Wind wall is a stupid spell. You'll get no argument from me, and I try to houserule it to be less obnoxious. What I'm talking about is people who say "Make that bow Force, so you have a way to deal with Wind wall" - that kind of authoritative statement is frustrating, because it tells me people haven't read the relevant rules but think they're qualified to talk about them. Please, at least say something like, "You should check with your DM to see if this enhancement will let you ignore wind wall effects, since the spell is so absurdly good at shutting down archer concepts, which really doesn't make the game any fun."
An argument I might buy is that magic weapons aren't "normal ranged weapons" and so bypass it. What's absurd is the idea that an enhancement does something it doesn't say it does, and the only implications people can come up with to support it are that force isn't a projectile (since when the hell does a projectile have to be a solid object? take the standard fireball from any genre but D&D, a hurled sphere of flame - how is it not a projectile?) or that a thing changing causes it to lose all of its previous properties (becoming a force attack doesn't cause it to cease being an arrow, because the rules don't say it does) or that I'm relying on the word "arrow" being present (I'm actually not, because at no point was an acid arrow an object that wind wall affected that was then subject to a change that the rules never indicate interacts with wind wall, and the dude who mentioned marrow must be illiterate if he thinks that's a relevant argument).
Look, my argument is entirely falsifiable. Here is what will prove me wrong! A quote saying that force effects ignore wind wall, or ignore any effects of which wind wall is a part (so spells with the [Air] descriptor, for instance), or that "force attacks" is a specific term that excludes arrows, or that force effects cannot be deflected.
Anything else is as logical as saying that gentle repose can delay the onset of disease, since it clearly functions as an antimicrobial because it suspends rotting. Yeah, you can come up with an argument, but it's not evidence - it has no basis in the rules.