 01:28:38 AM »
Well its really just a testament to how crazy strong Wild Shape is.
The mind transcends the body.
It's also a little cold because of that.
Please get it a blanket.

I wish I could read your mind,
I can barely read mine.

"Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. At 2:15, it begins rolling up characters."

[spoiler]
"Just what do you think the moon up in the sky is? Everyone sees that big, round shiny thing and thinks there must be something round up there, right? That's just silly. The truth is much more awesome than that. You can almost never see the real Moon, and its appearance is death to humans. You can only see the Moon when it's reflected in things. And the things it reflects in, like water or glass, can all be broken, right? Since the moon you see in the sky is just being reflected in the heavens, if you tear open the heavens it's easy to break it~"
-Ibuki Suika, on overkill

To sumbolaion diakoneto moi, basilisk ouranionon.
Epigenentheto, apoleia keraune hos timeis pteirei.
Hekatonkatis kai khiliakis astrapsato.
Khiliarkhou Astrape!
[/spoiler]

There is no higher price than 'free'.

"I won't die. I've been ordered not to die."

Sinfire Titan

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5697
  • You've got one round to give a rat's ass.
    • Email
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #362 on: June 11, 2011, 03:49:00 AM »
Everything that defines the 3.5e monk is traded out for Wild Shape AFAIK.

You say that like the 3.5 Monk has a definition.


[spoiler][/spoiler]

X-Codes

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 3941
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #363 on: June 11, 2011, 03:53:03 AM »
Everything that defines the 3.5e monk is traded out for Wild Shape AFAIK.

You say that like the 3.5 Monk has a definition.
In terms of fluff, it does.  In terms of crunch, an optimized Monk is an Unarmed Swordsage.

Mixster

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1642
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #364 on: June 11, 2011, 07:34:54 AM »
If we are allowing Dragon, Monk is Tier 4 anyway, and that makes the whole discussion meaningless.
If you're talking about the Wild Monk, that's really a separate class.  Everything that defines the 3.5e monk is traded out for Wild Shape AFAIK.

Nah, it does trade out many of the silly things, but the things you can still use while in the form of a Baboon or Bear is still there. So all you really lose is Diplomacy and fast movement IIRC. (and feather fall and a bunch of stuff nobody cares about).
Monks are pretty much the best designed class ever.

JaronK

Meep Meep - Mixster out

Sir Giacomo

  • That monkey with the orange ass cheeks
  • ****
  • Posts: 259
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #365 on: June 11, 2011, 10:29:28 AM »
The Expert has 2 skill points per level more than the Monk... but since Int is a dump stat for Monks, it's actually a lot more than that.
And they get any skill they want as a class skill, something Monks do not come with natively and usually don't have access to.
No, it's a class X fallacy when you pretend that things outside the class are proof that one class is stronger than another.  Claiming a Monk is stronger than another class because he can use cross class UMD, which the other class can do just as well (or in this case better, since it's a class skill for Experts) is a fallacy.  It's like me saying I'm a better person than you because I can breathe.

JaronK
« Last Edit: June 11, 2011, 11:02:52 AM by Sir Giacomo »

BlackAngelika

  • Ring-Tailed Lemur
  • **
  • Posts: 24
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #366 on: June 11, 2011, 12:10:02 PM »
Giacomo, altough I think that comparing Monk and Expert is silly, I really wouldn't say such things like You know why? Because as much as I would want the Monk to be the better class (he's a PC class, god dang it!), evidence keeps piling up FOR BOTH SIDES. IMO Monk is better, but I can see that it's not easy to decide.
Sooooo, STOP THREATING THE MONK AS THE OBVIOUS WINNER, BECAUSE IT ISN'T OBVIOUS!

Mixster

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1642
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #367 on: June 11, 2011, 12:18:51 PM »
Erm, the monk bonus feats can't be skill prodigy. The monk bonus feats can be crap, garbage, improved trip or Combat reflexes, and that's about it. So you still waste all your regular feats on picking up the experts tricks.

Things the expert can easily get ahead of by using all his regular feats to boost his skills, IE his area of expertise.

What does the monk get over the expert?
more hp - Yes this, is sad for the expert. Monk gets more here.
more attacks - Only with monk weapons and only on a full attack, this is meaningless because of the average enemy can make short work of either character if it gets a full attack.
better saves - decent win for the monk
better AC - Not really, that monk may add some AC from his Wis, (or int if you use carmendine), but he can't use armour, so the Expert can wear a chain shirt to counter this, the monks bonus here is at least trivial.
all his other class abilities - His speed is okay. But all his other class abilities? Like what? Healing himself?
So +1 hp/level, better saves and some speed for better class skills and +2 skill points per level.

Sounds like a decent trade off in the experts favour to me.
Monks are pretty much the best designed class ever.

