But what about you? You really need to give more detail here. They aren't biased against people with Templar avs, or people with usernames starting with "E"...
Presumably not the former, at least.
Since I'm the only one with one, I don't think we can tell.
More seriously: "We think this is true of Elennsar. We're not going to acknowledge anything contradicting what we think is true." kind of bias.
Before someone will acknowledge anything contradicting "what we think is true" about a person, there has to be something that contradicts "what we think is true".
When you came to this thread, you had points you wanted to make about the gameology-fu system.
They included, but were not necessarily limited to:
1) Gameology-fu should represent gameology contributions.
2) If it cannot, there needs to be a set definition that can demonstrate exactly what gameology-fu represents.
3) I have had my gameology-fu lowered, and I feel that it is unjust.
People on the boards read, responded, commented, and criticized your points.
An in-depth discussion about the merits of your points and the idea behind gameology-fu developed.
It was eventually decided that your recommendations for the gameology-fu system were either unnecessary or not possible.
Meg took extensive time to look understand your posts thoroughly and completely, and she came to the same conclusion.
Throughout this, you repeated the fact that you had lost gameology-fu as proof that the system needed changing.
Meg and several others contradicted you, and provided more information regarding why they thought that your points were earned.
You continued to repeat yourself. People awarded negative G-fu. Others explained to you what you were doing to earn the negative points.
You continued to repeat yourself, playing the victim of unfair -fu attacks. People awarded negative G-fu. Others explained to you what you were doing to earn the negative points.
Repeat the cycle to the present moment...
You may have lost a few G-fu points unfairly. Meg addressed the issue and clearly explained that she neither has the time, nor the desire to check each G-fu modification.
It was when you continued to "persist" and started playing the victim that more and more people awarded you negative points.
To tie it back in to the point that I quoted, you claim that people are unwilling to acknowledge contradictory evidence to their "personal" view of you. You have not given them any.
You may have added to the site in other threads and forums, but here, you have certainly done nothing productive.
In closing, I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.