You're missing the point. Those are just made up things that have never been referenced in any other D&D source. They're abstract enough that the DM can rightly claim that you can't make them using any magic, including Wish (and if you're using those rules, that's what you're supposed to do).
Exhibit A- souls and their harvesting have been covered in several places in D&D.
Exhibit B-anti-matter and atomic physics aren't referenced in any D&D source, but that doesn't stop people from going wild with magic to create them.
Exhibit C-I'm pretty sure that the D&D rules
supose you to don't chain bind efreetis, as well as they
supose a lot of other stuff, but what the players do with them is another thing.
You can't buy them with gold (which there are a zillion ways to get by abusing magic in D&D), and you can't reproduce them with magic.
So you can't make an infinite amount of them and break the economy, like you can with gold (or Wishes).
Thinaun weapon. Insert summon/calling spell. Profit. By tome logic, yes, you can harvest the souls of summoned creatures. And that's for starters. Once we start going with PaO, fabricate and major creation the true fun begins!
The idea is that it's easier to "fix" the D&D economy by basically throwing it out the window at a certain level, and creating another one that's entirely separate from it. That's the point.
Again, their intention, just as I'm sure the D&D designers didn't intend for infinite wealth combo. But their system is just as full of holes if you just try poking at it.
The alternatives are to 1) Go and "fix" every possible infinite wealth combo, like Wall of Iron + Fabricate, or abusing Efreet for Wishes (or just flat using a Ring of Three Wishes to wish for another Ring of Three Wishes).
See, that's the kind of cheesy reading that truly breaks games. You cannot use a ring of three wishes to wish for another ring of three wishes, because items that replicate spells that cost exp must have said exp cost already paid on their construction. The efreeti can do it, but it's just a matter of saying "Efreetis don't exist on this seting, as well as any monster with a Wish SLA". Was it that hard?
or 2) Agree to not use those things (via gentleman's agreement, DM threat, or whatever). But does that make for a believable world that exists within the given rules set? No. It's a huge, gaping hole that you have to just conveniently ignore, like a pink elephant in the room.
And now we have a purple elephant. The tome economy only works by gentleman's agreement for you don't starting your own soul factory or cheesy readings of other stuff.
Many people find both of those approaches to be unsatisfactory. Hence Frank and K's attempt to create a third alternative. And I fully suspect that you know all of that, and are just trolling because you dislike Frank, K, and/or the gaming den.
I'm not trolling here. I'm just pointing out that if you bother to stretch their economy as badly as they stretch the basic D&D economy, they both colapse.