JaronK

Meep Meep - Mixster out

Halinn

  • Barbary Macaque at the Rock of Gibraltar
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
    • Email
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #368 on: June 11, 2011, 12:22:52 PM »
If you have int 18 for your monk, your other ability scores are lacking, so you're not very good in melee, making your bonus combat feats fairly pointless. By level 20, you have 7 (8 if human/strongheart halfling) freely chosen feats, of which you have taken nymph's kiss, skill prodigy, carmendine monk, leaving you with only 4(5) left, where the expert has 6(7) left after taking just nymph's kiss.

You could take the Martial Monk ACF and get fighter feats for three of your bonus feats, but then you're using dragon, and might as well just take Wild Monk.

X-Codes

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 3941
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #369 on: June 11, 2011, 06:36:26 PM »
Giacomo, build a monk or GTFO.

Lycanthromancer

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4003
    • Email
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #370 on: June 11, 2011, 06:42:07 PM »
Giacomo, build a monk or GTFO.
I concur.
[spoiler]Masculine men like masculine things. Masculine men are masculine. Therefore, liking masculine men is masculine.

I dare anyone to find a hole in that logic.
______________________________________
[/spoiler]I'm a writer. These are my stories. Some are even SFW! (Warning: Mostly Gay.)
My awesome poster collection. (Warning, some are NSFW.)
Agita's awesome poster collection.
[spoiler]
+1 Lycanthromancer
Which book is Lycanthromancer in?
Lyca ... is in the book. Yes he is.
 :D
shit.. concerning psionics optimization, lycan IS the book
[/spoiler]

Solo

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 2684
  • Solo the Sorcelator, at your service
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #371 on: June 11, 2011, 06:58:29 PM »
Perhaps if you took the time you put into writing long posts about other people are wrong and made a monk build, things would get somewhere?

So far, it appears I'm the only actual person to present a serious build in this thread for the monk side. How ironic.

"I am the Black Mage! I cast the spells that makes the peoples fall down!"

The Legend RPG, which I worked on and encourage you to read.

JaronK

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4039
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #372 on: June 11, 2011, 07:13:44 PM »

Since it's not relevant to either class (both can take it just as easily) we ignore Nymph's Kiss entirely for this comparison.  This is how we avoid Class X Fallacies.  Also, being Exalted has serious problems and is not available in most games, I've found.

Quote

Note that you've just mixed settings.  Carmendine Monk requires Forgotten Realms, while Skill Protege requires that funny K one.  Taking both is less likely to be available... I find that while one setting is reasonable, taking from multiple is more likely to make DMs balk.  Also, you've just burned four feats solely to try and play catch up with the Expert.  That right there indicates you're making a rather piss poor Monk.  And while the Monk does get three bonus feats (level 1, 2, and 6), that's one of their few actually good class features... throwing away that advantage just to play catch up is a poor choice.  Not to mention completely free choice feats (such as level gained feats) are more valuable than locked in choice feats (such as the Monk ones), except of course where you can get those feats without prerequisites... if you wanted said feats anyway.  By Comparison, an Expert could just get a Monk's Belt and be most of the way there (though I can't imagine why he'd want to, he's an Expert, not a Monk).

Quote

It depends on how easy it is to get that ability.  Nobody cares that CA Ninjas get Disguise Self at level 10, because Hats of Disguise are cheap as dirt.  However, you just spent 4 of your 7 total free feats trying to catch up with the Expert... that's a HUGE expense.

Quote

Exactly.  A Ring of Feather Falling is trivially cheap (it's less than half the WBL of a level 4 character, even... by level 8 or so you could buy three of them just to practice juggling), so the fact that you get a worse version of that as a class feature is pretty irrelevant.  Compare that to spending 4 of your 7 free feats (8 if you're human)... ouch.

Quote
What does you breathing have to do with this? Completely wrong picture.

Exactly.  Both of us breathe just fine, so breathing has nothing to do with anything.  If both do it, it's irrelevant.

Quote

Sure.  If there was a feat that gave Cha to AC and was available to all, it would still be better on a Sorcerer than on a Fighter.  Why?  Because Sorcerers already use Charisma.  It would not be a Class X Fallacy to say that Sorcerers are better than Fighters in part because they could use that feat (well, it would be a silly argument, but not a CXF).  But in this case, you've been saying that Monks are better than Experts because of UMD (in part).  Except that Monks do not have Cha synergy, and UMD is cross class for them... while it's in class for Experts.  Monks are not any better at using UMD than anyone else (in fact, they're worse than most) so using UMD in a discussion of the comparative abilities of the two classes is a fallacy... if you count it in favor of the Monk.

