Author Topic: Making the classes in Diablo II: Diablerie not suck?  (Read 1265 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Gavinfoxx

  • King Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 822
  • *Forkbark* Wauwau!
    • Email
Making the classes in Diablo II: Diablerie not suck?
« on: July 30, 2010, 11:53:58 PM »
So... I recently found that silly Diablo II D20 book, Diablo II: Diablerie.  It's sooo hilarious, I totally want to play a Javazon in a normal D&D game.  The only problem is, the classes as written really kinda suck.  Has anyone done any 3.5e-relevant, maybe Tome of Battle style rewrites for any of them?  With the characters balanced with the options available in ToB?  I would absolutely LOVE something like that...
BG's other resident furry!

Solo

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 2684
  • Solo the Sorcelator, at your service
Re: Making the classes in Diablo II: Diablerie not suck?
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2010, 11:58:12 PM »
Assassin: Swordsage
Barbarian: Barbarian
Sorceress: Sorcerer
Javazon: Lightening Warrior Stormlord of Talos
Necromancer: Dread Necromancer
Paladin: Cleric
Druid: Druid

"I am the Black Mage! I cast the spells that makes the peoples fall down!"

The Legend RPG, which I worked on and encourage you to read.

Gavinfoxx

  • King Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 822
  • *Forkbark* Wauwau!
    • Email
Re: Making the classes in Diablo II: Diablerie not suck?
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2010, 12:00:29 AM »
Well, yea, presumably finding classes within D&D and then renaming them is ONE option... but I was kinda hoping for something that was more a mix, maybe folding some of the abilities of these classes into existing options for existing classes? Like some of the schools in Tome of Battle?
BG's other resident furry!