Author Topic: Canonical 3e Alignment  (Read 2608 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JaxGaret

  • Ring-Tailed Lemur
  • **
  • Posts: 27
Canonical 3e Alignment
« on: September 25, 2008, 05:17:10 PM »
First, let me just say that I don't want to start any kind of flamewar. Really. I just want a by-the-book answer:

Is the canonical, book definition of alignment in 3e that its sole determinant is actions, or do the books say that both actions and intent matters when it comes to determining alignment?

Thank you in advance for your thoughtful, mature replies.  :)
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Prime32

  • Administrator
  • Organ Grinder
  • *
  • Posts: 7534
  • Modding since 03/12/10
Re: Canonical 3e Alignment
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2008, 05:49:12 PM »
Didn't I see an argument along these lines on the GitP boards? :smirk

The section in the PHB says that alignment determines a character's personality and behaviour. A serial killer who, by sheer coincidence, has killed only evil characters would not become good. A serial killer who kills only evil characters on purpose is probably neutral (though he could be evil).
My work
The tier system in a nutshell:
[spoiler]Tier 6: A cartographer.
Tier 5: An expert cartographer or a decent marksman.
Tier 4: An expert marksman.
Tier 3: An expert marksman, cartographer and chef who can tie strong knots and is trained in hostage negotiation or a marksman so good he can shoot down every bullet fired by a minigun while armed with a rusted single-shot pistol that veers to the left.
Tier 2: Someone with teleportation, mind control, time manipulation, intangibility, the ability to turn into an exact duplicate of anything, or the ability to see into the future with perfect accuracy.
Tier 1: Someone with teleportation, mind control, time manipulation, intangibility, the ability to turn into an exact duplicate of anything and the ability to see into the future with perfect accuracy.[/spoiler]

Sunic_Flames

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
  • The Crusader of Logic.
Re: Canonical 3e Alignment
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2008, 07:32:29 PM »
A serial killer who intentionally only hit evils is neutral huh? What do you think a Paladin is? Kills evil as a pattern? Yup.
Smiting Imbeciles since 1985.

If you hear this music, run.

And don't forget:


There is no greater contribution than Hi Welcome.

Huge amounts of people are fuckwits. That doesn't mean that fuckwit is a valid lifestyle.

IP proofing and avoiding being CAPed OR - how to make characters relevant in the long term.

Friends don't let friends be Short Bus Hobos.

[spoiler]
Sunic may be more abrasive than sandpaper coated in chainsaws (not that its a bad thing, he really does know what he's talking about), but just posting in this thread without warning and telling him he's an asshole which, if you knew his past experiences on WotC and Paizo is flat-out uncalled for. Never mind the insults (which are clearly 4Chan-level childish). You say people like Sunic are the bane of the internet? Try looking at your own post and telling me you are better than him.

Here's a fun fact: You aren't. By a few leagues.
[/spoiler]

JaxGaret

  • Ring-Tailed Lemur
  • **
  • Posts: 27
Re: Canonical 3e Alignment
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2008, 08:03:38 PM »
Didn't I see an argument along these lines on the GitP boards? :smirk

You did indeed. I am attempting to ascertain if my assertions there are correct or not.
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Elennsar

  • Grape ape
  • *****
  • Posts: 1944
  • The Emperor is watching, the Emperor knows.
    • Email
Re: Canonical 3e Alignment
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2008, 08:14:51 PM »
Apparently, thusly:

IF
Action = evil
AND
motive = evil
THEN
Evil alignment.

IF
Action = evil
AND
motive = neutral
THEN
Evil alignment.

IF
Action = evil
AND
motive = good
THEN
?!!?!!?!!

IF
Action = neutral
AND
motive = evil
THEN
Evil alignment.

IF
Action = neutral
AND
motive = neutral
THEN
Neutral alignment.

IF
Actin = neutral
AND
Motive = good
THEN
Good alignment.

IF
Action = good
AND
Motive = evil
THEN
Evil alignment.

IF
Action = good
AND
Motive = neutral
THEN
Neutral alignment.

IF
Action = good
AND
Motive = good
THEN
Good alignment.

I believe this is true, but I am not positive without looking it up in the PHB and DMG.
Faith can move mountains. It still can't deflect bullets.



"Communication with humans." is a cross-class skill for me. Please bear this in mind.

CountArioch

  • Man in Gorilla Suit
  • *****
  • Posts: 2110
  • I <3 termites
Re: Canonical 3e Alignment
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2008, 10:26:06 PM »
A serial killer who intentionally only hit evils is neutral huh? What do you think a Paladin is? Kills evil as a pattern? Yup.

That technically applies to most D&D characters though.
She hasn't come to crush your bones, nor tear your flesh
She has come to steal your sanity with just one glance

Sacrapos - At First Glance, Eluveitie

Kuroimaken

  • Organ Grinder
  • *****
  • Posts: 6733
Re: Canonical 3e Alignment
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2008, 02:05:04 AM »
Quote
A serial killer who intentionally only hit evils is neutral huh? What do you think a Paladin is? Kills evil as a pattern? Yup.

Not necessarily since BoED came out...

Quote
That technically applies to most D&D characters though.

Pretty much. Also, "DIE, SPAWN OF THE DEVIL!" sounds much cooler than "COME WITH US TO PRISON AND SOCIAL REHABILITATION! WE WON'T HURT YOU THEN!"
Gendou Ikari is basically Gregory House in Kaminashades. This is FACT.

For proof, look here:

http://www.layoutjelly.com/image_27/gendo_ikari/

[SPOILER]
Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?
Final Fantasy 7
My Unitarian Jihad Name is: Brother Katana of Enlightenment.
Get yours.[/SPOILER]

I HAVE BROKEN THE 69 INTERNETS BARRIER!