These boards are now READ ONLY. We've started over! So don't try posting here. Go here: www.minmaxforum.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Q35 A couple of the other players have said that you can craft more powerful alchemist fire/acid/etc by a vague 'increase the craft DC'. Basicaly making the items hit for 2d6 or more instead of 1d6. I'm wondering if that's correct or if they're smoking something alchemical themselves.
Quote from: CyMage on August 04, 2010, 11:31:30 PMQ35 A couple of the other players have said that you can craft more powerful alchemist fire/acid/etc by a vague 'increase the craft DC'. Basicaly making the items hit for 2d6 or more instead of 1d6. I'm wondering if that's correct or if they're smoking something alchemical themselves.Epic level handbook has the rules for this
Quote from: Littha on August 04, 2010, 11:29:58 PMQuote from: kevin_video on August 04, 2010, 10:59:12 PMQuote from: snakeman830 on August 04, 2010, 10:58:00 PM@Dragonscale Husk: It is so badly worded, even your Dex bonus doesn't stack with it RAW.I saw that it still allows you have DEX +2 but has a check penalty of -4.yes but it also says about not getting AC bonuses from anywhere else...I took it as referring to no armor bonuses. ie You could use bracers of armor or chainmail, and have them stack.[/quoteIt should say something along those lines, RAW it says somthing to the effect of no AC bonuses... I would set it as one of armor bonuses or natural armor bonuses, as its written you cant have any other AC bonus from anywhere
Quote from: kevin_video on August 04, 2010, 10:59:12 PMQuote from: snakeman830 on August 04, 2010, 10:58:00 PM@Dragonscale Husk: It is so badly worded, even your Dex bonus doesn't stack with it RAW.I saw that it still allows you have DEX +2 but has a check penalty of -4.yes but it also says about not getting AC bonuses from anywhere else...
Quote from: snakeman830 on August 04, 2010, 10:58:00 PM@Dragonscale Husk: It is so badly worded, even your Dex bonus doesn't stack with it RAW.I saw that it still allows you have DEX +2 but has a check penalty of -4.
@Dragonscale Husk: It is so badly worded, even your Dex bonus doesn't stack with it RAW.
Quote from: kevin_video on August 04, 2010, 11:31:09 PMQuote from: Littha on August 04, 2010, 11:29:58 PMQuote from: kevin_video on August 04, 2010, 10:59:12 PMQuote from: snakeman830 on August 04, 2010, 10:58:00 PM@Dragonscale Husk: It is so badly worded, even your Dex bonus doesn't stack with it RAW.I saw that it still allows you have DEX +2 but has a check penalty of -4.yes but it also says about not getting AC bonuses from anywhere else...I took it as referring to no armor bonuses. ie You could use bracers of armor or chainmail, and have them stack.It should say something along those lines, RAW it says somthing to the effect of no AC bonuses... I would set it as one of armor bonuses or natural armor bonuses, as its written you cant have any other AC bonus from anywhere
Quote from: Littha on August 04, 2010, 11:29:58 PMQuote from: kevin_video on August 04, 2010, 10:59:12 PMQuote from: snakeman830 on August 04, 2010, 10:58:00 PM@Dragonscale Husk: It is so badly worded, even your Dex bonus doesn't stack with it RAW.I saw that it still allows you have DEX +2 but has a check penalty of -4.yes but it also says about not getting AC bonuses from anywhere else...I took it as referring to no armor bonuses. ie You could use bracers of armor or chainmail, and have them stack.
Q34: What ways are there for a 6th level Wizard to get more bonuses against SR?Feats, Spells, Items, whatever. I'd like to reliably get past a 17.
Q 37 If you get a decreased ability score to CON (from things like Bestow curse) would you're HP go down from the reduced CON mod?.
Q4: Are you not already playing the game once you know of it?
Monks are pretty much the best designed class ever.JaronK
Q 36 I know it exists, but I just can't find it. Where's the metamagic feat that adds the Good descriptor to spells?EDIT: I found Consecrate Spell, but I was hoping for something that didn't require you to be "good" yourself. Character is LN.
Q38What's the name of the spell that turns you into some tiny flier for rounds/level?
Q39: Is there an easy way for a wu jen or other arcane caster to share one or more of his attack spells with a summoned creature?
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
Quote from: InnaBinder on August 05, 2010, 12:26:35 PMQ39: Is there an easy way for a wu jen or other arcane caster to share one or more of his attack spells with a summoned creature?What exactly do you mean "attack spell"? You mean you want to give your summons the ability to cast something like Fireball? I know the Imbued Summoning (or whatever it's called) feat lets you cast some spells on them as you summon them, but IIRC that's limited to "buffs", isn't it?
Quote from: PhaedrusXY on August 05, 2010, 01:01:30 PMQuote from: InnaBinder on August 05, 2010, 12:26:35 PMQ39: Is there an easy way for a wu jen or other arcane caster to share one or more of his attack spells with a summoned creature?What exactly do you mean "attack spell"? You mean you want to give your summons the ability to cast something like Fireball? I know the Imbued Summoning (or whatever it's called) feat lets you cast some spells on them as you summon them, but IIRC that's limited to "buffs", isn't it?By "attack spell," I mean spells that either require an attack roll (like an Orb, frex), or require a target to make a save or have something bad happen to them (Fireball, Slow, Dominate). Yes, as far as I can tell, Imbued Summoning only applies to buffs.
Q40: Where did that short-lived thread from a few weeks back on using rage variants & feats to get large DEX bonuses from your rage go?Alternately, what all was in it?