Quote
It does not matter whether something is only written in the class description, or something that is useful to the class is written elsewhere (like a particular item that benefits in particular that class), it still can make that class stronger as a whole, and in a different way than the same game effect would for other classes.

In this case, no.  Monks are worse at UMD than Experts.  They're also worse than all classes with any Cha synergy, as well as all classes that actually get UMD as a class skill.  Yes, Monks would really like to have Divine Power on them... but so would Rogues, who would also draw even more benefit from PAO into a Hydra.  EVERY class can be made powerful with spells.

Quote

Rogues just wouldn't use Enlarge, obviously.  They prefer things like Knock, Lesser Vigor, and various things that let them do their job better.  One way or another, they'd better with UMD by a country mile.

Quote
In general, the (few) expert class abilities can be emulated easily, the (many) monk class abilities cannot be emulated easily. Advantage monk.

Ah, and here's where you're so wrong... NOBODY WANTS TO EMULATE A MONK.  You WANT to emulate an Expert because darn it UMD and Diplomacy and Iaijutsu Focus and Move Silently and Hide and so on and so forth are actually useful.  Who the hell wants unarmed strike, feather fall, and faster ground based run speed?  Heck, a single flying mount does better than tons of Monk abilities.  If I'm making a good Expert, I'm not thinking "man, if only I had unarmed strikes right now."  I'm thinking "how can I use my skills to be better at what I do?"  Perhaps I make a nice archer, with high Knowledge skills + Knowledge Devotion.  Perhaps I make an assassin, using that minor talent feat to get Psionic Minor Creation and combining that with Move Silently, Hide, and Iaijutsu Focus, along with Master of Poisons (with a few Craft ranks), and throw in Imperious Command + Intimidate, then round it out with some nice social skills... and don't forget the UMD.  Now I can sneak up on people and scare them into cowering or kill them, plus make everyone my friend.  That's how I play an Expert, using his own abilities, not just trying to emulate Monk abilities that nobody cares about (seriously, at some point either that archer or assassin's going to want to be able to fly... so he can use Handle Animal and Ride and have a flying mount.  Now why would he care about Safe Fall and land movement speed?).

Quote
When the only thing the expert class offers is some more skill points and the ability choose 10 class skills (not 21, as Saxony mistakenly believes), my above monk with INT 18 has six class skills to choose from, on top of his already 18 (!!) class skills (which in turn can get boosted even higher by ACFs or a ToB maneuver feat). This means the monk has, with just his bonus feat advantage, more than twice more class skills, plus chosen/already has the same most powerful skills the expert has.

Your Monk was trying to be an Expert.  That means the Expert wins outright.  The Expert wouldn't dream of trying to be a Monk... why would he want to do that?

Quote

Sure.  Necropolitan Whispergnome Expert 6 with Charisma 14, Int 14, Dex 16, Con -, Wisdom 8, Str 6 (22 Point Buy).  Skills:  Maxed Iaijutsu Focus, Intimidate, UMD, Diplomacy, Move Silently, Hide, and Craft Poison, with a few ranks as needed in Handle Animal, Bluff, and Sense Motive.  Feats:  EWP: Gnomish Quickrazor, that feat that lets you use a first level psionic ability once in a while (take it for Psionic Minor Creation), Imperious Command.  If Necropolitan isn't available, swap Imperious Command for Master of Poisons and take the point buy up a little to get a reasonable con score... you'll take Imperious Command later.  Fly around on a Magebreed Warbeast Desmoderu Hunting Bat (this is a standard domesticated animal in the underdark, see MMII, and costs a pretty small amount of money) using poisonous attacks (Black Lotus Poison from Psionic Minor Creation) to kill enemies.  Occasionally dismount and sneak up to kill enemies.  At other times force them to cower via Imperious Command and let your bat trip and disable them before you go in for the kill.  The Never Outnumbered skill trick is a good plan too.  Other gear includes some basic armor, a crossbow with gnomish crossbow sight for sniping, a nice masterwork saddle, a few sets of marbles, and a bunch of skill boosting masterwork tools... and of course a Feycraft Quickrazor, so he can use Dex to hit with that without needing Weapon Finesse.

Note that you'll need an item of +2 Cha by level 6 to qualify for Imperious Command.  Later on I'll probably invest in a Lyre of Building so that I can craft stuff extremely fast (with a decent Charisma it's quite easy to use the Lyre sans perform ranks).

