Author Topic: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition  (Read 120027 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

PhaedrusXY

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8022
  • Advanced Spambot
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #540 on: May 26, 2010, 11:24:19 AM »
A 123: I would say "Unarmed Strike progression" means the damage only.

And I would go the swordsage route, but there's no ToB allowed in my current campaign.
I know that's how people seem to generally interpret it, but back in 3.0 Unarmed Strike Progression actually referred specifically to the weird monk BAB progression that was directly replaced with Flurry of Blows in 3.5. I have to wonder if the author meant to say that the Unarmed Swordsage gets Flurry, but maybe doesn't actually get increased unarmed damage (unless they take the Superior Unarmed Strike feat).

I have to ask because I'm about to start a character with a couple of swordsage levels, and as he's getting light armor proficiency from another class there is really no reason at all not to use this variant. I'd never even looked at it before. :P
[spoiler]
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?

Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
[/spoiler]

shalandar

  • Ring-Tailed Lemur
  • **
  • Posts: 75
    • Email
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #541 on: May 26, 2010, 11:25:20 AM »
A 128: Is there any way to worship two dieties at one time? 

snakeman830

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 3494
  • BG's resident furry min/maxxer
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #542 on: May 26, 2010, 11:36:39 AM »
Unarmed Strike and Flurry of Blows are two seperate abilities.  You only get the Unarmed Strike ability of the Monk.
I am constantly amazed by how many DM's ban Tomb of Battle.  The book doesn't even exist!

Quotes:[spoiler]
By yes, she means no.
That explains so much about my life.
hiicantcomeupwithacharacterthatisntaghostwhyisthatamijustretardedorsomething
Why would you even do this? It hurts my eyes and looks like you ate your keyboard before suffering an attack of explosive diarrhea.
[/spoiler]

If using Genesis to hide your phylactry, set it at -300 degrees farenheit.  See how do-gooders fare with a liquid atmosphere.

Nunkuruji

  • Bi-Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 416
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #543 on: May 26, 2010, 12:46:31 PM »
A 128: Is there any way to worship two dieties at one time? 

Depends on the campaign setting

Agita

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5465
  • SFT is mai waifu.
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #544 on: May 26, 2010, 12:48:50 PM »
A 128: Is there any way to worship two dieties at one time? 
Worshipping a whole pantheon grants you access to all of the pantheon's domains. I'm unsure if there's a general rule that you can do this, but in specific, tightly-knit pantheons such as Eberron's Sovereign Host and the Greek, Asgardian, and Egyptian pantheons in Deities and Demigods, it's explicitly allowed.
It's all about vision and making reality conform to your vision. By dropping a fucking house on it.

Agita's Awesome Poster Compilation
Lycanthromancer's Awesome Poster Compilation

Flay Crimsonwind

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1310
  • Watching the World Burn in Magnificence
    • Email
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #545 on: May 26, 2010, 01:11:45 PM »
Q 129: I would like to add charges/day to the Brute Gauntlets from MIC. Where are there pricing rules for adding charges/day?  ???

PhaedrusXY

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8022
  • Advanced Spambot
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #546 on: May 26, 2010, 01:15:20 PM »
Q 129: I would like to add charges/day to the Brute Gauntlets from MIC. Where are there pricing rules for adding charges/day?  ???
A129: Well, they're more like guidelines...

5 divided by # of charges. 5 uses per day supposedly equals the price for "at will". So according to that, the cost of something that has 3 charges per day would be multiplied by 5/3 to get the price for "at will". I'd say that's too cheap for that item, though, since a continuous +2 enhancement to strength is 4000 gp. The "guidelines" also say compare a new item to existing items that do something similar to get a price that's more "accurate" than the one given by the table.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2010, 01:17:02 PM by PhaedrusXY »
[spoiler]
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?

Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
[/spoiler]

Agita

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5465
  • SFT is mai waifu.
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #547 on: May 26, 2010, 01:18:08 PM »
Goddamn Spambot Ninja. :p

Q 129: I would like to add charges/day to the Brute Gauntlets from MIC. Where are there pricing rules for adding charges/day?  ???
The price of an item with charges/day is unlimited price divided by (5/charges per day). So for an item usable three times per day, you first figure out the unlimited price by multiplying the normal price with 5/3 (833.3 in the case of Brute Gauntlets) and then figure out the price for more daily charges from scrap. Of course, at that point you might as wel just make them unlimited.
These guidelines can be found, along with all other pricing guidelines, here. Of course, these are probably not as applicable to MIC-style charged items that let you use more charges per use for greater effect.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2010, 01:23:20 PM by Agita »
It's all about vision and making reality conform to your vision. By dropping a fucking house on it.

