Author Topic: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition  (Read 127640 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The_Mad_Linguist

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8780
  • Simulated Thing
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #120 on: August 04, 2010, 11:35:57 PM »
Q35  A couple of the other players have said that you can craft more powerful alchemist fire/acid/etc by a vague 'increase the craft DC'.  Basicaly making the items hit for 2d6 or more instead of 1d6.  I'm wondering if that's correct or if they're smoking something alchemical themselves.
Epic level handbook has the rules for this
Linguist, Mad, Unique, none of these things am I
My custom class: The Priest of the Unseen Host
Planetouched Handbook
Want to improve your character?  Then die.

CyMage

  • Ring-Tailed Lemur
  • **
  • Posts: 85
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #121 on: August 04, 2010, 11:41:01 PM »
Q35  A couple of the other players have said that you can craft more powerful alchemist fire/acid/etc by a vague 'increase the craft DC'.  Basicaly making the items hit for 2d6 or more instead of 1d6.  I'm wondering if that's correct or if they're smoking something alchemical themselves.
Epic level handbook has the rules for this

Thanks.  Though I'll have to point out to them the epic feat requirement and the +20 DC increase compared to the +10 they mentioned.

Littha

  • Man in Gorilla Suit
  • *****
  • Posts: 2155
    • Email
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #122 on: August 04, 2010, 11:50:31 PM »
@Dragonscale Husk: It is so badly worded, even your Dex bonus doesn't stack with it RAW.
I saw that it still allows you have DEX +2 but has a check penalty of -4.

yes but it also says about not getting AC bonuses from anywhere else...
I took it as referring to no armor bonuses. ie You could use bracers of armor or chainmail, and have them stack.
[/quote

It should say something along those lines, RAW it says somthing to the effect of no AC bonuses...

I would set it as one of armor bonuses or natural armor bonuses, as its written you cant have any other AC bonus from anywhere

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #123 on: August 04, 2010, 11:51:43 PM »
@Dragonscale Husk: It is so badly worded, even your Dex bonus doesn't stack with it RAW.
I saw that it still allows you have DEX +2 but has a check penalty of -4.

yes but it also says about not getting AC bonuses from anywhere else...
I took it as referring to no armor bonuses. ie You could use bracers of armor or chainmail, and have them stack.

It should say something along those lines, RAW it says somthing to the effect of no AC bonuses...

I would set it as one of armor bonuses or natural armor bonuses, as its written you cant have any other AC bonus from anywhere
Hmm. That sucks. Thankfully I'm the DM so I'll choose the armor bonus so they can still get natural armor, and other armor bonuses too.
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #124 on: August 05, 2010, 12:27:05 AM »
Q 36 I know it exists, but I just can't find it. Where's the metamagic feat that adds the Good descriptor to spells?

EDIT: I found Consecrate Spell, but I was hoping for something that didn't require you to be "good" yourself. Character is LN.
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.

dna1

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1131
  • Im not albino Im just from Alaska
    • Email
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #125 on: August 05, 2010, 01:26:55 AM »
Q34: What ways are there for a 6th level Wizard to get more bonuses against SR?

Feats, Spells, Items, whatever. I'd like to reliably get past a 17.

A 34. There is a 4th level spell called "assay resistance" Yes your only 6th level now, but thats a good investment for future uses :D
or you could buy a scroll of it to use now.
Slappin ho's like E-Honda

the_shadowmind

  • Barbary Macaque at the Rock of Gibraltar
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #126 on: August 05, 2010, 04:42:43 AM »
Q 37 If you get a decreased ability score to CON (from things like Bestow curse) would you're HP go down from the reduced CON mod?.

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #127 on: August 05, 2010, 04:44:04 AM »
Q 37 If you get a decreased ability score to CON (from things like Bestow curse) would you're HP go down from the reduced CON mod?.
A 37 Yes.
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.


Mixster

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1642
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #129 on: August 05, 2010, 07:46:18 AM »
Q4: Are you not already playing the game once you know of it?

A4 The games is over it was won by some dude on Gaia.

Q38
What's the name of the spell that turns you into some tiny flier for rounds/level?
Monks are pretty much the best designed class ever.

JaronK

Meep Meep - Mixster out

Integral

  • Ring-Tailed Lemur
  • **
  • Posts: 34
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #130 on: August 05, 2010, 08:19:23 AM »
Q 36 I know it exists, but I just can't find it. Where's the metamagic feat that adds the Good descriptor to spells?

EDIT: I found Consecrate Spell, but I was hoping for something that didn't require you to be "good" yourself. Character is LN.

Might not be applicable, but you could check out Mark of the Enlightened Soul (DrM pg70). 4th level Clr/Sorc/Wiz, swift action, among other things gives all your spells the good descriptor.

