These boards are now READ ONLY. We've started over! So don't try posting here. Go here: www.minmaxforum.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The only flaw is, how long until somebody reads this thread and reports the whole thing? I imagine there's a fair bit of cross-traffic, so it's not as though it's terribly unlikely.
Quote from: Bauglir on March 09, 2010, 10:09:55 PMThe only flaw is, how long until somebody reads this thread and reports the whole thing? I imagine there's a fair bit of cross-traffic, so it's not as though it's terribly unlikely.No one likes Giacomo.
Quote from: Solo on March 10, 2010, 12:37:27 AMQuote from: Bauglir on March 09, 2010, 10:09:55 PMThe only flaw is, how long until somebody reads this thread and reports the whole thing? I imagine there's a fair bit of cross-traffic, so it's not as though it's terribly unlikely.No one likes Giacomo.that seems to be the case.
Quote from: awaken DM golem on April 06, 2011, 07:36:47 PMQuote from: Maeshin on April 05, 2011, 11:20:20 PMQuote from: Unbeliever on April 05, 2011, 11:08:07 PM+1 LycanthromancerWhich book is Lycanthromancer in?Lyca ... is in the book. Yes he is. shit.. concerning psionics optimization, lycan IS the book
Quote from: Maeshin on April 05, 2011, 11:20:20 PMQuote from: Unbeliever on April 05, 2011, 11:08:07 PM+1 LycanthromancerWhich book is Lycanthromancer in?Lyca ... is in the book. Yes he is.
Quote from: Unbeliever on April 05, 2011, 11:08:07 PM+1 LycanthromancerWhich book is Lycanthromancer in?
+1 Lycanthromancer
Pretty harsh, guys. I don't think he's so bad. I'm not writing fanletters or anything, but I don't especially dislike him for being wrong.
Quote from: Negative Zero on March 10, 2010, 01:56:52 AMPretty harsh, guys. I don't think he's so bad. I'm not writing fanletters or anything, but I don't especially dislike him for being wrong. I try to stay mostly neutral, but I kind of dislike him for being wrong and refusing to acknowledge the fact. The scientist in me hates that kind of attitude. if you propose a theory, and it gets proven wrong from EVERY angle, then you should be enough of a man (or woman. stop that Stan) to admit being incorrect, and instead try to revise your theory.
Quote from: Negative Zero on March 10, 2010, 01:56:52 AMPretty harsh, guys. I don't think he's so bad. I'm not writing fanletters or anything, but I don't especially dislike him for being wrong. He is also personally unpleasant, an asshole, and passively aggressive.
Quote from: Anklebite on March 10, 2010, 02:19:36 AMQuote from: Negative Zero on March 10, 2010, 01:56:52 AMPretty harsh, guys. I don't think he's so bad. I'm not writing fanletters or anything, but I don't especially dislike him for being wrong. I try to stay mostly neutral, but I kind of dislike him for being wrong and refusing to acknowledge the fact. The scientist in me hates that kind of attitude. if you propose a theory, and it gets proven wrong from EVERY angle, then you should be enough of a man (or woman. stop that Stan) to admit being incorrect, and instead try to revise your theory. Quote from: Solo on March 10, 2010, 02:39:55 AMQuote from: Negative Zero on March 10, 2010, 01:56:52 AMPretty harsh, guys. I don't think he's so bad. I'm not writing fanletters or anything, but I don't especially dislike him for being wrong. He is also personally unpleasant, an asshole, and passively aggressive.this.
The wizard's response: [spoiler][/spoiler]