Agita's Awesome Poster Compilation
Lycanthromancer's Awesome Poster Compilation

PhaedrusXY

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8022
  • Advanced Spambot
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #548 on: May 26, 2010, 01:20:16 PM »
Goddamn Sapmbot Ninja. :p
Yeah! Ninja robots are taking over the world!  :ninja
[spoiler]
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?

Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
[/spoiler]

McPoyo

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 3783
    • Email
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #549 on: May 26, 2010, 02:00:41 PM »
you could have just asked google...

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/

Yeah, but Pathfinder D&D, Pathfinder online, and pathfinder ogl didn't bring anything. A little after I though of SRD and posted here first  :D
Pathfinder doesn't use wotc's OGL for their stuff, they use something called the CDL instead.
pathfinder SRD works either way however.
I meant for why "pathfinder ogl" didn't return any useful results on google.
[Spoiler]
A gygaxian dungeon is like the world's most messed up game show.

Behind door number one: INSTANT DEATH!
Behind door number 2: A magic crown!
Behind door number 3: 4d6 giant bees, and THREE HUNDRED POUNDS OF HONEY!
They don't/haven't, was the point. 3.5 is as dead as people not liking nice tits.

Sometimes, their tits (3.5) get enhancements (houserules), but that doesn't mean people don't like nice tits.

Though sometimes, the surgeon (DM) botches them pretty bad...
Best metaphor I have seen in a long time.  I give you much fu.
Three Errata for the Mage-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Barbarian-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Monks doomed to die,
One for the Wizard on his dark throne
In the Land of Charop where the Shadows lie.
[/spoiler]

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #550 on: May 26, 2010, 02:35:12 PM »
you could have just asked google...

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/

Yeah, but Pathfinder D&D, Pathfinder online, and pathfinder ogl didn't bring anything. A little after I though of SRD and posted here first  :D
Google "Pathfinder PRD" works as well.
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.

kevin_video

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4833
    • Email
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #551 on: May 26, 2010, 02:44:21 PM »
Q 128: What would be an appropriate CR for a Half-Ogre Warrior 2?  I'm thinking CR 2.
I do believe that you are correct. A half-ogre is read as CR +1 so if you have two warrior classes, that only increases it by another 1.
I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.

Surreal

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1430
    • Email
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #552 on: May 26, 2010, 02:54:45 PM »
A 128: Is there any way to worship two dieties at one time? 
Worshipping a whole pantheon grants you access to all of the pantheon's domains. I'm unsure if there's a general rule that you can do this, but in specific, tightly-knit pantheons such as Eberron's Sovereign Host and the Greek, Asgardian, and Egyptian pantheons in Deities and Demigods, it's explicitly allowed.

Eberron Campaign Setting p.35 - there's a paragraph on following a pantheon instead of a specific diety.
---
"The late, sedate, and no to great." ~Surreal

Some Handy Links for CO Work (WotC 339 version) - a compilation of links for base/prestige class handbooks, tactics, spellcasting, character builds, D&D databases, etc.
Archived version of the above with working links

The Mango Index - a giant index for all things D&D and where to find them
The Mango List Reborn! - rehosted by KellKheraptis

Lists of Stuff - listing of class features etc and how to get them, etc. sort of like above but a little more specific and sorted by category
Polymorph, Wildshape and Shapechange, oh my! (comparison charts) - side-by-side comparison of all the various form altering abilities
Alternative Class Features
alternative ways to get class skills

Ithamar

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 959
  • PM me if you're interested in some Arena action!
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #553 on: May 26, 2010, 03:07:31 PM »
Complete Divine also has info regarding pantheonic worship as well, if you need something non-setting specific.
Are you worthy of Ascension?
Always accepting gladiators!  Now with a new and improved rule set!

shalandar

  • Ring-Tailed Lemur
  • **
  • Posts: 75
    • Email
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #554 on: May 26, 2010, 03:25:34 PM »
Q 129: Say I have a weapon with Spell Storing on it.  I can obviously cast any spell up to level 3 into the weapon to "use" later.  If I used a metamagic feat to enhance it above level 3, it wouldn't go in.  I understand that.  But, what if I used a Metamagic Rod or a Spell Shard (MiC)?  That doesn't raise the "level of spell used".  Could I put a Maximized / Empowered spell of 3rd level in it then?

Hand_of_Vecna

  • Domesticated Capuchin Monkey
  • **
  • Posts: 96
    • Email
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #555 on: May 26, 2010, 03:47:53 PM »
Q 129: Say I have a weapon with Spell Storing on it.  I can obviously cast any spell up to level 3 into the weapon to "use" later.  If I used a metamagic feat to enhance it above level 3, it wouldn't go in.  I understand that.  But, what if I used a Metamagic Rod or a Spell Shard (MiC)?  That doesn't raise the "level of spell used".  Could I put a Maximized / Empowered spell of 3rd level in it then?

