Author Topic: Incest and morality  (Read 3268 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Endless Twilight

  • Ring-Tailed Lemur
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Incest and morality
« on: November 08, 2009, 04:41:12 PM »
To render a long story short, here is a situation in the campaign I'm in that involves incestuous relationships, and I'm wondering if incest, strictly speaking, should have an impact on in-game morality.

Two of the major figures in the campaign are the long-deposed king and queen of a destroyed nation. However, they are also brother and sister, and they have a daughter. The queen became a priestess of Ilmater (LG Forgotten Realms deity of suffering and endurance), and specifically has become Exalted. Both the king and queen think the other is dead.

The problem is that the king is hellbent on re-establishing his kingdom, and neverminding the means by which he intends to carry that out, he is an extreme racist and human supremacist, and he would die before admitting a non-human into the royal bloodline. However, his attitude means that the quasi-human kingdoms (Aventi, Kalashtar, Elans, Azurins, etc) would likewise die before submitting to the king and offering a daughter in marriage. The king knows this, and knows that his daughter has no idea who or what she is, courtesy of a memory erasure and reprogramming by a psion affiliated with the forces that overthrew the kingdom in the first place.

The king therefore intends to marry his own daughter, and he's a powerful enough wizard to muck with genetics a little to remove the negative effects of inbreeding.

My questions are thus: should the queen have lost her Exalted status for having been in an incestuous relationship with her own brother, and in this regard, is the king outright evil for intending to marry his own daughter, who has no idea what she is?

Agita

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 5465
  • SFT is mai waifu.
Re: Incest and morality
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2009, 05:44:49 PM »
I'd say 'no' and 'yes, but for different reasons'; respectively.
An evil action is defined in D&D as harming others for your (and only your) personal profit, or just for the lulz. Incest, in and of itself, does none of that, especially if you muck around a little to remove the negative effects. Incestuous marriage was, in fact, quite common among royal bloodlines in the middle ages to avoid 'muddying' their blue blood.
The king is, however, likely evil, because he manipulates others for his own profit and he's a racist ass.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2009, 05:48:29 PM by Agita »
It's all about vision and making reality conform to your vision. By dropping a fucking house on it.

Agita's Awesome Poster Compilation
Lycanthromancer's Awesome Poster Compilation

veekie

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 9034
  • WARNING: Homing Miko
Re: Incest and morality
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2009, 06:08:23 PM »
Pretty much, D&D alignment wise, Sex is well, sex, no matter who, what or how you do it(just look at the freakin halfbreeds), the only evilness involved is coercion(which falls under evil once it crosses a vague line) and intention.
The mind transcends the body.
It's also a little cold because of that.
Please get it a blanket.

I wish I could read your mind,
I can barely read mine.

"Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. At 2:15, it begins rolling up characters."

[spoiler]
"Just what do you think the moon up in the sky is? Everyone sees that big, round shiny thing and thinks there must be something round up there, right? That's just silly. The truth is much more awesome than that. You can almost never see the real Moon, and its appearance is death to humans. You can only see the Moon when it's reflected in things. And the things it reflects in, like water or glass, can all be broken, right? Since the moon you see in the sky is just being reflected in the heavens, if you tear open the heavens it's easy to break it~"
-Ibuki Suika, on overkill

To sumbolaion diakoneto moi, basilisk ouranionon.
Epigenentheto, apoleia keraune hos timeis pteirei.
Hekatonkatis kai khiliakis astrapsato.
Khiliarkhou Astrape!
[/spoiler]

There is no higher price than 'free'.

"I won't die. I've been ordered not to die."

Endless Twilight

  • Ring-Tailed Lemur
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: Incest and morality
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2009, 08:12:58 PM »
Alright, good to know. The king is evil anyhow, as this is an Elder Evils campaign and the king is the one responsible for awakening the Elder Evil, but good to know the rest, should the subject ever come up again.

Alea_Iacta_Est

  • Barbary Macaque at the Rock of Gibraltar
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
  • Unfortunate Writer
    • Laughing Jack Wilton
    • Email
Re: Incest and morality
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2009, 07:27:46 PM »
In mediaeval times most royal families were incestuous. That is how during WW1 the King of England, Tzar of Russia, and Emperor of Germany were all related. Incest just happened in nobility to keep noble blood pure.
Seldom Affirm, Never Deny, Always Distinguish
My Gaming Blog, Reviews, and Design at: Laughing Jack Wilton
The Barely Legal Podcast: An AP Podcast From The Wednesday Night Gamers

Viletta Vadim

  • Curious George
  • ****
  • Posts: 337
  • Metal Genocider, maximum shooto!
Re: Incest and morality
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2009, 02:26:37 AM »
It's fairly normal regarding medieval settings to the point where the incest isn't even worth mention.  And the ramifications of single-generation incest are grossly exaggerated.  Having the king be a geneticist who fixes the kid just seems silly and arbitrary.

awaken DM golem

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 3294
  • PAO'd my Avatar
Re: Incest and morality
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2009, 01:34:23 AM »
2 in a row, is really bad genetically.

**

This is a Lawful Evil "family" history:

Pit Fiends are "progenitored" (to coin a word) via ~thousand days of torture of an Ice Devil.
Then they can select Male Female or Neutral-something-ish, according to 2e sources.
And they have a 1/year Wish sitting there, to do whatever.
Technically it's the end of the line at this point, but Pit Fiends "feel" otherwise.

Someone dies an evil life.
Gets turned into a Hades-ish worm with a face.
Night Hag corrals it and sells it to the highest bidder.
The LE powers that be, snag the deal.
Then they perform some un-godly ritual on it, to turn it into a Lemure.
Said Lemure somehow advances up the hierarchy chain.
Finally becoming a pit fiend, millenium(s) later.

What a Life.
What a family history.
Torture, reconstitution, all very very Lawful EVIL.

You wanna roleplay that ?!

Kuroimaken

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 6733
Re: Incest and morality
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2010, 10:23:06 PM »
The Queen most definitely shouldn't lose her Exalted status for one simple reason - the child she bore was an act of love, which insofar as D&D is concerned, is non-evil. (Unless, of course, you're a devil ripping out a poor commoner's throat to nurse your offspring with his blood, or something.)
Gendou Ikari is basically Gregory House in Kaminashades. This is FACT.

For proof, look here:

http://www.layoutjelly.com/image_27/gendo_ikari/

[SPOILER]
Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?
Final Fantasy 7
My Unitarian Jihad Name is: Brother Katana of Enlightenment.
Get yours.[/SPOILER]

I HAVE BROKEN THE 69 INTERNETS BARRIER!