Agita

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5465
  • SFT is mai waifu.
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #131 on: August 05, 2010, 09:07:55 AM »
Ad A 34

There is also a 1st-level spell called True Casting which does essentially the same as Assay Spell Resistance, but is a Standard action to cast. Think of it as True Strike for piercing SR.
It's all about vision and making reality conform to your vision. By dropping a fucking house on it.

Agita's Awesome Poster Compilation
Lycanthromancer's Awesome Poster Compilation

Rebel7284

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1585
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #132 on: August 05, 2010, 10:26:00 AM »
Q38
What's the name of the spell that turns you into some tiny flier for rounds/level?

A38 Shapechange?
Negative level on a chicken would make it a wight the next day.  Chicken the other wight meat. -borg286

InnaBinder

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1610
  • OnnaTable
    • Okay - - Your Turn: Monte Cook's Message Board
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #133 on: August 05, 2010, 12:26:35 PM »
Q39: Is there an easy way for a wu jen or other arcane caster to share one or more of his attack spells with a summoned creature?
Winning an argument on the internet is like winning in the Special Olympics.  You won, but you're still retarded.

I made a Handbook!?

PhaedrusXY

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8022
  • Advanced Spambot
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #134 on: August 05, 2010, 01:01:30 PM »
Q39: Is there an easy way for a wu jen or other arcane caster to share one or more of his attack spells with a summoned creature?
What exactly do you mean "attack spell"? You mean you want to give your summons the ability to cast something like Fireball? I know the Imbued Summoning (or whatever it's called) feat lets you cast some spells on them as you summon them, but IIRC that's limited to "buffs", isn't it?
[spoiler]
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?

Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
[/spoiler]

Rymosrac

  • Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
  • You were expecting?
    • Email
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #135 on: August 05, 2010, 01:08:04 PM »
Q40: Where did that short-lived thread from a few weeks back on using rage variants & feats to get large DEX bonuses from your rage go?

Alternately, what all was in it?
Shh. My common sense is tingling. . .

InnaBinder

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1610
  • OnnaTable
    • Okay - - Your Turn: Monte Cook's Message Board
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #136 on: August 05, 2010, 01:21:58 PM »
Q39: Is there an easy way for a wu jen or other arcane caster to share one or more of his attack spells with a summoned creature?
What exactly do you mean "attack spell"? You mean you want to give your summons the ability to cast something like Fireball? I know the Imbued Summoning (or whatever it's called) feat lets you cast some spells on them as you summon them, but IIRC that's limited to "buffs", isn't it?
By "attack spell," I mean spells that either require an attack roll (like an Orb, frex), or require a target to make a save or have something bad happen to them (Fireball, Slow, Dominate).  Yes, as far as I can tell, Imbued Summoning only applies to buffs.
Winning an argument on the internet is like winning in the Special Olympics.  You won, but you're still retarded.

I made a Handbook!?

PhaedrusXY

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8022
  • Advanced Spambot
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #137 on: August 05, 2010, 01:25:40 PM »
Q39: Is there an easy way for a wu jen or other arcane caster to share one or more of his attack spells with a summoned creature?
What exactly do you mean "attack spell"? You mean you want to give your summons the ability to cast something like Fireball? I know the Imbued Summoning (or whatever it's called) feat lets you cast some spells on them as you summon them, but IIRC that's limited to "buffs", isn't it?
By "attack spell," I mean spells that either require an attack roll (like an Orb, frex), or require a target to make a save or have something bad happen to them (Fireball, Slow, Dominate).  Yes, as far as I can tell, Imbued Summoning only applies to buffs.
I don't know of any way to do this. Greenbound Summoning adds a few things, but I forget exactly what other than Entangle. And a Psion can summon Astral Constructs that can use Energy Bolt every round. That's all I can think of that even comes close.
[spoiler]
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?

Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
[/spoiler]

Agita

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5465
  • SFT is mai waifu.
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #138 on: August 05, 2010, 01:42:17 PM »
Q40: Where did that short-lived thread from a few weeks back on using rage variants & feats to get large DEX bonuses from your rage go?

Alternately, what all was in it?
A 40

http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards/index.php?topic=8779.0
It's all about vision and making reality conform to your vision. By dropping a fucking house on it.

Agita's Awesome Poster Compilation
Lycanthromancer's Awesome Poster Compilation

Felix Underwood

  • Barbary Macaque at the Rock of Gibraltar
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
Re: Ask a Simple Question: Losing the Game Edition
« Reply #139 on: August 05, 2010, 02:29:36 PM »
Q41 If a dragon was able to use the spell Steal Life (BovD, pg 106) from a greater Ring of Spell Storing or some such shenanegans, could making itself younger reduce its Hit Dice?