I'd say no because the sword can't store the energy from a the item. By the same logic you can't use a rod of meta magic to create meta magiced scrolls at the cost of producing regular scrolls and a radient servent of Pelor can't monopolize the healing item market with enlarged maximized wands of clw that heal 9+(1d8/2) hp per charge but cost him the standard gold and xp for a first level wand to create.

I don't think it's RAW but I'd consider allowing a caster with metamagic reducers like arcane thesis to cast a spell with free metamagic on it into a spell storing weapon.

PhaedrusXY

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 8022
  • Advanced Spambot
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #556 on: May 26, 2010, 03:51:13 PM »
Q 129: Say I have a weapon with Spell Storing on it.  I can obviously cast any spell up to level 3 into the weapon to "use" later.  If I used a metamagic feat to enhance it above level 3, it wouldn't go in.  I understand that.  But, what if I used a Metamagic Rod or a Spell Shard (MiC)?  That doesn't raise the "level of spell used".  Could I put a Maximized / Empowered spell of 3rd level in it then?

I'd say no because the sword can't store the energy from a the item. By the same logic you can't use a rod of meta magic to create meta magiced scrolls at the cost of producing regular scrolls and a radient servent of Pelor can't monopolize the healing item market with enlarged maximized wands of clw that heal 9+(1d8/2) hp per charge but cost him the standard gold and xp for a first level wand to create.

I don't think it's RAW but I'd consider allowing a caster with metamagic reducers like arcane thesis to cast a spell with free metamagic on it into a spell storing weapon.
You might be able to use the Rod at the time the spell is discharged from the weapon, though. Ask your DM.
[spoiler]
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?

Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
[/spoiler]

shalandar

  • Ring-Tailed Lemur
  • **
  • Posts: 75
    • Email
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #557 on: May 26, 2010, 04:17:03 PM »
Q 130: Would you say there is any issue with learning a spell with a different elemental type?  The spell in question is Combust (Spell Comp).  Would a DM (you) allow me to learn it, instead of as fire, as say, electricity or acid or cold?

Saxony

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 742
  • My avatar is from the anime "Pani Poni Dash!".
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #558 on: May 26, 2010, 04:26:59 PM »
Q 130: Would you say there is any issue with learning a spell with a different elemental type?  The spell in question is Combust (Spell Comp).  Would a DM (you) allow me to learn it, instead of as fire, as say, electricity or acid or cold?
A 130 I totally would. That's not broken at all.

Especially since I, as the DM, choose the resistances and immunities of monsters.

Energy damage type is really just flavor text (Except in the case of the Searing Heat (Sandstorm) and Piercing Cold (Frostburn) feats, which have no electricity, acid, or sonic equivalents. Though I'd just homebrew them up anyway if a player wanted 'em. ). Players should have all the flavor they want.
If I say something about real world physics, and someone disagrees, assume I am right 90% of the time. This number goes up to 100% if I am late night posting - trust me, my star dust sibs.

McPoyo

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 3783
    • Email
Re: Ask a simple question: Monty Python edition
« Reply #559 on: May 26, 2010, 04:40:12 PM »
Q 129: Say I have a weapon with Spell Storing on it.  I can obviously cast any spell up to level 3 into the weapon to "use" later.  If I used a metamagic feat to enhance it above level 3, it wouldn't go in.  I understand that.  But, what if I used a Metamagic Rod or a Spell Shard (MiC)?  That doesn't raise the "level of spell used".  Could I put a Maximized / Empowered spell of 3rd level in it then?

I'd say no because the sword can't store the energy from a the item. By the same logic you can't use a rod of meta magic to create meta magiced scrolls at the cost of producing regular scrolls and a radient servent of Pelor can't monopolize the healing item market with enlarged maximized wands of clw that heal 9+(1d8/2) hp per charge but cost him the standard gold and xp for a first level wand to create.

I don't think it's RAW but I'd consider allowing a caster with metamagic reducers like arcane thesis to cast a spell with free metamagic on it into a spell storing weapon.
You might be able to use the Rod at the time the spell is discharged from the weapon, though. Ask your DM.
Or you might be able to make the rod into the weapon...
[Spoiler]
A gygaxian dungeon is like the world's most messed up game show.

Behind door number one: INSTANT DEATH!
Behind door number 2: A magic crown!
Behind door number 3: 4d6 giant bees, and THREE HUNDRED POUNDS OF HONEY!
They don't/haven't, was the point. 3.5 is as dead as people not liking nice tits.

Sometimes, their tits (3.5) get enhancements (houserules), but that doesn't mean people don't like nice tits.

Though sometimes, the surgeon (DM) botches them pretty bad...
Best metaphor I have seen in a long time.  I give you much fu.
Three Errata for the Mage-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Barbarian-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Monks doomed to die,
One for the Wizard on his dark throne
In the Land of Charop where the Shadows lie.
[/spoiler]