Now, how does this compare to a Monk?  Well, for the most part it's not equipment dependent (it's all mundane except for the +2 Cha item which is extremely basic... note that if the Desmoderu don't exist, he could train a Dire Bat for the same purpose).  While he could use UMD, he doesn't depend on it.  His point buy is acceptable for any game.  He's FAR more mobile than a normal Monk, being both faster and better able to traverse vertically.  He's viciously dangerous (DC 20 or 3d6 con damage HURTS) and is a threat both up close and at range (even firing single shots with the crossbow, that poison is nasty, while up close he can do IF damage effectively).  He's a great scout with his solid stealth abilities (in the future he should take Lifesight).  Basically, he does everything a Monk would do, but instead of trying to imitate a Monk, he does it via his own class using his advantage... skills.  Poison is generated with help from his Craft Poison ranks.  Melee damage is augmented by his Iaijutsu focus ranks.  Handle animal helps him with the bat, and Intimidate lets him cower people.  Diplomacy gives him the ability to handle social settings.  This is an optimized Expert, not a wanna be Expert like the Monks you've been making.  And sure, if you gave him stuff to use UMD on, he'd rock out with that too.

If I'm making a Monk, I'm not messing about with UMD and other stuff that's not the Monk's specialty.  I'm going to look at the Monk to see what good abilities they have... which is mostly Flurry and that Stunning Fist bonus feat.  So that's what I'm going to optimize around.  That's why I tend to run away from Monk after 6 levels into Shou Disciple, so I can finally use Reach Weapons and such.

JaronK
« Last Edit: June 11, 2011, 08:18:46 PM by JaronK »

Sir Giacomo

  • That monkey with the orange ass cheeks
  • ****
  • Posts: 259
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #373 on: June 11, 2011, 09:46:44 PM »
I cannot believe what I am reading here.
JaronK, please, at least revise your awful expert build ...

I'll wait until tomorrow, then post more.

- Giacomo

Lycanthromancer

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4003
    • Email
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #374 on: June 11, 2011, 10:18:01 PM »
I cannot believe what I am reading here.
JaronK, please, at least revise your awful expert build ...

I'll wait until tomorrow, then post more.

- Giacomo
It's better than any monk build I've seen.
[spoiler]Masculine men like masculine things. Masculine men are masculine. Therefore, liking masculine men is masculine.

I dare anyone to find a hole in that logic.
______________________________________
[/spoiler]I'm a writer. These are my stories. Some are even SFW! (Warning: Mostly Gay.)
My awesome poster collection. (Warning, some are NSFW.)
Agita's awesome poster collection.
[spoiler]
+1 Lycanthromancer
Which book is Lycanthromancer in?
Lyca ... is in the book. Yes he is.
 :D
shit.. concerning psionics optimization, lycan IS the book
[/spoiler]

Sir Giacomo

  • That monkey with the orange ass cheeks
  • ****
  • Posts: 259
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #375 on: June 11, 2011, 10:31:37 PM »
It's better than any monk build I've seen.

Which is somewhat surprising since you saw my monk build easily beating your (even illegal) psywar build.

- Giacomo

ninjarabbit

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1442
    • Email
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #376 on: June 11, 2011, 10:33:41 PM »
I cannot believe what I am reading here.
JaronK, please, at least revise your awful expert build ...

I'll wait until tomorrow, then post more.

- Giacomo

Joke post

Rejakor

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 610
    • Email
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #377 on: June 11, 2011, 10:58:18 PM »
Please stop feeding the obvious troll.

X-Codes

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 3941
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #378 on: June 12, 2011, 12:50:23 AM »
It's better than any monk build I've seen.

Which is somewhat surprising since you saw my monk build easily beating your (even illegal) psywar build.

- Giacomo
What monk build?

Sobolev

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 742
Re: Expert vs Monk Challenge!
« Reply #379 on: June 12, 2011, 01:40:07 AM »
At this point, Giacomo MUST be a troll.  Can we get him banned or something.  Unless he starts contributing more than "Monks are clearly better than Experts, you guys are just jealous" I would prefer if he stopped bumping my thread.  I think the build posted by JaronK is good and similar to the conclusion of this thread 10 pages ago.  Saying "A monk with 18 Int can do all the same and have class features!" is just nonsense.  I outlined all of the monk class features several pages ago.  Many of them require a high strength to make up for your poor BAB.  Many more require a good Wisdom bonus.  You can't have an 18 in everything in most games.

Also, monk bonus feats are HIGHLY limited, they aren't just "Four bonus feats' or even close.  Many of the feats are just bad.

The only reasonable monk mentioned thus far was the Wild Shape Monk, which you would then go in to MoMF and then go from there.  No one is debating that, but that's not really what was being discussed either.
Sha'ir Handbook
Binder Handbook


Quote from: Negative Zero on November 04, 2009, 02:16:14 AM
In my humble opinion, CO is haberdashery. Some say we're mad, but we can all agree we're hatters. Yes, we have potential to make very sophisticated hats, very fancy hats, be they dark or light. But the truth is that the color of the hat does not come from the group of us - our community doesn't directly produce hats. We simply give average head circumferences, list current fashion trends, and point out some shiny, obscure baubles to add to the latest hat line.