Sure. You are presuming I came to this conclusion suddenly and based upon no evidence, or perhaps even in spite of solid evidence to the contrary. What actually happens is either the target proves themselves an idiot beyond all doubt via dozens or even hundreds of tests before being disregarded as such, and they expend their allowance in the first few days. Week, tops. When faced with such overwhelming evidence, the only possible reason to deny it is active self delusion.
No one said anything about always right. Higher accuracy was implied, but better than shit =/= perfect. No one said better than everyone else either. Most individuals can be automatically dismissed as fucktards. The rest can potentially be learned from. Hell, even the fucktards occasionally get lucky. Point is your betters exist no matter what, but if you're good at what you do they exist in far lower quantities then if you are a faceless member of the incompetent ranks.
My stance is to learn from my betters to scale the ladder of rank, watching the others for 'lucky shots' where they say something worth learning despite their lower overall competence because natural 20s do happen, using the filter granted by competence to block out the false and/or bullshit ideas so as to avoid tainting myself.
The stance you are claiming me to have is that I am better than everyone else, always right, and incapable of improving.
Ironic bit is that most of the ones that fall under that idiot category and are summarily dismissed? They're the ones that won't learn (not to be confused with can't) and therefore fall under that stagnant and unevolving category.
