Author Topic: Make the Spellfire Channeler not suck.  (Read 5225 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nytemare3701

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 674
    • Email
Make the Spellfire Channeler not suck.
« on: October 30, 2011, 03:15:28 AM »
DO IT!  :shakefist

In all seriousness, I really want to use the class, but it's obviously not a caster, and it's obviously not a frontline fighter. I considered using it for a gish, but that didn't work either. I realized that the class is probably a bust when I started seriously considering capping a truenamer build with it.

Using the most favorable interpretation of spellfire (you can absorb as a free action), what can you make out of the spellfire channeler?

My attempt: Mineral Warrior PsyWar/SpellfireChanneler (mageslayer theme)

EDIT: It would be pretty awesome to get a ridiculously high con score & go nuts Shandril style.

Maat_Mons

  • Hong Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
  • What is a smile but a grimace of happiness?
Re: Make the Spellfire Channeler not suck.
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2011, 04:20:26 AM »
Using the most favorable interpretation of spellfire (you can absorb as a free action)

Where does that interpretation come from? 

Nytemare3701

  • Donkey Kong
  • ****
  • Posts: 674
    • Email
Re: Make the Spellfire Channeler not suck.
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2011, 04:27:38 AM »
Using the most favorable interpretation of spellfire (you can absorb as a free action)

Where does that interpretation come from? 

3.0 rod of absorption required a standard action to ready. The 3.5 one doesn't. Spellfire is readied as per a rod of absorption.